Ceisiadau cynllunio, y cynllun datblygu lleol a beth all gael ei adeiladu ble.
Beth mae cynghorau'n ei wneud
Mae cynghorau'n penderfynu ar geisiadau cynllunio ar gyfer adeiladau newydd, estyniadau a newidiadau defnydd, ac yn ysgrifennu'r cynllun datblygu lleol sy'n dweud ble gall cartrefi a swyddi newydd fynd. Mae parciau cenedlaethol yn penderfynu ar geisiadau o fewn eu ffiniau.
Pwy sy'n penderfynu
Swyddogion cynllunio sy'n penderfynu ar y rhan fwyaf o geisiadau. Mae rhai mwy neu ddadleuol yn mynd i bwyllgor cynllunio'r cynghorwyr, sy'n cyfarfod yn gyhoeddus.
Dweud eich dweud
Gall unrhyw un roi sylwadau ar gais tra ei fod ar agor, fel arfer am 21 diwrnod. Cadwch at faterion cynllunio fel traffig, dyluniad, sŵn ac edrych dros eiddo.
Mewn rhifau
Mae cynghorau Cymru yn bwriadu gwario £40 y pen ar hyn yn 2026-27.
Mae'n amrywio o £13 yn Sir Benfro i £152 yn Castell-nedd Port Talbot.
Ceisiadau cynllunio a benderfynwyd o fewn wyth wythnos: 45% ar draws Cymru.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to issue
an Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990 (as amended) to require:
(i) The cessation of the use of the Land for the storage of containers,
vehicles, caravans, trailers, vehicle parts, waste building material,
windows, fence panels and posts and other items.
(ii) The removal of the containers, vehicles, caravans, trailers, vehicle
parts, building material, windows, fence panels and posts and other
stored items along with the associated structures and any resultant
debris from the Land in their entirety.
(2) T H A T in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation be
granted to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reasons for decisions
(1) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control
constituting the change of use of the land to the storage of construction items and
waste, plant/machinery, the siting of a pre-fabricated container and other associated
structures has commenced within the last 10 years and the construction of
unauthorised structures within the last 4 years.
(2) The use of the land for the open-air storage of containers, vehicles,
caravans, trailers, vehicle parts, waste building material, windows, fence panels and
posts and other miscellaneous items along with the construction of structures
associated with the unauthorised use is visually akin to an industrial site. Both the
use and appearance of the site does not reflect the countryside setting of the site’s
locality, fails to preserve or positively contribute to the character of the surrounding
area and are detrimental to the countryside location, resulting in an unacceptable
visual intrusion into the open countryside. Furthermore, the site is readily visible
from the adjoining neighbouring property and is therefore detrimental to the visual
amenities of that property. For these reasons, the development is considered to be
contrary to Policies MD1 and MD2 of the Vale of Glamorgan Local Development
Plan 2011-2026 and does not conform with the aims of PPW.
(3) The items stored on site, namely the boat, vehicles and vehicle components,
likely contain an array of substances, such as petrol, diesel, oil, grease, washer fluid
etc. Vehicle components, such engines, frames, wheels are stored in the open.
Many vehicles are missing external bodyworks, such as bonnets, or the bonnets are
left open. Therefore, many of the components that hold or utilise these substances
are open to the elements. It is therefore not unreasonable to expect that such
substances, especially during periods of wet weather, are incrementally washed
from the components and onto the ground. Furthermore, components which hold
such substances are likely to rust and leak such substances onto the ground. The
nature of which the items are stored is therefore considered likely to result in an
Minutes - MT
No.
unacceptable impact on the natural environment from land contamination and the
pollution of surface water.
(4) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
(ii) Land at Field Access to the West of Village Farm House, Colwinston -
The report sought authorisation to issue an Enforcement Notice under section 38 of
the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as amended)
(“the Act”) in respect of the unauthorised demolition of a wall and stile. The
principal issue was considered to be the effect of the works on the character and
appearance of the Colwinston Conservation Area.
The report recommended that an Enforcement Notice be issued requiring the
reinstatement of the wall and stile. Authorisation was also sought to pursue legal
proceedings in the event that the Enforcement Notice was not complied with.
RESOLVED – T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to
issue an Enforcement Notice under Section 38 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and
Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as amended) to require:
(i) The reinstatement of the wall and stile to the field access to the same design
and dimensions and in the same materials as shown in photographs of the
site taken in May 2008.
Reasons for decision
(1) The demolition of the wall and stile fails to preserve or enhance the character
or appearance of the Colwinston Conservation Area. As such the works are in
conflict the Council’s duty under section 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and
Conservation Areas) Act 1990, Polices SP10 and MD8 of the Adopted Local
Development Plan 2011-2026, as well as with guidance contained within Planning
Policy Wales, TAN12 and TAN24.
(2) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the
following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action
be taken.
Minutes - MT
No.
2021/01081/FUL Received on 28 June 2022
(p31)
APPLICANT: Wales and West Housing Association, c/o Agent
AGENT: Gwen Thomas Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park,
Cardiff, CF23 8RS
Land at St. Brides Road, Wick
Residential development of 17 no. affordable units, including new access,
landscaping, drainage arrangements and associated works
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2021/01710/FUL Received on 23 September 2022
(p80)
APPLICANT: Business Loan Services (UK) Ltd Pension Scheme, C/o Agent,
AGENT: Mr Andrew Ayles, Office 14, 35 Stow Park Circle, Newport, NP20 4HF
Former Eastbrook Methodist Chapel, Chapel Row, Eastbrook, Dinas Powys
Demolition of chapel building and the erection of a dormer bungalow, on-site car
parking and amenity provision and associated development thereto
RESOLVED – T H A T subject to the relevant person(s) first entering into a Section
106 Legal Agreement or undertaking to include the following necessary planning
obligations:
• to pay a financial contribution to the sum of £27,631.20 for an off site
affordable housing contribution.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2022/00294/HYB Received on 21 March 2022
(p106)
APPLICANT: Wales and West Housing, Archway House, 77, Parc Ty Glas,
Llanishen, Cardiff, CF14 5DU
AGENT: Mr Dylan Green Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park,
Cardiff, CF23 8RS
Minutes - MT
No.
Land adjacent to Oak Court, Myrtle Close, Penarth
Hybrid planning application comprising of a full application for extra-care
accommodation and associated highways, landscaping and drainage works and
outline application for residential development and associated works with all matters
reserved except for access
RESOLVED – T H A T subject to the applicant first entering into a Section 111
Agreement under the Local Government Act 1972 to require a Section 106
Agreement to be signed on the transfer of the land to secure the following for the
extra care element of the development:
• The extra care scheme shall be delivered and retained as a 100% affordable
housing scheme that shall be occupied by people of 55 year of age and older
only and shall meet the definition of affordable housing in Annex B of the
Welsh Government Technical Advice Note 2 on Affordable Housing or any
future guidance that replaces it;
• £49,460.60 for the extra care building for sustainable transport;
• 0.755% of the project budget set aside for public art;
• The provision of land in the north west of the site (shaded in pink and falling
within the red circle on the above plan in the planning obligations section of
the report) as public open space.
• A clause for the payment of an administration fee of £5,448 (20% of the
application fee), to cover the Council’s costs to negotiate, monitor and
implement the terms of the necessary Section 106 agreement;
APPROVED - Subject to the conditions as contained within the report and it being
noted that the Reserved Matters will be reported back to the Planning Committee.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2022/00802/FUL Received on 4 August 2022
(p175)
APPLICANT: Ms Emma Vidler, Cwrt-yr-ala House , Michealston Le Pit Road,
Michaelston Le Pit, CF64 4HE
AGENT: Mr Eurig Williams, The Bank, 5 Cardiff Road, Taffs Well, Cardiff,
CF15 7RA
Cwrt Yr Ala House, Michaelston Le Pit Road, Michaelston Le Pit
Change of use of partially constructed Boiler House previously consented under
application reg 2018/01334/FUL to provide staff welfare facilities on site ancillary to
the main house.
APPROVED - Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Minutes - MT
No.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
Minutes - MT
RESOLVED – That the Chairperson writes to the Cabinet Member on behalf of the Committee to convey any comments, observations and recommendations made during the way forward.
RESOLVED: that the response to the recommendations of the Environmental Scrutiny Committee Joint Task and Finish Group on the Replacement Local Development Plan – Strategic and Delivery Options, as set out in appendix 2 be approved
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee,
the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary
action be taken.
2019/00871/OUT Received on 22 April 2021
(p31)
APPLICANT: Legal & General (Strategic Land) Ltd
AGENT: Mr. Darren Parker, Park House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff CF10 3AF
Land at Model Farm, Port Road, Rhoose
Hybrid application comprising an outline application for the demolition of existing
buildings and erection of 44.75ha Class B1/B2/B8 Business Park, car parking,
landscaping, drainage infrastructure, ecological mitigation and ancillary works (all
matters reserved aside from access) within Area A and a full application for
change of use from agricultural land to country park (Use Class D2) within Area B.
No.
RESOLVED – T H A T this matter be deferred.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2019/01031/RG3 Received on 5 July 2022
(p124)
APPLICANT: Housing and Building Services, Vale of Glamorgan, The Alps, Alps
Quarry Road, Wenvoe, CF5 6AA
AGENT: Georgia Peters, Dock Offices, Subway Road, Barry, CF63 4RT
Land to the North of Maes y Ffynnon, Bonvilston
Construction of 8 affordable residential units and associated works.
RESOLVED – T H A T deemed planning consent be granted, subject to the
amendment of the following conditions:
Amend Condition 5 to read:
No construction work associated with the development hereby approved shall take
place on the site on any Sunday or Bank Holiday or on any other day except
between the following hours:
Monday to Friday: 0800 – 1800
Saturday: 0800 – 1300
Unless such work is:
(a) Associated with an emergency (relating to health and safety or
environmental issues);
(b) Carried out with the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority.
Reason:
To safeguard the amenities of local residents, and to ensure compliance with the
terms of policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy) and MD7 (Environmental
Protection) of the Local Development Plan.
Amend Condition 13 to read:
Notwithstanding the approved plans, no development shall commence until full
engineering details of the roadworks, parking areas and turning areas shown on
drawings A101 - Site layout rev.D and A109 - Block Plan rev. D (which shall
include plain dropped curbs in place of the tactile crossing points) which shall
accommodate the amendments set out in Condition 21, have been submitted to,
No.
and approved in writing by, the planning authority. No dwelling shall be occupied
until the roadworks, parking areas and turning areas have been completed in
accordance with the approved details. The parking spaces shall thereafter be kept
available for the parking of vehicles for as long as the approved development
exists.
