Ysgolion, lleoedd ysgol ac adeiladau, anghenion dysgu ychwanegol ac addysg cyfrwng Cymraeg.
Beth mae cynghorau'n ei wneud
Mae cynghorau'n rhedeg ysgolion cymunedol, yn ariannu pob ysgol wladol, yn darparu cludiant i'r ysgol ac yn cefnogi disgyblion ag anghenion dysgu ychwanegol. Maen nhw'n cynllunio lleoedd ysgol, gan gynnwys lleoedd cyfrwng Cymraeg o dan gynllun deng mlynedd.
Pwy sy'n penderfynu
Mae'r Cabinet yn penderfynu ar newidiadau i ysgolion, fel agor, cau neu uno ysgolion, ar ôl ymgynghoriad ffurfiol. Penaethiaid a chyrff llywodraethu sy'n rhedeg pob ysgol o ddydd i ddydd.
Dweud eich dweud
Rhaid ymgynghori ar gynigion i newid ysgol, a gall unrhyw un ymateb. Gall rhieni hefyd ddod yn llywodraethwyr ysgol.
Mewn rhifau
Mae cynghorau Cymru yn bwriadu gwario £1,307 y pen ar hyn yn 2026-27.
Mae'n amrywio o £1,099 yn Sir Fynwy i £1,475 yn Merthyr Tudful.
Disgyblion Blwyddyn 1 a addysgir yn Gymraeg: 25% ar draws Cymru (2025-26).
RESOLVED: That the Chairperson writes to the Cabinet Member on behalf of the Committee expressing their comments and observations captured during the way forward.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the
following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be
taken.
2020/01218/HYB Received on 29 October 2020
(P. 103)
APPLICANT: Mr. Phil Worthing c/o Agent
AGENT: Mrs. Emma Fortune, Brunel House, 2 Fitzalan Road, Cardiff, CF24 0EB
Leckwith Quay, Leckwith Road, Leckwith
Hybrid planning application for residential development for up to 228 dwellings
(submitted in OUTLINE), associated highway and bridge improvement / realignment
works (submitted in FULL). Development involves the demolition of all buildings on
site and of the existing B4267 Leckwith Road Bridge.
RESOLVED – T H A T subject to the applicant entering into a Section 106
agreement to provide for the following:
• Procure that 10% (up to 23) of the dwellings built on the site pursuant to the
planning permission are built and thereafter maintained as affordable housing
units in perpetuity;
• Pay a contribution of £240,000 for the provision or enhancement of education
facilities to meet the needs of future occupiers;
• Pay a contribution of £60,000 for the off-site planting of trees to mitigate loss
as a result of the development.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2021/00476/FUL Received on 27 April 2023
(P. 189)
APPLICANT: Westbourne School, Hickman Road, Penarth, CF64 3EF
AGENT: Mr. Liam Griffiths, Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park,
Cardiff, CF23 8RS
GM2 House, Plymouth Road, Penarth
Full planning application for a proposed 2 storey extension and associated works.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2023/00337/FUL Received on 29 March 2023
(P. 226)
APPLICANT: Ceri Jones, 7 Sycamore Close, Llandough, Penarth, Vale of
Glamorgan, CF64 2NP
AGENT: Nicky Watkins, Studio 1, The Platform, Hemmingway Road, Cardiff,
CF10 5LS
7 Sycamore Close, Llandough, Penarth
Proposed two storey extension to rear elevation with hipped roof.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to issue an
Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) to require:
(i) The removal of the development;
or
(ii) The completion of the development in accordance with planning
permission 2023/00337/FUL.
(2) T H A T in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation be
granted to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
APPROVED – Subject to an amendment to Condition 3 to amend the position of the
bird boxes on the building and to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reasons for decisions
The decision to recommend planning permission has been taken in accordance with
Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires that,
in determining a planning application the determination must be in accordance with
the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The
Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local
Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National Plan 2040.
