Wrthi'n llwytho
Y penderfyniadau fel y mae cofnodion y cyngor yn eu cofnodi. Bydd crynodeb mewn iaith glir yn dilyn pan fydd wedi'i ysgrifennu.
RESOLVED That the application be deferred until February to allow a site visit to be undertaken. [The meeting adjourned for a short break at this juncture]
RESOLVED That delegated authority be granted to the Head of Planning to APPROVE the application following the Ratification of the draft Habitat Regulations Assessment by Natural Resources Wales and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report. [Councillor Mark Carter left the meeting and Councillor Jordan Ryan joined the meeting at this juncture] [The meeting adjourned for lunch and returned at 13:56]
RESOLVED That the Committee is minded to approve the application, contrary to recommendation, on the basis of economic benefit, job creation and security and disability accessibility. The matter will return to a subsequent Committee for further consideration. [The meeting was adjourned for a short break] [Councillor Rhys Jordan left the meeting at this juncture]
RESOLVED That the Committee is minded to approve the application, contrary to recommendation, on the basis of economic benefits outweighing the visual implications and to tackle climate change. The matter will return to a subsequent Committee for further consideration. [Councillor Jordan Ryan left the meeting at this juncture]
RESOLVED That delegated authority be granted to the Head of Planning to APPROVE the application following the receipt of a Green Infrastructure Statement and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report.
Application 24/0509/PA - The erection of 24 affordable residential apartments to rent for elderly persons at 70A-80A Charles Street, Milford Haven, Pembrokeshire SA73 2HE. Delegated authority was granted to the Head of Planning to approve the application following receipt of revised elevation plans and a swept path analysis drawing to meet the requirements of Welsh Government’s (WG) Highways Department. The revised details were received on 2nd December 2024 and following confirmation of their acceptability by WG Highways, the planning permission was issued on 24th December 2024. Application 24/0133/PA - Battery Energy Storage System with associated infrastructure and works (including underground cabling to the Pembroke Substation at Land South of Goldborough Road, Hundleton, Pembroke. The Committee resolved to approve the application on 3rd December 2024 subject to planning conditions and delegated authority being given to the Head of Planning to resolve matters relating to ecology. All outstanding ecological matters have since been resolved, subject to the planning conditions, including ratification of the draft Habitat Regulations Assessment by NRW. The planning permission was issued on 6th January 2025.
The following declarations of interest were received: Planning Application no. 24/0600/PA – Land at Entrance to Pembroke Power Station, Pwllcrochan, Pembroke SA71 5SS Councillor Steve Alderman declared a personal and prejudicial interest by virtue of being a member of the liaison committee for RWE but had been granted dispensation to speak and vote by the Standards Committee. Councillor Brian Hall declared a personal and prejudicial interest by virtue of being a member of the liaison committee for RWE but had been granted dispensation to speak and vote by the Standards Committee.
Moved by Councillor Dr Simon Hancock; Seconded by Councillor Brian Hall The vote, undertaken by way of a show of hands, was carried. RESOLVED That the Minutes of the meeting held on 3 December 2024 be approved as a correct record, in both English and Welsh.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the application be deferred until February to allow a site visit to be undertaken. [The meeting adjourned for a short break at this juncture]
The application was presented for Committee consideration as it involved a full planning application for more than 30 dwellings (Appendix 1 to Section 14 of the Constitution). The Planning Officer presented the application to the Committee. The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested parties, who wished to exercise their right to address the Committee: - Community Council: Mr Barry Childs - Agent: Mr Richard Banks - Objector: Mr Rhys Jones - County Councillor: Michael John The Chair then invited the Llangwm Community Council Representative, Councillor Barry Childs to address the Committee who emphasised that the Community Council had a responsibility to protect and maintain the distinctive character and ethos of the village. He explained that there had already been two significant developments in the village which had allowed the village to grow. He further noted that the land for this development had been sold on to Ateb with very different proposals and without prior consultation. The Community Council was concerned on the impact on infrastructure, the local school provision, lack of shop or post office and the impact on the sewage system. There were no questions raised by Members and the Chair then invited the Agent, Richard Banks to address the Committee who advised that planning permission was already in place for 54 dwellings and that the application would provide a wide range of dwellings including social housing, affordable housing and shared ownership housing. He advised that they had worked with the housing department and Welsh Water who reported that the infrastructure was suitable to support 67 additional dwellings. He further noted that Ateb had been in attendance at various meetings with the Community Council and residents and they reported that they were content with the application. The