Reason:
To ensure that the development proposal will have an acceptable effect on local
highway safety and the amenity of the area, in accordance with policies MD2
(Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development within Settlement
Boundaries) of the Local Development Plan.
Add New Conditions 19, 20 and 21
Condition 19
Notwithstanding the submitted plans and supporting documents, the permission
hereby approved shall not relate to the removal of the trees identified as T33, T34
and T35 as shown on plan ref. A109 - Block Plan rev. D.
Reason :
In the interest of ecology and the amenity value to the area and to ensure
compliance with policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built and Natural
Environment), MD1 (Location of New Development) and MD2 (Design of New
Developments) of the Local Development Plan.
Condition 20
Notwithstanding the submitted plans and supporting documents, the permission
hereby approved shall not relate to the extinguishment of the existing turning head
and landscaping of the turning head as shown on plan ref. A101 - Site layout rev.
D and A109 - Block Plan rev. D and the turning head shall be retained as adopted
highway.
Reason:
To ensure that the development proposal will have an acceptable effect on the
highway safety and parking in accordance with policies MD2 (Design of New
Development) and MD5 (Development within Settlement Boundaries) of the Local
Development Plan.
Condition 21
Notwithstanding the submitted plans and supporting documents, prior to any
works to widen the existing highway, full details of a revised layout and a method
statement to show how the works will minimise impact on trees T33, T34 and T35
as shown on plan ref. A109 - Block Plan rev. D shall be submitted to an approved
in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The works shall thereafter be completed
No.
in accordance with the approved plans and documents in conjunction with
Condition 13.
Reason:
In the interest of ecology and the amenity value to the area and to ensure
compliance with policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), SP10 (Built and Natural
Environment), MD1 (Location of New Development) and MD2 (Design of New
Developments) of the Local Development Plan.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2021/00012/FUL Received on 16 March 2021
(p164)
APPLICANT: Mr. Paul Davey, 20 Summerland Close, Llandough, Penarth,
CF64 2QA
AGENT: Mr. Paul Davey, 20 Summerland Close, Llandough, Penarth, CF64 2QA
20 Summerland Close, Llandough, Penarth
Replacement of existing fence.
REFUSED and AUTHORISE ENFORCEMENT ACTION
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T planning permission for the works as described in the application
be refused.
(2) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to serve
an Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990 (as amended) to require:
(i) The removal of the fence and resulting materials from the land or
reduction of the fence to a height of not more than 1 metre above
ground level where it is located adjacent to the highway.
(3) T H A T in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation be
granted to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reason for refusal
The fence, by virtue of its height, length and positioning immediately adjacent to
the highway, is a prominent and visually incongruous feature in the street scene
that crudely encloses the space to the side of no. 20 Summerland Close and in
doing so erodes the value of that corner space contributed to the openness and
No.
amenity of the street scene. This is considered to have an unacceptable impact on
the visual amenity of the area and is contrary to Policies MD2 (Design of New
Development) and MD5 (Development within Settlement Boundaries) of the Vale
of Glamorgan adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026, the Vale of
Glamorgan Residential and Householder Development Supplementary Planning
Guidance (2018) and national policy contained with Planning Policy Wales
(Edition 11) and Technical Advice Note 12 (Design).
Reasons for issuing Enforcement Notice
(1) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control
constituting operational development has occurred within the last four years.
(2) The fence, by virtue of its height, length and positioning immediately
adjacent to the highway, is a prominent and visually incongruous feature in the
street scene that crudely encloses the space to the side of no. 20 Summerland
Close and in doing so erodes the P.175 value of that corner space contributed to
the openness and amenity of the street scene. This is considered to have an
unacceptable impact on the visual amenity of the area and is contrary to Policies
MD2 (Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development within Settlement
Boundaries) of the Vale of Glamorgan adopted Local Development Plan 2011-
2026, the Vale of Glamorgan Residential and Householder Development
Supplementary Planning Guidance (2018) and national policy contained with
Planning Policy Wales (Edition 11) and Technical Advice Note 12 (Design).
(3) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee,
the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary
action be taken.
2021/00423/FUL Received on 6 December 2021
(p25)
APPLICANT: Transworld Real Estate Ltd
AGENT: Mr. Luke Grattarola Ceraint John Planning Ltd. Office 16 (House 1), The
Maltings, East Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF24 5EA
Land at Bolston House, Bonvilston
Demolition of the existing dwelling and redevelopment of the site to accommodate
residential development and associated works
REFUSED
(1) By reason of the loss of a large proportion of a Significant Stone Wall, the
loss of substantial amounts of tree cover and the suburban and insensitively
designed/orientated internal site layout, the proposed development would fail to
have regard to and would fail to preserve the character of the Bonvilston
Conservation Area, contrary to policies SP10 - Built and Natural Environment,
MD2 - Design of New Development, MD5- Development within Settlement
Boundaries and MD8 – Historic Environment of the Vale of Glamorgan Local
Development Plan 2011 - 2026 and the Bonvilston Conservation Area Appraisal
and Management Plan and national guidance contained in Planning Policy Wales
(Edition 11) and Technical Advice Note 12 - Design.
(2) By reason of the size of the dwellings and plots, the proposed layout fails to
make necessary, efficient use of the land, contrary to policy MD5 - Development
within Settlement Boundaries & MD6 - Housing Densities of the Vale of
Glamorgan
Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026.
(3) By reason of the geometry and radii of the access, and the design of works
to the carriageway/footway, the proposal would result in a substandard form of
access into and out of the site, which would adversely impact upon highway
safety. The proposal is therefore considered contrary to Policies MD2 (Design Of
New Development) & MD5 (Development within Settlement Boundaries) of the
Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026.
(4) In the absence of a noise assessment that considers potential noise
nuisance from the Red Lion Inn and its garden, the proposal fails to provide
adequate information to assess the impact of noise or demonstrate that the
proposal would not be prejudicial to the amenity and living conditions of future
Minutes - MS
No.
residents at the site. In this respect the development is contrary to Policies MD2
(Design of Development) & MD7 (Environment Protection) of the Vale of
Glamorgan Local Development Plan 2011-2026.
(5) The proposal fails to satisfy the tests to justify a derogation for protected
species and would result in inadequately mitigated loss of trees that would harm
the biodiversity interests of the site. Therefore, the development is considered
contrary to Policies MD2- Design of New Developments & MD9-Promoting
Biodiversity of the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-
2026, the guidance contained within the Councils Biodiversity and Development
Supplementary Planning Guidance.
(6) The proposal fails to provide any affordable housing or the infrastructure
necessary to mitigate the impacts of the development in respect of public open
space, education and sustainable transport. In this respect the development is
contrary to Policies MG4 and MD4 of the LDP and the Council’s SPG on
Affordable Housing and Planning Obligations, and Planning Policy Wales and
TAN 2- Planning and Affordable Housing.
Reasons for decisions
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2021/00424/CAC Received on 6 December 2021
(p59)
APPLICANT: Transworld Real Estate Ltd
AGENT: Mr Luke Grattarola, Geraint John Planning Ltd, Office 16 (House 1), The
Maltings, East Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF24 5EA
Land at Bolston House, Bonvilston
Demolition of the existing dwelling and redevelopment of the site to accommodate
residential development and associated works
REFUSED
(1) The loss of part of the historical stone boundary wall would be damaging to
the intrinsic character of the site and the conservation area. The proposal would
therefore fail to preserve or enhance the character of the Conservation Area and
would be in conflict with Policies SP10 and MD8 of the Adopted Local
Development Plan, in addition to TANs 12 and 24, the aims and objectives of the
Bonvilston Conservation Area Appraisal Plan and Section 72(1) of the Town and
Country Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
Reason for decision
Minutes - MS
No.
That Members of the Planning Committee note the above conclusions and agree
that these form the basis of the Council’s case in the current non-determination
appeal for the reason set out below:
It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being objectives
and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of
the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
2021/01379/FUL Received on 23 September 2021
(p74)
APPLICANT: Mr. C. Holder, Earthmovers House, Llantrisant Business Park,
Llantrisant, CF72 8LF
AGENT: Mr. R. Hunt, 20a The Wharfage, Ironbridge, Telford, Swadlincote, TF8
7NH
The Quarries, Bonvilston
The winning and working of limestone, importation/recovery of inert waste and
restoration to agriculture/amenity.
REFUSED -
(1) By reason of the excessive unjustified infilling operation, which is not
fundamentally required to create an acceptable restored site, the proposal would
amount to (and would encourage) unjustified waste disposal that is contrary to the
principles of the waste hierarchy, would result in unnecessarily and harmful
perpetuated environmental impacts, and would fail to provide a beneficial,
sustainable, and high quality restoration and after care solution for the quarry, at
the earliest opportunity. The proposal is therefore contrary to the policy and
guidance relating to waste management contained in TAN 21 paragraph 4.23, and
criterion 2 of Policy MD20 of the LDP. In addition, the proposal is contrary to
planning policy and guidance relating to quarry restoration and after care
contained in PPW paragraphs 5.14.4, 5.14.50, and 5.14.54, MTAN1 paragraphs
94, 97, 100, 103, and 130, and criterion 7 of Policy MG25 of the LDP.
(2) It has not been demonstrated, through submission of a bat survey, that the
development would not be detrimental to the maintenance of the population of
bats - a European Protected Species. The development is therefore contrary to
Policies MG19 – Sites and Species of European Importance and Policy MD9-
Promoting Biodiversity, of the Local Development Plan, as well as national
guidance contained at paragraphs 6.3.6 & 6.3.7 of TAN 5 – Nature Conservation
and Planning and paragraph 6.4.22 of Planning Policy Wales. It is also contrary to
the provisions of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010.
Reasons for decisions
The decision to refuse planning permission has been taken in accordance with
Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires
Minutes - MS
No.
that, in determining a planning application the determination must be in
accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate
otherwise. The Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of Glamorgan
Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National
Plan 2040.
It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being objectives
and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of
the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
The appropriate marine policy documents have been considered in the
determination of this application in accordance with Section 59 of the Marine and
Coastal Access Act 2009.
In reaching the recommendation below, the content of the submitted
Environmental Impact Assessment has been taken into account, in accordance
with the requirements of The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact
Assessment) (Wales) Regulations 2017.
