Casgliadau biniau, ailgylchu, safleoedd gwastraff y cartref, sbwriel a thipio anghyfreithlon.
Beth mae cynghorau'n ei wneud
Mae cynghorau'n casglu gwastraff ac ailgylchu o'r cartref, yn rhedeg canolfannau ailgylchu, yn cadw strydoedd yn lân ac yn delio â thipio anghyfreithlon.
Pwy sy'n penderfynu
Yr aelod Cabinet dros yr amgylchedd sy'n arwain. Mae newidiadau i gasgliadau fel arfer yn mynd i'r Cabinet.
Dweud eich dweud
Rhowch wybod i'r cyngor am gasgliadau a fethwyd a thipio anghyfreithlon. Yn aml, ymgynghorir ar newidiadau i wasanaethau casglu yn gyntaf.
Mewn rhifau
Mae cynghorau Cymru yn bwriadu gwario £172 y pen ar hyn yn 2026-27.
Mae'n amrywio o £114 yn Bro Morgannwg i £231 yn Merthyr Tudful.
RESOLVED – That the Sub Committee, having considered the application on its individual merits, the committee papers, the statutory guidance made under section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003 and the Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy, submissions made by the applicant and all other parties, and the oral evidence given by the applicant and objectors during the hearing in its determination of the matter, GRANTED the application; subject to the agreed conditions with South Wales Police and Environmental Health / Pollution Control.
Members noted that the applicant had agreed to the conditions proposed by South Wales Police and Environmental Health / Pollution Control, and that both parties had subsequently withdrawn their objections. They also noted that matters relating to commercial competition were not relevant to their determination.
Members considered the objections raised by local residents but were satisfied that the applicant had demonstrated that granting the licence would not undermine the licensing objectives. They acknowledged the concerns expressed in relation to litter and antisocial behaviour in the local area, but did not consider there to be sufficient evidence directly linking these issues to the applicant’s premises.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the
following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be
taken.
2024/00846/FUL Received on 19 September 2024
(P. 31)
APPLICANT: Mr J McQuade The Retreat, Penyturnpike Road, CF64 4HG
AGENT: Mr Richard Whitaker 43 Plas Saint Andresse, Penarth Haven, Penarth,
CF64 1BW
Hillcroft, Heol-y-cawl, Dinas Powys
Proposed subdivision of single dwelling to three dwellings with extensions to rear.
The application was required to be determined by Planning Committee under the
Council’s approved scheme of delegation because the application had been called in
for determination by Councillor Cowpe for the following summarised reasons:
• Access road was narrow and parking difficult,
• Access to existing garage would be restricted,
• Neighbours had raised concerns, and
• Impact on wildlife.
Following the matter being addressed at the meeting, a Member put forward a
Motion to refuse the officer’s recommendations and the application which was duly
seconded. Subsequently, a request was made by another Member for a Recorded
Vote on the Motion, with the vote having taken place as follows:
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Members For Against Abstain
Julie Aviet √
Gillian Bruce √
Ian Buckley √
Christine Cave √
Janice Charles √
Marianne Cowpe √
Pamela Drake √
Anthony Ernest √
Wendy Gilligan √
Nic Hodges √
Helen Payne √
Ian Perry √
Carys Stallard √
Neil Thomas √
Eddie Williams √
Mark Wilson √
TOTAL 7 7 2
Due to the vote being tied, the Chair used his casting vote against the Motion and
therefore the Motion was not carried.
Subsequently, a Motion was put forward to approve the officer’s recommendations
and to approve the application. A request was made for a Recorded Vote on the
Motion, with the vote having taken place as follows:
Members For Against Abstain
Julie Aviet √
Gillian Bruce √
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Ian Buckley √
Christine Cave √
Janice Charles √
Marianne Cowpe √
Pamela Drake √
Anthony Ernest √
Wendy Gilligan √
Nic Hodges √
Helen Payne √
Ian Perry √
Carys Stallard √
Neil Thomas √
Eddie Williams √
Mark Wilson √
TOTAL 7 7 2
Due to the vote being tied, the Chair used his casting vote for the Motion and
therefore the Motion was carried.
Councillor Cowpe wanted it noted that she felt she had not been given the
opportunity to come back in, as part of the Committee’s discussions and following
her previous questions and comments on this matter and wanted to object to this.
She had wished to provide additional valid reasons why the application should be
refused (following those raised by Councillor Cave and others). The Chair
apologised for this oversight and noted her objection but also stated that there had
been a lengthy debate on this single application, which had included contributions
from the Member concerned, and therefore it was time to move to the vote.
APPROVED subject to the following condition(s):
1. The development shall begin no later than twenty four months from the date of
this decision.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Reason:
To comply with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990.
2. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following
approved plans and documents unless otherwise required by any other
condition relating to this permission:
Hillcroft Location Plan
541-P08 Rev E Proposed Site Plan
541-P09 Rev A Proposed Ground Floor Plan
541-P10 Rev B Proposed First Floor Plan
541-P11 Rev B Proposed Roof Plan
541-P12 Rev E Proposed Elevations (Sheet 01)
541-P13 Rev C Proposed Elevations (Sheet 02)
541-P14 Rev B Proposed Site Sections
541-P15 Rev A Demolitions Ground Floor Plan
541-P16 Rev A Demolitions First Floor Plan
541-P17 Rev A Demolition Roof Plan
541-SK01 Verge Detail Bat Access
Green Infrastructure Statement (By TDA October 2024)
Design and Access Statement and Heritage Impact Assessment Revision B
(18th September 2024)
Predevelopment Tree Survey & Assessment (by TDA and dated December
2022)
Tree Constraints Plan (by TDA and dated December 2022)
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal V2 by Acer Ecology (February 2023)
Dusk Emergence Bat Surveys (By Grounded Trees & Ecology conducted
August and September 2023)
Letter titled Biodiversity Mitigation & Enhancement Strategy (By Soltys
Brewster Ecology and dated 29th August 2024)
Development Viability by CTD Consult November 2024
Reason:
For the avoidance of doubt as to the approved development and to accord
with Circular 016:2014 on The Use of Planning Conditions for Development
Management.
3. Each dwelling hereby permitted shall be used for a residential dwelling (C3
Use Class) and for no other purpose (including any other purpose in the
schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (or in
any provision equivalent to that class in any statutory instrument revoking and
re-enacting that order with or without modification).
Reason:
To control the precise nature of the use of the site, and to ensure compliance
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
with the terms of Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) of the Local
Development Plan.
4. Notwithstanding the provisions of schedule 2, Part 1, classes A, B, C, D, E
and H and Part 2, class A of the Town and Country Planning (General
Permitted Development) Order 1995 (as amended for Wales) (or any order
revoking and re-enacting that order with or without modification), the
development hereby approved shall not be altered in any way other than
those expressly authorised by this permission.
Reason:
To enable the Local Planning Authority to control the scale of development
and to ensure compliance with Policy MD2 (Design of New Developments)
and MD8 (Historical Environment) of the Local Development Plan.
5. No works to which this consent relates shall commence until an appropriate
programme of historic building recording and analysis (level 2) has been
secured and implemented in accordance with a written scheme of
investigation which has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local
planning authority.
Reason:
As the building is of architectural and cultural significance the specified
records are required to mitigate impact in accordance with Policy MD8-
Historical Environment of the Local Development Plan.
6. Notwithstanding the submitted details, the following details and samples to be
used in the construction of the development hereby approved shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
i.) stone covering for parking area (including delineation of parking spaces)
ii.) natural slate and ridge tiles for roofs
iii) windows, flush fitting rooflights, doors and gates including opening
surrounds
iv) render (including colour)
v) finishing materials for adjacent garage following demolition of garage on
site.
vi) Details of the proposed dormers at 1:10 scale
vii) Details of new stone boundary wall (to plot 03) including sample panel.
viii) Finishing details for elevation of adjacent garage wall following demolition.
ix) Boundary Treatments
x) wall adjacent Heol y Cawl at the junction of the access and adjacent
property.
The development shall be completed in accordance with the approved details
prior to the first occupation of any dwelling hereby approved.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, as required by Policies SP1 (Delivering
the Strategy), MD2 (Design of New Development), SP10 (Built and Natural
Environment) and MD8 (Historic Environment) of the Local Development Plan.
7. Any part of the bedroom window (room 04) of plot 01 that is below 1.7m in
height above the level of the floor in the room that it serves shall be obscurely
glazed to a minimum of level 3 of the "Pilkington" scale of obscuration and
fixed pane at the time of installation and so retained at all times thereafter.
Reason:
To ensure that the privacy and amenities of adjoining occupiers are
safeguarded, and to ensure compliance with Policy MD2 (Design of New
Developments) of the Local Development Plan.
8. No part of any flat roof area shall be used as a storage area, balcony, roof
garden or similar amenity area.
Reason:
To ensure that the privacy and amenities of adjoining occupiers are
safeguarded, and to ensure compliance with Policy MD2 Design of New
Developments of the Local Development Plan.
9. Notwithstanding the submitted details no development or site clearance shall
take place until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the
Local Planning Authority a scheme of landscaping, to include details of
replacement trees The scheme shall include indications of all existing trees
(including spread and species) and hedgerows on the land, identify those to
be retained and set out measures for their protection throughout the course of
development.
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, and to ensure compliance with the terms
of Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD2 (Design of New
Developments) and MD8 (Historic Environment) ] of the Local Development
Plan.
10. All planting, seeding or turfing comprised in the approved details of
landscaping shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons
following the occupation of the buildings or the completion of the
development, whichever is the sooner; and any trees or plants which within a
period of 5 years from the completion of the development die, are removed or
become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting
season with others of similar size and species.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, and to ensure compliance with the terms
of Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD2 (Design of New
Developments) and MD8 (Historic Environment) ] of the Local Development
Plan.
11. Prior to the first beneficial occupation of the development, a Biodiversity
Enhancement Strategy addressing enhancement measures shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The
development shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the approved
strategy and timings set out within and thereafter retained in accordance with
the approved details whilst the development remains in existence. The
Strategy shall include the following:
a) Details of any bird/bat box provision
b) Details of any landscaping features
c) Details of any additional ecological enhancements
Reason:
In the interests of ecology and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1
(Delivering the Strategy) and MD9 (Promoting Biodiversity) of the Local
Development Plan.
12. The parking spaces identified on plan number 541-P08 Rev E Proposed Site
Plan shall be allocated to each dwelling in accordance with a scheme to be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. A
minimum of 2no. spaces shall be provided to each dwelling and spaces
number 6 and 7 on the above plan shall be allocated to one of the dwellings
(and including another space). Thereafter, the parking shall be adhered to in
perpetuity.
Reason:
To ensure each dwelling has an adequate level of off-street parking in
accordance with Policy MD2 of the Vale of Glamorgan Local Development
Plan.
13. Prior to the first beneficial occupation of each dwelling hereby permitted, the
cycle parking identified on plan number 541-P08 Rev E Proposed Site Plan
shall have been provided. Thereafter it shall be maintained as such in
perpetuity.
Reason:
In the interest of promoting sustainable modes of transport in accordance with
Policies MD1-Location of New Development and MD2-Design of New
Development of the Local Development Plan.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
14. No development shall commence, including any works of demolition, until a
Construction Environment Management Plan (CEMP) has been submitted to,
and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. The CEMP shall
include the following details:
i) the parking of vehicles of site operatives and visitors;
ii) loading and unloading of plant and materials;
iii) storage of plant and materials used in constructing the development;
iv) the erection and maintenance of security hoarding including decorative
displays and facilities for public viewing, where appropriate;
v) wheel washing facilities;
vi) measures to control and mitigate the emission of dust, smoke, other
airborne pollutants and dirt during construction;
vii) a scheme for recycling/disposing of waste resulting from demolition and
construction works.
viii) hours of construction;
ix) lighting;
x) management, control and mitigation of noise and vibration;
xi) odour management and mitigation;
xii) diesel and oil tank storage areas and bunds;
xiii) how the developer proposes to accord with the Considerate Constructors
Scheme (www.considerateconstructorsscheme.org.uk) during the course of
the construction of the development; and
xiii) a system for the management of complaints from local residents which will
incorporate a reporting system.
The construction of the development shall be undertaken in accordance with
the approved CEMP.
Reason:
To ensure that the construction of the development is undertaken in a
neighbourly manner and in the interests of the protection of amenity and the
environment and to ensure compliance with the terms of Policy MD7
(Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
2024/00899/CAC Received on 19 September 2024
(P. 80)
APPLICANT: Mr J McQuade The Retreat, Penyturnpike Road, Dinas Powys,
CF64 4HG
AGENT: Mr Richard Whitaker 43 Plas Saint Andresse, Penarth Haven, Penarth,
CF64 1BW
Hillcroft, Heol-y-cawl, Dinas Powys
Proposed subdivision of single dwelling to three dwellings with extensions to rear.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
APPROVED subject to the following condition(s):
1. The demolition works hereby permitted shall begin no later than five years
from the date of this decision.
Reason:
To comply with the requirements of the Historic Environment (Wales) Act
2023.
2. The demolition works only relate to the garage identified on the following
approved plans and documents:
Location Plan
541-P15 Rev A Demolitions Ground Floor Plan.
Reason:
For the avoidance of doubt as to the approved development and to accord
with Circular 016:2014 on The Use of Planning Conditions for Development
Management.
2025/00033/FUL Received on 17 April 2025
(P. 96)
APPLICANT: Mr George Martin & Family C/o Agent,
AGENT: Mr Andrew Vaughan-Harries The Planning Studio, Hayston Bridge,
Johnston, Haverfordwest, SA62 3HJ
Existing yard, opposite April Cottage, Drope Terrace, Drope, St Georges Super
Ely
The provision of one gypsy traveller pitch incorporating one static caravan, one
touring caravan and day/utility room, two parking spaces, retention of boundary
fencing, installation of private treatment plant and ecological enhancements (partly
retrospective).
The application was required to be determined by Planning Committee under the
Council’s approved scheme of delegation because the application was of a nature
that was not covered by the scheme of delegation.
APPROVED subject to the following condition(s):
1. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following
approved plans and documents unless otherwise required by another
condition on this permission:
02e - Existing Location and Block Plans
03e - Overall Site Plan
04d - Site Plan
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
05a Utility Room Details
06 Aerial Photograph
07 Treatment Plant Details
08a - Foul Drainage and Location of Site Plan Percolation Test Holes
Planning Statement and Justification Report REV A (8th May 2025)
Appendix A – Supporting letter from Travelling Ahead
Gypsy, Roma and Traveller Advice and Advocacy Service dated 20th August
2024 - Confidential
Appendix B – Appeal Decisions
Appendix C Rev A - Green Infrastructure Statement
Appendix D - Preliminary Ecological Appraisal
Noise Assessment by inacoustics 31st March 2025
Site Infiltration Results
Herringbone Soakaway Size v2 dated 12/06/2025
Soakaway system for Bespoke Treatment Plant
Options for Soakaways from Private Treatment Plant
Brochure Tricel Novo Wastewater Treatment
Reason:
For the avoidance of doubt as to the approved development and to accord
with Circular 016:2014 on The Use of Planning Conditions for Development
Management.
2. The site shall not be occupied by any persons other than gypsies and
travellers as defined by Welsh Government Circular 005/2018 - "Planning for
Gypsy, Traveller and Showpeople Sites" or subsequent guidance that
supersedes this Circular.
Reason:
The residential use of the site in this rural location would not be permitted
unless occupied by a Gypsy or Traveller, and in order to ensure that the site is
kept available to meet the needs of other Gypsies or Travellers, in accordance
with Policies SP1-Delivering the Strategy, SP10-Built and Natural
Environment, MD1-Location of New Development and MD18-Gypsy and
Traveller Accommodation of the Local Development Plan.
3. When the land ceases to be occupied by a gypsy or traveller person, the use
shall cease and all caravans, structures, materials and equipment brought on
to or erected on the land or works undertaken to it in connection with the use,
shall be removed and the land shall be restored to its condition before the
development took place within 6 calendar months of that date.
Reason:
To reflect the circumstances that justify the grant of planning permission and
in accordance with Policies SP10-Built and Natural Environment, MD1-
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Location of New Development and MD2-Design of New Development of the
Local Development Plan.
4. No more than 2 caravans, as defined in the Caravan Sites and Control of
Development Act 1960 and the Caravan Sites Act 1968, comprising of 1 static
caravan and 1 touring caravan shall be stationed on the site at any time. Any
caravans positioned on the site shall be capable of being lawfully moved on
the public highway, without division into separate parts.
Reason:
To define the scope of the permission and in the interests of visual amenity in
accordance with Policy MD2 (Design of New Development) of the Vale of
Glamorgan Local Development Plan.
5. Within three months of the date of this permission the approved foul drainage
system with a soakaway based on the submitted "Herringbone Soakaway
Size v2 dated 12/06/2025" shall have been provided on site in accordance
with the full details hereby approved.
Thereafter the site shall only be occupied by 6no. people maximum unless
alternative details of a foul drainage scheme for the site have been submitted
to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter the
approved system shall be provided on site prior to any increase in occupancy
and maintained as such in perpetuity.
Reason:
To ensure no detriment to the environment and to comply with the terms of
Policy MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
6. No commercial or business activities shall take place on the land, including
the storage of materials, nor shall any vehicle over 3.5 tonnes be stationed,
parked or stored on the site.
Reason:
In the interests of the character and appearance of the site and conserving the
rural character and appearance of the area, in accordance with Policies MG17
and MD1 of the Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan.
7. No further ground breaking works shall commence until the Local Planning
Authority have been informed in writing of the name of a professionally
qualified archaeologist who is to be present during the undertaking of any
excavations in the development area so that a watching brief can be
conducted. No work shall commence until the Local Planning Authority has
confirmed in writing that the proposed archaeologist is suitable. A copy of the
watching brief report shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority within
two months of the archaeological fieldwork being completed.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Reason:
To identify and record any features of archaeological interest discovered
during the works, in order to mitigate the impact of the works on the
archaeological resource, and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1
(Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built and Natural Environment) and MD8
(Historic Environment) of the Local Development Plan.
8. Notwithstanding the submitted plans and details, within 56 days of the date of
this permission, Ecological Mitigation Measures for both construction and
operation of the approved development and based on all areas identified in
section 5.3 and 5.4 of the submitted Preliminary Ecological Appraisal including
a timetable for their implementation shall be submitted to the Local Planning
Authority for their approval in writing. The development and further
construction works shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the
approved strategy and timings set out within and thereafter retained in
accordance with the approved details whilst the development remains in
existence.
Reason:
In the interests of ecology and biodiversity and to ensure compliance with
Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD7 (Environmental Protection) and
MD9 (Promoting Biodiversity) of the Local Development Plan.
9. All planting, seeding or turfing comprised in the approved details of
landscaping on plans 03e - Overall Site Plan and 04d Site Plan shall be
carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons following the occupation
of the buildings or the completion of the development, whichever is the
sooner; and any trees or plants which within a period of 5 years from the
completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously
damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with
others of similar size and species.