Having regard to Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD2 (Design of New
Development), MD5 (Development Within Settlement Boundaries) and MD9
(Promoting Biodiversity) of the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan
2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National Plan 2040 and Supplementary Planning
Guidance on Residential and Householder Development; and national guidance
contained in Planning Policy Wales (11th Edition), and TAN12 (Design); the revised
proposal is considered acceptable in terms of the design and visual impact, impact
up on neighbouring properties, parking, amenity space and will secure biodiversity
enhancements.
Having regard to the Council’s duties under the Equality Act 2010 the proposed
development does not have any significant implications for, or effect on, persons
who share a protected characteristic.
It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being objectives
and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of
the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
The appropriate marine policy documents have been considered in the determination
of this application in accordance with Section 59 of the Marine and Coastal Access
Act 2009.
RESOLVED: Council AGREED to:
Approve the new appointments of Local Authority Governors to the school Governing Bodies as set out in Appendix 1, each for a term of 4 years from the date of the appointment, in accordance with the recommendations of the Local Authority Governor Panel.
RESOLVED: that
• the proposed vision, principles, and new operating model for Cardiff Youth Service be agreed.
• the proposed focus upon locality working, to strengthen and integrate youth work disciplines in a locality area, ensuring that teams are responsive to the needs of the community that they serve, be endorsed.
• It be noted that the Director of Education and Lifelong Learning will provide updates to the relevant Cabinet Member(s) on the delivery of the actions identified within the report, including assurance that resources are appropriately prioritised to address the needs of the most vulnerable and at-risk children and young people.
• It be noted that senior managers will provide updates to the relevant Cabinet Member(s) on the work being undertaken to integrate the Cardiff Youth Service more effectively with wider services for adolescents.
Caerdydd, Appointments Committee - Assistant Director, Education and Inclusion,
RESOLVED – That the Council be recommended to approve the recommendations of the Panel to appoint the following persons to current Local Authority Governing Body vacancies as follows:
School Name
Ward
Start of Vacancy
Applicant
Albany Primary School
Plasnewydd
24/07/2023
Muna Noor
Ffederasiwn y Ddraig
(Ysgol Bro Eirwy and Ysgol Pen y Pil)
Trowbridge / Llanrumney
02/09/2023
Glesni Owen
Fitzalan High School
Canton
01/09/2023
Cllr Ash Lister
Radyr Comprehensive School
Radyr & Morganstown
26/09/2023
Tim Opie
The Oaks Federation
(Greenway and Trowbridge Primary Schools
Rumney / Trowbridge
18/07/2023
10/05/2023
28/03/2023
Victor Chitsiga
Ahmed Azam
Jordan Jones
The Western Learning Campus (Riverbank School, Ty Gwyn School & Woodlands High School)
Caerau
04/09/2023
Andy Kreppel
Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Hamadryad
Butetown
01/08/23
Linda Mitchell
The Committee received and considered applications to future vacancies against criteria, matching skills to vacancies.
RESOLVED – That the Council be recommended to approve the recommendations of the Panel to appoint the following:
School Name
Ward
Start of Vacancy
Applicant
Gladstone Primary School
Roath Park Primary School
The Rainbow Federation (~Bryn Hafod & Glan Yr Afon Primary Schools
Llanrumney
24/02/2024
24/02/2024
John Brown
Lesley Noaks
Ysgol Gymraeg Coed-Y-Gof
Fairwater
29/01/2024
Ceri Landers
RESOLVED:
Pursuant to this Committee’s delegated powers the following development control applications be determined in accordance with the recommendation set out in the reports of the Director of Planning, Transport and Environment, subject to any further amendments as detailed below and notification be given of the decisions in accordance with Section 70 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 or Section 74 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation) Act 1990.
APPLICATIONS RESOLVED TO BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO ENTERING INTO A BINDING SECTION 106 AGREEMENT
21/00783/MJR – BUTETOWN
LAND AT CURRAN EMBANKMENT, BUTETOWN, CARDIFF
Demolition of existing buildings/structures and the comprehensive mixed-use redevelopment to provide up to 2,5000 new homes (class C3), business space (class B1), and a mix of complementary leisure, food and drink, hospitality, retail and health and wellbeing uses (class A1, A2, A3, C1, D1 and D2); creation of new open space (including a new riverside park and water taxi stop); new pedestrian, cycle and vehicular access points, pedestrian footbridge; vehicular and cycle parking facilities; landscaping; public realm and other associated ancillary and highways works. all matters reserved other than vehicular access.