2022/00397/RG3 Received on 28 March 2022
(p119)
APPLICANT: Mr. Andrew Freegard, Vale of Glamorgan Council, The Alps, Alps
Quarry Road, Wenvoe, CF5 6AA
AGENT: Miss Georgia Peters, Vale of Glamorgan Council, Dock Offices, Subway
Road, Barry, CF63 4RT
Land North of Holm View Leisure Centre, Barry
Phase Two of the residential development of 31 no. affordable housing units and
associated works
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T subject to the interested person(s) first entering into a Section 106
legal agreement to include the following necessary planning obligations:
• To pay a sum of £37,652.50 to contribute towards the provision or
enhancement of educational facilities.
• To pay a sum of £39,100 to contribute towards the provision of sustainable
transport facilities in the vicinity of the site.
• The developer provides public art on the site to the value of 1% of the build
costs or otherwise pays a contribution to the same value to the Council
• To pay a sum a sum £21,420 to contribute towards the provision of new, or
enhancement of existing, community facilities in the area.
(2) T H A T in addition to a clause requiring the payment of a fee to monitor
and implement the legal agreement.
Minutes - MS
No.
Deemed planning consent be GRANTED subject to the condition(s) as contained
within the report.
Reason for decision
The decision to recommend planning permission has been taken in accordance
with
Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires
that, in determining a planning application the determination must be in
accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate
otherwise. The Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of Glamorgan
Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National
Plan 2040.
Having regard to Policies SP1– Delivering the Strategy, SP3 – Residential
Requirement, SP4 – Affordable Housing Provision, MG1 – Housing Supply in the
Vale of Glamorgan, MG2 – Housing Allocations, MG4 – Affordable Housing, MD1
- Location of New Development, MD2 - Design of New Development, MD3 -
Provision for Open Space, MD4 – Community Infrastructure and Planning
Obligations, MD6 - Housing Densities, MD7 - Environmental Protection and MD9 -
Promoting Biodiversity of the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan
2011-2026, Future Wales, National planning policy in the form of Planning Policy
Wales (Edition 11), Technical Advice Notes 2 – Affordable Housing, 12 - Design,
and the Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance on Affordable Housing,
Barry Development Guidelines, Biodiversity and Development, Parking Standards,
Planning Obligations, Residential and Householder Development, and Trees,
Woodlands, Hedgerows and Development, the proposed development is
considered acceptable in principle and in respect of design, visual impact and
layout, residential amenity, parking, highway safety, amenity/open space,
drainage, and ecology.
It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being objectives
and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of
the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
The appropriate marine policy documents have been considered in the
determination of this application in accordance with Section 59 of the Marine and
Coastal Access Act 2009.
2022/00642/FUL Received on 19 May 2022
(p157)
APPLICANT: Mrs. Penny Knight, 8 Mountjoy Close, Penarth, CF64 2TA
AGENT: Susan Rosser, RIBA, 20 Duffryn Road, Cyncoed, Cardiff, CF23 6NP
8, Mountjoy Close, Penarth
Single storey side and rear extension with new porch and roof conversion
Minutes - MS
No.
REFUSED
Reasons for Recommendations
By reason of the design, form and siting, the proposed extensions and alterations
would be harmful to the appearance of the dwelling, the balance of the semi-
detached pair and the spacious and consistent character of the street. The
development is therefore contrary to policies MD2 and MD5 of the Vale of
Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026, The Council’s
Supplementary Planning Guidance on Residential and Householder Development
and TAN 12- Design.
Minutes - MS
RESOLVED: Pursuant to this Committee’s delegated powers the following development control applications be determined in accordance with the recommendation set out in the reports of the Director of Planning, Transport and Environment, subject to any further amendments as detailed below and notification be given of the decisions in accordance with Section 70 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 or Section 74 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation) Act 1990.
APPLIATIONS GRANTED
Councillor Adrian Robson, in accordance with his prejudicial interest, left the meeting during consideration of this item.
21/02608/MNR – LLANDAFF NORTH
LAND AT EITHER SIDE OF RIVER TAFF COMPRISING LAND SOUTH OF EXISTING ACCESS ROAD WITHIN HAILEY PARK AND LAND AT EASTERN TURNING HEAD OF DE BRAOSE CLOSE, DANESCOURT.
The Construction of Sewerage Pumping Station and Associated Compound Within Hailey Park Connecting to the Existing Gated Hard Standing Access Road Including Internal Kiosk Units With Security Fencing and Landscape Planting to the Eastern, Western and Southern Boundaries to Prevent Landscape Impacts on Hailey Park. The De Braose Close Development Would Include a 1.2m Tall Actuation Valve Kiosk Upon Overgrown Scrubland Adjacent to the Eastern Pedestrian Footway.
Councillor Adrian Robson, in accordance with his prejudicial interest, left the meeting during consideration of this item.
22/00347/MJR – RADYR
PLASDWR, NORTH WEST CARDIFF
Re-discharge of Condition 24 (strategic foul drainage masterplan) of outline planning permission 14/02733/MJR (condition 24 previously discharged under application 19/02887/MJR).
APPLICATIONS REFUSED
18/00736/MNR – WHITCHURCH & TONGWYNLAIS
71 CHURCH ROAD
Proposed demolition of existing garage / outbuilding construction of new 2 storey detached dwelling, detached replacement garage with studio above and glazed link to existing dwelling
REASON:
This application was considered on 6th July 20122 Planning Committee where it was resolved to defer the application to the next meeting of Planning Committee for reasons for refusal. The application was refused for the following reasons:
1. The proposed layout makes insufficient provision for replacement planting in mitigation for the removal of existing vegetation / boundary planting to the detriment of the character of the Church Road Conservation Area contrary to Policies 5 KP5: Good Quality and Sustainable Design and EN9: Conservation of the Historic Environment of the Adopted Cardiff Local Development Plan.
2. The proposed dwelling would be likely to have a dominating and overbearing impact on the living conditions of the occupiers of No. 1 Wingfield Road by virtue of its scale and close proximity to the boundary with this property. As such, the proposal would be contrary to advice contained in Policy KP5: Good Quality and Sustainable Design of the Cardiff Local Development Plan and paragraph 4.11 of the Cardiff Infill Sites Supplementary Guidance (November 2017).
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the
following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be
taken.
2021/01405/FUL Received on 22 September 2021
(P.75)
APPLICANT: Mr Michael Murphy c/o Agent
AGENT: Mr Jeremy Peter 21, Britten Road, Penarth, CF64 3QJ
Sefton Quarry (former Scrapyard), Penmark
Change of use of land for the siting of storage containers
REFUSED AND AUTHORISE ENFORCEMENT ACTION
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the application for planning permission for the change of use of the
land be refused for the following reasons:
(i) The site is in a divorced, inefficient, and unsustainable rural location
without benefit of good access to local transport infrastructure, existing
services, and without justification for or necessity to be in the
countryside. The development is therefore considered to be
inappropriately located, having regard to the sustainability and location
requirements for waste management (and employment) facilities, and is
therefore contrary to LDP Policies SP8, criterion 1 and 2 of MD20 and
criterion 2 and 5 of MD1, as well as national guidance contained within
5.13.11 and 5.13.12 of PPW and paragraphs 1.10 and 3.27 of TAN21.
(ii) By reason of its urban appearance in contrast with the rural, verdant
and open character of the previously regenerated application site and
the surrounding land, the change of use has resulted in a demonstrably
harmful and unacceptable impact on the character of the countryside,
which is in conflict with the aims and criteria of Policies MD1 (criterion
1) and MD2 (criteria 1, 2, and 10) of the LDP, paragraphs 5.5 and 5.8.1
of TAN12 and having regard to the advice in paragraph 3.9, 3.14, 3.16,
3.38 of PPW (Edition 11).
(iii) The site has been locally designated a Site of Importance for Nature
Conservation for its potential as invertebrate and reptile habitat. In the
absence of ecological surveys or measures of biodiversity mitigation
and enhancement, and the lack of justification for the rural location, the
need for the development does not outweigh the likely nature
conservation value of the site. The development is therefore contrary
to Policies MG21 and MD9 of the LDP.
(2) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to issue an
Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) in respect of the land shown edged blue on the site location plan, to
require:
(i) The cessation of the unauthorised use of the land for storage,
(ii) The removal from the land of the shipping containers, portacabin,
portaloo, and any other structures, machinery or chattels associated
with the storage use.
(iii) The removal from the land of all items being stored on the land
including, but not limited to, any motor vehicles, caravans, trailers,
boats, the telephone kiosk, all building materials, other items such as
furniture, electrical goods, plastics, glass, metals, and all items of waste
on the site, including piles of rubble, and all rubble deposited on the
ground to form the new hardstanding,
(iv) The reinstatement of the land to its former condition prior to the
unauthorised change of use taking place.
(3) T H A T in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation be
granted to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reason for dual decision
(1) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control constituting
the change of use of the land has occurred within the last 10 years.
(2) The site is in a divorced, inefficient, and unsustainable rural location without
benefit of good access to local transport infrastructure, existing services, and without
justification for or necessity to be in the countryside. The development is therefore
considered to be inappropriately located, having regard to the sustainability and
location requirements for waste management (and employment) facilities, and is
therefore contrary to LDP Policies SP8, criterion 1 & 2 of MD20 and criterion 2 & 5 of
MD1, as well as national guidance contained within 5.13.11 & 5.13.12 of PPW and
paragraphs 1.10 and 3.27 of TAN21.
(3) By reason of its urban appearance in contrast with the rural, verdant and open
character of the previously regenerated application site and the surrounding land, the
change of use has resulted in a demonstrably harmful and unacceptable impact on
the character of the countryside, which is in conflict with the aims and criteria of
Policies MD1 (criterion 1) and MD2 (criteria 1, 2, and 10) of the LDP, paragraphs 5.5
and 5.8.1 of TAN12 and having regard to the advice in paragraph 3.9, 3.14, 3.16,
3.38 of PPW (Edition 11).
(4) The site has been locally designated a Site of Importance for Nature
Conservation for its potential as invertebrate and reptile habitat. In the absence of
ecological surveys or measures of biodiversity mitigation and enhancement, and the
lack of justification for the rural location, the need for the development does not
outweigh the likely nature conservation value of the site. The development is
therefore contrary to Policies MG21 and MD9 of the LDP.
(5) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
2022/00440/FUL Received on 25 August 2022
(P.98)
APPLICANT: Mr Bill O’Donoghue, Orchard Bungalow, Treguff, St. Mary Church.