Reason:
To ensure satisfactory maintenance of the landscaped area to ensure
compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built and
Natural Environment), MG17 (Special Landscape Areas), MD1 (Location of
New Development), MD2 (Design of New Developments) and MD9
(Promoting Biodiversity) of the Local Development Plan.
10. The 2m high wooden boarded fence erected on the eastern boundary of the
site adjacent the boundary with the A4232 road shall be maintained and
retained as such as long as the site is being used as a gypsy/traveller pitch.
Reason:
In the interest of the amenity of the occupiers in accordance with Policy MD2-
Design of New Development and MD7-Environmental Protection in the Local
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Development Plan.
11. Within 56 days of the date of this permission an assessment of the nature and
extent of contamination shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the
Local Planning Authority. This assessment must be carried out by or under
the direction of a suitably qualified competent person * in accordance with
BS10175 (2011) Code of Practice for the Investigation of Potentially
Contaminated Sites and shall assess any contamination on the site, whether
or not it originates on the site.
The report of the findings shall include:
(i) a desk top study to identify all previous uses at the site and potential
contaminants associated with those uses and the impacts from those
contaminants on land and controlled waters. The desk study shall establish a
‘conceptual site model’ (CSM) which identifies and assesses all identified
potential source, pathway, and receptor linkages;
(ii) an intrusive investigation to assess the extent, scale and nature of
contamination and monitor the site for the presence of gases** which may be
present.
(iii) an assessment of the potential risks to:
- human health,
- groundwaters and surface waters
- adjoining land,
- property (existing or proposed) including buildings, crops, livestock, pets,
woodland and service lines and pipes,
- ecological systems,
- archaeological sites and ancient monuments; and
- any other receptors identified at (i)
(iv) an appraisal of remedial options, and justification for the preferred
remedial option(s).
All work and submissions carried out for the purposes of this condition must
be conducted in accordance with DEFRA and the Environment Agency’s
‘Model procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, CLR 11’
(September 2004) and the WLGA / WG / NRW guidance document ‘Land
Contamination: A guide for Developers’ (2023), unless the Local Planning
Authority agrees to any variation.
* A ‘suitably qualified competent person’ would normally be expected to be a
chartered member of an appropriate professional body (such as the Institution
of Civil Engineers, Geological Society of London, Royal Institution of
Chartered Surveyors, Institution of Environmental Management) and also
have relevant experience of investigating contaminated sites.
** ‘Gases’ include landfill gases, vapours from contaminated land sites, and
naturally occurring methane and carbon dioxide, but does not include radon
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
gas. Gas Monitoring programmes should be designed in line with current best
practice as detailed in CIRIA 665 and or BS8485 year 2007 Code of Practice
for the Characterization and Remediation from Ground Gas in Affected
Developments.
Reason:
To ensure that any unacceptable risks from land contamination to the future
users of the land, neighbouring land, controlled waters, property and
ecological systems are minimised, and to ensure that the development can be
carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other
offsite receptors in accordance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and
MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
12. Within 72 days of the date of this permission a detailed remediation scheme
and verification plan to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended
use by removing any unacceptable risks to human health, controlled waters,
buildings, other property and the natural and historical environment shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The
scheme shall include all works to be undertaken, proposed remediation
objectives and remediation criteria, a timetable of works and site management
procedures. The scheme must ensure that the site will not qualify as
contaminated land under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in
relation to the intended use of the land after remediation.
All work and submissions carried out for the purposes of this condition must
be conducted in accordance with the Environment Agency’s ‘Land
contamination: risk management (LCRM)’ (October 2020) and the WLGA /
WG / NRW guidance document ‘Land Contamination: A guide for Developers’
(2023) unless the Local Planning Authority agrees to any variation.
Reason:
To ensure that any unacceptable risks from land contamination to the future
users of the land, neighbouring land, controlled waters, property and
ecological systems are minimised, and to ensure that the development can be
carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other
offsite receptors in accordance with policy MD7 of the Vale of Glamorgan
Local Development Plan.
13. The remediation scheme approved by condition 12 above must be fully
undertaken in accordance with its terms. The Local Planning Authority must
be given two weeks written notification of commencement of the remediation
scheme works.
On the completion of the measures identified in the approved remediation
scheme and prior to the occupation of any part of the development unless
otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, a verification
report that demonstrates the effectiveness of the remediation carried out must
be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
All work and submissions carried out for the purposes of this condition must
be conducted in accordance with the Environment Agency’s ‘Land
contamination: risk management (LCRM)’ (October 2020) and the WLGA /
WG / NRW guidance document ‘Land Contamination: A guide for Developers’
(2023) unless the Local Planning Authority agrees to any variation.
Reason:
To ensure that any unacceptable risks from land contamination to the future
users of the land, neighbouring land, controlled waters, property and
ecological systems are minimised, and to ensure that the development can be
carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other
offsite receptors in accordance with policy MD7 of the Vale of Glamorgan
Local Development Plan.
14. In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the
approved development that was not previously identified it must be reported in
writing within 2 days to the Local Planning Authority, all associated works
must stop, and no further development shall take place unless otherwise
agreed in writing until a scheme to deal with the contamination found has
been approved. An investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken
and where remediation is necessary a remediation scheme and verification
plan must be prepared and submitted to and approved in writing by the Local
Planning Authority. Following completion of measures identified in the
approved remediation scheme a verification report must be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The timescale for the
above actions shall be agreed with the LPA within 2 weeks of the discovery of
any unsuspected contamination.
Reason:
To ensure that any unacceptable risks from land contamination to the future
users of the land, neighbouring land, controlled waters, property and
ecological systems are minimised, and to ensure that the development can be
carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other
offsite receptors in accordance with policy MD7 of the Vale of Glamorgan
Local Development Plan.
15. Any topsoil [natural or manufactured], or subsoil, to be imported shall be
assessed for chemical or other potential contaminants in accordance with a
scheme of investigation which shall be submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority in advance of its importation. Only material
approved by the Local Planning Authority shall be imported. All measures
specified in the approved scheme shall be undertaken in accordance with
Pollution Control’s Imported Materials Guidance Notes. Subject to approval of
the above, sampling of the material received at the development site to verify
that the imported soil is free from contamination shall be undertaken in
accordance with a scheme and timescale to be agreed in writing by the LPA.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Reason:
To ensure that the safety of future occupiers is not prejudiced in accordance
with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
16. Any aggregate (other than virgin quarry stone) or recycled aggregate material
to be imported shall be assessed for chemical or other potential contaminants
in accordance with a scheme of investigation which shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in advance of its
importation. Only material approved by the Local Planning Authority shall be
imported. All measures specified in the approved scheme shall be undertaken
in accordance with Pollution Control’s Imported Materials Guidance Notes.
Subject to approval of the above, sampling of the material received at the
development site to verify that the imported soil is free from contamination
shall be undertaken in accordance with a scheme and timescale to be agreed
in writing by the LPA.
Reason:
To ensure that the safety of future occupiers is not prejudiced in accordance
with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
17. Any site won material including soils, aggregates, recycled materials shall be
assessed for chemical or other potential contaminants in accordance with a
sampling scheme which shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the
Local Planning Authority in advance of the reuse of site won materials. Only
material which meets site specific target values approved by the Local
Planning Authority shall be reused.
Reason:
To ensure that the safety of future occupiers is not prejudiced in accordance
with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
18. Within 56 days of the date of permission details of existing ground levels
within and adjacent to the site and proposed finished ground and floor levels
have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the
approved details.
Reason:
In the interests of visual amenity and to ensure the development accords with
Policies SP10 (Built and Natural Environment), MD2 (Design of New
Development) and MG17 (Special Landscape Area) of the Local Development
Plan.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
19. The existing means of vehicle access shall maintain the existing vision splays
provided.
Reason:
In the interest of highway and public safety in accordance with Policy MD2-
Design of New Development of the Local Development Plan.
20. No gates whatsoever shall be located and fitted to open out over the adopted
highway (All gates shall open inwards).
Reason:
In the interest of highway / Public Safety and the free flow of traffic along
adopted Highway in accordance with Policy MD2-Design of New Development
of the Local Development Plan.
21. The drainage scheme for the site shall ensure that all foul and surface water
discharges separately from the site and that land drainage run-off shall not
discharge, either directly or indirectly, into the public sewerage system.
Reason:
To prevent hydraulic overloading of the public sewerage system, pollution of
the environment and to protect the health and safety of existing residents and
ensure no detriment to the environment and to comply with the terms of
Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD1 (Location of New Development)
and MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
2025/00333/RG3 Received on 10 April 2025
(P. 143)
APPLICANT: Vale of Glamorgan Council Civic Offices, Holton Road, Barry,
CF63 4RU
AGENT: Mr Liam Griffiths Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park,
Cardiff, CF23 8RS
Land at Former Eagleswell School, Eagleswell Road,
Llantwit Major
Variation of Condition 8 (Obscure Glazing/Fixed Windows) of Planning Approval
2023/01102/RG3 : Temporary housing accommodation and associated works.
The application was required to be determined by Planning Committee under the
Council’s approved scheme of delegation because the Head of Sustainable
Development had deemed it necessary due to public interest in the original
application.
Following the matter being addressed at the meeting, and due to the concerns raised
by some Members concerning the application, a vote on officer’s recommendations
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
was undertaken. The vote being carried by the majority of the Committee, the
application was
APPROVED subject to the following condition(s):
1. The dwellings and any associated infrastructure associated with the
residential use of the site shall be removed from the land in its entirety and the
land shall be restored to its former condition on or before 22 July 2029.
Reason:
To ensure that local amenities are safeguarded and to ensure the
development accords with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD1
(Location of New Development) and MD2 (Design of New Development).
2. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following
approved plans and documents:
Approved by 2023/01102/RG3:-
2657 00(02)100 Location Plan
2657 00(03)300 Ancillary Details
2657 00(03)301 Bin Store Details
2657 00(03)302 Cycle Store Details
2657 00(03)400a Site Sections
2657 00(05)303 Fence Details
Eag Hom Xx Zz Dr Zz 000017 Home 2b Flat Floor Plan
Eag Hom Xx Zz Dr Zz 000018 Home Elevations Front And Top
Eag Hom Xx Zz Dr Zz 000019 Home Elevations Side And Rear
Wates Hom Xx Zz Dr Zz 000064 Home 3b Flat Floor Plan
Wates Hom Xx Zz Dr Zz 000074 Home 1b Flat Floor Plan
Beattie Passive Type 3 Bed Elevation
Beattie Passive Type D 4 Bed Floor Plan Accessible
Beattie Passive Type D 4 Bed Floor Plan
Beattie Passive Type Da 4 Bed Elevation
Beattie Passive Type Db 4 Bed Accessible Elevation
Beattie Passive Type Db 4 Bed Elevation
Beattie Passive Type Db 4 Bed Floor Plan Accessible
Beattie Passive Type Db 4 Bed Floor Plan
Beattie Passive Type Ga 3 Bed Floor Plan
Beattie Passive Type Gb 3 Bed Elevation
Beattie Passive Type Gb 3 Bed Floor Plan
Egw Civ Xx Zz Dp C 9007 P3 D4 Estate Roads Refuse Tracking
Egw Civ Xx Zz Dp C 9013 C1 D4 Highway Setting Out Sheet 1
Egw Civ Xx Zz Dp C 9015 C1 D4 Surfacing And Kerbing Layout
Egw Civ Xx Zz Dp C 9101 C1 D4 S278 General Arrangement
Egw Civ Xx Zz Dp C 9104 C1 D4 Refuse Tracking L
Topographical Survey
Underground Services Survey
Planning Statement
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal
Reptile Survey Report
Site Investigation Report
Tree Constraints Plan
Tree Survey
Transport Statement
Travel Plan
Design and Access Statement
Site Investigation Report April 2016
ESG Desk Study Report January 2016
EGW-CIV-XX-ZZ-DP-C-9001-C6-D4 - External Works Layout Sheet 1
EGW-CIV-XX-ZZ-DP-C-9002-C6-D4 - External Works Layout Sheet 2
EGW-CIV-XX-ZZ-DP-C-9003-C6-D4 - External Works Layout Sheet 3
2657-00(03)130 - Plot 23 & 12 Section
2657-00(03)111 - Plot 23 & 12 Site Plan
Construction Environmental Management Plan
EGW-CIV-XX-ZZ-DS-C-9004-P3-D4 - Long Sections Sheet 1
EGW-CIV-XX-ZZ-DS-C-9005-P3-D4 - Long Sections Sheet 2
EGW-CIV-XX-ZZ-DD-C-9006-C1-D4 - Highway Construction Details
Lighting Plan
2657 00(05)115 Boundary Treatments
EGW-LAN-XX-00-DD-L-100 Landscape Strategy 3 For Construction V19
EAG-HOM-XX-ZZ-DR-ZZ-000287 Type C01 Elevation Standard
EAG-HOM-XX-ZZ-DR-ZZ-000457 Type Z01 Elevations
EAG-HOM-XX-ZZ-DR-ZZ-000290 Type C02 Elevation Standard
EAG-HOM-XX-ZZ-DR-ZZ-000460 Type Z02 Elevations
EAG-HOM-XX-ZZ-DR-ZZ-00392 Type AE Elevations Gable
EAG-HOM-XX-ZZ-DR-ZZ-000284 Type C Elevation Gable
Approved by 2023/01102/1/CD:-
Landscape and Ecological Management Plan (Tir Collective, October 2024,
R03)
Approved by 2023/01102/3/CD
Highway condition survey prepared by Asbri Transport dated November 2024
Approved by 2025/00333/RG3:-
2657-00(03)110 Rev A Site Layout S73 WINDOWS, received 19/06/25
A001 Quick Release Restrictor
Resident Management Plan rev A, received 24/06/25
Reason:
For the avoidance of doubt as to the approved development and to accord
with Circular 016:2014 on The Use of Planning Conditions for Development
Management.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
3. Prior to beneficial occupation of any respective unit, the fences, trellis and
patio screens to serve that unit shall be erected in accordance with plan no.
2657 00(05)115 Boundary Treatments. Once erected, the boundary
treatments shall thereafter be retained as such for the duration of occupation
of the units.
Reason:
In the interests of privacy and to ensure compliance with Policy MD2 (Design
of New Development) of the Local Development Plan.
4. The parking spaces shall be retained in accordance with drawing no. Egw Civ
Xx Zz Dp C 9013 C1 D4 Highway Setting Out Sheet 1 and kept available for
parking for as long as the development remains on site.
Reason:
To ensure that satisfactory vehicle parking and turning facilities is provided on
site to serve the development, and to ensure compliance with the terms of
Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD2 (Design of New
Developments) of the Local Development Plan.
5. The highway works including traffic calming measures shall be retained in
accordance with the details on drawing no. EGW-CIV-XX-ZZ-DD-C-9006C1-
D4 Highway Construction Details and maintained as such for the lifetime of
development.
Reason:
In the interests of highway safety, and to ensure compliance with the terms of
Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD2 (Design of New
Developments) of the Local Development Plan.
6. Notwithstanding the provisions of schedule 2, Part 1, classes A, B, C, D and E
of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order
1995 (as amended for Wales) (or any order revoking and re-enacting that
order with or without modification), the development hereby approved shall
not be altered in any way.
Reason:
To enable the Local Planning Authority to control the scale of development
and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and
MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local Development Plan.
7. Any part of the rear windows in plots 9-27 that are below 1.7m in height above
the level of the floor in the room that it serves shall be:
1) Obscurely glazed in relation to plots 9 – 27 in accordance with details
approved by application ref. 2023/01102/2/CD;
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
2) Fixed closed in relation to plots 9-12, 19-20 and 22-26 in accordance
with details approved by application ref. 2023/01102/2/CD and as
marked purple on plan ref 2657-00(03)110 Rev A in relation to plots 13-
18, 21 and 27 and;
3) Fixed with a quick release restrictor in relation to plots 13-18, 21 and 27
as marked green on plan ref 2657-00(03)110 Rev A in accordance with
details ref. A001 Quick Release Restrictor.
The windows shall thereafter be retained at all times in accordance with the
approved details.
A sign informing residents about the correct use of quick release restrictors,
as detailed in the Resident Management Plan rev A received 24/06/25, shall
be placed on each affected window prior to first beneficial occupation of any
respective unit on plots 13-18, 21 and 27. The measures set out in the
Management Plan shall be complied with whilst the units on plots 13-18, 21
and 27 remain in occupation.
Reason:
To ensure that the privacy and amenities of adjoining occupiers are
safeguarded, and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the
Strategy) and MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local Development
Plan.
8. The site landscaping, ecological enhancements and open space areas shall
be maintained in accordance with the Landscape and Ecological Management
Plan (Tir Collective, October 2024, R03), as approved under ref.
2023/01102/1/CD, for the lifetime of the development.
Reason:
To ensure satisfactory maintenance of the landscaped and amenity areas to
ensure compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD1 (Location
of New Development) and MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local
Development Plan.
9. Any trees or plants forming part of the approved landscaping scheme
(comprising drawing no. EGW-LAN-XX-00-DD-L-100 'Landscape Strategy
3 For Construction V19' and the Landscape and Ecological Management Plan
approved under ref. 2023/01102/1/CD) which within the lifetime of this
temporary consent die, are removed or become seriously damaged or
diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar
size and species.
Reason:
To ensure satisfactory maintenance of the landscaped area to ensure
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built and
Natural Environment), MD1 (Location of New Development), MD2 (Design of
New Developments) of the Local Development Plan.
10. Within one month of the date of this consent, a plan/strategy to manage the
removal of the temporary residential units from the site shall be submitted to
the Local Planning Authority for approval in writing. The Strategy will detail the
plans to relocate the modular units to alternative sites within the 5-year period
from the grant of planning permission and should include the commencement
of this work at least 18 months prior to the expiry of the planning permission
with the 7 plots 21-27 being identified as those to be removed from the site
first. The plan will detail the proposed method and numbers of units to be
relocated to newly identified sites in batches appropriate to the size of the
receiving site. The temporary residential units shall thereafter be removed
from the site in accordance with the approved details.
Reason
To ensure that local amenities are safeguarded and to ensure the
development accords with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD1
(Location of New Development) and MD2 (Design of New Development).
2025/00487/FUL Received on 19 May 2025
(P. 164)
APPLICANT: Greenhill Investments (Vale) Limited c/o Agent,
AGENT: Mr Joe Ayoubkhani 14 Neptune Court, Vanguard Way, Cardiff, CF24 5PJ
Land North of Hayes Road, Sully
Proposed industrial unit, access, landscaping, drainage and associated works
APPROVED subject to the following condition(s):
1. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following
approved plans and documents:
Planning, Design, Access & GI Statement dated March 2025
Location Plan 20995-c
Stie Location Plan A101 Rev B received 27 June 2025
Construction Environmental Management Plan, Issue 01, by Vale
Consultancy dated 9th May 2025.