APPLICATIONS GRANTED
23/02009/FUL – PENYLAN
7 LADY MARGARET COURT, COLCHESTER AVENUE, PENYLAN, CARDIFF, CF23 9AW
Change of use to class A3 Café/Coffee Shop with ancillary takeaway use.
22/00687/FUL – RADYR & MORGANSTOWN
RADYR COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL, HEOL ISAF, RADYR, CARDIFF, CF15 8XG
Abertawe, Pwyllgor Trawsnewid Gwasanaethau Addysg a Sgiliau,
RESOLVED – That the following matters be dealt with as indicated:
(1)
Case 1
The Sub Committee were asked to consider a complaint received from a member of the public that alleged a driver refused to take him and his disabled wife from Heath Hospital to Llandaff North, and also told them he would not take a fare for less than £10. It was further alleged that the driver had used abusive language towards another driver who challenged him about not taking them.
The driver addressed the Sub Committee, stating that he had not refused the fare and had instead sought to give it to the next driver in the rank because he was aware that that driver was soon leaving the rank to attend to a school run. He did not recall using any abusive language and suggested that the other driver involved had a personal problem with him.
The complainant addressed the Sub Committee, reiterating the sequence of events outlined in his witness statement. The driver had refused to take him and his wife to Llandaff North, saying that he was waiting for somebody and then saying he did not take fares less than £10.
The complainant approached the second taxi on the rank. He explained what had occurred to the driver but was still within earshot of the first driver. The second driver asked his colleague why he had refused the fare. The first driver told him to ‘fuck off and mind your own business’, followed by ‘fuck off’ again. The complainant stated that it was at this point the first driver accepted another fare and left the rank.
The complainant stated that the driver of the second vehicle was unhappy and he himself was upset. He asked the driver for information on how to lodge a complaint and was provided with the relevant details.
The Sub Committee discussed the two versions of events and agreed that the witness provided more credible evidence. Members asked why the driver now had a full recollection of the incident, in contrast to the written statement he provided where he indicated he could not recall any details of the incident.
RESOLVED – That the Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be suspended for 28 days for refusal of a fare and unacceptable conduct.
(2)
Case 2
The Sub Committee were asked to consider a complaint received from Dragon Taxis regarding an incident that had been recorded on video by a member of the public and subsequently provided to them. The Licensing Manager stated that they had also received a video of the incident by a friend of the driver.
Members viewed three video clips of the incident, and were advised that the videos showed an altercation involving the driver of a licence vehicle displaying Dragon Taxis livery and a number of other individuals. However, the vehicle was not a Dragon taxi and the driver was not employed by them. The Committee clarified the identities of those involved.
The Sub Committee asked how the incident had started. The driver stated that a car was blocking a junction causing traffic to back up. He asked the driver of the vehicle to move. The other driver got out of his car, approached him and used abusive language. The driver stated that he felt threatened, so he pretended to get a weapon from the boot of his vehicle in order to scare his assailant off, but it was actually a hat in his hand.
Members discussed the incident and agreed that the driver may well have been frustrated by the road being blocked, but had lost his temper and escalated the situation.
The Committee was not convinced by the driver’s suggestion that he had only been holding a hat, as the video appeared to show a sharp object in his hand. The witness also described the driver as ‘holding a sharp object threatening to stab somebody’ during the commentary on the video. Members felt that he had clearly made a threatening gesture, regardless of what the object was.
Members also noted that the driver had a Dragon Taxis logo on his car despite not working for them, which could be considered fraudulent or misrepresentation.
The driver left the hearing and the hearing proceeded in his absence.
RESOLVED – That the Hackney Carriage/Private Hire licence be revoked.