CF71 7FS
AGENT: Mr Bill O’Donoghue, Orchard Bungalow, Treguff, St. Mary Church. CF71
7FS
Orchard Bungalow, St. Mary Church
Orchard Bungalow extended garden. Land acquired is currently agricultural. Use
required for residential to match that of existing property. Note we do not intend to
use the Land for commercial logging / metal fabrication / commercial usage or
anything associated/deemed industrial
REFUSED AND AUTHORISE ENFORCEMENT ACTION
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the application for planning permission for the change of use of the
land be refused for the following reason:
(i) By reason of its size, the rural/agricultural context, and the appearance
and open character of the application site and surrounding land, the
change of use of the land results in a demonstrably intrusive incursion
into the countryside which is harmful to its appearance and character. It
also results in an incremental and harmful urbanising effect on the
countryside, which is in conflict with the aims and criteria of Policies
MD1 (criterion 1) and MD2 (criteria 1 and 2) of the LDP, and Policy
DG13 of the Design in Landscape SPG, paragraphs 5.5 and 5.8.1 of
TAN12 and having regard to the advice in paragraph 3.9, 3.14, 3.16,
3.38 of PPW (Edition 11).
(2) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to issue an
Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) in respect of the land west and south of Orchard Bungalow, to require:
(i) The cessation of the residential use of the land,
(ii) The removal from the land of the metal shed, polytunnel, and domestic
paraphernalia including, but not limited to, goal posts and play
equipment.
(3) T H A T in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation be
granted to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reason for dual decision
(1) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control constituting
the change of use of the land from agriculture to residential use has commenced
within the last 10 years.
(2) The unauthorised change of use of the land by reason of its size, the
rural/agricultural context, and the appearance and open character of the application
site and surrounding land, has resulted in a demonstrably intrusive incursion into the
countryside which is harmful to its appearance and character. It has also resulted in
an incremental and harmful urbanising effect on the countryside, which is in conflict
with the aims and criteria of Policies MD1 (criterion 1) and MD2 (criteria 1 and 2) of
the LDP, and Policy DG13 of the Design in Landscape SPG, paragraphs 5.5 and
5.8.1 of TAN12 and having regard to the advice in paragraph 3.9, 3.14, 3.16, 3.38 of
PPW (Edition 11).
(3) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to serve an
Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) to require:
(i) The cessation of the use of the site for the depositing, storage and any
processing of construction and miscellaneous materials.
(ii) The cessation of the use of the site for all domestic and leisure
purposes.
(iii) The removal of all containers / buildings, equipment, materials and
other miscellaneous items from the land that are used in association
with the unauthorised uses identified above in steps (i) and (ii).
(iv) The removal of the wooden fence panels affixed to the palisade
fencing.
(2) In the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation be granted to
take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reason for recommendation
(1) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control constituting
the material change of use of the land has occurred within the last 10 years
(2) The use of the agricultural/forestry land for domestic leisure purposes and as
a storage and transfer facility for construction and/or miscellaneous other materials
and equipment is an unacceptable and unjustifiable development that fails to
respond appropriately to the countryside and special landscape area setting and the
activities are considered to be incongruous in the rural setting. By virtue of the
encroachment on the countryside and the unacceptable visual impact the use has on
the countryside, the development is contrary to the aims of Policies SP1 – Delivering
the Strategy, MG17 – Special Landscape Areas, MD1 – Location of New
Development, MD2 – Design of New Development, and MD7 – Environmental
Protection of the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011 – 2026
as well as the Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance on Design in the
Landscape and Chapter 3 - Strategic and Spatial Choices, of Planning Policy Wales
Edition 11 (2021).
(3) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
(ii) The Old Chapel, The Rhiw, Graig Penllyn, Cowbridge, CF71 7RS –
This report sought authorisation to issue an Enforcement Notice under section 172 of
the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) in respect of the trellis
fencing that had been erected along the southern boundary of the property.
The report recommended that an Enforcement Notice is issued requiring the removal
of the trellis fencing and supportive posts and the repairing and making good of any
damage caused to the wall with a material to match the colour and texture of the
wall. Authorisation was also sought to pursue legal proceedings in the event that the
Enforcement Notice was not complied with.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to serve an
Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) to:
(i) Remove any part of the trellis fencing including its supportive posts that
is above one metre in height above ground level;
(ii) Repair and make good any damage to the boundary wall as a result of
step (i) above with a suitable material to match the colour and texture
of the existing wall.
(2) T H A T in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation be
granted to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reasons for decisions
(1) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control constituting
the erection of a trellis fence has occurred within the last 4 years.
(2) The trellis fencing due to its height, design and prominent positioning
represents a visually harmful and insensitive form of development that is detrimental
to the character of the area, contrary to Policies SP10, MG17, MD2 and MD5.
(3) The location and height of the fencing obscures views of drivers using the
immediate highway network as well as those egressing from the garage. This
coupled with the highway network not benefitting from a pedestrianised walkway
results in an increased chance of conflict between road users and / or pedestrians,
which is detrimental to highway safety contrary to Policy MD2.
(4) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
RESOLVED: Pursuant to this Committee’s delegated powers the following development control applications be determined in accordance with the recommendation set out in the reports of the Director of Planning, Transport and Environment, subject to any further amendments as detailed below and notification be given of the decisions in accordance with Section 70 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 or Section 74 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation) Act 1990.
APPLICATIONS GRANTED:
22/00725/MJR – WHITCHURCH & TONGWYNLAIS
LAND TO THE NORTH-WEST OF WHITCHURCH HOSPITAL PLAYING FIELDS
Discharge of Condition 8 (Construction Environmental Management Plan) & 10 (Mitigation and Monitoring) of 20/01110/MJR
Subject to the following note:
“Members expressed their view that hours of working should be limited to the specified hours, albeit noting that any works undertaken beyond agreed operating hours would require the consent of the Local Planning Authority and Shared Regulatory Services”
22/00802/MJR – WHITCHURCH & TONGWYNLAIS
LAND TO THE NORTH-WEST OF WHITCHURCH HOSPITAL PLAYING FIELDS.
Discharge of Condition 17 (Construction Environmental Management Plan) of 17/01735/MJR
Subject to the following note:
“Members expressed their view that hours of working should be limited to the specified hours, albeit noting that any works undertaken beyond agreed operating hours would require the consent of the Local Planning Authority and Shared Regulatory Services”
22/00711/MNR – SPLOTT
100 SPLOTT ROAD
Ground floor extension, rear dormer and alterations to create a 7 Bedroom sui generis house in multiple occupation.
APPLICATIONS REFUSED
22/00885/MNR – CATHAYS
76 MAINDY ROAD
Change of use from a C3 dwelling house to eight person house of multiple occupation (sui generis) with ground and first floor rear extensions, rear dormer roof extension, insertion of roof light to the front roof plane and associated alterations
REASON: The use of the property as an 8 bedroom House in Multiple Occupation has the potential to further exacerbate the unacceptable cumulative adverse impacts on the amenities of the area by virtue of:
§ a higher number of transient residents leading towards less community cohesion and undermining the objectives of securing a sustainable mixed use community, contrary to Policy KP5, Policy KP13 and Policy H5 of the Cardiff Local Development Plan (2006-2016) and advice contained within the Houses in Multiple Occupation Supplementary Planning Guidance (2016).
§ a higher portion of transient residents leading to an increase of cumulative demand on social, community and physical infrastructure, contrary to Policy KP5, Policy KP13 and Policy H5 of the Cardiff Local Development Plan (2006-2026) and advice contained within the Houses in Multiple Occupation Supplementary Planning Guidance (2016).
1. The use of the property as an 8 bedroom HMO will result in an increase in the number of HMO’s within the vicinity to the detriment of the existing community affecting its composition, cohesion, character, functionality and its sense of place contrary to Policy KP5, Policy KP13 and Policy H5 of the Cardiff Local Development Plan (2006-2026) and the Houses in Multiple Occupation Supplementary Planning Guidance (2016).
APPLICATIONS DEFERRED
18/00736/MNR – WHITCHURCH & TONGWYNLAIS
71 CHURCH ROAD
Proposed demolition of existing garage/ outbuilding construction of new 2 storey detached dwelling, detached replacement garage with studio above and glazed link to existing dwelling.
REASON: As a result of a technical issue with the new software system and Councillors being unable to speak.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the
following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be
taken.
2021/00622/FUL Received on 18 May 2022
(P. 76)
APPLICANT: Kestral Construction and Hafod HA
Agent: Mr Liam Griffiths Asbri Planning Ltd., Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate
Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RS
81-85, Holton Road, Barry
Part demolition, extension and conversion of the upper floors of no. 81 – 85 Holton
Road to provide 25 no. residential flats, internal and external alterations and
associated works.
RESOLVED – T H A T subject to the applicant entering into a Section 106
agreement to secure the following:
EITHER
• The residential units are delivered by the Vale of Glamorgan Council, or by a
Housing Association Partner (Hafod Housing, Newydd Housing, United Welsh
Housing or Wales & West Housing) of the Vale of Glamorgan Council.
OR
• The developer pays £54,996 for the provision or enhancement of educational
facilities in schools serving the development for Secondary school children.
• The developer pays a contribution of £57,500 towards sustainable transport
facilities in the vicinity of the site.
• The developer provides public art on the site to the value of 1% of the build
costs or otherwise pays a contribution to the same value to the Council.
• The developer pays a contribution of £66,700 towards providing or enhancing
public open space in the vicinity of the site.
AND
• The units shall only be occupied as affordable housing that meets the definition
of affordable housing in Annex B of the Welsh Government Technical Advice
Note 2 on Affordable Housing, or any future guidance that replaces it.
• The developer pays the legal and implementation/monitoring fees for the S106
agreement.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2021/00764/FUL Received on 15 July 2022
(P. 104)
APPLICANT: Heritage Coast Campsite Monknash, Cowbridge, Vale of Glamorgan.,
CF71 7QQ
AGENT: r. Andrew Parker Andrew Parker Associates, The Old Farmhouse,
Trerhyngyll, Vale of Glamorgan, CF71 7TN
Heritage Coast Campsite, Monknash
Proposed 2 no. new tourist lodges, conversion of existing camp site facilities to form
2 no. tourist accommodation units. Proposed campervan site and tent area with
provision of new toilet shower block.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2021/01270/FUL Received on 1 September 2021
(P. 125)
APPLICANT: Mr. D Clarke Brooklands, Brook Lane, St. Nicholas. CF5 6TB
AGENT: Mr. Geraint John Office 16 (House 1, 2nd Floor), The Maltings, East
Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF24 5EA
Brooklands, Brook Lane, St. Nicholas
Part retrospective application to regularise and seek the approval for the completion
of the 'as built' development for a new detached dwelling (through a barn conversion
and associated works of adaptation and extension).