20995_700 Rev 02 - Highway General Arrangement
20995_900 Rev 02 - 16.5m HGV Swept Path Analysis
20995_901 Rev 01 - Standard Car Swept Path Analysis
20995_510 Rev 02 Proposed Drainage Plan
Foul Drainage Report prepared by Vale Consultancy
Proposed Ground Floor Plan A103 Rev B
Proposed Mezzanine Floor Plan A104 Rev B
Proposed Roof Plan A105 Rev C
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Proposed Elevations – Sheet 1 A106 Reb B
Proposed Elevations – Sheet 2 Rev B
Flood Consequence Assessment by Vale Consultancy 20995-FCA-02 dated
30 June 2025
Reason:
For the avoidance of doubt as to the approved development and to accord
with Circular 016:2014 on The Use of Planning Conditions for Development
Management.
2. No further development shall take place, until the following components of a
scheme to deal with the risks associated with contamination at the site, has
been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
1. A preliminary risk assessment which has identified:
• all previous uses
• potential contaminants associated with those uses
• a conceptual model of the site indicating sources, pathways and receptors
• potentially unacceptable risks arising from contamination at the site
2. A site investigation scheme, based on (1) to provide information for a
detailed assessment of the risk to all receptors that may be affected, including
those off site.
3. The results of the site investigation and the detailed risk assessment
referred to in (2) and, based on these, an options appraisal and remediation
strategy giving full details of the remediation measures required and how they
are to be undertaken.
4. A verification plan providing details of the data that will be collected in order
to demonstrate that the works set out in the remediation strategy in (3) are
complete and identifying any requirements for longer-term monitoring of
pollutant linkages, maintenance and arrangements for contingency action.
The remediation strategy and its relevant components shall be carried out in
accordance with the approved details.
Reason:
To ensure the risks associated with contamination at the site have been fully
considered prior to commencement of development as controlled waters are
of high environmental sensitivity and to safeguard human health; and where
necessary remediation measures and long-term monitoring are implemented
to prevent unacceptable risks from contamination in accordance with Policy
MD7 of the adopted Local Development Plan.
3. Prior to the occupation of the development a verification report demonstrating
completion of works set out in the approved remediation strategy and the
effectiveness of the remediation shall be submitted to and approved in writing
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
by the Local Planning Authority. The report shall include results of sampling
and monitoring carried out in accordance with the approved verification plan to
demonstrate that the site remediation criteria have been met. It shall also
include a long-term monitoring and maintenance plan for longer-term
monitoring of pollutant linkages, maintenance and arrangements for
contingency action, as identified in the verification plan. The long-term
monitoring and maintenance plan shall be carried out in accordance with the
approved details.
Reason:
To ensure the methods identified in the verification plan have been
implemented and completed and the risk associated with the contamination at
the site has been remediated prior to occupation or operation. To prevent
unacceptable risks to controlled waters and ecological systems in accordance
with Policy MD7 of the adopted Local Development Plan.
4. Prior to the occupation of the development, a long term monitoring plan for
land contamination shall be submitted and approved in writing by the Local
Planning Authority. The long term monitoring plan should include:
• Details of the methods and triggers for action to be undertaken
• Timescales for the long term monitoring and curtailment mechanisms e.g. a
scheme of monitoring for 3 years unless the monitoring reports indicate that
subsequent monitoring is or is not required (for x years)
• Timescales for submission of monitoring reports to the LPA e.g. annually
• Details of any necessary contingency and remedial actions and timescales
for actions
• Details confirming that the contingency and remedial actions have been
carried out
The monitoring plan shall be carried out in accordance with the approved
details, within the agreed timescales.
Reason:
A long term monitoring plan should be submitted prior to occupation or
operation, to ensure necessary monitoring measures are approved to manage
any potential adverse impacts as a result of development on controlled waters
and to ensure compliance with Policy MD7 of the adopted Local Development
Plan.
5. In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the
approved development that was not previously identified it must be reported in
writing within 2 days to the Local Planning Authority, all associated works
must stop, and no further development shall take place until a scheme to deal
with the contamination found has been submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority. An investigation and risk assessment must
be undertaken and where remediation is necessary a remediation scheme
and verification plan must be prepared and submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority. Following completion of measures
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
identified in the approved remediation scheme a verification report must be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The
timescale for the above actions shall be agreed with the LPA within 2 weeks
of the discovery of any unsuspected contamination.
Reason:
To ensure that any unacceptable risks from land contamination to the future
users of the land, neighbouring land, controlled waters, property and
ecological systems are minimised, and to ensure that the development can be
carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other
offsite receptors in accordance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and
MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
6. No infiltration of surface water drainage into the ground is permitted other than
with the express written consent of the Local Planning Authority, which may
be given for those parts of the site where it has been demonstrated that there
is no resultant unacceptable risk to controlled waters. The development shall
be carried out in accordance with the approval details.
Reason:
To prevent pollution to the water environment in accordance with Policy MD7
of the adopted Local Development Plan.
7. Any aggregate (other than virgin quarry stone) or recycled aggregate material
to be imported shall be assessed for chemical or other potential contaminants
in accordance with a scheme of investigation which shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in advance of its
importation. Only material approved by the Local Planning Authority shall be
imported. All measures specified in the approved scheme shall be undertaken
in accordance with Pollution Control’s Imported Materials Guidance Notes.
Subject to approval of the above, sampling of the material received at the
development site to verify that the imported soil is free from contamination
shall be undertaken in accordance with a scheme and timescale to be agreed
in writing by the LPA.
Reason:
To ensure that the safety of future occupiers is not prejudiced in accordance
with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
8. Any site won material including soils, aggregates, recycled materials shall be
assessed for chemical or other potential contaminants in accordance with a
sampling scheme which shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the
Local Planning Authority in advance of the reuse of site won materials. Only
material which meets site specific target values approved by the Local
Planning Authority shall be reused.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Reason:
To ensure that the safety of future occupiers is not prejudiced in accordance
with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
9. Within one month of this consent a revised landscaping scheme shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The
scheme shall include indications of all existing trees (including spread and
species) and hedgerows on the land, identify those to be retained, set out
measures for their protection throughout the course of development, in
addition to details of equipment and layout of communal areas to serve the
development and the proposed wayfaring/entrance feature within the site.
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, and to ensure compliance with the terms
of Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD1 (Location of New
Development) and MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local
Development Plan.
10. All planting, seeding or turfing comprised in the approved details of
landscaping shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons
following the occupation of the buildings or the completion of the
development, whichever is the sooner; and any trees or plants which within a
period of 5 years from the completion of the development die, are removed or
become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting
season with others of similar size and species.
Reason:
To ensure satisfactory maintenance of the landscaped area to ensure
compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD1 (Location of New
Development) and MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local
Development Plan.
11. Any amenity areas approved as part of the approved landscaping scheme
pursuant to condition 9, shall be provided in accordance with the approved
details, within 3 months of the first beneficial occupation of the first unit hereby
approved and maintained in accordance with the approved details in
perpetuity thereafter.
Reason:
To ensure satisfactory maintenance of the landscaped and amenity areas to
ensure compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD1
(Location of New Development) and MD2 (Design of New Developments) of
the Local Development Plan.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
12. Prior to the first beneficial use of the development, a Biodiversity
Enhancement Strategy addressing enhancement measures shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The
development shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the approved
strategy and timings set out within and thereafter retained in accordance with
the approved details whilst the development remains in existence. The
Strategy shall include the following:
a) Details of any bird/bat box provision
b) Details of any landscaping features
c) Details of any additional ecological enhancements
Reason:
In the interests of ecology and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1
(Delivering the Strategy) and MD9 (Promoting Biodiversity) of the Local
Development Plan.
13. Notwithstanding the submitted details, a schedule of materials (inclusive of
samples and artistic elements) to be used in the construction of the
development hereby approved shall be submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be completed in
accordance with the approved details prior to beneficial occupation of the unit
hereby approved.
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, as required by Policies SP1 (Delivering
the Strategy) and Policy MD2 (Design of New Development) of the Local
Development Plan.
14. The approved access and internal circulation layout, inclusive of 3.5m
footway/cycleway to site frontage; vehicular and cycle parking as well as
internal circulation spaces shall be laid out in accordance with the approved
details, prior to the first beneficial use of the unit hereby approved and shall
thereafter be so retained at all times to serve the unit hereby approved.
Reason:
To ensure the provision on site of parking and turning facilities to serve the
development in the interests of highway and public safety, and to ensure
compliance with the terms of Policies MD1 and MD2 of the Local
Development Plan 2011-2026.
15. The development permitted by this planning permission shall only be carried
out in accordance with the Flood Consequence Assessment (FCA) produced
by Vale Consultancy reference 20995-FCA-02 dated 30 June 2025 including
that the finished slab level of the approved industrial units shall be set no
lower than 7.25 metres Above Ordnance Datum (AOD) (Newlyn).
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
Reason:
To reduce the risk of flooding to the proposed development and future
occupant, in accordance with the requirements of Policies SP1 and MD1 of
the Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026 and TAN15- Development
and Flood Risk.
July 10 Minutes and DN (MT)
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the
following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be
taken.
2016/00849/FUL Received on 15 August 2023
(P. 45)
APPLICANT: Mr. Simpson, Equorium Limited, c/o Agent
AGENT: Jessica Burgar Equorium Property Company Ltd, Capital Link, Windsor
Road, Cardiff, CF24 5NG
Gardenhurst Resource Centre, Holmesdale Place, Penarth
Redevelopment and change of use of former care facility to provide 6 apartments,
plus 3 new terrace houses on the existing car park of the property, including
associated car parking, landscaping and improvement works to the existing
boundary wall and arboriculture.
The application was required to be determined by Planning Committee under the
Council’s approved scheme of delegation because it had been called-in for
determination by Councillor Anthony Ernest for the reason that the scheme related to
a comprehensive proposal involving a substantial property and conversions into
numerous dwellings, as well as the impact upon the conservation area.
RESOLVED – T H A T subject to the interested person(s) first entering into a Section
106 Legal Agreement to trigger a viability review if the development was not
substantially completed within six years of the date of the planning permission,
No.
APPROVED subject to the following conditions:
1. The development shall begin no later than 3 years from the date of this
decision.
Reason:
To comply with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990.
2. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following
approved plans and documents:
2266-TYP-LP-01 Rev P1 - Site Location Plan
A_2266-TYP-GA-04 Rev P2 - Proposed Basement Floor Plan
A_2266-TYP-GA-05 Rev P3 - Proposed Ground Floor Plan
A_2266-TYP-GA-06 Rev P3 - Proposed First Floor Plan
A_2266-TYP-GA-07 Rev P3 - Proposed Loft Floor Plan
A_2266-TYP-GA-08 Rev P1 - Proposed Roof Plan
A_2266-TYP-GA-24 Rev P2 - Proposed Elevations - Sheet 01
A_2266-TYP-GA-25 Rev P2 - Proposed Elevations - Sheet 02
A_2266-TYP-GA-26 Rev P1 - Presentation Elevations - Sheet 01
A_2266-TYP-GA-27 Rev P1 - Presentation Elevations - Sheet 02
A_2266-TYP-GA-40 Rev P2 - Basement Demolition Plan
A_2266-TYP-GA-41 Rev P2 - Ground Floor Demolition Plan
A_2266-TYP-GA-42 Rev P2 - First Floor Demolition Plan
A_2266-TYP-GA-43 Rev P1 - Roof Demolition Plan
7935_500 Rev 03 - Drainage Strategy Plan
TDA.2878.01(A) - Outline Landscape Proposals
7935 900 R02 Vehicle Tracking - Fire Tender
7935 901 R01 Vehicle Tracking- 7.5T Box Van
AMENDED - 2266-TYP-BP-02 - P2 - Proposed Block Plan
AMENDED - 2266-TYP-SP-02 - P3 - Site Context Demolition Plan
AMENDED - 2266-TYP-SP-03 - P4 - Proposed Site Plan
AMENDED - 2266-TYP-SP-31 - P2 - Proposed Site Sections
AMENDED - 2266-TYP-SP-40 - P3 - Proposed 3-D Visuals - Sheet 01
AMENDED - H_2266-TYP-GA-09 - P2 - Proposed Ground Floor Plan –
Townhouses
AMENDED - H_2266-TYP-GA-10 - P2 - Proposed First Floor Plan -
Townhouses
AMENDED - H_2266-TYP-GA-11 - P2 - Proposed Second Floor Plan -
Townhouses
AMENDED - H_2266-TYP-GA-12 - P2 - Proposed Roof Plan - Townhouses
AMENDED - H_2266-TYP-GA-29 - P4 - Proposed Elevations - Sheet 01 -
Townhouses
AMENDED - H_2266-TYP-GA-30 - P4 - Proposed Elevations - Sheet 02 -
Townhouses
AMENDED - H_2266-TYP-GA-31 - P4 - Presentation Elevations - Sheet 01 -
Townhouses
No.
AMENDED - H_2266-TYP-GA-32 - P4 - Presentation Elevations - Sheet 02 -
Townhouses
AMENDED - H_2266-TYP-GA-33 - P4 - Proposed 3D Visuals - Townhouses
Gardenhurst Green Infrastructure Statement
Pre-Development Tree Survey & Constraints
Reason:
For the avoidance of doubt as to the approved development and to accord
with Circular 016:2014 on The Use of Planning Conditions for Development
Management.
3. No development shall commence until details of existing ground levels within
and adjacent to the site and proposed finished ground and floor levels have
been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.
Reason:
To preserve the special interest of the conservation area and safeguard visual
amenity, and to ensure the development accords with Policies SP1 (Delivering
the Strategy), SP10 (Built and Natural Environment), Policy MD2 (Design of
New Development) and MD8 (Historic Environment) of the Local Development
Plan.
4. Notwithstanding the submitted plans and details, and prior to their use on site,
a schedule of materials (including samples) to be used in the construction of
the development hereby approved shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be completed
in accordance with the approved details and thereafter retained at all times.
Reason:
To preserve the special interest of the conservation area and safeguard visual
amenity, as required by Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built
and Natural Environment), Policy MD2 (Design of New Development) and
MD8 (Historic Environment) of the Local Development Plan.
5. Notwithstanding the submitted plans and details, prior to their use on site full
details of:
- Cycle storage
- All entrance gates, including details of the widening of the bin store
opening
- All new hardstandings (including samples)
- All new boundaries (including samples)
- All new railings
- All new windows
- All new doors
- All new balcony railings
No.
- All new rainwater goods
- Canopy’s (townhouses)
and details of a replacement enclosure along to the northern boundary
between the application site and Parkside Residential Home, shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The
development shall be completed in accordance with the approved details prior
to being brought into beneficial use and shall thereafter be so retained.
Reason:
To preserve the special interest of the conservation area and safeguard visual
amenity, as required by Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built
and Natural Environment), Policy MD2 (Design of New Development) and
MD8 (Historic Environment) of the Local Development Plan.
6. Where making good, the materials to be used shall match those used in the
existing building / stone wall that exist at the time of this approval.
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, as required by Policies SP1 (Delivering
the Strategy), MD2 (Design of New Development), SP10 (Built and Natural
Environment) and MD8 (Historic Environment) ] of the Local Development
Plan.
7. All rooflights to be used in the development shall be flush fitting "conservation"
type.
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, as required by Policies MD2 (Design of
New Development), SP10 (Built and Natural Environment) and MD8 (Historic
Environment) of the Local Development Plan.
8. The landscaping works approved under plan ref: TDA.2878.01(A) - Outline
Landscape Proposals shall be carried out in accordance with the approved
details during the first planting season immediately following completion of the
development.
Reason:
To ensure satisfactory maintenance of the landscaped area to ensure
compliance with the terms of Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) MD1
(Location of New Development) & MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the
Local Development Plan.
9. Any trees or plants which within a period of 5 years from the completion of the
development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased
No.
shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and
species.
Reason:
To ensure satisfactory maintenance of the landscaped area to ensure
compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built and
Natural Environment), MD1 (Location of New Development), MD2 (Design of
New Developments) and MD8 (Historic Environment) of the Local
Development Plan.
10. Any part of north facing windows and roof lights contained within the rear
elevation of the townhouses and north facing side elevation of Gardenhurst at
first floor that are below 1.7m in height above the level of the floor in the room
that they serve shall be obscurely glazed to a minimum of level 3 of the
"Pilkington" scale of obscuration and fixed pane at the time of installation, and
so retained at all times thereafter.
Reason:
To ensure that the privacy and amenities of adjoining occupiers are
safeguarded, and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the
Strategy) and MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local Development
Plan.
11. The balcony hereby approved to serve apartment 4 shall not be brought into
beneficial use until the following requirement has been complied with:
A 1.8m high privacy screen is erected along the north facing side of the
balcony, details of which shall have first been submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Once erected, the privacy screen erected in compliance with the above shall
thereafter be retained in perpetuity.
Reason:
In the interests of privacy and to ensure compliance with Policy MD2 (Design
of New Development) of the Local Development Plan.
12. No townhouse or apartment shall be occupied until the parking spaces, bin
stores and cycle parking have been laid out within the site in accordance with
drawing no AMENDED - 2266-TYP-SP-03 - P4 - Proposed Site Plan for 13
vehicles to be parked and those spaces shall thereafter be kept available for
such purposes in perpetuity.
Reason:
To ensure that satisfactory vehicle parking and turning facilities is provided on
site to serve the development, and to ensure compliance with the terms of
No.
Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD2 (Design of New
Developments) of the Local Development Plan.
13. Prior to the commencement of development, any site clearance or demolition,
a Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved
in writing by the local planning authority. The CTMP shall include a scheme
detailing provision for onsite parking for construction workers for the duration
of the construction period, loading and unloading of plant and materials within
the site boundary, measure to control mud and debris entering the highway
and ensuring that no materials whatsoever shall be stored on the adjacent
highway. The scheme shall be implemented throughout the construction
period.
Reason:
To ensure that the parking provision and highway safety in the area are not
adversely affected by the construction of the development and to meet the
requirements of Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD2 (Design of New
Developments) and MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local
Development Plan.
14. Prior to the first beneficial occupation of the development, a Biodiversity
Enhancement Strategy addressing enhancement measures shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The
development shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the approved
strategy and timings set out within and thereafter retained in accordance with
the approved details whilst the development remains in existence. The
Strategy shall include the following:
a) Details of any bird/bat box provision
b) Details of any additional ecological enhancements
Reason:
In the interests of ecology and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1
(Delivering the Strategy) and MD9 (Promoting Biodiversity) of the Local
Development Plan.
15. Notwithstanding the provisions of schedule 2, Part 1, classes A, B, C, D and E
of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order
1995 (as amended for Wales) (or any order revoking and re-enacting that
order with or without modification), the town house hereby approved shall not
be altered in any way, no extensions shall be erected to the building other
than those expressly authorised by this permission, and no buildings shall be
erected other than those expressly authorised by this permission.
