Swyddi, cymorth i fusnesau, adfywio, canol trefi a dinasoedd a thwristiaeth.
Beth mae cynghorau'n ei wneud
Mae cynghorau'n cefnogi busnesau lleol, yn adfywio canol trefi, yn rhedeg marchnadoedd ac yn gwneud cais am gyllid adfywio. Maen nhw'n gweithio gyda chynghorau cyfagos drwy gyrff rhanbarthol o'r enw cyd-bwyllgorau corfforedig.
Pwy sy'n penderfynu
Yr aelod Cabinet dros yr economi sy'n arwain. Mae prosiectau mawr yn mynd i'r Cabinet, a rhai rhanbarthol i'r cyd-bwyllgor corfforedig.
Dweud eich dweud
Gall perchnogion busnes gysylltu â thîm cymorth busnes y cyngor. Fel arfer, ymgynghorir ar gynlluniau adfywio.
Mewn rhifau
Mae cynghorau Cymru yn bwriadu gwario £40 y pen ar hyn yn 2026-27.
Mae'n amrywio o £13 yn Sir Benfro i £152 yn Castell-nedd Port Talbot.
RESOLVED – That the public be excluded from the meeting at this point during consideration of this item as the Committee discussed exempt information of the description contained in paragraphs 14 and 16 of Part 4 and paragraph 21 of Part 5 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Action 1972. The public may be excluded from the meeting by resolution of the Committee pursuant to Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 during discussion of this item.
AGREED: that the Chairperson, on behalf of the Committee, writes to the Cabinet Member conveying the observations of the Committee when discussing the way forward.
RESOLVED:
The recommendation is for Planning Committee to approve the application for Legal Services to make the Legal Order and book Magistrate Court appearance.
RESOLVED: that
i. the results of public consultation on the draft Recycling Strategy 2022-25: ‘Greener and Cleaner’ attached as Appendix B be noted
ii. Approval be given to the Recycling Strategy 2022-25: ‘Greener and Cleaner’ attached as Appendix A.
iii. the outcomes of the segregated recycling pilot undertaken by 4,000 properties be noted
iv. Agreement in principle be given to the programme of change set out in the Recycling Strategy 2022-25: ‘Greener and Cleaner’ and this report and delegate authority to the Director of Economic Development in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Climate Change to roll-out the phased implementation of the programme including:
· The phased roll-out of segregated recycling as set out in this report across household properties in Cardiff.
· The phased roll-out of reduced residual waste collections as set out in this report to improve the level and quality of recycling across household properties in Cardiff.
· Undertake further pilot work in relation to Houses of Multiple Occupancy and Flats to improve recycling performance including the testing of communal segregated recycling bins.
· Review the expansion of kerbside collection services to cover items currently not collected at the kerbside.
· Enhance and strengthen education and enforcement to deliver improved recycling compliance across household properties in Cardiff.
· Develop the business case to move from a Material Recovery Facility to a Material Handling Facility required to manage segregated recycling.
· Improvements to the trade / business waste model to improve recycling and meet new legislative requirements.
· Identification of wider Council / service area change to value resources and minimise the Council’s impact on climate change.
v. the plans to enhance the cleansing service, including the move balanced resourcing and ‘same day cleanse’ following collections for inner wards be noted.
vi. the development of a business case for a future repair and re-use ‘superstore’ be noted. A further report will be brought regarding the business case.
RESOLVED: that agreement be given to the response to the Economic and Culture Scrutiny CommitteeRecommendations to “Community Sport in Cardiff: Regional Partnerships” as contained in Appendix 1 of this Report
RESOLVED: that
(i) Approval be given to the proposals in respect of changes to additional learning needs provision as set out in a paragraph 1 of this report without modification
(ii) Officers be authorised to take the appropriate actions to implement the proposals as set out in paragraph 1
(iii) Approval be given to the proposal as set out in paragraph 2 without modification
(iv) Officers be authorised to take the appropriate actions to implement the proposal as set out in paragraph 2
(v) Officers be authorised to publish the decisions within 7 days of determination of the proposal
(vi) Authority be delegated to the Director of Education & Lifelong Learning (in consultation with the Cabinet Members for Education and Finance, Modernisation & Performance, the Director of Governance and Legal Services, the Director of Economic Development and the Corporate Director for Resources) to determine all aspects of the procurement process (including for the avoidance of doubt development of all procurement documentation and selection and award criteria, commencement of procurement through to award of contracts).