Chair then invited questions from Members to the Agent. In response to a concern from Councillor Alan Dennison regarding the provision of a bus shelter and a dry lockable cycle store at each property, the Agent advised that there were pathways but that they were not dedicated cycle paths. He further acknowledged that the dry lockable cycle stores were sheds. In response to a concern raised by Councillor Simon Hancock regarding school capacity, the Agent advised that they had received advice from the Education Officers that there was no Section 106 element in the 2022 application. He further advised that approximately £200K would be given to Cleddau Reach Primary School. Councillor John Cole recognised the potential opportunity to reopen the local shop, and the Agent clarified that there would be a local letting policy and that the planned play area would be open to all residents in the village. In response to a question from Councillor Mark Carter regarding Electric Vehicle charging points, the Agent advised that it was not yet compulsory for charging points to be placed at every property and that the current policy of 10% was adhered to. Councillor Dennison raised concerns that building a second play park in the village when the existing play park was in need of refurbishment was segregating the village children. The Agent advised that Llangwm was a long village with two distinctive areas but acknowledged there was potential for refurbishment of the existing play park. The Chair then invited the Objector, Rhys Jones to address the Committee who advised the Committee that the residents were not opposed to development but that the Agents and Developers had ignored the pre-application comments and that no safe cycle routes had been proposed. He highlighted that the report stated that 67 dwellings would not increase traffic however there was potential for 134 additional vehicles and raised serious concerns in connection with the transport report. The Chair then invited questions from Members to the Objector. In response to a comment from Councillor Simon Hancock regarding a redesign of the application, the Objector advised that they were not against development but there were various inaccuracies contained within the reports and that it should not be approved. In response to a concern from Councillor Dennison regarding the potential overflow of sewage into the estuary, the Objector advised that there was photographic evidence of spillage and that they encourage residents to report it. The Chair then invited the Local Member, Councillor Michael John to address the Committee who emphasised that the outline planning permission was given for 54 properties and that this had increased to 67. Phase One was for 25 properties and Phase Two was for the remaining 42. The Local Member confirmed that the original application had been supported and allowed an increase in parking and green spaces. He highlighted that the proposal did not support young people purchasing properties as the affordable housing was for housing register applicants only. He emphasised the need for affordable housing which would allow Section 106 funds to be used for improvements including the infrastructure. The Local Member further emphasised the need to be sympathetic to the area noting the lack of public transport, cycle routes and other infrastructure which did not support a development of this size. The Local Member then highlighted the waste water treatment works, the ground conditions and that the preliminary surveys had not been conducted at the appropriate time as the field was historically very wet, highlighting that the new school had to be totally redesigned following surveys of the water saturation. The Local Member further clarified that the majority of the £200K education funds would be going to Haverfordwest High School and not Cleddau Reach as the Agent had claimed. The development would increase pupil numbers and classroom sizes and advised that the views of the Head Teacher should be taken into consideration. He further highlighted the proposed play area was situated directly behind existing properties which would increase the noise levels and concurred with the comments of segregating village children. The Local Member summarised that he could not support this application in its current form and he considered that the Applicant should withdraw the application and resubmit with the correct data suggesting that a site visit be undertaken to fully understand the size of the development and the size of the village. The Chair clarified that the Committee could not amend the application and then invited questions from members to the Local Member. Councillor Alan Dennison highlighted a number of concerns that had been raised in particular the discharge into the Haven and the consultation process that had not been taken into consideration and the Chair agreed to the Agent being allowed to respond. The Agent advised that the formal pre-application consultations had been conducted 12 months previously and that Ateb had then attended an additional meeting which was not compulsory. He emphasised that the developer had not ignored the residents’ concerns but agreed there may be some typographical errors. In response to concerns from Councillors Dennison and Cameron regarding the allocation of properties and the phases in which they will be built, the Local Member advised that they would be allocated to people that were on the housing register. He further advised that 25 properties had been agreed and that a further 42 were to be decided. Councillor Carter agreed that whilst housing was required, it did not feel appropriate for Llangwm highlighting the limited transport and