Reason:
To enable the Local Planning Authority to control the scale of development
and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and
No.
MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local Development Plan.
16. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General
Permitted Development) Order 1995 (as amended for Wales) (or any order
revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification), no fences,
gates or walls shall be erected within the curtilage of any dwelling house or
within the grounds of Gardenhurst other than those expressly authorised by
this permission.
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, and to ensure compliance with Policies
SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) & MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the
Local Development Plan.
17. No surface water and/or land drainage shall be allowed to connect directly or
indirectly with the public sewerage network.
Reason:
To prevent hydraulic overloading of the public sewerage system, pollution of
the environment and to protect the health and safety of existing residents and
ensure no detriment to the environment and to comply with the terms of
Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD1 (Location of New Development)
and MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
18. In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the
approved development that was not previously identified it must be reported in
writing within 2 days to the Local Planning Authority, all associated works
must stop, and no further development shall take place until a scheme to deal
with the contamination found has been submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority. An investigation and risk assessment must
be undertaken and where remediation is necessary a remediation scheme
and verification plan must be prepared and submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority. Following completion of measures
identified in the approved remediation scheme a verification report must be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The
timescale for the above actions shall be agreed with the LPA within 2 weeks
of the discovery of any unsuspected contamination.
Reason:
To ensure that any unacceptable risks from land contamination to the future
users of the land, neighbouring land, controlled waters, property and
ecological systems are minimised, and to ensure that the development can be
carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other
offsite receptors in accordance with Policy / Policies SP1 (Delivering the
Strategy) / MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
No.
19. Any aggregate (other than virgin quarry stone) or recycled aggregate material
to be imported shall be assessed for chemical or other potential contaminants
in accordance with a scheme of investigation which shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in advance of its
importation. Only material approved by the Local Planning Authority shall be
imported. All measures specified in the approved scheme shall be undertaken
in accordance with Pollution Control’s Imported Materials Guidance Notes.
Subject to approval of the above, sampling of the material received at the
development site to verify that the imported soil is free from contamination
shall be undertaken in accordance with a scheme and timescale to be agreed
in writing by the LPA.
Reason:
To ensure that the safety of future occupiers is not prejudiced in accordance
with Policy / Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) / MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
20. Any topsoil [natural or manufactured],or subsoil, to be imported shall be
assessed for chemical or other potential contaminants in accordance with a
scheme of investigation which shall be submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority in advance of its importation. Only material
approved by the Local Planning Authority shall be imported. All measures
specified in the approved scheme shall be undertaken in accordance with
Pollution Control’s Imported Materials Guidance Notes. Subject to approval of
the above, sampling of the material received at the development site to verify
that the imported soil is free from contamination shall be undertaken in
accordance with a scheme and timescale to be agreed in writing by the LPA.
Reason:
To ensure that the safety of future occupiers is not prejudiced in accordance
with Policy / Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) / MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
21. No development, demolition works or site clearance, shall take place until
there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority details of a scheme for the protection of the retained trees within the
site. The approved scheme shall be carried out during the demolition of the
buildings and throughout the construction phase of the development.
Reason:
In order to avoid damage to trees on or adjoining the site which are of amenity
value to the area and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the
Strategy), SP10 (Built and Natural Environment), MD2 (Design of New
Developments) and MD8 (Historic Environment) of the Local Development
Plan.
No.
22. No development or the removal of any internal features shall commence until
a photographic survey (equivalent to Level 2 Building Recording) of the
principal building on the site has been submitted to and approved in writing by
the Local Planning Authority.
Reason:
In order that records are kept of any historic features of interest and to ensure
compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built and
Natural Environment) and MD8 (Historic Environment) of the Local
Development Plan.
2024/00537/FUL Received on 8 April 2025
(P. 93)
APPLICANT: Mr Rhys Llewellyn C/O AGENT
AGENT: Mr David Thomas Temple Court, 13A Cathedral Road, Cardiff, CF11 9HA
Cliff Haven Residential Home, 10 Clive Crescent, Penarth
Conversion to 3 Apartments with side and rear extensions and other alterations.
Proposed alterations throughout the site to include the addition of retaining walls and
alterations to levels.
DEFERRED – To a future meeting of the Committee.
Reason for decision
To allow the Applicant adequate time to re-submit the application, to reflect the
extent and form of development proposed at the site.
RESOLVED: Pursuant to this Committee’s delegated powers the following development management applications be determined in accordance with the recommendation set out in the reports of the Director of Planning, Transport and Environment, subject to any further amendments as detailed below and notification be given of the decisions in accordance with Section 70 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 or Section 74 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation) Act 1990.
APPLICATIONS GRANTED
24/01635/FUL - BUTETOWN
Land at The Wharf, Schooner Way
Erection of building (up to 10-storeys including upper and lower ground floors) for mixed use purposes including commercial space (for A1/A3) uses on upper ground floor level and living accommodation for students (sui generis) with associated accommodation and works.
(Cllr Gunter left her seat as a member of the Committee during this item in order to speak as a Ward Councillor.)
RESOLVED:
That delegated authority is given to the Head of Planning &/Or Operational Manager: Strategic Development & Placemaking, to make changes to the conditions and/or Heads of Terms of the required legal agreement, subject to consultation with the Chair of Planning, up to the point where the legal agreement is signed and planning permission issued.
APPLICATIONS GRANTED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
25/00854/FUL – CANTON
Former Fitzalan High School, Lawrenny Avenue
Erection of 8no temporary single storey modular school buildings, central canopy, cycle stands, bin store, play area, fencing and gates, barrier control measures, car parking and associated works to facilitate the temporary relocation of Lansdowne Primary School for a period of five years.
The application was granted subject to conditions.
25/00645/PRAP – CATHAYS
Cardiff Central Railway Station, Central Square, Cathays, Cardiff
Construction of New Building at Platform 0, External Modifications to West Wing, New Southern Entrance and Two HV Substations.
The application was granted subject to conditions.
25/00630/LBC – CATHAYS
Cardiff Central Railway Station, Central Square, Cathays, Cardiff
Alterations to Cardiff Central Station comprising of internal alterations to the Northern booking hall, improved access to Platform 0 including new platform building, alterations to existing platform buildings, subways and West Wing.
The application was granted subject to conditions.
24/01306/FUL – CANTON
312 Cowbridge Road East
Demolition of ground floor class A1 commercial unit, three storey side extension in place of the existing commercial unit, rear dormer loft conversion and external alterations to the existing domestic dwelling, new class A1 commercial unit and 2 self-contained 1 bed apartments above.
The application was granted subject to conditions.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the
following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be
taken.
2021/00075/FUL Received on 4 February 2021
(P. 48)
APPLICANT: Mr John Crockford 20 Gwern Close , Cardiff, CF5 6XL
AGENT: Mr Ieuan Williams Gate House, Beechwood Court, Long Toll, Woodcote,
RG8 0RR
Land West of St. Lythans
Two livestock buildings with access from highway.
APPROVED subject to the following condition(s):
1. The development shall begin no later than five years from the date of this
decision.
Reason:
To comply with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990.
2. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following
approved plans and documents:
Noise Impact Assessment dated 9 September 2022, received 12 September
PL (00) 00 LOCATION PLAN
PL (00) 01 PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT (revised)
PL (00) 02 PROPOSED SITE CONTEXT (revised)
RAC9002-1 Livestock Buildings Elevations and layout
RAC9002-3 Visibility splay
Planning Application for Two Livestock Buildings and Access off the Highway
(redacted) dated October 2023
Received 12 January 2024
Green Infrastructure Statement received 21 June 2024
A Dispersion Modelling Study of the Impact of Odour dated 16 January 2025,
received 23 January 2025
Reason:
For the avoidance of doubt as to the approved development and to accord
with Circular 016:2014 on The Use of Planning Conditions for Development
Management.
3. Prior to the commencement of development, a method statement for the
removal and translocation of the hedgerow adjacent to the adopted highway
and as indicated in plan no. RAC9002-3 Visibility splay shall be submitted to
and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Reason:
To ensure no detrimental impact to the wider visual amenities and to comply
with policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD2 (Design of New
Development) of the adopted Local Development Plan.
4. No development or site clearance shall take place until there has been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority a
scheme of landscaping, calculated at a ratio of 3:1 for hedgerow planting, to
include detail of any additional planting, including native tree planting, their
location and species. The scheme shall include indications of all existing trees
(including spread and species) and hedgerows on the land, identify those to
be retained and set out measures for their protection throughout the course of
development.
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, and to ensure compliance with the terms
of Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built and Natural
Environment), MG17 (Special Landscape Areas), MD1 (Location of New
Development) and MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local
Development Plan.
5. All planting, seeding or turfing comprised in the approved details of
landscaping secured under conditions 3 and 4 shall be carried out in the first
planting and seeding seasons following the occupation of the buildings or the
completion of the development, whichever is the sooner; and any trees or
plants which within a period of 5 years from the completion of the
development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased
shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and
species.
Reason:
To ensure satisfactory maintenance of the landscaped area to ensure
compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built and
Natural Environment), MG17 (Special Landscape Areas) and MD1 (Location
of New Development) of the Local Development Plan
6. Prior to the first beneficial use of the buildings hereby approved, the first 10m
of the access track adjacent to the adopted highway shall be finished in a
bound material and retained in perpetuity.
Reason:
To ensure no egress of loose material to the adopted highway and to comply
with policy MD2 (Design of New Development) of the adopted Vale of
Glamorgan Local Development Plan.
7. The access gate, adjacent to the public highway, shall open inwards and
away from the adopted highway and shall remain as such in perpetuity.
Reason:
To ensure no detrimental impact to highway safety and to comply with policy
MD2 (Design of New Development) of the Vale of Glamorgan Local
Development Plan.
8. The biodiversity enhancement measures set out in the Green Infrastructure
Statement (dated June 2024) shall be carried out in full prior to the first
beneficial occupation or use of the development and thereafter retained in
accordance with the approved details whilst the development remains in
existence.
Reason:
In the interests of ecology and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1
(Delivering the Strategy) and MD9 (Promoting Biodiversity) of the Local
Development Plan.
9. The development hereby approved shall be occupied and managed for the
lifetime of the development in accordance with the details as provided within
the 'Dispersion Modelling Study of the Impact of Odour', received 23 January
2025.
Reason
To protect neighbouring amenities from odour and to ensure compliance with
policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD2 (Design of New Development)
of the Local Development Plan.
10. Prior to the commencement of development, a programme for the
management of all forms of waste shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out
in accordance with the approved details for the lifetime of the development
hereby approved.
Reason:
To ensure no detrimental impact to nearby habitats, watercourses and the
balance of species within them and to comply with policy SP1 (Delivering the
Strategy) of the adopted Local Development Plan.
Reason for decision
The decision to recommend planning permission has been taken in accordance with
Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires that,
in determining a planning application the determination must be in accordance with
the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The
Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local
Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National Plan 2040.
Having regard to Policies SP1 – Delivering the Strategy, SP9 – Minerals, SP10 –
Built and Natural Environment, MG17 – Special Landscape Areas, MG22 –
Development in Minerals Safeguarding Areas, MD1 - Location of New Development,
MD2 - Design of New Development, MD7 - Environmental Protection, MD9 -
Promoting Biodiversity and MD17 - Rural Enterprise of the Local Development Plan,
Future Wales – the National Plan 2040, Planning Policy Wales and the relevant
Technical Advice Notes and Supplementary Guidance, the development is
considered acceptable in respect of the principle of its location, neighbour amenity,
highway safety, visual and landscape amenity and in all other respects.
Having regard to the Council’s duties under the Equality Act 2010 the proposed
development does not have any significant implications for, or effect on, persons
who share a protected characteristic.
It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being objectives
and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of
the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
The appropriate marine policy documents have been considered in the determination
of this application in accordance with Section 59 of the Marine and Coastal Access
Act 2009.
2021/00852/FUL Received on 17 June 2021
(P. 87)
APPLICANT: Filco Supermarkets 19 Boverton Road, Llantwit Major, CF61 1XZ
AGENT: Mr Peter Lee P J Lee Architect LTD, 2, Court Road, Bridgend, CF31 1BN
Filco, 2, High Street, Cowbridge
Proposed ground floor extension to the Filco Foodstore and External Alterations at
2 High Street and Proposed conversion and extension of redundant 1st floor retail
storage space into office accommodation with rear terrace roof garden and
associated steps and external alterations at 4 High Street
APPROVED subject to the following condition(s):
1. The development shall begin no later than five years from the date of this
decision.
Reason:
To comply with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990.
2. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following
approved plans and documents:
15090 SV 00 003 Topographic survey
15090 SV 00 010 Existing Ground Floor plan
15090 SV 00 011 Existing First Floor plan
15090 SV 00 015 Existing Roof plan
15090 SV 00 031 Section A
15090 SV 00 032 Section B
15090 SV 00 033 Section C
15090 SV 00 041 Existing front Elevation
15090 SV 00 042 Existing Rear Elevation
15090 SV 00 043 Existing N.2 Side Elevation
15090 SV 00 044 Existing N.4 Side Elevation
Received 17 June 2021
17460 PL 01 -C Design and Access Statement (except for drawing numbers)
received 9 April 2024
17460 PL 01-C Heritage Impact Assessment received 29 April 2024
Proposed Site & Ground Floor 17460 PL 00110F
Proposed First Floor 17460 PL 00111E
Proposed First Floor Level 17460 PL 70111E
Proposed Roof Plan 17460 PL 00115D
Proposed Section A-A 17460 PL 00131D
Proposed Rear Elevation EV 03 17460 PL 00143E
Proposed Side Elevation EV 04 17460 PL 00144E
Extension Facade - Section Profiles 17460 PL 20401B
Received 14 May 2024
17460 PL 00 142 G PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION EV 02
17460 PL 00 101 DRAWING INDEX – Site Location Plan
17460 PL 00 141 J PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION EV 01
Received 18 July 2024
Reason:
For the avoidance of doubt as to the approved development and to accord
with Circular 016:2014 on The Use of Planning Conditions for Development
Management.
3. No part of the first floor of the premises shall be used for residential uses
falling within use classes C3, C5 or C6 (including any other purpose in class C
of the schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987
(or in any provision equivalent to that class in any statutory instrument
revoking and re-enacting that order with or without modification).
Reason:
Due to the flood risk identified on the site and to ensure compliance with the
terms of Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD1 (Location of New
Development) of the Local Development Plan.
4. Notwithstanding the submitted details, prior their use on site, a schedule and
samples of materials to be used in the construction of the development,
including RAL colours for paint finishes, hereby approved, shall be submitted
to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development
shall be completed in accordance with the approved details.
Reason:
To safeguard local visual amenities, as required by Policies SP1 (Delivering
the Strategy), MD2 (Design of New Development), SP10 (Built and Natural
Environment) and MD8 (Historic Environment) of the Local Development Plan.
5. Notwithstanding the submitted plans and details, prior to the commencement
of development, details of the proposed windows and doors, including section
drawings of a minimum 1:10 including elevations, vertical and horizontal
sections with larger scale details to sufficiently describe the proposed units,
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
The development shall be completed in accordance with the approved details
and shall thereafter be so retained.
Reason:
To safeguard the wider visual amenities of the conservation area, as required
by Policies SP10 (Built and Natural Environment) and MD8(Historic
Environment) of the Local Development Plan.
6. The rooflights hereby approved shall be installed as flush fitting Conservation
Style rooflights.
Reason:
To preserve the character of the Conservation Area and to comply with
policies SP10 (Built and Natural Environment) and MD8 (Historic
Environment) of the adopted Local Development Plan.
7. Notwithstanding the submitted plans and details, prior to the commencement
of development, full details of the louvres, including a section drawing 1:20,
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
The louvres shall be completed in accordance with the approved details and
shall thereafter be so retained.
Reason:
To safeguard both neighbouring privacy and the visual amenities of the
conservation area, as required by Policies MD2 (Design of New
Development), SP10 (Built and Natural Environment) and MD8 (Historic
Environment) of the Local Development Plan.
8. Any part of the staff room window that is below 1.7m in height above the level
of the floor in the room that it serves shall be obscurely glazed to a minimum
of level 3 of the "Pilkington" scale of obscuration and fixed pane at the time of
installation, and so retained at all times thereafter.
Reason:
To ensure that the privacy and amenities of adjoining occupiers are
safeguarded, and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the
Strategy) and MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local Development
Plan.
9. The flat roof areas of the proposed development shall not be used as a
storage area, balcony, roof garden or similar amenity area.
Reason:
To ensure that the privacy and amenities of adjoining occupiers are
safeguarded, and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1 (Delivering the
Strategy) and MD2 (Design of New Developments) of the Local Development
Plan.
10. The biodiversity enhancement measures set out in plan ref: pl 00111
'Proposed First Floor Plan' shall be carried out in full prior to the first beneficial
occupation or use of the development and thereafter retained in accordance
with the approved details whilst the development remains in existence.
Reason:
In the interests of ecology and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1
(Delivering the Strategy) and MD9 (Promoting Biodiversity) of the Local
Development Plan.
11. No development shall commence, including any works of demolition, until a
Construction Environment Management Plan (CEMP) has been submitted to,
and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. The CEMP shall
include the following details:
i) the parking of vehicles of site operatives and visitors;
ii) loading and unloading of plant and materials;
iii) storage of plant and materials used in constructing the development;
iv) the erection and maintenance of security hoarding including decorative
displays and facilities for public viewing, where appropriate;
v) wheel washing facilities;
vi) measures to control and mitigate the emission of dust, smoke, other
airborne pollutants and dirt during construction;
vii) a scheme for recycling/disposing of waste resulting from demolition and
construction works.
viii) hours of construction;
ix) lighting;
x) management, control and mitigation of noise and vibration;
xi) odour management and mitigation;
xii) diesel and oil tank storage areas and bunds;
xiii) how the developer proposes to accord with the Considerate Constructors
Scheme (www.considerateconstructorsscheme.org.uk) during the course of
the construction of the development; and
xiii) a system for the management of complaints from local residents which will
incorporate a reporting system.
xiv) details of how the adjacent watercourse and any habitats will be
safeguarded during construction.
The construction of the development shall be undertaken in accordance with
the approved CEMP.
Reason:
To ensure that the construction of the development is undertaken in a
neighbourly manner and in the interests of the protection of amenity and the
environment and to ensure compliance with the terms of Policy / Policies SP1
(Delivering the Strategy) / MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local
Development Plan.
12. No development or any demolition shall take place until a method statement
has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority, which shall include:
i) Details of development and construction methods (to include details of any
scaffolding and their location) and measures to be taken to minimise the
impact of any works on the adjacent river and its habitats;
ii) Details on how the river will be protected from both direct pollution and
indirect via run-off and any migrated materials from the site;
iii) Details of construction hours;
iv) Details on any lighting, which should ensure that the river is unlit in the
evenings and overnight to allow passage of Otters and European Eels.