(vii) the publication of a statutory notice in respect of proposals published by the Governing Body of Whitchurch High School to expand its Specialist Resource Base from 70 places to 100 places from September 2022 and future determination of the proposal be noted
RESOLVED: that
1. the 2022/23 Annual Property Plan attached at Appendix 1 be approved
2. authority be delegated to the Director of Economic Development to complete the disposal of land at St Teilo’s, via appropriation by the HRA, at market value of the property less any relevant ring-fenced sums.
RESOLVED – That the following matters be dealt with as indicated:
(1)
Case 1
The Sub Committee received representations from a complainant who alleged that a driver had failed to complete a journey, had attempted to overcharge them and had abandoned them in an unsuitable location.
The Sub Committee was advised that a group of 4 passengers entered a vehicle in the City Centre. The passengers were travelling to Newport with 3 stop on route. The driver requested £110 payment for the fare. However, after starting the journey the passenger learned that a group of friends that were travelling in another taxi were paying £60. The passengers determined that £110 was excessive and attempted to enter into dialogue with the driver.
The driver was not willing to negotiate and therefore the group of friends requested that the vehicle pull over in order to allow them to leave the vehicle. Upon exiting the vehicle it was alleged that the driver attempted to take money out of the hand of the complainant. The driver was ‘irate’ and intimidating. The passengers, fearing for their safety, gave him £10.
When questioned, the complainant stated that the group of friend had been drinking alcohol but were not intoxicated. The complainant disagreed with the driver’s statement that he had taken the group to a cashpoint. The driver was also alleged to have provided false details to the complainant when requested.
The driver stated that the fee agreed at the point of entry was £60 but an additional £5 was added for each of the 3 stops on route. When the additional fees were requested the passengers became angry and abusive.
RESOLVED – That the hackney carriage/private hire drivers licence be suspended for 7 days for unacceptable conduct. The driver must also complete the SQA training course within 3 months.
(2)
Case 2
The Sub Committee received representations from a complainant who alleged that a driver has refused to use a taxi meter for a fare. The Sub Committee was advised that the complainant has approached a taxi on a marshalled rank in the City Centre. The driver requested £40 payment in advance. The complainant stated that he was aware that drivers must use the meter for fares within the city’s boundaries but the driver refused to do so. The complainant considered this to be common occurrence in his experience.
The driver denied refusing to use the meter. The driver considered that there was a misunderstanding around the estimated cost of the journey.
RESOLVED – That the hackney carriage / private hire drivers licence be suspended for 7 days for refusing to use the taxi meter.
(3)
Case 3
The Sub Committee considered the case of a driver who had received a caution for sending a threatening message. The driver explained that he had become involved in a heated discussion with an individual known to him which resulted in him saying something unlawful on social media. The driver accepted that he had made a mistake and he regretted his actions.
RESOLVED – That the driver receive a written warning for non-disclosure of a conviction.
(4)
Case 4
Members were asked to consider an application for a hackney carriage/private hire drivers licence from an individual who had received penalty points for using a mobile phone whilst driving. The applicant explained that he was working food delivery driver and his phone was used to accept work via an app. The phone was illuminated on the passenger seat when he was stopped by police. He has since purchased a cradle for the device. The applicant had no other convictions.
RESOLVED – That the application for a hackney carriage/private hire drivers licence be granted.
(5)
Case 5
The Sub Committee received representations from a driver who had declared 2 motoring convictions for speeding. The driver was asked to explain the circumstances.
Members were advised that the first conviction came at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic prior to the vaccination roll out. The driver had passengers in the vehicle who were not complying with the covid safety requirements and he was concerned that he was at risk and his vehicle was contaminated. He was rushing to reach a safe place to disinfect his vehicle and there were no passengers in the vehicle at the time.
The second offence occurred when this vehicle was put on cruise control. He left the M4 and still had cruise control applied by mistake. The driver stated that as a result of his actions he has 11pts on his DVLA licence and he is now ultra-cautious due to the risk to his livelihood. He has had no further convictions for over a year and he was determined to continue with that.
RESOLVED – That the driver receive a written warning for motoring convictions.
(5)
Case 5
The Sub Committee received representations from a driver who had receive a conviction for conspiracy to supply drugs. The conviction was not declared on the driver’s renewal application.