facilities. The Head of Planning clarified that, if the Committee was minded to vote against the Officer recommendation, there would need to be valid reasons. She emphasised that the site was allocated in the Local Development Plan (LDP) for housing. She further reiterated that the Committee was required to determine the application as put before them. In response to a question from Councillor Brian Hall regarding a cooling off period, the Head of Planning advised they could propose the recommendation of a cooling off period but needed to be mindful of the local need, which had been debated at length. In response to concerns from Councillor Dennison regarding facilities available in Llangwm, the Planning officer advised that the school would not be stretched and that whilst the Chemist and Doctors were currently part time, the development could assist the retention and increase in facilities. In response to a question from Councillor Evans regarding a deferral to the next meeting, the Head of Planning advised that a revised application would not be available as it would not be able to go through the appropriate process. She also highlighted that the Welsh Government funding for Phases One and Two was within strict deadlines and advised of the implications on funding and progress of the scheme and its delivery. Councillor Michael Williams sought clarification that if the application was not approved, the grant funding could be lost. The Head of Planning advised that the potential loss of funding was for information purposes. Councillor Michael Williams advised that no one would vote against the development of affordable homes but that relevant concerns had been raised. The Head of Planning advised that the recommendation was for approval with a condition for Phase Two to be discharged on the tenure mix to be decided by Officers. She noted that it may be appropriate for that tenure mix to be debated at a future meeting of the Planning Committee. Concerns were raised by Councillor Rhys Jordan on the issues already raised by the Community Councillor, Local Member and Objector and Councillors John Davies and Michael Williams concurred with those concerns. Councillor Michael Williams then Moved that the matter be deferred given the extent of the concerns raised and requested that Ateb meet with the Community Council and Local Member to address these concerns; Seconded by Councillor Mark Carter. However, the Head of Planning advised that the Motion was not valid, and the Solicitor clarified that an application could only be deferred for a site visit providing there were good reasons. The Head of Planning advised Members that there was provision for the Committee to recommend that it was minded to refuse the application contrary to Officer recommendation which would invoke a cooling off period and provide the opportunity to address the issues for consideration at the next meeting. However, the Head of Planning emphasised that the application had been thoroughly assessed by Officers as outlined in the report. Councillor Alan Dennison then Moved that a site visit be undertaken in relation to the land drainage and capacity at the wastewater treatment plant; Seconded by Councillor Brian Hall. In response to a question from Councillor John Cole regarding the Authority’s Housing Register, the Housing Strategy and Affordable Housing Manager advised that the criteria for joining the housing register had been changed by Cabinet in 2024 and an affordable housing register had been created to identify need. He further advised that the rents were set at an intermediate rent between social renting and private renting. The Chair then sought confirmation on the first Motion as Moved and Seconded by Councillors Michael Williams and Mark Carter. Councillors Williams and Carter then withdrew their Motion to defer the application. The Chair then clarified that the proposal was for a site visit to be undertaken and that this Motion had been Moved and Seconded. The vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Mark Carter, John Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Brian Hall, Rhys Jordan, Chris Williams, Michael Williams and Danny Young [10] Against the Motion: Councillors John Cole and Simon Hancock [2] Abstained – Councillors Alistair Cameron [1] RESOLVED That the application be deferred until February to allow a site visit to be undertaken. [The meeting adjourned for a short break at this juncture]
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That delegated authority be granted to the Head of Planning to APPROVE the application following the Ratification of the draft Habitat Regulations Assessment by Natural Resources Wales and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report. [Councillor Mark Carter left the meeting and Councillor Jordan Ryan joined the meeting at this juncture] [The meeting adjourned for lunch and returned at 13:56]