The proposed development shall be completed in accordance with the
approved method statement and shall be retained at all times in accordance
with the approved details.
Reason:
In the interests of ecology and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1
(Delivering the Strategy) and MG19 (Sites and Species of European
Importance) of the Local Development Plan.
13. No surface water from any increase in the roof area of the building /or
impermeable surfaces within its curtilage shall be allowed to drain directly or
indirectly to the public sewerage system.
Reason:
To prevent hydraulic overloading of the public sewerage system, to protect the
health and safety of existing residents and ensure no pollution of or detriment
to the environment and to comply with policy SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) of
the Local Development Plan.
14. No development shall take place until the applicant, or their agents or
successors in title, has secured agreement for a written scheme of historic
environment mitigation which has been submitted by the applicant and
approved by the local planning authority. Thereafter, the programme of work
will be fully carried out in accordance with the requirements and standards of
the written scheme.
Reason:
To identify and record any features of archaeological interest discovered
during the works, in order to mitigate the impact of the works on the
archaeological resource and to comply with policy SP1 (Delivering the
Strategy) of the Local Development Plan.
Reason for decision
The decision to recommend planning permission has been taken in accordance with
Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires that,
in determining a planning application the determination must be in accordance with
the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The
Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local
Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National Plan 2040.
Having regard to Policies SP1 – Delivering the strategy, SP4 – Affordable Housing
Provision, SP6 – Retail, SP10 – Built and Natural Environment, MG12 – Retail
Hierarchy, MG14 – Non A1 Retail Uses within Town and District Retail Centres, MD2
- Design of New Development, MD5 – Development Within Settlement Boundaries,
MD7 – Environmental Protection, MD8 – Historic Environment and MD9 Promoting
Biodiversity of the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011- 2026,
and the advice contained within the Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance on
Residential and Householder Development (2018), Parking Standards (2019),
Cowbridge Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan, Future Wales: The
National Plan 2040, Chapter 3 – Strategic and Spatial Choices Planning Policy
Wales 12th Edition (2024), and Technical Advice Note 12- Design (2016), 15 –
Development and Flood Risk (2004), 24 – The Historic Environment (2017), the
development is considered acceptable in terms of its principle, scale, design and
visual impact, as well as its impact on neighbours, flooding, parking provision and
biodiversity enhancement provision.
It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being objectives
and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of
the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
The appropriate marine policy documents have been considered in the determination
of this application in accordance with Section 59 of the Marine and Coastal Access
Act 2009.
2024/00832/FUL Received on 16 September 2024
(P. 125)
APPLICANT: Mrs Bevan 30 Forge Road, Port Talbot, Glamorgan, SA13 1NU
AGENT: Mr Geraint John Office 16 (House 1, 2nd Floor), The Maltings, East Tyndall
Street, Cardiff, CF24 5EA
Lloyds TSB Bank Plc, 9 Boverton Road, Llantwit Major
Application for the change of use from Lloyds Bank (A2) to Dominos (A3)
APPROVED subject to the following condition(s):
1. The development shall begin no later than five years from the date of this
decision.
Reason:
To comply with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990.
2. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the following
approved plans and documents:
14015-AEW-PJ006011-00-DR-0003
14015-AEW-PJ006011-00-DR-PRELIM-0001
14015-AEW-PJ006011-XX-DR-0004
14015-AEW-PJ006011-XX-DR-0006
14015-AEW-PJ006011-XX-SP-0001
Reason:
For the avoidance of doubt as to the approved development and to accord
with Circular 016:2014 on The Use of Planning Conditions for Development
Management.
3. The biodiversity enhancement measures set out in Green Infrastructure
Statement shall be carried out in full prior to the first beneficial occupation or
use of the development and thereafter retained in accordance with the
approved details whilst the development remains in existence.
Reason:
In the interests of ecology and to ensure compliance with Policies SP1
(Delivering the Strategy) and MD9 (Promoting Biodiversity) of the Local
Development Plan.
4. No construction work associated with the development hereby approved shall
take place on the site on any Sunday or Bank Holiday or on any other day
except between the following hours:
Monday to Friday 0800 – 1800
Saturday 0800 – 1800
Unless such work is:
(a) associated with an emergency (relating to health and safety or
environmental issues);
(b) carried out with the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority.
Reason:
To safeguard the amenities of local residents, and to ensure compliance with
the terms of Policy / Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) / MD7
(Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
5. Prior to beneficial use of the premises as hereby approved, the equipment to
control the emission of fumes and odour from the premises shall be installed
in accordance with approved details Specification and EMAQ Report Quote
reference EH30926; 14015-AEW-PJ006011-XX-DR-0004 / 14015-AEW-
PJ006011-XX-SP-0001. All equipment installed as part of the scheme shall
thereafter be operated and maintained in accordance with the approved
details for as long as the use continues.
Reason
To ensure that the amenities of occupiers of other premises in the vicinity are
safeguarded and to ensure the development accords with Policy / Policies
SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) / MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local
Development Plan.
6. No staff shall be on site outside the hours of 07:00 to 00:00 Monday to
Sundays.
Reason:
To safeguard residential amenity, and to ensure compliance with the terms of
Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) / MD2 (Design of New Developments)
and MD7 (Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
7. The use hereby permitted shall not be open to pick up customers or delivery
drivers outside of the following hours:
07:00 to 23:00 on Monday to Sunday
Reason:
To safeguard residential amenity and to ensure compliance with the terms of
Policy MD2 (Design of New Development) and MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the adopted Local Development Plan.
8. The premises shall be used for hot food takeaway and for no other purpose
(including any other purpose in class A3 of the schedule to the Town and
Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (or in any provision equivalent to
that class in any statutory instrument revoking and re-enacting that order with
or without modification).
Reason:
To control the precise nature of the use of the site, and to ensure compliance
with the terms of Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD2 (Design of New
Developments), MD5 (Development Within Settlement Boundaries) and MD7
(Environmental Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
9. Within 6 weeks of the first operation of the extraction units hereby approved, a
post installation noise assessment shall be undertaken. Details of the test
results shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority within 14 days of the
test date together with any details of mitigation should the units not achieve
the required overall rating figure of -10dB below the background noise level
(L90) at 1 metre from the boundary of the nearest noise sensitive receptor at
day and night. Any mitigation identified within the submission shall be
undertaken within 14 days of the date of submission of the results with further
acoustic measurements submitted to the Local Planning Authority for approval
in writing.
Reason:
To safeguard residential amenity and to ensure compliance with the terms of
Policy MD2 (Design of New Development) and MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the adopted Local Development Plan.
Reason for decision
The decision to recommend planning permission has been taken in accordance with
Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires that,
in determining a planning application the determination must be in accordance with
the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The
Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local
Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National Plan 2040.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the report and appendices, together with the views of the Governance
and Audit Committee, be noted.
(2) T H A T the Council’s response to the Panel Performance Assessment be
approved.
Reasons for decisions
(1) Having regard to the contents of the report, the views of the Governance and
Audit Committee and the discussions held at the meeting.
(2) To comply with the requirement for the Council to publish its response and
action upon recommendations arising from the Panel Performance Assessment.
VALE 2030 – DRAFT VALE OF GLAMORGAN CORPORATE PLAN 2025-30 (REF)
The Leader presented the draft Corporate Plan which had been shared with all
Scrutiny Committees and subject to significant consultation. They outlined there
were five well-being objectives which would help both the residents, Council and
partners to improve well-being in the Vale of Glamorgan. The Leader drew attention
to two key elements of the report, the first being what had changed as a result of
consultation, and secondly, how the Council would work with partners in the future.
Councillor Carroll did not feel that the Corporate Plan would improve performance,
as there was not an emphasis on providing the best service for the best price, a
concern that he had previously raised at Corporate Performance and Resources
Scrutiny Committee. He stated that the Plan’s focus should be on improving
productivity and ensuring value for money, and referenced that equality, diversity,
and inclusion were mentioned a significant amount of times.
Councillor Haynes indicated that he found the document disturbing. He stated that
what was happening in St. Athan, such as building on land, was against this
strategy, and believed placemaking should be the priority.
Councillor Hooper reflected that there was a huge value in diversity, which the
Council should be supporting. He felt blanket statements around equalities and
productivity were false and could not be applied to public sector. He also
emphasised the need to reshape services and the need to do the same things more
efficiently.
Councillor Wilson stated that he felt the Plan reflected the values of the Council, and
there were lots of references to operational services such as recycling, waste and
green spaces. He shared that he was proud of the Corporate Plan which was
ambitious to residents.
Councillor Dr. Johnson acknowledged that there had been a number of iterations of
the Plan, which was better for it. He felt the Plan was ambitious in achieving its aims
and objectives, and that the challenge would be in delivering this Plan. He stated
that there needed to be clear financial resources to achieve its aims, and hopefully in
five years the Council would be able to say it had achieved the objectives of the
Plan. He also stated that there needed to be alignment between the Corporate Plan
objectives and scrutiny structure. Councillor Dr. Johnson also reflected on previous
comments surrounding equalities and suggested that this incorrect information may
be due to a misarticulation of the Equality Impact Assessment information and
advised that better analysis should be undertaken before presenting as fact.
Councillor Sivagnanam was very proud to support an ambitious Plan with how the
Council supported residents, believed this would help to create a more equal Vale of
Glamorgan, what was the focus on helping the most disadvantaged. She also
reflected upon some of the Council's work on improvement equality such as its Age
Friendly status and Her Voice Wales project.
Councillor John was delighted to support the Plan and urged people to read it as it
contains a lot of information. He also offered thanks to officers.
Councillor Cave shared that they did not feel things in the in the Council were even
more equal. For example, the building on green sites despite opposition and the
inability to replace the village hall roof. They also reflected upon the need to use
technology to improve services.
Councillor Hodges stated that a Corporate Plan required funding, and was
concerned that the economy was not improving to support. He felt that tourism tax
and devolving the Crown Estate were opportunities to increase funding.
Councillor Perry highlighted the limited investment in the future such as green
technology and active travel. He also identified rural poverty, which existed in the
Vale. He felt the Town and Community Councils could be doing more and taking on
additional responsibilities. Councillor Perry also questioned if the Plan was adding
value or if this would be delivered anyway. He also emphasised the need for more
diversity and increased opinions, including communicating cross party, as there were
talented people who could influence policy.
The Leader responded that there were a range of unique services delivered by the
Council, which would cost significant sums to deliver, so they were not able to be
outsourced. They also shared a Place Making Toolkit which could be used by all
Members to support placemaking within communities. The Leader also
acknowledge that not all Members’ talents were being utilised and considered this a
key part of scrutiny proposals, and emphasised that the Plan and all Members
needed to be ambitious for the residents of the Vale of Glamorgan.
A recorded vote took place on the recommendations as contained within the report,
as follows:
Members For Against Abstain
Anne Asbrey √
Julie Aviet √
Gareth Ball √
Rhiannon Birch √
Bronwen Brooks √
Gillian Bruce √
Ian Buckley √
Lis Burnett √
Samantha Campbell √
George Carroll √
Christine Cave √
Charles Champion
Janice Charles √
Millie Collins √
Marianne Cowpe √
Pamela Drake √
Vincent Driscoll √
Anthony Ernest √
Christopher Franks √
Wendy Gilligan √
Russell Godfrey √
Emma Goodjohn √
Ewan Goodjohn √
Stephen Haines √
Sally Hanks √
William Hennessy √
Nic Hodges √
Mark Hooper √
Catherine Iannucci-Williams √
Gwyn John √
Dr. Ian Johnson √
Susan Lloyd-Selby √
Belinda Loveluck-Edwards √
Julie Lynch-Wilson √
Kevin Mahoney √
Naomi Marshallsea √
Michael Morgan √
Jayne Norman √
Helen Payne √
Sandra Perkes √
Ian Perry √
Joanna Protheroe √
Ruba Sivagnanam √
Carys Stallard √
Neil Thomas √
Rhys Thomas √
Steffan Wiliam √
Margaret Wilkinson √
Eddie Williams √
Mark Wilson √
Nicholas Wood √
TOTAL 37 13
The vote being carried, it was
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Vale 2030 draft Corporate Plan (Appendix A to the report) be
approved.
(2) T H A T delegated authority be granted to the Director of Corporate
Resources, in consultation with the Executive Leader and Cabinet Member for
Performance and Resources, to make any factual updates to the content of the Plan
prior to publication (for example, information relating to budgetary information).
Reasons for decisions
(1) Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions held at the
meeting.
(2) To ensure the Corporate Plan, ‘Vale 2030’ when published, contained the
most up to date information available (for example information regarding the budget
for 2025-26).
N.B. Councillor Champion was not present for the vote.
CAPITAL STRATEGY AND INVESTMENT PROGRAMME 2025/26 TO 2029/30 (REF)
The Leader outlined the proposed strategy for the Capital Programme which had
been developed on the basis of varying factors such as annual settlements, capital
receipts and the impact of the wider labour market. They outlined that the proposal
was a mixture of grant and borrowing, and an increase from previous years, which
was expected to be £434m in the coming years, of which a significant proportion
related to schools and housing.
Councillor Dr. Johnson indicated support for the Capital Strategy with the majority
belonging to building Council housing or schools, which Plaid Cymru supported. He
reflected upon the challenge of year-on-year confirmation from Welsh Government
surrounding funding making it a challenge to plan for the future.
Councillor Perkes welcomed the Strategy as housing was key, and there had been
significant achievements, such as the building of 82 new homes, and the upcoming
partnership with Cardiff Council, which offered the opportunity to build more for less.
They shared that they felt a decent life was the first step to success in life.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Capital Strategy 2025/26, as set out in Appendix 1 to the report,
be approved.
(2) T H A T the final Capital Programme for the years 2025/26 to 2029/30, as set
out in Appendix 2 to the report, be approved.
(3) T H A T Officers be granted delegated authority to vire £10k or below between
schemes that were already approved within the five year Capital Programme.
(4) T H A T the Chief Executive and the Head of Finance / Section 151 Officer, in
consultation with the Executive Leader and Cabinet Member for Performance and
Resources, be granted delegated authority to make additions, deletions or transfers
to or from the:
i. 2025/26 to 2029/30 Housing Improvement Programme as appropriate.
ii. 2025/26 to 2029/30 Asset Renewal budgets as appropriate.
iii. S106 funded schemes subject to Member consultation as required
under the existing process.
iv. Decarbonisation Schemes.
v. Building Strong Communities Fund schemes.
vi. Sustainable Communities for Learning programme.
vii. Discretionary Adaption Grant Schemes.
viii. Vale Regeneration Schemes.
ix. Shared Prosperity Fund.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To approve the Capital Strategy for 2025/26.
(2) To set and approve future Capital Programmes to 2029/30.
(3) To enable officers to progress schemes more quickly where low value
virements below £10k were required.
(4) To enable the Housing Improvement Programme budget, Asset Renewal
budgets, S106 schemes, Decarbonisation Schemes, Building Stronger Communities
Fund, Sustainable Communities for Learning programme, Discretionary Adaption
Grant Schemes, Vale Regeneration schemes and Shared Prosperity Fund to be
managed effectively.
TREASURY MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT STRATEGY 2025/26 AND UPDATE FOR 2024/25 (REF)
The Leader presented an overview of treasury management as the need to
demonstrate financial sustainability was important, and that Members should have
recently undertaking training surrounding this area. They shared around revised
estimates in expenditure, and wider prudential indicators, and outlined the Council’s
borrowing position and wider investments.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the revised policy for making Minimum Revenue Provision from
2024/25 onwards be approved.
(2) T H A T the proposed 2025/26 Treasury Management and Investment
Strategy be approved, including the following specific resolutions (detailed in
Appendix 2 to the report):
• The Authorised Limit for External Debt be set at £265.394m for
2024/25, £296.207m for 2025/26, £331.078m for 2026/27 and
£381.753m for 2027/28.
• The Operational Boundary for External Debt be set at £244.170m for
2024/25, £263.914m for 2025/26, £297.677m for 2026/27 and
£347.407m for 2027/28.
• The Head of Finance/Section 151 Officer be given delegated authority
within the total Authorised Limit and Operational Boundary as
estimated for individual years to effect movement between the
separately agreed limits for borrowing and other long-term liabilities.
• An upper limit of £0m for 2024/25, £10m in 2025/26, £10m in 2026/27
and £10m in 2027/28 be set for total principal sums invested for over
364 days.
• The amount of projected borrowing that was fixed rate maturing in each
period as a percentage of total projected borrowing that was fixed rate
be set as shown below (and further detailed in Appendix 1 to the
report).
Table 1 – Upper and lower Limits for fixed rate borrowing
Upper Limit Lower Limit
Under 12 months 20% 0%
12 months and within 24 months 40% 0%
24 months and within 5 years 40% 0%
5 years and within 10 years 40% 0%
10 years and above 100% 0%
• Any breaches of the Prudential Indicators would be reported through to the
next meeting of Cabinet, with the exception of the Authorised Limit for
External Debt which would require prior Full Council approval.
(3) T H A T the Treasury Management Policy Statement set out in Appendix 3 to
the report be approved.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To agree the basis of the Minimum Revenue Provision calculation for 2024/25
onwards.
(2) In order for the Treasury Management and Annual Investment Strategy as
prepared be approved as required by the Local Government Act 2003.
(3) In order for the Treasury Management Policy Statement to be approved.
DRAFT BUDGET 2025/26 AND MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN 2025/26 TO 2029/30 (REF)
The Leader presented an overview of the proposed budget for 2025/26, and shared
that this was based on the settlement received from Welsh Government, which is the
second lowest per head in Wales. They outlined that the proposed increase in
Council Tax was 5.9%, which is generally lower than the Welsh average for the
upcoming year, and a percentage point less than consulted upon due to late
changes in the settlement from Welsh Government. They outlined how Schools and
Social Care are still allocated the majority (71%) of the budget, but that these areas
need to be supported and align the Corporate Plan’s well-being objectives of “Best
Start in Life” and “Supporting the Most Vulnerable”. They also reflected that there is
still a budget gap, which will need to be supported by transformational activity (via
Reshaping programme) and a series of savings, which are supported by equality
impact assessments, that reserves continue to be held in accordance with legislation
and that they will continue to work with Welsh Government surrounding future multi-
year settlements to support longer term planning.
Councillor Dr. Johnson thanked staff for work on supporting a complex budget and to
WLGA in their lobbying role. They also highlighted how the budget proposed
spending increases and cuts to non-statutory services, emphasising that they felt
austerity was not over. They indicated that the future reorganisation of Scrutiny was
essential in monitoring resources and financial proposals moving forward and
indicated that the settlement for the Fire and Rescue Service should be undertaken
separately as they were responsible for their own budgets, in a similar means to
Town and Community Council currently set their budgets.