The driver stated that during the course of his work he had transported people who were dealing drugs. The police charged him with being associated and implicated with the group due to evidence on his mobile phone.
RESOLVED – That the hackney carriage / private hire drivers licence be suspended for 6 months for a conviction in relation to conspiracy to supply drugs. The driver must also complete the SQA qualification within 6 months.
(6)
Case 6
The Sub Committee received representations from a driver who had been involved in a road traffic accident in a taxi whilst being over the legal limit for alcohol. The driver explained the circumstances.
RESOLVED – That the hackney carriage/private hire drivers licence be revoked for a serious motoring conviction.
RESOLVED – That the following matters be dealt with as indicated:
(1)
Case 1
The Sub Committee was advised that complaints were received from two members of the public regarding the conduct of a driver. The complaints related to an incident when the driver was alleged to have refused to use the taxi meter and asked for a £50 deposit.
Members received representations from the Solicitor representing the Driver, stating that the driver had initially refused the fare but then asked for a £50 deposit as a precaution because the complainants were intoxicated and he had seen them argue with two other taxi drivers before approaching his car. He added that the driver had been a driver for 10 years, was married with 5 children, his wife doesn’t drive and he wouldn’t do anything to jeopardise his job just for extra money.
There were no questions to the driver at this point.
Members received representations from the complainants. Members were advised that 2 female customers had been to a concert, they had one drink there then after the concert they headed into the city centre and had one more drink. They then approached the taxi and the driver immediately said it would be £50 deposit. The complainants said they were not intoxicated, it was a work night, they had children at home. They told the driver that one of the women worked for the Local Authority and she asked for him to use his meter. She said he would not listen, he said no and repeated that he wanted £50 deposit. The women walked off and said they would be taking a picture of his badge and reporting him.
Members were then advised that the complainants approached another taxi who asked for £40 deposit, they refused and took a picture of his badge, this was included in the paperwork. They then approached another taxi who said he wanted 2 separate fares rather than them sharing. They refused and took a picture of his badge but this was too blurred to be in the paperwork. The next taxi they approached agreed to take them and to use the meter. The women advised this driver what had happened and he said it had become common practice due the Uber etc. Members were advised that the trip had totalled £25 including a tip for both the women. The women added that they both have daughters and the are worried about them using taxis.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee on the fare that took them home, the complainants clarified that the fare was £22 and they gave a £3 tip.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver said he had been driving since 2012. Members asked if the driver has asked for deposits before as this is not normal practice and should be meter only. The driver said that he asks for deposits for fares outside the city.
RESOLVED – That the driver be suspended for 7 days for refusing a fare.
(2)
Case 2
The Sub Committee was advised that a complaint had been received from a member of the public who was a wheelchair user, regarding the conduct of a driver. The complaint related to an incident when the driver was alleged to have refused to take the complainant in his wheelchair, with his brother.
Members received representation from the complainant, stating that they had approached a wheelchair accessible taxi close to the New Theatre, told the driver where they wanted to go and when they went to the back of the vehicle, he drive off. Sub Committee were provided with CCTV footage of the taxi rank at the time of the complaint.
Members received representations from the driver who stated that he had been flagged down by the New Theatre, a man approached him and mentioned going to Ely with his brother who was in a wheelchair. The driver said he told the man to go and get his brother, he waited for a long time but they didn’t come. The driver claims that the man who approached him was swearing and he was frightened there may be trouble, he added that he did not speak to the wheelchair user. He added that he has been attacked and robbed previously so he is cautious.
The driver stated that he picks up disable drivers regularly, he regretted what had happened and apologised.
RESOLVED – That the driver be suspended for 7 days for refusing a fare.
(3)
Application 3
The Sub Committee was asked to consider whether a driver was a fit and proper person to hold a licence after he had not disclosed a police caution on his renewal application. The Licensing Officer outlined the case and the driver was asked to explain the circumstances.
The driver explained that his father had taken three passengers to London, they were being investigated by the Police who went to the family home with a warrant to take the fathers car for a few days and the driver had obstructed the constable as he thought he was taking the car for good and it was his fathers livelihood.
At the police station the driver had asked if the caution would show on his file and whether he needed to declare it to the licensing authority and the police had advised him it would not show on his file. He stated if he had known he would have declared it.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver further explained the situation and explained that the police had apologised for not making the situation clear at the time and that there would be no further action taken against him.