The application was presented for Committee consideration as it was subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment (Appendix 1 to Section 14 of the Constitution). The Planning Officer presented the application to the Committee. The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested parties, who wished to exercise their right to address the Committee: - Agent: Victoria Williamson The Chair then invited the Agent to address the Committee who was representing RWE and highlighted that the site was adjacent to existing sites and benefited from screening. She further explained that no in principle objections had been received from any statutory consultees. The Chair then invited questions from Members to the Agent. In response to a question from Councillor Alan Dennison regarding the time scales for the build and implementation of the Battery Energy Storage System (BESS), the Agent advised that there would be approximately two years of construction with an anticipated commencement of the build at the end of 2025. In response to a question from Councillor John Cole regarding soil samples, the Agent advised that soil samples had been undertaken together with an Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) survey. She noted that the classification had been slightly high but advised that during the Pembroke A build, some inert material had been removed to this site. It had a 3c classification and remained suitable for crop cultivation. The Agent further clarified that the battery energy would be connected to the National Grid power station to store excess energy. Clarification was sought by Councillor Cole regarding the reasons to store energy when we do not produce enough necessitating the importing of energy, the Agent advised that this was for excess energy produced which was sold back to the Grid. In response to concerns raised by Councillors Simon Hancock and Tim Evans, the Agent clarified that 0.89 hectares of the 5 hectare site would be used for the BESS and, following the construction, the ground would be returned to its original state and that the BESS would be connected to the National Grid by underground cables. Approval of the application was then Moved by Councillor Brian Hall; Seconded by Councillor Steve Alderman. There were no further questions from Members to the Agent. The vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Alistair Cameron, Mark Carter, John Cole, John Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Brian Hall, Simon Hancock, Rhys Jordan, Chris Williams, Michael Williams and Danny Young [13] There were no votes against and no abstentions. RESOLVED That delegated authority be granted to the Head of Planning to APPROVE the application following the Ratification of the draft Habitat Regulations Assessment by Natural Resources Wales and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report. [Councillor Mark Carter left the meeting and Councillor Jordan Ryan joined the meeting at this juncture] [The meeting adjourned for lunch and returned at 13:56]
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the Committee is minded to approve the application, contrary to recommendation, on the basis of economic benefit, job creation and security and disability accessibility. The matter will return to a subsequent Committee for further consideration. [The meeting was adjourned for a short break] [Councillor Rhys Jordan left the meeting at this juncture]
The application was presented for Committee consideration as it was for tourism development on a site exceeding 0.5 hectare in area (Appendix 1 to Section 14 of the Constitution). The Planning Officer presented the application to the Committee. The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested parties, who wished to exercise their right to address the Committee: - Community Council: Mr Alan Jones - Applicant: Mr Andrew Evans The Chair then invited the Community Council Representative to address the Committee who highlighted the need for consistency in applications. He advised Members that the Applicant had engaged fully with the Community Council and attended meetings providing a much-improved design from the original application and, following this, the Community Council supported the application. The Chair then invited questions to the Community Council Representative. In response to a question from Councillor Simon Hancock regarding the original application, the Representative explained that the applicant was genuine in the provision of a much-needed facility and that the updated design allowed a wider range of disabilities to benefit from the facility. Councillor Alan Dennison reiterated the positivity of Developers engaging with their Community Councils. In response to a question from Councillor John Cole regarding public footpaths and access to the village, the Representative explained that there was a bus stop directly opposite and that there were wide verges. The Chair then invited the Applicant to address the Committee who highlighted the need for a fully inclusive facility in the area that also provided accommodation for hidden disabilities include deaf, hard of hearing, visually impaired etc. He advised of nine separate washrooms for disabled guests and use of wheelchairs free of charge. He also noted the hearing loops available throughout the facility. The Applicant emphasised the only objection from the Planning Officers was due to the Local Development Plan, regimental layout and landscaping and noted that there was an updated layout with increased landscaping with new hedgerows, perennial planting to enhance biodiversity and screening. The Chair then invited questions from Members to the Applicant. In response to a question from Councillor Simon Hancock regarding the economic benefits, the Applicant advised that the facility would provide an additional five jobs with groundsmen, laundry and an on-call facility 24/7 with emergency pull cords in each facility linked to the main office. Clarification was sought by Councillor Tim Evans regarding the accommodation and the Applicant explained that once the caravans were wheeled into place, the wheels were then removed and were situated on a concrete base, 16” off the ground with ramp access. He also highlighted that the units were manufactured locally in Pembroke Dock. In response to a question from Councillor Alan Dennison regarding the access to the lodges, the Applicant advised that there was an electric barrier for access as the area had previously been used as an