RESOLVED -
(1) T H A T planning permission for the works as described in the application be
refused.
(2) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to serve an
Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) to require the following:
i. The removal of all unauthorised works that have taken place to Barn F,
including the doors and windows, blockwork walls, cladding and roof
covering, and the reinstatement of the barn to its previous appearance, as
shown in the approved plans and the photographs attached to planning
application file 2011/00898/FUL;
ii. The demolition of the brick link extension (referred to as building B in the
submitted planning application) that has been built between Barn F and
the adjacent building (Barn E);
iii. Making good the east elevation of Barn E (following the demolition of the
link extension) by bricking this up in matching brickwork.
(3) T H A T in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation is also
sought to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reasons for decisions
(1) The extent of works proposed and that have been carried out to the former
steel portal framed barn in the east of the site (Barn F), and the link extension
adjoining this to the adjacent brick and blockwork barn (Barn E) and as proposed,
amount to the substantial reconstruction and alteration of the building, to the extent
that these elements of the proposal would constitute the construction of a new
building in the countryside. By reason of the design and character of the
alterations/new building, relative to its former agricultural appearance, the works
have unacceptably harmed and fundamentally altered the character of the building.
The former overly agricultural portal barn now has a highly domesticated an
urbanised character, which is to the detriment of the group of buildings and the wider
character of the yard. This is contrary to Policies MD1 (Location of New
Development) and MD11 (Conversion and Renovation of Rural Buildings) of the Vale
of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026, the Conversion and
Renovation of Rural Buildings Supplementary Planning Guidance (2018) and advice
in Technical Advice Note 12 (Design).
(2) The recommendation to refuse planning permission has been taken in
accordance with Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004,
which requires that, in determining a planning application the determination must be
in accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate
otherwise. The Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of Glamorgan
Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National Plan
2040.
(3) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
(4) The appropriate marine policy documents have been considered in the
determination of this application in accordance with Section 59 of the Marine and
Coastal Access Act 2009.
2021/01386/RG3 Received on 22 September 2021
(P. 158)
APPLICANT: Vale of Glamorgan Council, The Alps, Quarry Road, Cardiff, CF5 6AA
AGENT: Mr John Griffiths Blacksmiths Shop, The Forge, Cantref, Brecon, LD3 8LR
2, Dyffryn Close, St. Nicholas
Retrospective application for new roof covering.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2021/01387|/RG3 Received on 22 September 2021
(P. 169)
APPLICANT: Vale of Glamorgan Council, The Alps, Quarry Road, Cardiff, CF5 6AA
AGENT: Mr John Griffiths Blacksmiths Shop, The Forge, Cantref, Brecon, LD3 8LR
4, Dyffryn Close, St. Nicholas
Retrospective application for new roof covering.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2021/01388/RG3 Received on 22 September 2021
(P. 181)
APPLICANT: Vale of Glamorgan Council, The Alps, Quarry Road, Cardiff, CF5 6AA
AGENT: Mr John Griffiths Blacksmiths Shop, The Forge, Cantref, Brecon, LD3 8LR
13, Dyffryn Close, St. Nicholas
Retrospective planning application for change of roof covering.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2021/01809/FUL Received on 6 January 2022
(P. 192)
APPLICANT: Mr Eugene McKay c/o Agent, Unit D - Lunesdale, Upton Magna
Business Park, Shrewsbury, SY4 4TT
AGENT: Tim Williams Green Planning Studio Ltd, Unit D - Lunesdale, Upton Magna
Business Park, Shrewsbury, SY4 4TT
Barn (to the North of Howe Mill Farm), St Athan Road, St Mary Church
Change of use of a barn to dwelling to be used for holiday purposes.
WITHDRAWN by the applicant
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to serve an
Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) to require:
(i) Reinstate the building to its original condition including undertaking the
following:
• Remove the render applied to the exterior of the building.
• Remove the windows and doors on the front and rear elevations.
• Remove the additional areas of new external blockwork in elevations.
• Remove the profiled tiled metal sheeting roof.
(ii) Remove all of the waste materials from the land resulting from the taking
of step (i) above.
(2) T H AT in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation is also
sought to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reasons for decisions
(1) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control constituting
operational development has occurred within the last four years.
(2) The works that have been undertaken to date have resulted in the substantial
alteration of the former rural brick building and are not sympathetic to the fabric of
the existing building and unacceptably affects the appearance and rural character of
the building and its wider rural setting. The development would, therefore, conflict
with Policies SP1 - Delivering the Strategy, MD1 - Location of New Development,
MD11 – Conversion and Renovation of Rural Buildings and MD13 - Tourism and
Leisure of the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026 and
Conversion and Renovation of Rural Buildings (2018) Supplementary Planning
Guidance, as well as national policy identified within Planning Policy Wales (Edition
11, 2021), TAN12- Design and TAN 24 – The Historic Environment.
(3) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
2021/00571/FUL Received on 4 May 2022
(P. 222)
APPLICANT: Mr Jacob George, 122-124, Plymouth Road, The Waverley Care
Centre,
Penarth , Vale Of Glamorgan. CF64 5DN
AGENT: Mrs Kruti Gandhi, 58B, Clearwater Way, Lakeside, Cardiff. CF23 6DJ
The Waverley Care Centre, 122-124, Plymouth Road, Penarth
Retain boundary fence and gates as built replacing approved (2021/01186/FUL of
14/12/2021) brick wall with metal fencing due to structural instability.
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to issue an
Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) to require:
(i) The cessation of the use of the land for the storage of:
(a) construction related goods including (but not limited to), building
materials, fittings, fixtures, signage, ladders, paint, machinery, bricks, fencing,
sheds, tubing, wheelbarrows, tubs, woodwork, pallets and UPVC frames and
other miscellaneous items;
(b) construction related waste materials including (but not limited to),
rubble, tubs, woodwork and pallets;
(c) a prefabricated unit, shed and other buildings, along with the remains
of a roof.
(ii) The permanent removal from the land of the:
(a) construction related goods including (but not limited to), building
materials, fittings, fixtures, signage, ladders, paint, machinery, bricks, fencing,
sheds, tubing, wheelbarrows, tubs, woodwork, pallets, UPVC frames and
other miscellaneous items;
(b) construction related waste materials including (but not limited to),
rubble, tubs, woodwork and pallets;
(c) prefabricated unit, shed and other buildings, along with the remains of
a roof.
(2) T H AT, in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation be
granted to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reasons for decisions
(1) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control constituting
the change of use of the land from agriculture to a mixed use of agriculture and the
storage of construction items and waste, plant/machinery, the siting of a pre-
fabricated container and other associated buildings has commenced within the last
10 years.
(2) The unauthorised change of use of the land has resulted in a large volume of
commercial items, waste as well as associated machinery and buildings stored on
agricultural land in readily visible positions. This results in the loss of open
countryside which is detrimental to the rural character of the area and to the visual
amenities of local properties. Furthermore, the movement, sorting, collecting and
delivery of items, waste and machinery is a loud and disruptive process which further
detrimentally impacts the amenities of neighbouring properties by way of noise
disturbance and further detrimentally impacts the character of the area. The
unauthorised use of the land for the storage of construction items, plant/machinery
and associated structures and buildings is therefore considered to be contrary to
Policies MD2, MD5 and MD7 of the Local Development Plan as well as guidance set
out in Planning Policy Wales (Edition 11, 2021).
(3) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
(ii) Land and Buildings at 101, Port Road West, Barry -
The report sought authorisation to issue an Enforcement Notice under section 172 of
the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) in respect of the grey roof
tiles, boundary wall and dormer window recently constructed at the property.
The report recommended that an Enforcement Notice be issued requiring the
replacement of the roof tiles on the existing dwelling and extension with a suitable
alternative that matched the colour and texture of the original dwelling, lowering the
1.8m high boundary wall and the finishing of the dormer window in materials that
matched the roof of the original dwelling. Authorisation was also sought to pursue
legal proceedings in the event that the Enforcement Notice was not complied with.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to serve an
Enforcement Notice under Section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
(as amended) to require:
(i) The removal of the grey cement roof tiles on the existing dwelling and
their replacement with a suitable alternative that matches, as far as
practicable, the colour and concrete texture/profile of the tiles on the original
dwelling and adjoining property.
(ii) The removal of the grey cement roof tiles on the two-storey side
extension and their replacement with a suitable alternative that matches the
colour and concrete texture/profile of the tiles on the original dwelling and
adjoining property.
(iii) The reduction of the 1.8m high boundary wall/fence constructed around
the boundary of the garden to a height of no more than 1m above ground
level.
(iv) The removal of all waste materials resulting from the taking of steps (i)
– (iv) above from the site.
(2) T H A T in the event of non-compliance with the Notice, authorisation be
granted to take such legal proceedings as may be required.
Reasons for decisions
(1) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control constituting
operational development - the re-roofing of the original dwelling and the construction
of the boundary wall, have occurred within the last 4 years and the roofing of the
extension with grey cement tiles in breach of condition 2. On planning application
2020/01082/FUL, within the last 10 years.
(2) The development has been undertaken to a residential property within the
settlement boundary where development is expected to be of a high standard of
design that positively contributes to the context and character of the surrounding
natural and built environment and is of a scale, form, layout and character that is
sympathetic to and respects its immediate setting and wider surroundings. The use
of grey cement roof tiles on the original dwelling and extension, and boundary wall
are considered to be unacceptable as they detract from the character of the existing
property and its setting and have an adverse impact on the wider street scene. The
development is therefore considered to be contrary to policies SP1, (Delivering the
Strategy), SP10 (Built and Natural Environment), MD2 (Design of New Development)
and MD5 (Development within Settlement Boundaries), the Residential and
Householder Development SPG, PPW Edition 11 (2021) and Technical Advice Note
12: Design.
(3) Despite meetings and correspondence with the owner of the property, no
further attempts have been made to regularise the position or remove the
unauthorised development which is considered to be unacceptable.
(4) It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being
objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the
requirements of the Well Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.
RESOLVED – THAT the comments of the Environment and Regeneration
Scrutiny Committee and subsequent comments from Councillor Morgan be noted
and considered further by the next Administration as part of an authority-wide
traffic management and road safety policy that linked with both the 20mph default
speed limit and plans for greater active travel opportunities .