The driver added that he had previously declared an offence on an application and he would have done so on this occasion if he had known it would show on the DBS check
The driver was remorseful and stated that he is a good person and taxi driving is his livelihood.
RESOLVED – That the driver receives a written warning for failing to disclose a police caution on his license renewal application. License renewal approved.
(4)
Application 4
The Sub Committee was asked to consider whether a driver was a fit and proper person to hold a licence given that the Licensing Authority have been advised that Mr Hamad was subject to a conviction regarding consumer protection, unfair trading, hallmarking and Trademark offences. The Licensing Officer outlined the case and the driver was asked to explain the circumstances.
The driver explained that he had stopped taxi driving in 2019 and started work as a manager of a shop in Pontypool. He stated that his friend had brought tobacco and cigarettes from outside of the UK to sell in the shop. He had taken the good and a few days later, Trading Standards visited the shop to check the stock. They asked if the tax had been paid on the good when they were brought into the UK. The driver explained that he thought it had been but he then found that it had not. Trading Standards had taken the goods. The driver was taken to court in Newport he pleaded guilty and was fined. He had since resigned from the shop and has no connection to the business anymore.
The driver had declared the conviction on his licence renewal application.
RESOLVED – That no further action was required. Application renewal approved.
RESOLVED: that
a) Cardiff Council’s submission to the Shared Prosperity Fund Regional Investment Plan, as detailed in paragraphs 24 to 34 be approved
b) Authority be delegated to the Leader and Chief Executive to shape and endorse the final Regional Investment Plan submission by the Lead Body in the Leader’s capacity as the Council’s representative on the Cardiff Capital Region Cabinet and Corporate Joint Committee.
c) Authority be delegated to the Director of Economic Development, in consultation with the Section 151 officer, the Corporate Director People & Communities, the Director of Education & Lifelong Learning and the Director of Planning, Transport & Environment to establish an internal programme management team.
d) Authority be delegated to the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader of the Council to develop a detailed governance and delivery framework for the operation of the Shared Prosperity Fund in Cardiff.
e) Agreement be given to agree and enter into all legal agreements with the Lead Body and partner authorities in connection with the Shared Prosperity Fund, subject to legal advice.
RESOLVED: that
(i) the proposals in respect of changes to Additional Learning Needs provision as set out in a paragraph 1 of this report be approved without modification.
(ii) officers be authorised to take the appropriate actions to implement the proposals as set out in paragraph 1 of this report
(iii) officers be authorised to publish the decision within 7 days of determination of the proposal
authority be delegated to the Director of Education & Lifelong Learning (in consultation with the Cabinet Member Education and Cabinet Member Finance, Modernisation & Performance, the Director of Governance and Legal Services, the Director of Economic Development and the Corporate Director for Resources) to determine all aspects of the procurement process (including for the avoidance of doubt development of all procurement documentation and selection and award criteria, commencement of procurement through to award of contracts).
RESOLVED: that
(i) the proposals in respect of changes to The Court Special School, Cardiff West Community High School and Eastern High as set out in paragraph 1 of this report, be approved without modification.
(ii) Officers be authorised to take the appropriate actions to implement the proposals as set out in paragraph 1 of the report
(iii) officers be authorised to publish the decision within 7 days of determination of the proposal
(iv) authority be delegated to the Director of Education & Lifelong Learning (in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Education and Cabinet Member Finance, Modernisation & Performance, the Director of Governance and Legal Services, the Director of Economic Development and the Corporate Director for Resources) to determine all aspects of the procurement process (including for the avoidance of doubt development of all procurement documentation and selection and award criteria, commencement of procurement through to award of contracts).
RESOLVED: that
(i) the proposals in respect of changes to Pentyrch Primary School as set out in paragraph 1 of this report, be approved without modification.
(ii) officers be authorised to take the appropriate actions to implement the proposals as set out in paragraph 1
(iii) officers be authorised to publish the decision within 7 days of determination of the proposal
(iv) authority be delegated to the Director of Education & Lifelong Learning (in consultation with the Cabinet Members for Education and Cabinet Member Finance, Modernisation & Performance, the Director of Governance and Legal Services, the Director of Economic Development and the Corporate Director for Resources)to determine all aspects of the procurement process (including for the avoidance of doubt development of all procurement documentation and selection and award criteria, commencement of procurement through to award of contracts).