overflow car park. Permission had previously been granted for five touring caravans but that had never been utilised. In response to a question from Councillor Chris Williams regarding the difference to other sites, the Applicant explained that he owned the freehold for the full site and that currently, they had to lay staff off in Winter; however, with the new application they would be open all year round. He further advised that the lodges were located nine metres from each other to allow vehicles to drive right up to the lodge. Councillors John Cole, Michael Williams and Alan Dennison sought further clarification on the differences to other sites and the Applicant explained that booking would only be available for older age groups with both hidden and visible disabilities and that the site would be open until Christmas and then close until the February half term. Currently, they closed at the end of September and reopened at the end of March. The Chair then reminded Members that they were to review the planning application only, and not the operation of the business. Councillor Rhys Jordan, as Local Member for the area expressed his support for the application as a chance for Pembrokeshire to lead the way in tourism highlighting that the Applicant had fully engaged with the Community Council and that it supported sustainable and economic development. The Head of Planning reminded Members that the recommendation was for refusal due to non-compliance with policy GN19 of the LDP. In response to a question from Councillor Alistair Cameron regarding the landscaping, the Head of Planning explained that the Council Landscape Officer had been unable to respond to the latest design within the required timeframe due to sickness absence. Clarification was sought by Councillor Cameron on the Planning Officer Recommendation, and the Head of Planning and Chief Planning Officer advised that LDP policy GN19 was informed by strategic tourism policies. The Chief Planning Officer advised that the suggestion for only letting to disabled occupants had not been part of the application and questioned the legality of refusal to non-disabled occupants. The Head of Planning then clarified the process if the Committee went against Officer recommendation and that a cooling off period would be invoked followed by a return to the Planning Committee and then to full Council. In response to a question from Councillor Jordan Ryan regarding supporting the application and undertaking a site visit, the Chief Planning Officer advised that the resolution could be to defer for a site visit or approve contrary to Officer recommendation invoking the cooling off period. Concerns were raised by Councillor Dennison on the legality and enforcement of disability only occupation and he emphasised that they did not want to impose further restrictions on the Application. The Head of Planning advised that Officers would need to review the implications of disabled only accommodation. Approval of the application was Moved by Councillor Rhys Jordan; Seconded by Councillor Chris Williams. The Chair requested a further report be submitted to include the opinions of the Council Ecologist and Council Landscape Officers and clarified that should the Committee be minded to approve the application then the cooling off period would be invoked and the application would return to the next meeting of the Planning Committee and then to a meeting of Council for ratification. The vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Alistair Cameron, John Cole, John Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Brian Hall, Rhys Jordan, Jordan Ryan, Chris Williams and Danny Young [11] Against the Motion: Councillors Simon Hancock Michael Williams [2] There were no abstentions. RESOLVED That the Committee is minded to approve the application, contrary to recommendation, on the basis of economic benefit, job creation and security and disability accessibility. The matter will return to a subsequent Committee for further consideration. [The meeting was adjourned for a short break] [Councillor Rhys Jordan left the meeting at this juncture]
The Committee agreed a change in the order of business as follows to allow the public speakers to address the Committee.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the Committee is minded to approve the application, contrary to recommendation, on the basis of economic benefits outweighing the visual implications and to tackle climate change. The matter will return to a subsequent Committee for further consideration. [Councillor Jordan Ryan left the meeting at this juncture]
The application was presented for Committee consideration as the application was for a wind turbine over 30 metres in overall height to blade tip (Appendix 1 to Section 14 of the Constitution). The Planning Officer presented the application to the Committee advising of two oral updates. The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested parties, who wished to exercise their right to address the Committee: - Agent: Mr Paul Cowley The Chair then invited the Agent to address the Committee who highlighted the increase in power generated and the increase in revenue generated by the larger size of turbine. The Chair then invited questions from Members to the Agent. In response to a question from Councillor Alistair Cameron regarding the comments that Pembrokeshire Coast National Park Authority (PCNPA) have concerns and that National Resources Wales (NRW) did not have sufficient information, the Agent clarified that the PCNPA concerns were regarding visual impact; however, this had been addressed and their views had softened. He noted that the existing turbine was already visible from