Question:
Can you please confirm that the current Cabinet has brought forward this
resolution and that the proposed authority-wide traffic management and road
safety policy will now be addressed as a matter of priority?
Reply from the Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Sustainable Places
Welsh Government announced on 12th June, 2022, a decision to introduce a
default speed limit of 20mph in Wales. At this current time our officers are working
hard to plan and deliver this project in time for the current introduction date of
September 2023. This means there are limited resources to undertake any further
large scale traffic policy work, but in addition it would be inappropriate to
undertake this work prior to the implementation of the ongoing 20mph default
project, as this involves the review of various guidance associated with the setting
of speed limits which would be an essential part of any such policy.
There is a detailed plan of Active Travel proposals for the Vale of Glamorgan and
this can be found on the Council’s website which she would encourage people to
look at. The work to develop an authority-wide traffic management and road
safety policy will commence following the implementation of the 20mph default
speed limit.
If there are any specific issues – whether these are around a specific issue or
locality that Councillor Morgan has concerns about, I would be more than happy to
explore those matters further through discussion with all Members as well if they
asked.
Minutes - JR
No.
Supplemental
Councillor Morgan, referring to his disappointment that nothing had been
progressed, sought a meeting with the Cabinet Member to discuss the matter
further.
The Cabinet Member indicated that she was happy to do so.
(iii) Question from Councillor Dr. I.J. Johnson
How many people are currently waiting for social services support, and what is the
Council doing to reduce that number?
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Social Care and Health
People approach Social Services for a variety of reasons. The question is very
broad and so I have endeavoured to give some broad details firstly for Adults and
then secondly for Children and Young People. If there is anything specific that
Councillor Dr. Johnson has concerns about, I can maybe deal with that as a
supplementary or through further discussion.
Adult Assessment:
In Adult Services there are currently 99 people in the community waiting for a
Social Services assessment. There are an additional 6 people waiting in hospital
for an assessment by a Social Worker
There are no urgent cases waiting assessment, but there are 24 awaiting
allocation and 75 cases awaiting input from an Occupational Therapist (these are
lower priority) the standard we seek to achieve is for assessment to be made
within 12 weeks.
Adults Waiting for a Service:
There are 5 people waiting for a care home placement (3 permanent, 1 temp,
1 respite).
There are 120 people waiting for domiciliary care however, just over 20 of those
are temporarily receiving that care from the Vale Community Resource Service
which specialises in providing reablement and rehabilitation.
For Children and Young People
The picture here is different and the detail I will provide relates to the numbers
waiting to be assessed. This is the position as at the 11/7/22:
• 10 children (in 9 families) awaiting assessment by the Child Health and
Disability Team. It is expected a number of these children will be allocated
for assessment within a week.
Minutes - JR
No.
• 39 children (in 28 families) awaiting assessment by the Intake Team.
The list of children waiting is kept under regular review and allocated according to
need.
Supplemental
Thanking the Cabinet Member for his response, Councillor Dr. Johnson sought
clarification in respect of the market fragility and service capacity, noting that these
were high on the Council’s risk register and enquired if staffing issues were
affecting the Council’s ability to deliver support.
The Cabinet Member confirmed that there were seven individuals waiting
assessment and confirmed that in regard to Adult Services there were less than
100 people waiting for care at home and this was where the Authority was finding
it particularly difficult to meet those individuals’ needs. As a result the service was
conducting risk assessments for those individuals to ensure that they were
prioritised. Domiciliary care was particularly difficult to resource in rural areas as a
result specific initiatives were in place to develop additional capacity in the
Western Vale. The supply and demand of domiciliary care was carefully
monitored and over the previous three months a growing number of packages had
been put in place each month. In April, this was 108 packages and in June 136.
There was however a gap in capacity and Social Services had put several
measures in place to mitigate the situation. He agreed to forward details of these
measures to Councillor Dr. Johnson and Members of the Council.
(iv) Question from Councillor Dr. I.J. Johnson
How many Council houses have been built by the Vale of Glamorgan Council in
the last decade?
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Public Sector Housing and Tenant
Engagement
Given the housing crisis in this country, let alone in the Vale of Glamorgan, the
straightforward answer is – not enough!
But, the good news is that the Council re-commenced its house building
programme in September 2017, and since this date Council has completed 76
properties in the following areas:
• Francis Road, Barry – 3 no. units
• Llys Llechwedd Jenner, Barry – 28 no. units
• Clos Holm View, Barry Phase 1 – 11 no. units
• Court Road, Barry – 11 no. units
• Lon y Felin Wynt, Hayes Road, Barry – 23 no. units
67 properties are currently under construction and these are:
Minutes - JR
No.
• St Cyres Road, Penarth – 14 no. units
• Hayeswood Road, Barry – 53 no. units
We are ‘in contract’ for 32 properties and awaiting construction start dates at:
• Coldbrook Road East, Barry – 20 no. units
• Colcot Clinic, Barry – 12 no. units
Awaiting Planning Decision, but due to start on site 2022/23, on a further 49
properties at the following locations:
• Clos Holm View, Barry (Phase 2) – 31 no. units
• Maes y Ffynnon, Bonvilston – 8 no. units
• Olive Lodge, Barry (acquisition pending) – 10 no. units
In addition we currently have 346 units for schemes at Feasibility and Pre-
development stage from 2023.
Supplemental
Councillor Dr. Johnson, being pleased to hear that the projects were under
delivery, enquired of the Cabinet Member as to what consideration she had given
in the context of the number of units quoted in her response, the impact of inflation
and supply chain issues affecting the construction industry would have on the
delivery of the programme over the coming years.
The Cabinet Member acknowledged that there had been difficulties with costings
of materials and prices from contractors and the Council was working hard to
mitigate these pressures and she indicated that she would provide Councillor
Dr. Johnson with a written reply.
(v) Question from Councillor Dr. I.J. Johnson
What is the current situation regarding the Model Farm development?
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Community Engagement, Equalities and
Regulatory Services
Planning permission was quashed in October 2021 when the Court Order by
HHJ Jarman QC confirmed the application for permission for judicial review was
granted. The planning application is now back with the Council for determination.
A new public consultation regarding the planning application was undertaken
earlier in the year and additional viability information has also been presented by
the applicant which the public could comment on. This information is currently
being considered by relevant experts on behalf of the Council.
The application remains under assessment and will be reported back to Planning
Committee for consideration once this process (including the assessment of the
viability information) is complete. However, it should be noted that the application
Minutes - JR
No.
is also currently subject to a holding direction from Welsh Government and once
the Planning Committee considers the application, it will have to be passed back
to Welsh Government for an actual decision.
The application will not be on the agenda for next Planning Committee on 27th July
and is likely to come back for consideration in the Autumn.
Supplemental
Councillor Dr. Johnson sought clarification on the process and decision-making in
terms of who would make the final decision regarding the granting of planning
permission.
Referring to the holding direction received from Welsh Government the Cabinet
Member confirmed that the matter would come back to the Council’s Planning
Committee in the near future to consider officers’ recommendations. Once the
Planning Committee had considered the matter the application would be passed
back to Welsh Government for the final decision.
(vi) Question from Councillor Dr. I.J. Johnson
What is the timetable for a new-build Welsh medium school in Cowbridge?
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Education, Arts and the Welsh Language
Thank you for your question. The new build Welsh Medium School in Cowbridge
proposal will need to be subject to a statutory consultation process. This is
provisionally planned for September 2022 and a final determination on the
education proposal likely in March 2023. This consultation is required to determine
what form of Welsh Medium primary school would be most appropriate based on
the statutory considerations outlined in the School Organisation Code.
It is anticipated that the funding for the project will form part of the extended
Sustainable Communities for Learning Band B programme. This will depend on
Welsh Government approval to extend the programme. Projects within the Band B
programme must be approved before 2024 and completed by 2026.
Based on the current estimated timeframe it is expected that the relevant business
case, planning and SAB approvals would be in place by September 2023 to allow
construction to begin. The new school would be anticipated to open in January
2025 subject to no delays in achieving the relevant approvals.
The Council’s draft Welsh in Education Strategic Plan covering the years 2022 to
2032 requires the new school to be delivered by 2027. Under the current
programme the Council aims to deliver the new school by 2025. However, this is
subject to the necessary funding being in place and the outcome of the relevant
stages of the decision making process.
Minutes - JR
No.
Supplemental
Councillor Dr. Johnson enquired if any lessons had been learned from the Barry
Waterfront development.
The Cabinet Member confirmed that there had been and she would be happy to
discuss these with Councillor Dr. Johnson further.
(vii) Question from Councillor M.J. Hooper
Given the upcoming changes at Westminster, and especially cognisant of Boris
Johnson's personal agenda, have the Council identified any new risks to the
levelling up funding bid, and what are they doing to mitigate said risks?
Reply from the Executive Leader and Cabinet Member for Performance and
Resources
The scope of the Levelling Up Round 2 remains unchanged and changes within
Westminster have not impacted on bid development. The Portal for submission of
bids had opened and the Council bid would be submitted shortly. The Council has
identified this as a risk in terms of delivery timescales for capital works should the
bid be approved. It is hoped that the end dates for delivery or the appraisal
window will be amended by UK Government to mitigate against this delay at the
start of the process.
Supplemental
Councillor Hooper, referring to the current Prime Minister leadership contest and
to the pledges relating to taxation made by the candidates which economic
commentators believed could result in implications for future levelling up funding
and shared prosperity funding, asked the Leader if she would consider a review of
the risks.
Referring to scenario planning by the Project Team, the Leader indicated that they
were well ahead in terms of working out the potential implications, but until clarity
was achieved within the Conservative party, it was a case of waiting and seeing
and then act accordingly.
(viii) Question from Councillor C.A. Cave
Could the Cabinet Member please explain the criteria for cutting highway verges?
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Neighbourhood and Building Services
There are set criteria for the various designated areas of the Highways Verge
network and the detail of this is as follows:
Minutes - JR
No.
There are 150km of carriageway designated as Strategic Routes within the
adopted highway, these are cut during May, July and September throughout the
growing season to an average width of 3 metres.
There are 655km of carriageway designated as Non-Strategic Routes within the
adopted highway, these are cut on one occasion at an average width of 1.2
metres after the 3rd Monday in July to aid users of the carriageway but also to aid /
assist the ecological interest of these verges.