Councillor Carroll indicated that they felt the budget was a reflection of
mismanagement, with residents paying “more for less”, such as car parking and
waste collection. They also felt that the Council were focusing upon the wrong things
such as bureaucratic work and diversity, equality and inclusion, and not its core
purpose. They also believed that the proposed budget would have a negative impact
to residents, and that the increase proposed was above CPI. They further explained
that they felt the issue of productivity was not being taken seriously, and that
efficiencies need to be identified as the Council has lost control of its finances, needs
a change in administration and should use its reserves to keep the Council Tax rate
low.
Councillor Franks felt that there has been a failure from the Administration in
lobbying for an increase settlement, and more needed to be done to influence
government as to how the Council could have the required budget to meet its needs.
They queried if savings had been properly costed and impact assessed, as he felt
this budget had failed to convince the public surrounding its robustness and value.
They also questioned the longer-term sustainability of the budget and cited the
proposed reduction in the education as a concern.
Councillor Goodjohn shared that the budget in theory was a real terms increase in
Council spend, and that it was necessary for the Council to fund changes impacted
by an aging population and additional learning needs, as there needed to be a
significant improvement in public services.
Councillor Hooper queried how car parking charges proposals were reflected within
the budget, as it was still in a consultative stage, and emphasised the impact to local
businesses and communities. They indicated how they believed this was an austerity
budget reflective of wider Welsh Government and UK Government positions. They
also reflected upon the importance of Council’s role in supporting diversity, equality
and inclusion.
Councillor Hodges highlighted the potential 700,000 disabled people who may go
into poverty due to welfare reform, and how the Council would need to support these
people. They raised the issue of a lack of A&E facility within the County, impacting
upon people’s health, and expressed how Welsh Government were struggling to
come to terms with issues as highlighted through the budget. They also expressed
limited faith in opposition leadership, as he felt comments to be disingenuous.
Councillor Perry indicated that they felt we were still living in austerity and seeing
rises in poverty. They expressed that recent reductions to overseas aid budgets
highlighted how it was easy to pick on vulnerable people. They raised that they felt
Council Tax to be regressive and impacted less well-off people more. They also
stated that there needed to be more planning for the future and consideration of the
new ideas and technologies.
Councillor Wilson indicated that the Council was productive, reflecting upon class
size ratios and social care workloads, and indicated that the Council was not a
sweatshop environment with bizarre productivity targets. They shared that removing
bins did not have a catastrophic impact and it only affected a small number of bins
(approximately 160) where they were looking at recycling bins, whereas changes to
care might have a more significant impact and emphasised that Cabinet were trying
to transform the Council to be as effective and efficient as possible.
The Leader responded that any changes to how the process for the Fire and Rescue
Service worked would be minimal and have no material impact to residents, whilst
sharing around the lobbying work undertaken at National level, such as appearing at
Committees. They agreed that future Scrutiny arrangements would help with some of
the queries raised, as the review was focused upon outcomes. The Leader finally
reflected that working with the local MP in partnership had helped raised awareness
of reporting mechanisms for pot holes.
A recorded vote took place on the recommendations as contained within the report
as follows:
Members For Against Abstain
Anne Asbrey √
Julie Aviet √
Gareth Ball √
Rhiannon Birch √
Bronwen Brooks √
Gillian Bruce √
Ian Buckley √
Lis Burnett √
Samantha Campbell √
George Carroll √
Christine Cave √
Janice Charles √
Millie Collins √
Marianne Cowpe √
Pamela Drake √
Vincent Driscoll √
Anthony Ernest √
Christopher Franks √
Wendy Gilligan √
Russell Godfrey √
Emma Goodjohn √
Ewan Goodjohn √
Stephen Haines √
Sally Hanks √
William Hennessy √
Nic Hodges √
Mark Hooper √
Catherine Iannucci-Williams √
Gwyn John √
Dr. Ian Johnson √
Susan Lloyd-Selby √
Belinda Loveluck-Edwards √
Julie Lynch-Wilson √
Kevin Mahoney √
Naomi Marshallsea √
Michael Morgan √
Jayne Norman √
Helen Payne √
Sandra Perkes √
Ian Perry √
Joanna Protheroe √
Ruba Sivagnanam √
Carys Stallard √
Neil Thomas √
Rhys Thomas √
Steffan Wiliam √
Margaret Wilkinson √
Eddie Williams √
Mark Wilson √
Nicholas Wood √
TOTAL 28 22
The vote being carried, it was
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T a Council Tax increase of 5.9% be approved.
(2) T H A T the budget for 2025/26, as set out in the report, be approved.
Reasons for decisions
(1) Setting the annual rate of Council Tax was a key policy decision for Council.
(2) Setting a balanced budget was a statutory responsibility and decision for Full
Council.
PAY POLICY 2025/26 (REF)
The Leader presented the Pay Policy, which outlined how employees should be fairly
rewarded for duties, which had changed incrementally based on wider changes.
They also acknowledged the reduction of the gender pay gap, and the multiple
between lowest and highest paid was encouraging.
RESOLVED – T H A T the Council’s Pay Policy, as attached at Appendix A to the
report to Cabinet on 6th February 2025 (Minute No. C247), be approved.
Reason for decision
To respond to the legal requirements under the Local Authorities (Standing Orders)
(Wales) Amendment Regulations 2014, the Local Government (Wales) Act 2015 and
related advice from the Welsh Government as well as provide openness and
accountability in relation to how the Council rewards its staff.
N.B. All Chief Officers, save for two Democratic and Scrutiny Services Officers
servicing the meeting and the Head of Human Resources and Organisational
Development, left the meeting when this item was considered. The Head of
Human Resources and Organisational Development remained in the meeting,
until the matter was to be voted upon, in order to provide any clarification
required by Elected Members.
RESOLVED: That the Chairperson writes to the Cabinet Member on behalf of the Committee expressing their comments and observations captured during the way forward.
Abertawe, Panel Perfformiad Craffu - Gwella Gwasanaethau, Adfywio a Chyllid,
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee,
the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary
action be taken.
2023/00285/RG3 Received on 25 April 2023
(p.112)
APPLICANT: Vale of Glamorgan Council Kelly Williams, Sustainable
Communities for Learning, Civic Offices, Holton Road, Barry, CF63 4RU
AGENT: The Urbanists Mr. Mark Farrar, The Creative Quarter, 8a, Morgan
Arcade, Cardiff, CF10 1AF
St. Richard Gwyn RC High School, Argae Lane, St. Andrews Major
Proposed replacement St. Richard Gwyn Catholic High School including access,
parking, landscape works, formal and informal recreation space, and demolition of
the existing school.
A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations
within the report as amended, with the results as follows:
Member For Against Abstain
G. Bruce √
I. Buckley √
C.A. Cave √
C. Champion √
M. Cowpe √
P. Drake √
A. Ernest √
W. Gilligan
N.P. Hodges √
Dr. I.J. Johnson √
H. Payne √
S. Perkes √
I. Perry √
C. Stallard √
N. Thomas √
E. Williams √
M.R. Wilson √
TOTAL 15 1 0
Minutes - MS
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report as set out
on the Matters Arising note.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2023/00491/FUL Received on 7 August 2023
(p.179)
APPLICANT: Mr Sean Mayor, 1st Floor, Wellington House, Wellington Street,
Cardiff, CF11 9BE
AGENT: Mr Sean Mayor, 1st Floor, Wellington House, Wellington Street, Cardiff,
CF11 9BE
Port Road West, Rhoose
Dog Adventure Land proposes to repurpose this site for a new dog daycare centre
as part of their plans for growth in South Wales. We are proposing for the site to
be used for grooming and outdoor/indoor daycare. The site will be fenced off to
secure the perimeter, create a large carpark for staff and visitor on the existing
hard standing, fencing the fields into sections for dogs to be safely and securely
exercised in and providing educational course to the public. We would require the
land to have a change of use from B1,B2 & B8 to Sui Generis.
A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations
within the report as amended, with the results as follows:
Member For Against Abstain
G. Bruce √
I. Buckley √
C.A. Cave √
C. Champion √
M. Cowpe √
P. Drake √
A. Ernest √
W. Gilligan
N.P. Hodges √
Dr. I.J. Johnson √
H. Payne √
S. Perkes √
I. Perry √
C. Stallard √
Minutes - MS
N. Thomas √
E. Williams √
M.R. Wilson √
TOTAL 15 1 0
REFUSED – For the reasons set out in the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2023/00577/FUL Received on 26 January 2024
(p.193)
APPLICANT: Harris and Ford Ltd., Fonmon Castle, Fonmon, CF62 3ZN
AGENT: Mr Geraint John Office 16 (House 1, 2nd Floor), The Maltings, East
Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF24 5EA
Fonmon Castle, Fonmon
Creation of 9 off-line ponds within the floodplain.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2023/00826/FUL Received on 20 March 2024
(p.208)
APPLICANT: Former Darren Farm, Westgate, Cowbridge, CF717AQ
AGENT: David Williams 1 Embankment Way, Ringwood , BH24 1EU
Darren Farm, Westgate, Cowbridge
Redevelopment of site incorporating the erection of a Class B1 office building and
a retirement living scheme for older people with communal lounge, refuse, guest
suite, electric buggy, and house manager accommodation. Associated car parking
with electric charging points, cycle storage realigned vehicular access, sub station,
retaining walls, sustainable drainage and landscaped grounds.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report including
subject to Section 106 Agreement and subject to variation as set out on the
matters arising note that a ‘Viability Review’ be included in the Heads of Terms of
the Section 106 Agreement.
Minutes - MS
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2023/01265/FUL Received on 19 December 2023
(p.270)
APPLICANT: Welsh Water Linea, Fortran Road, St Mellons, Cardiff. CF3 0LT
AGENT: Miss Chloe Jones Arcadis Cymru House, St Mellons Business Park,
Fortran Road, Cardiff. CF30EY
Sewage Disposal Works, Brook Lane, St. Nicholas
Full planning permission was sought for the expansion of the existing Waste
Water Treatment Works to include the following: Inlet Works, Trickling Filter,
Buried Humus Tanks, Sludge Holding Tank, Motor Control Centre Kiosk, Reed
Bed, Reed Bed Blower Kiosk, Alkalinity Dosing Kiosk, Trickling Filter Distribution
Chamber, De-sludge Pumps and Slabs, Landscaping, Internal Access Road,
Lighting, along with a Temporary Contractor’s Compound and Construction
Access.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report and subject
to variation to Condition 11 as set out on the matters arising note.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
Minutes - MS
Abertawe, Pwyllgor Trawsnewid Gwasanaethau Newid yn yr Hinsawdd ac Adfer Natur,
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the
following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be
taken.
2020/01170/OUT Received on 14 October 2020
(P. 1)
APPLICANT: Welsh Government Land Division, Permanent Secretary's Group,
Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3NQ
AGENT: Ms Catherine Blyth Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park,
Cardiff, CF23 8RS
Land at Upper Cosmeston Farm, Lavernock Road, Penarth
Outline application for residential development, a primary school, community space
and public open space with all matters reserved other than access.
A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations
within the report, with the results as follows:
No.
Members For Against Abstain
G. Bruce
I.R. Buckley √
C.A. Cave
C.E.A. Champion √
C.M. Cowpe √
P. Drake √
A.M. Ernest √
W. Gilligan √
N.P. Hodges √
Dr. I.J. Johnson √
H.M. Payne √
S.D. Perkes √
I.A.N. Perry
C. Stallard √
N.C. Thomas √
E. Williams √
M.R. Wilson √
TOTAL 12 2
RESOLVED – T H A T subject to the applicant entering into a Section 106
agreement to provide for the following (based on 576 dwellings):
• Procure that 40% (up to 231) of the dwellings built on the site pursuant to the
planning permission are built and thereafter maintained as affordable housing
units in perpetuity.
• Pay a contribution of £1,324,800 towards sustainable transport improvements.
No.
• Pay a financial contribution towards education requirements arising from the
development of £6,476,088, in addition to the transfer of the 1ha school site to
the Council.
• Provision of suitable open space within the confines of the site (inclusive of 1
x NEAP, 3 x LEAPs and 4 x LAPs).
• Pay 1% of project budget towards public art.
• Cliff monitoring contribution of £59,150
• To provide community facilities of circa 0.1-0.2 hectares within the
development
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2023/00032/FUL Received on 27 January 2023
(P. 79)
APPLICANT: Biomass UK No.2 Limited -, -,
AGENT: Mr Philip Murphy 21 Soho Square, London, W1D 3QP
Barry Biomass Renewable Energy Facility, David Davies Road, Barry
Retrospective full planning permission for development comprising a wood fired
renewable energy plant and associated structures without complying with Condition
5 (Drawings) attached to planning permission 2015/00031/OUT.
A recorded vote was called for the Application, based upon whether Members were
for or against Rejection of the Application, with the results as follows:
Members For Against Abstain
G. Bruce
I.R. Buckley √
C.A. Cave √
C.E.A. Champion √
C.M. Cowpe √
P. Drake √
A.M. Ernest
W. Gilligan √
No.
N.P. Hodges √
Dr. I.J. Johnson √
H.M. Payne √
S.D. Perkes √
I.A.N. Perry √
C. Stallard √
N.C. Thomas √
E. Williams √
M.R. Wilson √
TOTAL 13 2
REFUSED – Subject to the following reasons:
(1) The unauthorised addition of the ancillary structures, minor alterations, and
associated layout changes including:- a Lean-to Fuel Reception Building, lean-to
Compressor House, urea Silo, externally mounted discharge Incline conveyor,
screening tower and dust extraction plant, emergency diesel generator and fire
kiosk, fire water tank and pump house, amendment to stack width and an
enlargement to the noise attenuator located at the base of the chimney stack; have
detrimentally affected the appearance of the development over and above that
approved in 2015 and will harm the amenity of nearby residential properties in both
the Waterfront and Dock View Road. The Development is accordingly contrary to
policies MD 2 (Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development Within
Settlement Boundaries) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan.
(2) The applicant has failed to demonstrate that there will not be adverse
environmental impacts because the EIA fails to adequately and fully assess the
impacts regarding waste; particularly as there is no specific chapter dealing with this
key issue. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New
Developments), MD 7 (Environmental Protection) and MD 20 (Assessment of waste
Management Proposals) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting.
No.
2023/00033/FUL Received on 24 January 2023
(P. 130)
APPLICANT: Biomass UK No. 2 Ltd., c/o Agent, -, -
AGENT: Mr Philip Murphy, 21, Soho Square, London, W1D 3QP
Land to the North of Barry Biomass Renewable Energy Facility, David Davies
Road, Barry
Retrospective planning permission for external storage, vehicle turning and vehicle
layover, and perimeter fencing for use in association with the adjacent renewable
energy plant.
A recorded vote was called for the Application, based upon whether Members were
for or against Rejection of the Application, with the results as follows:
Members For Against Abstain
G. Bruce √
I.R. Buckley √
C.A. Cave √
C.E.A. Champion √
C.M. Cowpe √
P. Drake √
A.M. Ernest
W. Gilligan √
N.P. Hodges √
Dr. I.J. Johnson √
H.M. Payne √
S.D. Perkes √
I.A.N. Perry √
C. Stallard √
N.C. Thomas √
No.
E. Williams
M.R. Wilson √
TOTAL 15
REFUSED – Subject to the following reasons:
1. The proposal comprises an integral and operational part of the wider
development which, by reason of the unauthorised ancillary structures, minor
alterations, and associated layout changes that include:- a Lean-to Fuel Reception
Building, lean-to Compressor House, urea Silo, externally mounted discharge Incline
conveyor, screening tower and dust extraction plant, emergency diesel generator
and fire kiosk, fire water tank and pump house, amendment to stack width and an
enlargement to the noise attenuator located at the base of the chimney stack; has
detrimentally affected the appearance of the development over and above that
approved in 2015 and will harm the amenity of nearby residential properties in both
the Waterfront and Dock View Road. The Development is accordingly contrary to
policies MD 2 (Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development Within
Settlement Boundaries) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan.
2. The proposal comprises an integral and operational part of the wider
development, which is not supported by adequate information to demonstrate that
there would not be adverse environmental impacts (due to the EIA failing to assess
fully the impacts regarding waste, particularly as there is no specific chapter dealing
with this key issue). The proposal is therefore contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of
New Developments), MD 7 (Environmental Protection) and MD 20 (Assessment of
waste Management Proposals) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local
Development Plan.
Reason for decisions
Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2023/00895/FUL Received on 17 January 2024
(P. 156)
APPLICANT: Mr Huw Llewellyn Great House Farm, Penllyn, Cowbridge, CF71 7RQ
AGENT: Ms Bethan Evans Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park,
Cardiff, CF23 8RS
Great House Farm, Penllyn
Proposed change of use from agricultural use to glamping visitor accommodation
comprising 3 yurts, separate kitchen units and conversion of the existing barn to a
shower block and farm storage.
A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations
within the report, with the results as follows:
No.
Members For Against Abstain
G. Bruce √
I.R. Buckley √
C.A. Cave √
C.E.A. Champion √
C.M. Cowpe √
P. Drake √
A.M. Ernest
W. Gilligan √
N.P. Hodges √
Dr. I.J. Johnson
H.M. Payne √
S.D. Perkes √
I.A.N. Perry √
C. Stallard √
N.C. Thomas √
E. Williams
M.R. Wilson √
TOTAL 13 1
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the policy with regard to not granting any level of discount for
unoccupied dwellings that have remained so for 6 months agreed for 2023-24,
be agreed for 2024-25.
(2) T H A T the long term empty property premium of 100% be agreed for
the 2023-24 financial year and continue for such properties from 2024-25 that
remain so for the period up to (but not including) 24 months.
(3) T H A T from 1st April, 2024 a premium of 150% be introduced for long
term empty properties that have remained as such for a continuous period of
24 months or more.
(4) T H A T from 1st April, 2025 a premium of 200% be introduced for long
term empty properties that have remained as such for a continuous period of
36 months or more.
(5) T H A T the policy to introduce a premium of 100% on second homes
for the 2024-25 financial year be agreed and reaffirmed.
Reasons for decisions
(1) The Council was required to determine its policy on discounts in
relation to unoccupied dwellings as defined in classes A, B and C to the
Council Tax (Prescribed Class of Dwellings) (Wales) Regulations 1998 each
year.
(2&4) The Council was required to determine its policy regarding premiums in
respect of long-term empty properties as defined in Sections 12A and 12B of
the Local Government Finance Act 1992 as inserted by the Housing (Wales)
Act 2014.
No.
(3) Upon reviewing the implementation of the premium for long term empty
properties introduced from the start of 1st April 2023, it was felt that a straight
increase to the premium levels as previously proposed, may counteract the
intention of the policy, which was to bring long term empty properties back
into use, if the level of charges due hindered necessary works required to
make a dwelling habitable. As such it was felt that a stepped approach would
be more in keeping with the policy to ensure that persistent long term empty
properties were targeted.
(5) The Council was required to determine its policy regarding premiums in
respect of second homes as defined in Sections 12A and 12B of the Local
Government Finance Act1992 as inserted by the Housing (Wales) Act 2014.