various locations. The concern from NRW was in relation to sufficient information regarding bats and he noted that they were currently in hibernation and was comfortable that further monitoring could be undertaken during the May to October period. Councillor John Cole made reference to the Community led project asking whether they had considered vertical designs as they were less obtrusive. The Agent advised that there had been a vertical turbine in Noth Pembrokeshire, and it had proved unsuccessful and replaced with a three-blade turbine. In response to a question from Councillor Alan Dennison regarding the return on investment, the Agent clarified that the initial investment had been fully repaid with 5% interest and that a number of grants had been awarded to the community due to the generated revenue. They were now seeking to increase the size of the turbine to increase the revenue in their mission to support Fishguard and Goodwick as they move to Net Zero. Councillor Jordan Ryan then motioned a Point of Order as he advised he was the local Member. He Moved that they Approve the Application against Officer recommendation and Policy; Seconded by Councillor Alistair Cameron. Councillor Cameron highlighted that the need to support economic benefits outweighed the visual implications. The vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Alistair Cameron, John Cole, John Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Brian Hall, Jordan Ryan, Chris Williams, Michael Williams and Danny Young [11] Against the Motion: Councillor Simon Hancock [1] There were no abstentions. RESOLVED That the Committee is minded to approve the application, contrary to recommendation, on the basis of economic benefits outweighing the visual implications and to tackle climate change. The matter will return to a subsequent Committee for further consideration. [Councillor Jordan Ryan left the meeting at this juncture]
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That delegated authority be granted to the Head of Planning to APPROVE the application following the receipt of a Green Infrastructure Statement and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report.
The application was presented for Committee consideration as the application was for tourist, leisure or recreation development over 500 sqm floorspace or 0.5 hectares in area (Appendix 1 to Section 14 of the Constitution). The Planning Officer presented the application to the Committee highlighting the conditions set out in paragraph 1.4 of the report. The Committee were advised that there were no public speakers in attendance at the meeting. The approval of the application was Moved by Councillor Alan Dennison; Seconded by Councillor Brian Hall. The Committee then debated the application with key points highlighted as follows: In response to a concern from Councillor Michael Williams regarding a traffic management plan for the construction phase, the Planning Officer advised that the Head of Infrastructure (Highways) had made no objections to the proposal as the increase in traffic was comparable to current levels. In response to a question from Councillor Simon Hancock regarding a wildlife habitat area, the Planning Officer clarified that there was an existing grass scrubland area on the Southern aspect of the site which would be retained for biodiversity. Additional areas were to be provided around the Northern area. In response to a concern raised by Councillor Chris Williams regarding the gradient of the proposed site, the Planning Officer advised that each unit would be accessible via a set of external steps. There were no further questions raised. The vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Alistair Cameron, John Cole, John Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Brian Hall, Simon Hancock, Chris Williams, Michael Williams and Danny Young [11] There were no votes against and no abstentions. RESOLVED That delegated authority be granted to the Head of Planning to APPROVE the application following the receipt of a Green Infrastructure Statement and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report.
The application was presented for Committee consideration as it was made under Section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) – a consent under Section 73 represents a new planning permission which, in this case, raises issues regarding compliance with the development plan (Appendix 1 to Section 14 of the Constitution). The Planning Officer presented the application to the Committee together with an oral update noting the error in paragraph 6.6 referring to alterations to the first-floor accommodation. It was not an en-suite but a store cupboard. The application seeks to vary the house type from type C to type E on plots 16 and 17. There were no public speakers in attendance. Approval of the application was then Moved by Councillor Alan Dennison; Seconded by Councillor Brian Hall The vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Alistair Cameron, John Cole, John Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Brian Hall, Simon Hancock, Chris Williams, Michael Williams and Danny Young [11] There were no votes against and no abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report.
Rhaid i gynghorwyr ddweud pan fydd ganddyn nhw gysylltiad personol â rhywbeth sy'n cael ei drafod, fel swydd, eiddo neu aelod o'r teulu. Mae buddiant sy'n rhagfarnu yn ddigon cryf i'r cynghorydd adael yr ystafell fel arfer a pheidio â chymryd rhan.
Caiff datganiadau eu darllen o'r cofnodion unwaith y byddan nhw wedi'u cyhoeddi.
Yn rhestru cynghorwyr presennol y cyngor yn unig. Nid yw aelodau cyfetholedig, swyddogion a chyn-gynghorwyr yn cael eu dangos.