RESOLVED: that
1. the content of the report be noted
2. approval be given to the procurement proposals as detailed in this report for the third generation of non-domestic building maintenance frameworks as set out in the report, and
3. authority be delegated to the Director of Economic Development, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Investment and Development, the Section 151 Officer and Director of Governance and Legal Services, to deal with all aspects of the procurement of the non-domestic building maintenance framework, including finalising the scope of the contracts and the evaluation criteria, and the award of the contracts, and all other ancillary matters.
RESOLVED: that
i) authority be delegated to the Director of Economic Development in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Investment and Development, the Section 151 Officer and the Legal Officer to acquire the land illustrated etched red in the plan attached at Confidential Appendix 4 in accordance with the terms outlined in Confidential Appendix 4 and in line with the independent valuation set out at Confidential Appendix 5.
ii) Authorisation be given to the commencement of land referencing investigations to identify any outstanding third-party interests that may need to be acquired to enable the regeneration scheme.
iii) Approval be given to the principal of making a Compulsory Purchase order under section 226(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004) and the Acquisition of Land Act 1981 to seek the acquisition of land and interests within the site area shown edged red on the plan attached at Appendix 5.
Pursuant to powers under Section 122 of the Local Government Act 1972 and Section 227 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to facilitate the redevelopment of the land for a Multi Storey Car Park approval be given to the appropriation of the Red Dragon Centre (RDC) over-flow car park land shown edged red on the plan at Appendix 7 for planning purposes as it is no longer required for its current purpose and it be noted that the appropriation of the RDC for planning purposes would enable the finalisation of the Full Business Case for the Multi Storey Car Park development for presentation to Cabinet at a future meeting.
AGREED: that the Chairperson, on behalf of the Committee, writes to the Cabinet Member conveying the observations of the Committee when discussing the way forward.
AGREED: that the Chairperson, on behalf of the Committee, writes to the Cabinet Member conveying the observations of the Committee when discussing the way forward.
RESOLVED – That the following matters be dealt with as indicated:
(1)
Case 1
The Sub Committee was advised that complaints were received from two members of the public regarding the conduct of a driver. The complaints related to an incident when the driver was alleged to have refused to use the taxi meter.
Members received representations from the complainants. Members were advised that a lone female customer entered the vehicle in Castle Street. The passenger wanted to go to Fairwater. The driver asked for the postcode of the customer and, once the journey had started, requested payment in advance. The customer stated that she was not prepared to pay in advance and asked the driver to use the taxi meter, as required by regulation. The passenger stated that at that point she felt unsafe and anxious. She asked the driver to stop the vehicle so that she could get out. The driver slowed down but didn’t stop. She got out of the vehicle whilst it was still moving.
Members also received representations from a witness to the incident. The witness was a friend of the passenger. They had enjoyed a night socialising in the city centre. The pair approached a taxi on Castle Street and the passenger asked to be taken to Fairwater. They checked in advance that the fare would be on the meter. The witness then took a photograph of the rear of the taxi and got into the taxi behind it with her partner. The witness realised that something was wrong when she saw her friend exit the vehicle whilst it was still moving.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the passenger and the witness denied that they were carrying food at the time of the incident. The fare would normally cost between £11 and £12 and the driver was asking for £15 in advance. The passenger knew that this was contrary to the regulations and she became worried that she would not get home safely.
The driver claimed that both the complainant and the witness were lying. They were carrying food and large fizzy drinks from McDonalds. When the passenger was asked not to eat food in the vehicle she became aggressive.
Members asked why the driver had not mentioned McDonalds food or food of any description in the extensive statement he had provided. The driver stated that he subsequently recalled the incident. The driver denied asking for payment in advance.
When questioned by Members of the Sub Committee, the driver stated that his first statement and his second statement were completely different because he was having to deal with some personal issues at the time.
In closing the complainant categorically denied carrying food and a drink at the time of the incident. Members were advised that she doesn’t eat McDonalds food as she is lactose intolerant.
RESOLVED – That the driver be suspended for 14 days for refusing to use the taxi meter.
(2)
Application 2
The Sub Committee was advised that a driver had received 6 penalty points for a driving offence.
The drivers representative stated the driver received 6 penalty points for using a mobile phone. The phone had fallen from its holder in the vehicle and the driver handled the phone when he picked it up. The driver accepts that this was a serious error of judgement and he regretted his actions.
The driver was unaware that he was required to report that he had received 6 penalty points to the Licensing authority.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver confirmed that he was driving his taxi but there were no passengers in the vehicle at the time.