(3)
Case 3
The Sub Committee were asked to determine whether a taxi driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Private Hire Driver’s License given that a motoring conviction for IN10 (using an uninsured vehicle) was returned on his DVLA check as part of his licence renewal.
The driver stated that his conviction had nothing to do with his role as a taxi driver. He had purchased a private vehicle and was driving that at the time of the offence. Members were advised that the vehicle was purchased with a number of mechanical faults. He took the vehicle to a garage using temporary insurance cover for 1 hour. He had not realised that the cover had expired when the mechanic recommended that he drive the car further than was necessary on his homeward journey in order to ensure the car was in good working order. He was stopped by the police who found the car was uninsured. However, his was unable to use his phone to demonstrate that the car had been insured earlier that day. He had received 6 points on his licence and a fine.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver clarified that he had first applied for a taxi licence in 2020, and the incident had happened in January 2023. He had no points on his licence other than the six he had received for this offence.
RESOLVED – that the driver receive a written warning for a driving offence.
(4)
Application 4
The Sub Committee was asked to consider an application for the grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver’s Licence. Members were advised that that the applicant had been convicted of the offence of battery in 2017.
The driver’s representative stated that the driver had not intended to deceive anyone by not declaring his conviction. There was some confusion because the website used to complete the application contained out of date or misleading information.
The driver’s representative stated that the conviction was the result of a domestic incident in October 2017. The applicant was extremely remorseful. The applicant and his wife were still together and happily married after 35 years. They had run a shop together for many years, during which time he obtained a personal licence to sell alcohol, demonstrating that he was a responsible individual.
In response to questions from the Sub Committee, he explained that in 2017 he and his wife had a heated argument that involved extended family in India on a mobile phone. The wife took the phone and asked to speak with them. When attempting to retrieve the phone from his wife, this this caused her to hit her head on a wall. The police were called. His wife was present and stated to the Sub Committee that nothing had occurred since this incident. The family worked together very well. The driver added that he was confident he could handle the stresses of the job in the future.
RESOLVED – that the application for the grant of a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be approved.
(5)
Application 5
The Sub Committee was asked to consider an application for the grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver’s Licence Members were advised that the applicant had a relevant conviction on his DBS relating to an offence from 1994.
The driver stated that he was reapplying for a licence, having previously held one until 2008. Since then he had worked full time as a coach driver for National Express and Cardiff Bus. He was experienced in working with the general public, including vulnerable adults and children, and had never once had a problem in all that time. The conviction was from about 30 years ago when he was young and foolish, and he accepted that he had made a mistake which he had been punished for.
RESOLVED – that the application for the grant of a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be approved.
(6)
Case 6
The Sub Committee was asked to consider a complaint received from a member of the public that that the driver attempted to charge £6 to take an assistance dog and had discriminated against the complainant.
The Sub Committee viewed a video of the incident which had been submitted by the complainant.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver stated that he was not notified on the booking that there would be a dog. He arrived at the pickup location and the dog was a few metres away and not wearing any high-vis, so he explained to the passengers that he would have to start the meter at £6.
The passenger asked whether the driver understood what the high-vis harness the dog was wearing was. The driver responded that he did. He had no problem with dogs, only that it wasn’t mentioned on the booking.
The complainants stated that they called the office to clarify that there should be no charge for an assistant dog. By then they felt uncomfortable, so they left the taxi and got into another one. The complainant described the incident as an unnecessary and embarrassing experience.
Members sought to clarify whether the driver was aware of the operators policies on assistance dogs and pets. The driver stated that for a pet dog the meter will start at £6. For assistance dogs there is no additional charge. Members asked why it would matter whether there was notification that a dog was mentioned at the time of the booking. The driver stated that he didn’t see the assistance dog it at first because of the poor visibility he was therefore surprised.
Members asked why the driver had insisted on a £6 fee after being told it was a guide dog. The driver stated that he was unaware and his English language skills are not the best. The video highlighted that there was a language barrier.
The complainants reminded Members that that the driver initially claimed to be allergic to dogs but he could not provide an exemption certificate when asked.