There are several recognised Vision Splays within the highway network that
require cutting at the beginning of the growing season to ensure appropriate vison
at these junctions, this would usually take place in May, however within our
contract we also have the ability to call upon a second vison splay cut if verge
growth requires it.
Supplemental
Councillor Cave sought an explanation from the Cabinet Member as to why
contractors were being allowed to choose when and where they would cut grass
verges. She had particular concern that vehicle vision splays were not being
appropriately managed.
The Cabinet Member indicated that he was not aware of any particular issues in
regard to the maintenance of highway verges but gave an assurance that he
would investigate the matter.
(ix) Question from Councillor C.A. Cave
Will the Cabinet Member please give his support to a Rural Roads Policy?
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Sustainable Places
Thank you for your question and I would advise that I am aware that this matter
has already been responded to and addressed via Council questions by the
previous Cabinet Member for Neighbourhood Services and Transport. I would
concur with his statements and position stated at that time, however, for the
avoidance of doubt I would clarify as below for new Members.
The Council’s local road network comprises a mixture of road classes and
unclassified roads within the rural Vale incorporating country lanes. It is the case
with a significant number of both urban and rural roads throughout the Vale that
these were not designed or constructed to accommodate the current mix and
volume of traffic, pedestrian, cyclist and equestrian users. However, all roads
including rural roads and country lanes, must carry a certain composition of traffic
to serve the needs of the local population both from a business, work and leisure
perspective and motorists who use these roads should do so with appropriate care
and consideration for others. It is also accepted that there is a general increase in
the use of all roads for various purposes, but this is Vale wide and affects all
classes or road both rural and urban.
Minutes - JR
No.
Where specific safety or conflict issues arise along rural roads or country lanes
this is already investigated and managed based on specific investigation and
evidence obtained in the same was as urban roads to ensure the Council comply
with its statutory duty to manage its overall highway network in accordance with
the appropriate legislation. There are no requirements for the Council to manage
country lanes or rural roads separately or in a different manner to its other local
road network and there is no evidence that country lanes are generally unsafe,
albeit there is a recognition of a slightly different mix of traffic and infrastructure
conditions in managing various elements and classes of road within the Vale’s
local road network. Where issues on any country roads are brought to the
Council’s attention then these will be fully investigated based on the evidence and
risk approach in the same way that all other roads are assessed and managed.
As a consequence, and based on the above position, I do not consider that there
is a need to have a separate Rural Roads Policy as safety and traffic conditions
are already considered specific to each circumstance and section of road based
on investigation and evidence whether this is a rural country lane or busy urban
road. In summary, the Council’s highways teams review and considers specific
concerns on its rural network in the same manner as any other road within the
Vale’s local highway network and this is considered adequate, reasonable and a
proportionate way to deal with safety issues which may be raised or occur at any
time.
Finally, and as referenced in one of my previous responses, at a meeting of the
Cabinet on 28th February 2022 consideration was given to a reference from the
Environment and Regeneration Scrutiny Committee concerning a suggested Rural
Roads Policy in the Vale. Cabinet at the time resolved to note the comments of
the Environment and Regeneration Scrutiny Committee and subsequent
comments from Councillor Morgan and considered further by the next
Administration as part of an authority-wide traffic management and road safety
policy that linked with both the 20mph default speed limit which she supported.
I agree with the previous Cabinet Member’s position on this matter and as I have
stated, work to develop an authority-wide traffic management and road safety
policy will commence following the implementation of the 20mph default speed
limit.
Supplemental
Thanking Councillor Morgan for his support and campaigning for such a policy,
Councillor Cave asked the Cabinet Member if she would accept an invitation to
visit her ward to look at issues that had not been addressed by her Cabinet
predecessor.
The Cabinet Member indicated that she would be happy to visit Councillor Cave’s
ward.
Minutes - JR
No.
(x) Question from Councillor G.D.D. Carroll
What action is the Council taking in response to the impacts of inflation on the
Authority’s budgets?
Reply from the Executive Leader and Cabinet Member for Performance and
Resources
The inflationary pressures are impacting on all of the Council’s finances both
revenue and capital.
For revenue the Council has been largely protected on rising utility costs having
purchased its gas and electric in advance but is seeing pressure coming through
on changes to standing charges. Negotiations are ongoing on the 2022/23 pay
award and it is looking likely that the 3% set aside will be insufficient. Services are
managing their budgets tightly to ensure the Council’s finances are as robust as
possible. Regular sessions are held to discuss budget pressures across all
Directorates. You will also be aware that regular revenue (and capital) monitoring
reports are brought before Cabinet (and all Scrutiny Committees) so that the
budgets can be monitored and where necessary, action taken to address
emerging issues.
Pressures are also coming through in Capital and again the finance team are
working with service managers to understand the impact of rising prices at a
scheme level. As part of this work we are ascertaining progress on schemes,
whether work is under way, contracts agreed or work still out to tender. Managers
are having to value engineer schemes to keep to agreed cost envelopes. In
particular cases, such as with key projects that are funded via Welsh Government
(21stC schools being a key example), discussions are held to establish whether
inflationary pressures can be factored into any awards.
Finally, all be aware that the Council does hold specific reserves (both revenue
and capital) which are available to be used as a consequence of cost pressures,
including inflationary increases.
Supplemental
Councillor Carroll enquired if the Leader anticipated a draw down from reserves
and what this amount would be.
The Leader pointed out to Councillor Carroll that this had been set out in recent
reports to the Corporate Performance and Resources Scrutiny Committee and the
Governance and Audit Committee. Those reports referred to reserves that could
be used and would be used if deemed necessary and it was just as well the
Council had these.
Minutes - JR
No.
(xi) Question from Councillor G.D.D. Carroll
Will the Cabinet Member please provide an update on action the Council is taking
to improve highway infrastructure on Llandough Hill?
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Neighbourhood and Building Services
Thank you for your question, however, it is unclear exactly what information you
are looking for regarding the highway infrastructure on Llandough. I can confirm
that Llandough Hill is recorded as adopted highway and the Council as local
highway authority has a duty to maintain it at public expense under Section 41 of
the Highways Act 1980. I am unaware of any other infrastructure on Llandough
Hill that you may be referring too. Perhaps if you could elaborate, I would be
happy to respond further.
Supplemental
Councillor Carroll asked the Cabinet Member if he would support the resurfacing
of the road.
The Council’s three year plan which provided a method whereby individual roads
were identified and prioritised for resurfacing through consideration of several
specific criteria, which included but was not limited to road classification, ongoing
maintenance costs, customer complaints and third party claims. The process
enabled the Council to implement an annual programme of resurfacing works on a
priority basis so as to manage its highway asset in the most cost effective and
beneficial manner subject to the funding available annually for such works. The
three year plan had recently been updated and was presented to Cabinet on
7th July, 2022 and the Environment and Regeneration Scrutiny Committee on
12th July, 2022. The agendas and minutes of these meeting were available, as he
pointed out to Councillor Carroll, via the Council’s website.
That Cabinet report identified that Llandough Hill was identified as scoring 195
points on the three year Resurfacing Plan and it was anticipated, based on current
funding available in the current financial year, that resurfacing works would be
undertaken to roads scoring a total of 210 points or above. Therefore it was
unlikely that the road would be resurfaced in the current financial year, although
the position would be reviewed again in 2023.
(xii) Question from Councillor R.R. Thomas
Will the Leader confirm how many potholes have been reported to the Council
within the town of Penarth in the last 12 months?
Reply from the Executive Leader and Cabinet Member for Performance and
Resources
I am informed that 126 carriageway defects have been reported to the Council
from July 2021 to June 2022. All of these reported defects have been inspected
Minutes - JR
No.
to ensure they meet the intervention criteria set by the Council. The criteria is
available on the Council’s website and the Environment and Regeneration
Scrutiny Committee had also discussed this recently.
In addition, the Council’s Highway Inspectors have raised some 242 actionable
carriageway defects in Penarth from July 2021 to June 2022. Some of these
defects will be in the 126 reported defects identified above.
Whilst we regularly inspect all our highways, as has been detailed, defects will
appear in between these inspections. We therefore encourage all residents to use
the ‘report it’ feature on our website if they are concerned about a pothole, or
alternatively to telephone our contact centre with this information.
Supplemental
Councillor R. Thomas, referring to the Council’s report which only identified one
road which required resurfacing which he was disappointed with, asked the
Leader why residents of Penarth were low on the Council’s priority list and invited
her to visit the ward with him to walk and speak to residents on the issue.
The Leader indicated that she regularly walked and cycled around the Plymouth
ward for a number of reasons and that at a recent visit to the ward she only
identified three potholes which had already been assessed for repair and since
that time the work had been undertaken. She reminded Councillor Thomas that
she regularly reported potholes for repair and recounted from emails she had
retained for her records that she had reported a number of defects to road across
Penarth in 2017 and 2018. In 2019 she had reported 132 defects and one road
where she had reported potholes had since been resurfaced. In 2020 she had
reported 5 defects and in 2021 she had reported a further 47 defects across
various locations in Penarth. She also pointed out to Councillor Thomas that she
also took the time to report street bins that required emptying, street lights that
were not working and graffiti. She was not only a voice for the community in the
Council but an effective Councillor. She also reminded Councillor Thomas of the
reporting feature on the Council’s website and suggested that he walked his ward
and reported any potholes which she had no doubt would be repaired if they met
the Council’s repairs criteria.
(xiii) Question from Councillor G. Bruce
Why has the Council not taken action to ensure adequate school transport
provision is put in place for pupils travelling from Rhoose Primary to Cowbridge
Comprehensive following catchment area changes to protect the education
continuity of pupils attending Cowbridge?
Reply from the Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Sustainable Places
Free home to school transport is provided to secondary aged pupils who live three
or more miles from their catchment school.
Minutes - JR
No.
Transport is provided for any pupil who qualifies either on distance grounds or
because they do not have an available walking route to school, if they attend their
catchment area school.
This is and has been the Authority’s position and is part of the school and college
transport policy which can be found on the Council’s website.
Pupils moving up from Rhoose Primary to Cowbridge Comprehensive in
September 2022 will be allocated free school transport, as long as they live in
catchment. Parents are able to apply to any school they wish, but as outlined in
the Policy if it is non-catchment parents/carers will be responsible for transport
provision.
The change of catchment for Cowbridge Comprehensive, that included Rhoose
moving into catchment was, as other changes in school catchments have been, a
phased approach.
The change came in for Year 7 in September 2021 and will be for both Year 7 and
Year 8 in September 2022.
The Council does not change the catchment for all year groups at the same time.