RESOLVED – That the driver receives a written warning for a driving offence.
(3)
Application 3
The Committee was asked to consider an application for a new driver. During the renewal application the driver advised the Licensing authority that he received 6 penalty points for using his vehicle without insurance.
The driver was asked to explain the circumstances. Members were advised that the driver, his friend and his young son were shopping in a supermarket. The driver asked his friend to drive the vehicle from the car park to the adjacent petrol station because he young son was crying and he was trying to settle him.
A customer was said to have complained to the police that child was unrestrained in the vehicle whilst it was moving. Police arrived at the petrol station and questioned the driver and his friend. It was subsequently established that the friend was uninsured to drive the vehicle and the driver was charged.
The driver apologised for his mistake and accepted that he was responsible for checking that anyone driving his vehicle is insured to do so.
RESOLVED – That the renewal application for a hackney carriage / private hire drivers licence be granted.
(4)
Application 4
The Sub Committee was asked to consider whether a driver was a fit and proper person to hold a licence after he received a criminal conviction whilst licenced. The driver was asked to explain the circumstances.
The driver made a statement. The driver advised the Licensing authority of his conviction by email on 22 May 2020 and he had been waiting to be asked to appear before the Sub Committee since. He was honest and upfront and accepted that he had made a big mistake. However, the customer at the time was aggressive and after 39 years as a taxi driver he was acting in self-defence.
The driver’s representative described the incident. The driver had picked up a fare on Churchill Way and had taken the passenger to Cardiff Bay. He had difficulty obtaining payment for the journey. An argument ensued and the driver thought that things could escalate. So, in self-defence, he pushed the customer away causing him to fall. He also took the customer’s mobile phone and left the vicinity. He subsequently threw the phone into some bushes nearby.
The driver was interviewed by the police and charged. The customer had chipped a bone in his elbow.
The driver was remorseful. During 39 years of driving he had completed over 250,000 journeys and he had never reacted in this manner previously, despite provocation. He accepted his actions were wrong and he could have handled the situation better. However, his actions were an isolated incident and there was no pattern of behaviour.
The driver was not a violent person and was always professional. As a result of this incident he no longer works nights.
RESOLVED – That the driver receives a written warning regarding his conduct and be required to complete the SQA qualification within 3 months.
AGREED: that the Chairperson, on behalf of the Committee, writes to the Cabinet Member conveying the observations of the Committee when discussing the way forward.
AGREED: that the Chairperson, on behalf of the Committee, writes to the Cabinet Member conveying the observations of the Committee when discussing the way forward.
RESOLVED: That the Council AGREED to:
1. approve the election of Chairs and Deputy Chairs (as appropriate) to the Regulatory and Other Committees and Groups as follows:
Committee
Chair
Deputy Chair
Constitution Committee
Cllr Russell Goodway
-
Corporate Parenting Advisory Committee
Cllr Sarah Merry as Deputy Leader
-
Council Appeals Committee
Cllr Lay
-
Democratic Services Committee
Cllr Jayne Cowan
-
Employment Conditions Committee
Cllr Chris Weaver
-
Licensing Committee
Cllr Michael Michael
Cllr Maliika Kaaba
Pensions Committee
Cllr Chris Weaver
-
Planning Committee
Cllr Ed Stubbs
Cllr Irene Humphreys
Public Protection Committee
Cllr Michael Michael
Cllr Maliika Kaaba
Bilingual Cardiff Working Group
Cllr Owen Jones
-
Local Authority Governor Panel
Cllr Sarah Merry as Deputy Leader
-
Investment Advisory Panel
Cllr Chris Weaver
-
Works Council
Cllr Chris Weaver
-
Health & Safety Advisory Forum
Cllr Chris Weaver
-
2. approve the proportional allocation of Scrutiny Chairs as set out in paragraph 4, Table A of the report; and
3. note the proposed appointments of the Scrutiny Chairs made by Party Groups pursuant to Part 6 of the Local Government Act (Wales) Measure 2011 as follows:
Scrutiny Committee
Chair
Deputy Chair
Children & Young People
Cllr Lee Bridgeman
N/A
Community & Adult Services
Cllr Bablin Molik
N/A
Economy & Culture
Cllr Peter Wong
N/A
Environmental
Cllr Owen Jones
N/A
Policy Review & Performance
Cllr Joel Williams
N/A