The complainant stated that in his experience incidents like this are a regular occurrence with taxi drivers in Cardiff. The complainant considered that the matter should be before Magistrates. The language barrier was not considered to be a major factor in the incident as the driver kept saying that he understood. Blind people should not be left out in the street.
Committee in agreement that the video clearly showed that it was not just a misunderstanding, and the driver was trying to charge and additional fee. It was confirmed that all drivers have assistance dog training as part of their SQA qualification. The Sub Committee acknowledged that the driver had no history of offences, but refusing a fare to someone because of a protected characteristic was unacceptable.
RESOLVED – that the Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be suspended for 7 days for refusal of a fare and attempting to overcharge.
(7)
Case 7
The Sub Committee was asked to determine whether a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire Driver’s License after a complaint was received stating that he refused to take an assistance dog and claimed he had a medical condition.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver stated that as he picked the complainants up from their house they were recording him on a mobile phone, which had confused him. He was sneezing and dizzy at the time, but he took them to their destination.
Members asked whether the driver had an allergy and an exemption certificate. The driver confirmed that he did not have an exemption certificate and had not seen a doctor about getting one since the incident. He was not allergic to dogs.
The complainant addressed the Sub Committee, emphasising the driver would have known he was visually impaired because his guide dog’s harness was clearly labelled. He and his partner had to spend 10 minutes explaining to the driver why he had to take them and the dog, which they shouldn’t have had to do. They had missed a train because of the delay which affected their work.
The complainant’s partner added that he had started filming because he saw the driver looking at them while they approached the car and suspected he would refuse to let the dog in.
RESOLVED – that the Hackney Carriage/Private Hire driver’s licence be suspended for 7 days for unacceptable conduct.
RESOLVED:
1. To note the update on the Annual Education Report of Children Looked After and the Virtual School and Virtual Headteacher Update and;
2. To feedback any observations or comments.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the contents of the report be noted.
Minutes - GD
No.
(2) T H A T Cabinet be advised of the views of the Governance and Audit
Committee, those being:
• Accessibility – that it be clarified that there was an opposing view that the
document was easily accessible as it was felt that the document may be
difficult to read for some members of the public as there was some
complexities around the way that certain opinions were expressed in the
report, particularly in relation to a rise in Council Tax and a decrease in
services.
• Brexit – for further detail to be included regarding the impact of Brexit or for
Cabinet to consider removing this reference.
• Hybrid meetings – for the self-assessment document to reflect that the
Council has not implemented a hybrid meeting solution and that this was
now an urgent matter to resolve. The second reference in the assessment
was felt to be more accurate than the first.
• Public engagement and communication – for commentary to outline to the
public how the Council spends its money and the priority areas that the
money was allocated to as part of communicating the Assessment and in
particular the Council’s budget. To also clearly highlight that the majority of
the Council’s budget (around 75%) was allocated to education and social
services which meant that along with those departments, all other service
areas were under extreme budget pressures.
• Agency staff – for a detailed in-depth review to be undertaken to
understand the how’s and why’s of the areas that the Council spends on
agency staff. For this to be undertaken as part of the development of the
Council’s budget proposals for 2024/25.
Reasons for decisions
(1&2) Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting.
RESOLVED: Pursuant to this Committee’s delegated powers the following development control applications be determined in accordance with the recommendation set out in the reports of the Director of Planning, Transport and Environment, subject to any further amendments as detailed below and notification be given of the decisions in accordance with Section 70 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 or Section 74 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation) Act 1990.
APPLICATIONS RESOLVED TO BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO ENTERING INTO A BINDING SECTION 106 AGREEMENT
23/01705/VAR – BUTETOWN
RED DRAGON CENTRE AND COUNTY HALL, ATLANTIC WHARF, CARDIFF
A variation of condition application made pursuant to Section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to vary Condition 2 (approved plans), Condition 9 (CEMP) and Condition 10 (Soil Resource Survey) of the detailed planning permission (Arena and Hotel) within hybrid planning permission reference: 21/02687/MJR
The application was approved as per recommendation subject to the amendments to the conditions set out with in the Amendment Sheet/Late Representations Schedule.