If that was to happen, in this particular case, then all pupils who attended Llantwit
Major Comprehensive and live in Rhoose would all be out of catchment and not
qualify for free school transport. That would affect close to 230 pupils who live in
the Rhoose area and who knowingly choose to attend at that time their catchment
school, Llantwit Comprehensive.
The Council has fulfilled its statutory duty and continues to provide transport for
pupil who attend their catchment school.
I am aware of issues raised with regards costs for the private bus that runs from
Rhoose to Cowbridge Comprehensive which is in part due to a lack of pupils not
needing to purchase seats on this bus as they now travel for free on a Council
contracted school bus. However, I will refer to another private bus that ran from
the Ely area of Cardiff to Cowbridge Comprehensive that another operator
decided to cancel at the beginning of this year. This was not due to lack of
passengers, it was a decision made by the operator for business reasons. The
Council has no control over the running of private services and as such operators
can make decisions on fares, whether or not they run a service or the route the
bus may take without consultation
(xiv) Question from Councillor C.P. Franks
Will the Cabinet Member indicate the additional tax burden falling on the Vale of
Glamorgan Council in respect of the proposed increase in National Insurance
contributions imposed by the UK Government?
Minutes - JR
No.
Reply from the Executive Leader and Cabinet Member for Performance and
Resources
The direct impact of the NI increase in 2022/23 was calculated as part of the
Budget proposals to be £1.034m – this figure includes all schools.
In terms of the indirect impact on for instance social care providers – we haven’t
been able to put a figure on this as we do not have sufficient detail on our
suppliers pay and the increases to Social Care Providers for 2022/23 would reflect
the RLW increase and other inflationary impacts such as energy costs.
Supplemental
Councillor Franks sought an assurance from the Leader that all front line services
would be protected in the face of increased National Insurance contributions.
The Leader referred to the fact that the increase had been budgeted for as part of
the Council’s budget setting process and alluded to approximately £1m of
additional costs that had been accounted for. The budget setting process for the
previous financial year identified £24m shortfall and that the Council had received
a good budget settlement from the Welsh Government. However, she did not
know what the settlement would be for the future financial year, but it was unlikely
that it would be at the same level. Alluding to the forthcoming budget setting
process that the Council would be undertaking, this would need to take account of
a number of additional financial challenges and she specifically referred to energy
prices and inflationary pressures. She would do all that was humanly possible to
protect services starting with the most vulnerable.
(xv) Question from Councillor C.P. Franks
The Cabinet Member will be aware of increasing concerns in Dinas Powys
regarding road safety. Will you indicate what measures are being implemented to
make our streets safer?
Reply from the Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Sustainable Places
Thank you for your question, however, I note that you do not provide any specific
details relating to your road safety concerns and it is therefore difficult for me to
respond specifically.
The Council receives numerous concerns regarding a variety of aspects relating to
road safety throughout the Vale and investigates those concerns as appropriate
and as far as reasonably practicable given the current resource available and its
current powers and responsibilities.
I would firstly clarify that the Council as local highway authority has a statutory
duty under Section 39 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 to undertake studies into road
traffic collisions, and to take steps both to reduce and prevent them as far as
reasonably practicable and appropriate. To carry out this duty, the Council
Minutes - JR
No.
reviews collision data provided by the Welsh Government on a six monthly basis
relating to injury collisions which have occurred within the Vale’s local highway
network and considers the evidence and potential contributary factors associated
with those collisions. Where necessary based on this analysis and the potential
cause of any collision, the Council will consider schemes to improve road safety
subject to available funding. This includes Dinas Powys, however, I am unaware
of any serious injury collision within the village which require any specific and
immediate consideration at this time.
There is quite often some confusion over responsibilities with regard to highway
safety matters and speed related issues.
Although, the Council sets speed limits, the primary responsibility for speed
enforcement rests with the Police and the Council has no powers to deal with
speeding offences. For this reason, we recommend that contacting South Wales
Police should always be the first line of approach taken by members of the public
who are concerned about speeding issues in their local area. Alternatively,
residents can make a request for speed camera enforcement direct with GoSafe,
the Wales Casualty Reduction Partnership, whose primary function is to make
Welsh roads safer by reducing road casualties. However, the Council, Police and
GoSafe will generally recommend residents consider the setting up of a
community speed watch scheme which has proven to helpful deterring speeding in
local areas throughout Wales and of which there are many example throughout
the Vale. Details can be found on the GoSafe website.
In exceptional circumstances, where there is a significant history of personal injury
collisions, and where police and/or GoSafe action has failed to reduce speeding
offences and improve road safety, the Council will consider introducing further
measures to assist with speed enforcement such as traffic calming. Such
measures are expensive to introduce and where further measures are considered
necessary then those schemes compete for limited Welsh Government grant
funding, where in most, if not all cases, the most severe locations are awarded
funding. The Council has currently accumulated a significant number of schemes
that are awaiting future funding.
Finally, you will also be aware of the Welsh Government proposal for 20mph
speeding limits in Wales following the issue of advice on 12th July, 2022 by the
Head of Neighbourhood Services and Transport. The Senedd also voted on and
approved the proposal to reduce the default speed limit from 30mph to 20 mph on
restricted roads and residential streets on 12th July, 2022. Council officers are
currently working through the requirements of the legislation to understand the
implications within the Vale and which roads will be impacted after having
successfully taken part in one of eight Welsh Government pilots for the 20mph
default speed in St. Brides Major. The default speed limit is due to be implemented
in September 2023 and this measure would hopefully address ongoing road safety
concerns relating to speed not only in Dinas Powys but throughout the Vale where
the limit is to be implemented. I anticipate that the Council will be able to provide
further details on the implications for individual areas in Autumn 2022.
Minutes - JR
No.
Supplemental
Referring to the necessary investment, policing, enforcement and the lack of
safety schemes including the provision of a camera safe scheme in Dinas Powys
which volunteers were happy to support if provided the equipment, Councillor
Franks asked the Cabinet Member what she was going to do about it.
The Cabinet Member referred to her initial response and reminded Councillor
Franks that these measures would help address the issues he raised. The
Council was taking serious steps to address road safety and reminded Councillor
Franks that the Police also had an important role to play in the issue.
(vxi) Question from Councillor C.P. Franks
In the event of serious flooding of residential and commercial properties what
plans exist to safe guard vulnerable people?
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Neighbourhood and Building Services
The Council’s Civil Protection Unit (CPU) operate a 24/7 365 duty officer system to
respond to emergencies. The CPU works with other service areas to respond and
if necessary will open an emergency control room, usually based at the Alps in
Wenvoe. In the event of a flooding emergency, officers will contact the Social
Services Emergency Duty Team to ascertain if there are any known vulnerable
residents within the area, but it should be noted these would only be if they are
social services clients.
Welsh Government are working on a system called JIGSO which is a web service
that allows the user to be able to search a specific area of a map and identify the
properties within which are vulnerable citizens who may require assistance during
an emergency such as flooding/snowfall or perhaps an area being affected by
smoke. For example, the user can draw a circle/polygon around an area and
within a matter of minutes, be able to identify which households require
assistance. This will allow vulnerable citizens to receive priority assistance to
prepare for an emerging incident, receive additional support as a result of an
event e.g. water bottles, or evacuate if required.
In the case of Storm Bella in 2020, to obtain data on which properties required
assistance took some time, with JIGSO this information can obtained in a couple
of minutes. The maps can also be changed i.e. a black and white map just
showing outlines or perhaps a satellite map (similar to Google Earth but in more
detail) can be selected.
The system, which is unique to the UK, now means that data is now available
within minutes detailing the most vulnerable citizens in our communities so they
can be supported when an incident occurs.
In addition the CPU has produced a new Community Flood Plan and Extreme
Weather Guidance, that explains how to prepare a Community Flood Plan. This
Minutes - JR
No.
plan can be completed by households and as a community or flood group. This
can help communities develop local level plans that will assist local communities
and groups to identify and prepare plans for any vulnerable residents within their
local community who may need extra assistance, guidance can be found on the
Council’s website where you will also find further information and guidance, for
residents and businesses, on what to do before, during and after a flooding event.
Supplemental
Referring to the recent flooding events in Dinas Powys Councillor Franks asked
the Cabinet Member if he would reconsider the level of support from the Council in
future to vulnerable residents.
Disagreeing with Councillor Franks’ assessment of the support provided by the
Council during the recent flooding events having seen related reports, it was his
view officers had worked hard to support affected residents.
(xvii) Question from Councillor J.E. Charles
Will the Cabinet Member please outline the Council’s waste recycling targets and
confirm if these are being met.
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Neighbourhood and Building Services
The last measured recycling and the minimum Local Authority recovery (recycling,
preparation for re-use and composting) target was 64% (2019 / 2020).
The Council had to achieve a recycling rate of 64% within this target year and
thereafter up until 2023 / 2024. During the target year of 2019 / 2020, the Council
recorded a recycling rate of 70.3% exceeding the statutory target.
The next measured target will be 70% by 2024 / 2025. At present, the Council
continues to exceed the statutory targets and it is currently the second highest
performing Council in Wales and on target to achieve and exceed the 2024 / 2025
target.
Supplemental
Referring to the current emergencies, Councillor Charles enquired if the Council
would make more savings from increasing recycling and reuse rates.
The Cabinet Member indicated that the Council had plans to do this and referred
to the new waste transfer station at Cowbridge with a further facility to be provided
at the Atlantic Trading Estate, Barry.
Minutes - JR
No.
(xviii) Question from Councillor C.E.A. Champion
Will the Cabinet Member consider increasing the number of separated recycling
waste bins in the public spaces across the Vale?
Reply from the Cabinet Member for Neighbourhood and Building Services
There are no immediate plans to provide separated recycling bins for town and
rural litter as previous trials affected recycling quality and increased contamination
levels due to poor compliance by users with the various separate recycling
compartments.
However, when the Council’s new recycling plant opens next year there will be
greater service flexibility for further trials and hopefully improved compliance due
to there being a greater awareness now amongst residents and visitors of the
need to effectively recycle all waste. We will therefore plan to undertake further
work in this area during 2023.
Supplemental
Councillor Champion enquired why the Council did not have separated recycle
bins when other Councils did.
In response the Cabinet Member referred Councillor Champion to his original reply
for the reasons.
RESOLVED: that the Environmental Scrutiny Task & Finish Letter on the Replacement Local Development Plan Strategic and Delivery Options be received and a response provided within two cycles.