CORPORATE FRAUD ENFORCEMENT POLICY (REF)
Cabinet had considered the report on 25th January, 2024 (Minute No. C220)
together with the reference from Governance and Audit Committee of
11th December, 2023 (Minute No. 636) and had referred the same to Council
for consideration and approval. Having regard to the contents of the report
and the previous discussions at the meeting earlier in the meeting in respect
of the report titled amendments to the Constitution, it was subsequently
RESOLVED – T H A T the report and the Officer Delegation Scheme and
relevant provisions within the current Constitution be updated to reflect the
changes referred to in the report and as considered earlier in the agenda
under the Amendments to the Constitution report.
Reason for decision
To update the Officer Delegation Scheme and relevant provisions within the
current Constitution to reflect the changes outlined within the report and as
considered under an earlier report in the agenda.
DRAFT VALE OF GLAMORGAN COUNCIL ANNUAL DELIVERY PLAN 2024-25 (REF)
Cabinet had considered the report on 22nd February, 2024 (Minute No. C248
refers) and had referred the same to Council for consideration and approval.
The Leader took the opportunity to remind Members that the initial draft had
been considered by Cabinet and the Scrutiny Committees with the amended
draft coming back to Cabinet and to the Corporate Performance and
Resources Scrutiny Committee. Members had stated that they had been
pleased with the way the report had been presented which demonstrated how
their feedback had been included, with Members also being able to easily see
where the changes had been made.
There being no further comments, it was
No.
RESOLVED – T H A T the draft Annual Delivery Plan 2024-25, as attached at
Appendix A to the report to Cabinet on 22nd February, 2024 (Minute No.
C248), be approved.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting.
DRAFT BUDGET 2024/25 AND MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN 2024/25 TO 2028/29 (REF)
The Leader advised that the proposals had been published at the end of the
previous week, prior to the availability of Welsh Government ‘s settlement
figures. There had been no changes to the overall settlement following that
announcement but there was additional detail regarding the Standard
Spending Assessment that was subsequently detailed in the supplementary
information that had been distributed to all Members and published online
prior to the Cabinet meeting on 29th February, 2024.
The Council faced significant financial pressures in excess of £38m initially
and had undertaken significant work to mitigate those pressures. As a result,
it had not been possible to fund pay awards in full and there were limited
resources to meet the full demands of care providers to fully meet
demographic growth and the complexity of services required.
A 3.4% increase in the grant received by the Council from Welsh Government
alongside the proposed 6.7% increase in Council Tax fell short of meeting the
additional costs.
There would be a further UK budget announcement on the same day the
report would be considered by Full Council, and it remained to be seen if
there would be any further funding made available for Local Government, but
it was not expected there would be any further matters for Council to consider
on 6th March.
Consultation on how to allocate the available resources had taken place,
including a 4-week public budget consultation, consideration by the five
Council Scrutiny Committees and the ‘Life in the Vale’ survey where residents
were asked for their views on what they expected from the Council, where
residents were supportive of the ambition to target resources to social care,
affordable housing and schools and less supportive of any Council Tax
increase and increase in discretionary charges by the rate of inflation.
Council Tax levels in the Vale of Glamorgan were below the Welsh average
and below the level of expected rises for many Authorities across Wales, with
10% or more having been proposed by some.
No.
There had been in-depth discussions at Scrutiny but no alternatives put
forward prior to consideration at Full Council, where it was difficult to take
proposals on board at that point and achieve a balanced budget as was the
legal requirement for the Authority to do, but there would be a full debate at
Full Council on the day.
The proposal concerning charging for toilets at coastal areas had been
removed as Members felt that was not something they could support and the
£5k saving would be found elsewhere. The next year’s £7.7m savings
programme was mostly tactical and looked at how to provide and deliver
services more effectively, along with some transformational initiatives, as
having another multi-million pound savings programme next year would be
challenging.
The Leader further commented that the Cabinet and officers had been
working on the budget since June 2023. In July 2023 Cabinet had referred
the Financial Strategy to all Scrutiny Committees and November had brought
the refreshed Medium Term Financial Plan. Christmas had been cancelled
for a lot of the officers and a number of Cabinet Members. The things that it
had hoped to do were no longer possible until the funding gap could be
reduced to a reasonable level. In January 2024 the draft budget was
presented to all Scrutiny Committees which were attended by the Cabinet
Members who had listened to the discussions. There were some things she
said that were unpalatable, not liked and had reluctantly been accepted but
one recommendation had been made which had been accepted by Cabinet
that the proposed charges to Coastal toilets be removed.
The budget this evening, she said, proposed for a balanced budget, which
was required to be delivered by 11th March, considerations for which had
included the money that the Council would receive from Council Tax and as
the Council wanted to continue to support bus services and not make car
parking charges on streets etc., a 6.7% Council Tax was being proposed.
The budget was also she said based on supporting the Council’s most
vulnerable.
In referring to the recent Living in the Vale Survey she said the top priority for
residents had been easy accessibility to care and health care, the second
priority the ability to buy or rent a good quality home. The cost of living crisis
had also not gone away, in the feedback received 60% of respondents said
that they had chosen not to put the heating on at times, and 44% of them said
that they could not pay an unexpected bill of £850, so if their boiler went that
would be it.
There were a number of pressures for the Council, pressures in terms of
demography not just numbers of people but the complexity and scale of need,
people's lives and lived experience were hugely diverse in the Vale and as a
result the need was hugely diverse. Since the pandemic the Council was
aware that older residents had become more isolated, more frail and required
more care. Young people were struggling with anxiety and there were
behavioural issues across the Vale with the Council having to consider a
No.
range of ways to meet such needs. Service redesigns were being considered
and looking for ways to do things more effectively. Reviews of the street
cleansing service, litter etc, would be undertaken as well as transformational
change. The Leader referred to other areas of good work that had taken
place, which had included reshaping of the Library services, Big Fresh was
also delivering not only Universal Free School Meals to primary children, but
also delivering a surplus that can be reinvested into schools. Income
generation was being considered as well as generating income from fees and
charges for non-statutory services. However although the financial position
was difficult the Council, through its proposed budget, was still delivering
many services.
The Leader also referred to other aspects of Council provision such as each
week 105 recycling rounds were out in the communities with each vehicle
collecting from 550 properties a day. As a result over 850 articulated lorries
full of material that could be sold or reused with this year forecasting income
of between £1.2m and £1.4m from processing recycling at the new recycling
facility. With the support of residents the Council had managed to deliver over
a 70% recycling outcome being one of the top in Wales, one of the top in the
UK and actually one of the top in Europe.
The Council also managed 30 Feature Parks, 21 Recreation Grounds, 13
Conservation Parks, 88 Play Areas and 9 Skateboard areas and has 38
football pitches, 13 mini football pitches alongside rugby pitches, cricket, etc
which are all still supported. Over the past 3 years the Council had delivered
over 177,000 meters of active travel shared use being pedestrian and cycling
paths. The Council offered child pedestrian training, delivered cycle shelters
in schools and bought bikes for schools. 20 Car Parks were owned and
controlled by the Vale with only two of the town centre car parks with a
charge. The Leader further advised that 52,567 square meters of
carriageway resurfacing had been undertaken in the year, 3,261 square
meters of footway improvements and surface water gullies had been
cleansed. The Leader concluded by stating that she would be happy to
circulate some of the information recognising that the Council was still
providing services. With regard to queries of measuring productivity that she
had heard being said at meetings, she questioned how did you choose or
measure how productive a care worker was, how did you look at productivity
when you've had a child with severe learning needs. The Council would
measure where it was appropriate to do so and she ended by presenting the
budget to Council which was duly seconded by Councillor Brooks who
reserved her right to speak later in the debate.
Councillor Carroll commenced by saying the Labour Council was asking
residents to pay more for less. He said Labour had failed to show leadership
and manage budgets properly and was therefore imposing cuts to services
and charging for things like garden waste collections. He drew attention to
the multi-million pound bus station and enquired as to how much this Authority
spent on diversity and inclusion. At the Healthy Living and Social Care
Scrutiny Committee meeting Councillor Cave had made perfectly reasonable
comments about the funding of bus services in the rural Vale but instead of
No.
addressing Councillor Cave's concerns, the Leader ‘s comments many
residents had told him they considered to be a smear with Councillor Cave
being accused of using inflammatory language. Perhaps he said the Leader
could enlighten Council as to what aspect of Councillor Cave's remarks were
considered inflammatory. He also referred to a recent report where the
Leader had stated the 2% cut in National Insurance contributions announced
in November by the Conservative UK Government was disappointing and that
she had confirmed that this Council opposed tax cuts for millions of working
people with he said his only assumption from those comments was that the
Leader would oppose further tax cuts that had been announced that day.
The 6.7% rise proposed he said fitted with his view of the Administration’s
attitude that residents should pay more. The rise proposed significantly
exceeded inflation with CPI currently standing at 4%. He felt the rise was not
necessary as the Council had tens of millions of pounds in usable reserves
including £10,177mn sat in the bank in the Council Fund as a percentage of
the Authority's Revenue budget. If the Authority was to consider a real terms
freeze in Council Tax and increase it in line with inflation at 4% it would cost
£2,505m but given the amount held in Reserves it would be possible to go
further than that and to cut Council Tax in real terms, which is what he said
the Council should do. A 3% rise would cost £3.435m which he said would be
below the rate of inflation. This real terms cut stood in stark contrast to the
6.7% rise proposed by Labour and would ease the pressures on working
people across the Vale, so on behalf of the Conservative Group he proposed
an amendment to the revenue budget which would transfer £3.435m from the
Council's General Fund balances to support the base budget and he urged all
Members to support the amendment.
Councillor Charles, in seconding the amendment, said the additional income
required by the Council could well be taken from Reserves which the
taxpayers of the Vale of Glamorgan had already contributed to. She said she
believed this could be the fairest way of raising the revenue instead of
increasing the pressure on every household. The budget management of the
Council had, in her view, been mismanaged by Labour backed up Llantwit
Firsts and the people of the Vale of Glamorgan deserved better.
Councillor Dr. Johnson, speaking to the amendment by Councillor Carroll
whilst reserving his right to speak later on the proposed budget, asked after
listening to the Conservatives uncosted amendment taking money out of the
Reserves if £3.5m was taken out of the Reserves did the Conservative Group
have any idea how to return it as it would obviously be using the exact same
£3.5m next year and the year after and then the Council would be left with
nothing in the Reserves. This was not the way to run a Council, stating that
unfortunately the Conservatives had created the problems that were before
the Council. In 2010 Britain's debt was £1 trillion and now it's £2.7 trillion so
this was quite a shambles. What sort of ridiculous regime increased or cut
one country's budget based on the spending of a government in another
country. Taking a look at public spending in its entirety there was more spent
per head in London than anywhere else. A little bit higher than in Scotland
and Northern Ireland. The spending per head in London, Scotland and
No.
Northern Ireland was 500 times higher annually almost 4%, even if Wales only
received funding on an equal footing with these three it would be richer to the
tune of £1.5 billion and this was the type of money which could transform the
Vale’s local services and ensure that the Council did not need to increase
Council Tax as has been suggested, but the we don't and this was leading to
difficult decisions for all of us. Of course in Scotland the SNP Government
had used part of the additional funding to freeze Council Tax realising the
impact of the economic storm for families, but here with the challenging
budget across Wales the ordinary people must pay more a lot more to
maintain even basic services. Councillor Dr. Johnson ended by saying that
he did not accept the figures presented by the Conservative Group which had
not been costed in either a sensible or responsible manner which could be
sustained.
Councillor Wilson commented that he thought the amendment was pretty
interesting, in that we would be looking at a 3% Council Tax increase at least
where as in previous years the Conservatives had suggested no increase.
He said that in his view the Conservative Group did not have the right to talk
about financial mismanagement as Councillor Dr. Johnson had rightly said,
we have got huge issues with our debt at the moment. Referring to 2008
where he said Labour helped out the banks and stopped people running out
of money at cash points, which had happened in other places like Cyprus.
We do not need any lessons from the Conservatives about financial
management he said as in his view they didn’t have a clue how to manage the
budget.
Councillor Godfrey commented that if people were quoting facts then they
should be correct and encapsulate the whole picture including the impact of
the Ukraine war and BREXIT and he felt it quite wrong if people were not
doing that.
Councillor Hodges, in response to Councillor Godfrey’s comments, said yes
the Ukraine war and Covid had a dramatic effect on balances as did Brexit but
he felt that there was plenty of other mismanagement going on as well.
Councillor Goodjohn considered that the amendment didn’t appear to be a
very tactical solution to the Council’s issues and enquired of Councillor Carroll
as to exactly what mismanagement of the budget issues there were in the
Revenue proposals. He also asked the Conservative Leader to consider that
taking from Reserves would quite frankly cause cash flow issues in the
Council and what he would propose do in such situations as if there were
cash flow issues in the Council people would have delays in getting vital
services which would impact on their lives, being people's real lives here in
the real world rather than some abstract idea. He also took the opportunity to
remind Council of the current 10% inflation rate.
Councillor Hodges, in drawing attention to Social Care costs, said if they were
not funded what would happen going forward further, commenting that the
NHS was already struggling because of mismanagement from the
Conservative Government and its finances stating that he could not support
No.
the amendment as it had not been fully costed and would mean a cut in
schools provision and social care.
Councillor John said he could not believe what he was hearing from the
Conservative Group referring to the months of discussion on the budget that
had already taken place and that it was a good job the Council had reserves.
He mentioned other Councils, in particular Monmouth Council, who he said
did not have any Reserves to help them and their Council Tax had gone up to
7.5%.
Councillor Franks, listening with interest to Councillor Carroll’s and the
Conservative Members’ comments, said he felt that they were basically
saying that apart from them no one else could financially manage the Council
and referred to the catastrophic failures of Conservative Councils in England.
The Leader, in response, said that in her view the amendment was completely
preposterous in view of the financial position facing the Council and that she
would be voting against the amendment.
Councillor Perry said it was a shame that as Elected Members elected by the
communities that there was a lack of togetherness. He said he applauded
attempts to get rid of Council Tax or severely change it as, in his view, a land
value tax would be much fairer. He said he would not be supporting the
amendment because he believed that his residents would rather not spend
money on new tyres and suspensions on their vehicles that they would rather
if there were Reserves fix the roads and fix the other services and stop relying
on volunteers to run services and stop cheering the minority getting wealthier
and wealthier and have a more equitable society.
Following a vote on the amendment the amendment was lost it being noted
12 were in favour, 38 against and one abstention.
Councillor Dr. Johnson, speaking on the substantive Motion, said it had been
interesting to hear the conversations taking place and that some people might
almost be surprised to hear that he sympathised with the Leader of the
Council in respect of the challenge before her, but that was why Plaid did not
accept the propaganda about the Council being a great Council because the
average person did not feel this. We as a Council needed to provide on
demand services which were quickly rising as a result of lack of investment in
preventative services. We needed to consider the relationship between the
people that we served and the funding. Welsh Government added extra
funding at the last minute and that increased £25m between the provisional
and the final settlement £600,000 through to the Revenue Grant and around
£500,000 through the introduction of the K Grant where we're expecting a loss
and furthermore additional funding in the Housing Support Grant last week.
How much was still unclear but the Council intended to keep Council Tax at
the same level rather than considering a cut like last year when we received
last minute funding which the Council put in its Reserves. This year we
considered our energy savings to be too tight and so the money needed to go
to the coffers for that rather than reducing Council Tax. There was no
No.
scrutiny, and he had been to all of the meetings, there was no scrutiny which
would change the minds of those deciding Council Taxes and setting aside
funding elsewhere in the budget. He had mentioned in the past how the
Council looked after its bank balance before considering the public's needs
and of course this year the figures before us showed some spend of the
Reserves of £51m which was almost a half. Let's see if this was true because
the same types of figures which were provided to us in the past had been
incorrect. But he said there were challenges nonetheless. The public had
seen a huge cost of living rise over the last years from energy costs, everyday
shopping costs and housing costs, including 12.5% over the last two years for
people in our Council houses. He understood that the budget was tight but
said what was the purpose of Welsh Government providing extra funding for
Councils in the final settlement if it was only put into Reserves.
A number of things he said concerned him, he didn’t like the idea of the
administrative fee for residents in parking permanent zones. Of course he
stated the Council could provide any service if it forced people to pay for it.
There was not enough money for fundamental core services for residents
although he accepted that the situation was a difficult one, as was the case for
all Councils, and he expressed his concern that the mix of cuts for Council’s
consideration and the increase in Council Tax stating that between the both of
them this was not acceptable and that he would be voting against the Motion.
Councillor Brooks said the reality was that more and more Councils were
being pushed to the financial brink. More Councils had issued a Section 114
Notice in the previous year than in the previous 30 years combined which she
said was quite astounding. Welsh Government had quite rightly put the
protection of public services at the front and centre of their budget, however
the Council could not get away from the fact that their funding had been cut
for the last 14 years from the Westminster Government leaving them with no
alternative but to reduce their transfer funding for Local Authorities. The cost
of living crisis came out as a significant issue in the recent survey with 42% of
the population citing easily accessible care and health care closely followed
by the buying or renting of good quality homes. These were the issues that
really mattered to people and their priorities she said and she stood by the
commitment to protect services which supported the Council’s most
vulnerable residents. However, in conclusion she said difficult decisions had
to be made to deliver a balanced and fair budget and she was pleased that
the Council had been able to protect supported bus services as she felt many
residents in rural and deprived communities relied on the bus services.
Councillor Franks commented that the Council had heard about potholes
being filled, a bit of resurfacing, grass being cut, road gullies being emptied,
which was basically the standard work of all Councils. However, what did
surprise him a little bit was the quick reference to support for Education. He
was not sure if he had misheard but that's what he thought he heard, but our
support for education has led to a disastrous situation in our schools, we've
also heard a mention about people's priorities that was good to be reminded,
but he didn't think we heard mention of the consultation with the public which,
if his memory served him right, did not support the proposed level of increase.
No.
He wondered why we had that omission. Whereas other facts were
highlighted, he considered there to be an element of cherry-picking. In the
previous year’s budget debate almost a year to the day, the Cabinet proposed
a £2m plus cut in schools with Cabinet being warned at that time that this
would have had a terrible impact on school budgets. This was disregarded by
Labour Members who, in his view he said, cheerfully dismissed such
warnings. The result had been over 20 schools now facing a deficit budget, of
these 19 apparently indicated that there was no prospect of recovery within 3
years, however since then he understood that the situation had worsened,
both in terms of the numbers of schools and the size of the deficits. He
therefore asked how can we and the public have any faith in this year's
budget process now seeing that this year's allocation to schools would
basically be following last year's allocation. What was the situation going to
be in a year's time for our schools? What was going to be the size of the
deficits? How many schools were going to be facing at least 3 years in the
red and to add to their problems he understood that schools were going to be
asked to pay for school crossing patrols and for elements of grass cutting?