23/00050/FUL – CAERAU
LAND SOUTH OF NARBERTH ROAD, CAERAU, CARDIFF
Development of 83 residential units (use Class C3, including affordable housing) as well as associated vehicular, cyclist and pedestrian access, engineering and infrastructure works, landscaping, open space and sustainable urban drainage.
The application was approved as per recommendation subject to the amendments to the conditions set out with in the Amendment Sheet/Late Representations Schedule.
APPLICATION GRANTED
23/01501/FUL – FAIRWATER
CANTONIAN HIGH SCHOOL, FAIRWATER ROAD, FAIRWATER, CARDIFF
Construction of new Cantonian, Woodlands and Riverbank Schools and other associated buildings including new Health and Well-being Centre. Provision of various outdoor spaces, Sports Pitches and Multi-Use Games Areas, Flood-lighting, parking and access provision, cycle and refuse storage areas, SuDS provision and other associated work including the demolition of the school buildings.
The application was approved as per recommendation.
RESOLVED: that
1. the consideration by the Governing Body of St Monica’s Church in Wales Primary School of the proposal to transfer St Monica’s Church in Wales Primary School to the current Ysgol Mynydd Bychan site and establish nursery provision at the school, from September 2025 be noted.
2. Subject to the agreement of the Governing Body of St Monica’s Church in Wales Primary School to proceed to publish its proposals, Officers be authorised to proceed to publish proposals in accordance with section 48 of The School Standards and Organisation (Wales) Act 2013 on proposals to:
· Transfer Ysgol Mynydd Bychan to the current Allensbank Primary School site.
· Increase the capacity of Ysgol Mynydd Bychan from 192 places (0.9FE) to 420 places (2FE) and increase the number of nursery places at Ysgol Mynydd Bychan from 64 to 96.
· Amalgamate Allensbank and Gladstone Primary Schools:
• Formally Close Allensbank Primary School.
• Formally Close Gladstone Primary School.
• Establish a new 420 place (2FE) English-medium Primary School with nursery on the current shared Gladstone Primary School / St Monica’s Church in Wales Primary School site.
The proposed changes would take effect from September 2025.
3. It be noted that, prior to implementation of the proposals, financial resources must be identified to facilitate the process of organisational change of establishing the new two form entry primary school and the transfer of St Monica’s Church in Wales Primary School.
4. It be noted that, prior to implementation of the proposals, a further report will be provided to the Cabinet providing details of any objections received, the proposed responses to those objections and recommendations for implementation or otherwise of the proposals, and sources of funding for the full set of proposals.
RESOLVED: that
(i) subject to Ministerial approval, the funds from the Council’s Sustainable Communities for Learning Band B Programme (outlined in the Confidential Appendix 2) of the Final Business Case be authorised for use to enable commencement of the main works required to progress the Fairwater Community Campus.
(ii) the commitment made for the early works orders to progress the project at risk ahead of entering into contract for the main works be noted.
RESOLVED: That the public be excluded from the meeting for Part 2 of the item to consider Appendices 2 and 4 in accordance with paragraphs 14 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972.
***End of Part 1 – webcasting stopped 18:08***
***webcasting re-commenced – 18:46***
Members welcomed the ambitious and exciting proposals for the Fairwater campus and the news that this would be the largest development of its kind in the UK and looked forward to monitoring the development closely going forwards.
RESOLVED: That the Chairperson writes to the Cabinet Member on behalf of the Committee expressing their comments and observations captured during the way forward.
Caerdydd, Children and Young People Scrutiny Committee,
RESOLVED: That the Chairperson writes to the Cabinet Member on behalf of the Committee expressing their comments and observations captured during the way forward
Abertawe, Panel Llofnodwyr Cyfamod y Lluoedd Arfog,
RESOLVED:
The Council APPROVED the new appointments and re-appointments of Local Authority Governors to the school governing bodies as set out on the Amendment Sheet, each for a term of 4 years from the date of the appointment, in accordance with the recommendations of the Local Authority Governor Panel.