We really do need to know what the impact would be on schools in 2024/25.
What would be the accumulated overspend and what was the anticipated
overspend in the following year and he welcomed comments from the Cabinet
Member for Education on these points.
Councillor Birch, advising that she would be unable to answer all of the points
at the meeting that evening, said that all of the schools that had budget
deficits had been assisted by the finance teams with schools unable to
recover their deficits within 3 years being offered plans to restructure the debt
that they had so that they could eventually balance their budgets. Going
forward she could not say what the deficits would be like in three years’ time,
rather she hoped that they would be balanced. Furthermore, Councillor Birch
added that all that had been said during the debate had been about the
difficulties of various events in the last few years and the toll that that had
taken on budgets everywhere, so schools were not going to be immune from
that. It was obvious that balancing budgets was going to be more difficult for
some schools than others.
In conclusion, the Leader referred to the number of times the budget process
had been considered by Cabinet and Scrutiny however she was disappointed
with the questions at Council when a lot of the discussion could have been
held at the Scrutiny Committee meetings over the year with suggestions being
put forward for consideration. In referring to the issues of diversity and
inclusion that had been commented on during the debate, the Leader drew
attention to the budget for Corporate Resources being only 5% of the overall
total. Having regard to Reserves she said the detail was contained within the
report although they had been rationalised. In referring to the comments
relating to the 2% cut in National Insurance the Leader mentioned that if one
was of retirement age they wouldn’t receive this cut.
The Leader subsequently took the opportunity to repeat her earlier comments
that the proposed budget was a budget to protect the most vulnerable and
moved the recommendations within the report.
No.
The motion moved by the Leader and seconded by Councillor Brooks was
subsequently voted upon.
A recorded vote took place on the recommendations as contained within the
reference and the report, as follows:-
Members For Against Abstain
Anne Asbrey x
Julie Aviet x
Gareth Ball x
Rhiannon Birch x
Bronwen Brooks x
Gillian Bruce x
Ian Buckley x
Lis Burnett x
Samantha Campbell x
George Carroll x
Christine Cave x
Charles Champion x
Janice Charles x
Millie Collins x
Marianne Cowpe x
Pamela Drake x
Vincent Driscoll
Anthony Ernest x
Robert Fisher x
Christopher Franks x
No.
Wendy Gilligan x
Russell Godfrey x
Emma Goodjohn x
Ewan Goodjohn x
Stephen Haines x
Howard Hamilton x
Sally Hanks x
William Hennessy x
Nic Hodges x
Catherine Iannucci x
Gwyn John x
Dr. Ian Johnson x
Susan Lloyd-Selby x
Julie Lynch-Wilson x
Kevin Mahoney x
Naomi Marshallsea x
Michael Morgan x
Jayne Norman x
Helen Payne x
Elliot Penn x
Sandra Perkes x
Ian Perry x
Joanna Protheroe x
Ruba Sivagnanam x
Carys Stallard x
No.
Neil Thomas x
Rhys Thomas x
Steffan Wiliam x
Margaret Wilkinson x
Eddie Williams x
Mark Wilson x
Nicholas Wood x
TOTAL 30 21
The vote being carried, it was
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T a Council Tax increase of 6.7% be approved.
(2) T H A T the Revenue budget for 2024/25 and Medium Term Financial
Plan 24/25 to 28/29 be approved.
(3) T H A T the fees and charges presented for approval in January 2024,
which stood unchanged following review by Scrutiny, be noted.
(4) T H A T the information provided in the supplemental report to Cabinet
th
on 29 February 2024 regarding updated Standard Spending Assessment
figures be endorsed.
Reasons for decisions
(1) Setting the annual rate of Council Tax was a key policy decision for
Council.
(2) Setting a balanced budget was a statutory responsibility and decision
for Full Council.
(3) To confirm fees and charges for 2024/25.
(4) Having regard to the supplemental information which provided Full
Council with the most up to date figures as part of its final budget
deliberations.
No.
CAPITAL STRATEGY 2024/25 AND FINAL CAPITAL PROGRAMME PROPOSALS 2024/25 TO 2028/29 (REF)
Cabinet had considered the report on 29th February, 2024 (Minute No. C261)
and had referred the same to Council for consideration and approval.
Appendix 1 to the report provided the Council's Capital Strategy for 2024/25.
The Capital Strategy provided a framework which outlined how capital
expenditure, capital financing and treasury management activity contributed to
the provision of corporate objectives, along with an overview of how
associated risk was managed and the implications for future financial
sustainability.
The report set out the Council’s proposed Final Capital Programme for the
period 2024/25 to 2028/29 at Appendix 2.
The Council was facing significant pressures in relation to price inflation and
the cost-of-living crisis which had seen increases in the costs of materials and
labour. This had had an impact on the current schemes within the Capital
Programme and the funding available to fund new schemes within the Capital
Programme.
The total value of capital schemes over the next five years was £387.582m
which included £25.376m for the Band B Sustainable Communities for
Learning Programme (excluding the pipeline schemes) and £205.775m for the
Housing Improvement Programme.
Since the Draft Capital Programme proposals report in January, a number of
changes had been made including the reprofile and allocation of
decarbonisation schemes, City Deal reprofile, slippage from the 2023/24
Capital Programme into the 2024/25 Capital Programme and the Llanmaes
match funding was no longer being removed from the five year proposals.
The detail of these changes was covered later in the report.
The Leader subsequently moved the recommendations in the report, which
were seconded by Councillor Brooks, and there being no dissent it was
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Capital Strategy 2024/25, as set out in Appendix 1 to the
report to Cabinet on 29th February, 2024 (Minute No. C261), be approved.
(2) T H A T the final Capital Programme for the years 2024/25 to 2028/29,
as set out in Appendix 2 to the report to Cabinet on 29th February, 2024
(Minute No. C261), be approved.
(3) T H A T the Chief Executive and the Head of Finance / Section 151
Officer, in consultation with the Executive Leader and Cabinet Member for
No.
Performance and Resources, be granted delegated authority to make
additions, deletions or transfers to or from the:
i. 2024/25 to 2028/29 Housing Improvement Programme as
appropriate.
ii. 2024/25 to 2028/29 Asset Renewal budgets as appropriate.
iii. S106 funded schemes subject to Member consultation as
required under the existing process.
iv. Energy Management Schemes
v. Building Strong Communities Fund schemes.
vi. Sustainable Communities for Learning Band B programme
(Previously 21st Century Schools schemes).
vii. Discretionary Adaption Grant Schemes.
viii. Vale Regeneration Schemes.
(4) T H A T the Chief Executive, Head of Finance / Section 151 Officer,
and Director of Learning and Skills in consultation with the Executive Leader
and Cabinet Member for Performance and Resources, be granted delegated
authority to increase the Capital Programme for the long term solution in
relation to the Successful Futures Centre at Pencoedtre High School when
the feasibility studies had been concluded. It being noted that £300k had
been ringfenced within reserves to carry out the scheme when feasibility
studies had been undertaken.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To approve the Capital Strategy for 2024/25.
(2) To set and approve future Capital Programmes to 2028/29.
(3) To enable the Housing Capital budget, Asset Renewal budgets, S106
schemes, Energy Management Schemes, Building Stronger Communities
Fund, Sustainable Communities for Learning Band B programme,
Discretionary Adaption Grant Schemes, and Vale Regeneration schemes to
be managed effectively.
(4) To enable the long term solution to the Successful Futures Centre at
Pencoedtre High School to proceed when the feasibility studies had been
concluded.
TREASURY MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT STRATEGY 2024/25 AND UPDATE 2023/24 (REF)
Cabinet had considered the report on 29th February, 2024 (Minute No. C262)
and had referred the same to Council for consideration and approval.
The interim report outlined the proposed 2024/25 Treasury Management
Strategy detailed in Appendix 1 and provided an update on the Council’s
Treasury Management operations for the period 1st April to 31st December,
No.
2023. All activities were in accordance with the Council’s approved strategy
on Treasury Management.
Total external borrowing as of 31st December, 2023 was £145.479m at an
average rate of 4.37%. New external borrowing totalling £5.000m was
undertaken during the first 9 months of 2023/24 at a rate of 4.38% with
utilised the special project rate for Housing Revenue Account schemes.
The Council invested with the Debt Management Deposit Facility, Local
Authorities, Treasury Bills, Money Market Funds together with Lloyds Bank
Call Accounts. Total investments as of 31st December, 2023 stood at
£50.495m at an average rate of 4.53% over the nine-month period.
The Council had to ensure that the Prudential Code was complied with, which
had been developed by CIPFA as a professional code of practice, last
updated in December 2021. To demonstrate that the Council had fulfilled
these objectives, the Code set out a list of Prudential and Treasury indicators
that should be calculated together with other factors that had to be
considered. These were included in Appendix 1 to the report as part of the
Strategy.
The Council also had a legal requirement to comply with the Welsh
Government Guidance on Investments and had taken this guidance into
consideration when developing the Strategy.
New borrowing in the period to 2028/29 was expected to be £184.377m for
new Capital Expenditure and a further £14.000m of borrowing to replace
maturing loans and reflect the Council’s reducing ability to internally borrow
over the period.
Capital expenditure when financed by long term debt incurred two elements of
cost, interest and repayment of the principal sum borrowed. The resources
the Council must put aside in each year to repay the principal sum borrowed
was known as Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) and the Council's policy
for the calculation was detailed in the report.
The Treasury Management Policy Statement for 2024/25 was attached at
Appendix 2 to the report.
The Leader, in referring to the recent training provided to all Members, and
indeed training that was provided each year, on the subject, commented that
she had found the training to be a really constructive training session which
had also been recorded for Members to view it online.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Treasury Management interim report for the period 1 st April
st
to 31 December, 2023 be approved.
No.
(2) T H A T the policy for making Minimum Revenue Provision in 2024/25
be approved.
(3) T H A T the proposed 2024/25 Treasury Management and Investment
Strategy be approved, including the following specific resolutions (as detailed
in Appendix 1 to the report to Cabinet on 29th February, 2024 [Minute No.
C262]):
• The Authorised Limit for External Debt be set at £240.969m for
2023/24, £271.200m for 2024/25, £303.939m for 2025/26 and
£336.893m for 2026/27.
• The Operational Boundary for External Debt be set at
£226.147m for 2023/24, £255.687 for 2024/25, £287.406m for
2025/26 and £320.338m for 2026/27.
• The Section 151 Officer be granted delegated authority within
the total Authorised Limit and Operational Boundary as
estimated for individual years to effect movement between the
separately agreed limits for borrowing and other long term
liabilities.
• An upper limit of £0m for 2023/24, £10m for 2024/25, £10m in
2025/26 and £10m in 2026/27 be set for total principal sums
invested for over 364 days.
• The amount of projected borrowing that was fixed rate maturing
in each period as a percentage of total projected borrowing that
was fixed rate for 2024/25 be set as:
Table 1 – Upper and lower Limits for fixed rate borrowing
Upper Lower
Limit Limit
Under 12 months 20% 0%
12 months and within 24 months 20% 0%
24 months and within 5 years 30% 0%
5 years and within 10 years 40% 0%
10 years and above 100% 0%
(4) T H A T Prudential Indicators set out in Appendix 1 to the report to
Cabinet on 29th February, 2024 (Minute No. C262) be approved.
(5) T H A T the Treasury Management Policy Statement set out in
Appendix 2 to the report to Cabinet on 29th February, 2024 (Minute No. C262)
be approved.
Reasons for decisions
(1) Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the
meeting.
(2) To agree the basis of the Minimum Revenue Provision calculation for
2024/25.
No.
(3-5) In order for the Treasury Management and Annual Investment Strategy
as prepared be approved as required by the Local Government Act 2003.
PAY POLICY 2024/25 (REF)
The Council had a statutory requirement under the Localism Act 2011 to
prepare a pay policy statement for the new financial year 2024/25. The
statement needed to be approved and published by 31st March, 2024. The
document provided a framework for ensuring that employees were rewarded
fairly and objectively, in accordance with the service needs of the Council and
that there was openness and transparency in relation to the process. It being
a straightforward report the Leader moved the recommendations which were
seconded by Councillor Brooks.
Prior to putting the recommendations to Full Council the Mayor asked if there
were any points of clarification required by Members from the Head of Human
Resources. There being no clarifications required and no further comments, it
was subsequently
RESOLVED – T H A T the Council’s Pay Policy as attached at Appendix A to
the report to Cabinet on 8th February, 2024 (Minute No C234) be approved.
Reason for decision
To respond to the legal requirement under the Localism Act 2011 and to
provide openness and accountability in relation to how the Council rewards its
staff.
N.B.
All Chief Officers, save for the Head of Human Resources, left the meeting
when this item was considered. The Head of Human Resources remained in
the meeting, until the matter was to be voted upon, in order to provide any
clarification required by Elected Members.
RESOLVED: That the Chairperson writes to the Cabinet Member on behalf of the Committee to convey any comments, observations and recommendations made during the way forward.
RESOLVED – That :
(1) The comments of the Committee be noted;
(2) The draft Terms of Reference for the Post Trial Review in Waste Management be approved.
RESOLVED – That the following matters be dealt with as indicated:
(1)
Application 1
The Sub Committee were asked to consider an application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence given that the applicant had been convicted of an offence of possession of a Class C Controlled Drug in 2019 and failing to surrender to bail in 2001.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the applicant stated that he had a conviction for driving while drunk and had been banned from driving twice around 20 years ago. After that, a good friend advised him to stop drinking entirely, which he did. He didn’t mention this on the application because of the 10 year guidance, he didn’t think it would be considered relevant.
He added that the second matter, concerning possession of a class C drug, happened after he went to a wedding where he and his friends took khat before collecting what was left in a bag at the end and putting in his car. A few days later, the police searched the car, found the bag and gave him a caution for possession.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the applicant stated that he hadn’t declared his caution on his application because he didn’t think he needed to, which was a mistake. The Sub Committee noted that the question on the application was very clear about the need to declare cautions.
The Sub Committee also sought to clarify that he understood it would not be acceptable to have drugs in the work environment even if someone else put them there. The applicant confirmed that he understood this.
RESOLVED – that the application for the grant of a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be refused.
(2)
Application 2
The Sub Committee were asked to consider an application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence given that the applicant had been convicted of an offence for Common Assault on 15th January 2016 and also declared an IN10 giving 6 points on his DVLA Licence in May 2022.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the applicant stated that his conviction for common assault was due to poor judgement as a young man, when he had reacted badly to a difficult situation. As for the six points, he was using his father’s car while working as a food delivery driver and his father told him he was on his insurance, but this was not true. He did have food delivery insurance but this had not been accepted as a replacement. He was sorry for his mistakes and emphasised that it would not happen again.
The applicant’s friend spoke on his behalf, explaining that they were from the same city and had been friends since they were children. He had never known him to react like that in any situation before or since. He used to employ the applicant as a driver at his company and found him to be a model worker who never had any complaints.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the applicant clarified that he had assaulted his partner. They had been together for more than ten years now and had two children. He confirmed that he had not used any support services such as counselling since his conviction.
RESOLVED – that the application for the grant of a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be refused.
(3)
Application 3
The Sub Committee were asked to consider if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Private Hire Driver’s License given that upon renewal of his licence there was an issue with the DBS process.
In the absence of the driver, the Licensing Officer clarified that this hearing was solely about the lack of a DBS certificate rather than what might be on it. He had just spoken to the driver, who confirmed that he had received the DBS, but as the licensing authority they had not yet received it.
The Committee suggested suspending the driver until he produced the DBS. The Legal Officer clarified that they had to specify a time period after which it could come back to committee, rather than leaving it open-ended.
The Committee agreed that a month’s suspension was appropriate. The Legal Officer added that the suspension could be lifted early if the driver provided a clear DBS before this time had elapsed.
RESOLVED – that the Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be suspended for one month.
(4)
Application 4
The Sub Committee were asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Private Hire Driver’s Licence given that a common law notification from South Wales Police was submitted in relation to an incident which stated that the driver was arrested for assaulting a person in 2023, thereby occasioning them actual bodily harm.
The driver’s wife addressed the Sub Committee, stating that she was the person he had been arrested for assaulting. She explained that the time leading up to the incident had been very stressful as they were moving house and had an autistic son, who that morning had nearly been hit by a car. She and her husband had to drive to the recycling centre with her following, but she got lost and became frustrated when he wouldn’t reply to her calls. When they got to the centre, they argued and he swore at her, then she hit him and he hit her back.
Someone else saw this and reported her husband for assault. She had tried to explain that she was fine to this person but suggested that the report may have been racially motivated because they were Muslim. She and her husband had been married for 18 years and known each other for 22, and had three children together, and he had never done anything like that before or since. Her husband apologised to her straight away but the police came around that night anyway because it had been reported as an assault.
The Sub Committee noted that driving a taxi could be a stressful job, and asked how he would deal with situations where passengers were impolite, drunk or angry. The driver responded that he would just ignore them, as he was an experienced driver who had been licenced in London before as well and had experienced violent passengers in the past.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver’s wife confirmed that they had not complained to the police about what they felt could have been a racially motivated report by the witness. The driver also confirmed that after the incident took place, the police took him to the station, gave him a caution and then released him.
RESOLVED – that the driver receive a written warning.
(5)
Application 5
The Sub Committee were asked to consider an application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence given that the applicant had been convicted of an offence of possession with intent to supply class A in 2018.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the applicant stated that he was truly remorseful about his previous behaviour, and there were no excuses for having been stupid and naïve. He was now aged 27 and had truly grown up and rehabilitated. Life had been difficult, and it had been hard to find decent and sustainable work. He had never been in any trouble before 2018 but fell in with people who exploited his naivety.
Since his conviction, he had had no further trouble with the legal system and tried to be the best possible citizen. He regularly attended his local mosque and had completed his SQA level 2. He wanted to show that he was a changed man who was committed to being a taxi driver. He posed no danger to the public and could conduct his duties in a professional manner. He had made a horrendous error in the past but did not want to be punished forever for the behaviour of someone who no longer existed.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver clarified that the 6 points on his licence were from speeding offences in the last couple of years while working in Magor, and he wouldn’t do anything like that now.
RESOLVED – that the application for the grant of a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be refused.
(6)
Application 6
The Sub Committee were asked to consider an application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence given that the applicant had convictions on his DBS.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the applicant stated that he had done everything possible to show that he could be trusted to drive a taxi, and understood the responsibilities of the role.
In response to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver accepted he had been to prison but believed he was innocent of the offences listed on his DBS, which included the possession of a class B drug and improperly obtaining another’s identity. He stated that he was not that type of person, and had not declared them on his application because they were a very long time ago. The Sub Committee noted that the most recent offence was in 2015.
RESOLVED – that the application for the grant of a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be refused.
RESOLVED: That the Chairperson writes to the Cabinet Member on behalf of the Committee to convey any comments, observations and recommendations made during the way forward.