Wrthi'n llwytho
Y penderfyniadau fel y mae cofnodion y cyngor yn eu cofnodi. Bydd crynodeb mewn iaith glir yn dilyn pan fydd wedi'i ysgrifennu.
RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be not adopted, but Cabinet consider the matter as part of their review of the Discretionary Discount Policy.
RESOLVED (a) That it be noted that there has been no use of the available powers under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) since the last inspection by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office (IPCO) in 2022. (b) That it be noted that the Council’s RIPA Policy, as attached at Appendix 1 to the report, does not require any further amendments.
RESOLVED That the progress made by Pembrokeshire County Council as a delivery partner to Sports Wales, be noted
RESOLVED (a) That Cabinet note the update. (b) That continuing with Option 1 as detailed in the report and which is capable of accommodating an increase to an hourly service, be approved. (c) That the inclusion of the Milford Haven Public Transport Interchange (MHPTI) as part of the Local Transport Fund Bids Grant Application for the financial year 2025-26 for the sum of £6,070,690, be approved to continue development and phased delivery of the MHPTI. (d) That it be noted that any Local Transport Fund Bids Grant Application (or successor grant fund) for the financial year 2026-27, will be subject to a further report to Cabinet for consideration and approval at the relevant time. (e) That the inclusion in the Capital Programme of the MHPTI scheme for financial year 2025-26 and financial year 2026-27, be approved, with the amounts being as set out in Table 2 of the report. (f) That it be noted that should the MHPTI scheme cost in financial year 2025-26 or financial year 2026-27 exceed the amounts included in the Capital Programme, a further report to Cabinet will be required seeking approval for any such additional funding, and this approval must be received before the MHPTI scheme is progressed in the relevant financial year.
RESOLVED That entering into the Regional Agreement, substantially in the form shown in Appendix A, be approved; and that authority be delegated to the Head of Law and Governance, in conjunction with the Cabinet Member for Residents’ Services, to agree any revisions to the Regional Agreement, as are considered necessary prior to its completion.
RESOLVED That the public be excluded from the meeting in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 as Appendix E involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 16 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the Act; and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. The webcast was paused at this juncture. Having convened in private session in accordance with Paragraph 16 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, Cabinet considered Appendix E, The webcast was then resumed. The Leader stated his support for the outlined Recommendations and agreed that six months was too short a time to amend the premium again, as there was no significant data available to review at this time. He also understood the concern around the 182 day rule, and highlighted that the Recommendations on the matter would be for Council to determine in due course. The votes, undertaken by way of separate roll calls, were carried. The votes were recorded as follows: RESOLVED That the following be approved: (a) Level of Council Tax Premiums (i) Second Homes: Option 2 - to remain as current For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [7] Against the Motion: Councillor Neil Prior [1] There were no abstentions. (ii) Long Term Empty Properties: Option 2 - to remain as current For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [7] There were no votes against or abstentions. (b) Discretionary Discount Policy (i) Retained Firefighter Discount: Option 1 - no discount For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions. (ii) Self-catering Units: Option 1 – To follow the 182/252 days as stipulated by Welsh Government legislation, but, as suggested by the Council Tax Working Group, to recommend to Full Council that they write to Welsh Government asking them to reduce the 182 days let threshold. For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions.
RESOLVED That the progress made and challenges faced in the implementation of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund be noted.
RESOLVED That the report be received and the progress, which continues to be made, on the improvement of the delivery of Social Services during 2023-24, be noted.
RESOLVED (a) That the proposed fee structure set out in the table below be approved, and that the Head of Housing and Public Protection be authorised to carry out the scheme of delegated powers in accordance with the list of powers in paragraph 11 in the report. (b) That Cabinet ensure that the delegations are reflected by amendment in the Constitution and the amendments reported to Council for noting the changes in the Constitution. Licence Type New Renewal Special Procedures Licence (3yr licence) £203 (£159 Application £44 Compliance) £189 (£148 Application £41 Compliance) Approved Premises Certificate (3yr licence) £385 (£244 Application £141 Compliance) £345 (£204 Application £141 Compliance) Special Procedure Licence Variation (Add Procedure) £131 Special Procedure Licence Variation (Change of Detail) £26 Replacement Licence £13 Temporary Special Procedure licence £92 Special Procedure approved premises variation (Add Procedure) £189 Approved Premises Variation (Structural Change) £189 Approved Premises - Change of Detail £26 Replacement Licence £13 Approved Premises Temporary Approval (Ancillary Event) £385 Approved Premises Temporary Approval (Convention / Main Purpose) £680
The following declarations were made: Item 9 – Review of Council Tax Premiums for Second Homes and Long-Term Empty Properties and Discretionary Discount Policy Councillor Guy Woodham declared a personal interest by virtue of a family member having a second home in Tenby. Councillor Michelle Bateman declared a personal and prejudicial interest by virtue of a family member having an empty property, but stated that she had dispensation to speak but not vote.
The Leader Moved the Minutes; Seconded by Councillor Michelle Bateman. The vote was taken by way of a show of hands and carried. RESOLVED That the Minutes of the Cabinet Meeting held on 9 September 2024 be approved as a correct record.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be not adopted, but Cabinet consider the matter as part of their review of the Discretionary Discount Policy.
Cabinet considered a report by the Head of Financial Services which outlined the Notice of Motion (NOM) submitted by Councillor Huw Murphy to Council on 18 July 2024, relating to Council Tax Reduction for Fire Fighters. The Notice of Motion was submitted as follows: There is currently a significant and severe shortage in suitable applicants coming forward to be on-call Fire Fighters (retained) for the Mid & West Wales Fire Service. Currently there are vacancies for on-call fire fighters at all Fire Stations throughout the region, which impacts considerably upon the safety of both residents and visitors who may need the assistance of the Fire Service. Pembrokeshire is heavily reliant on our on-call firefighters. In recognition of the vital work performed by our on-call Fire Fighters (retained not full time employees of the service) and to encourage others to consider undertaking this vital role within our communities this Notice of Motion proposes that Pembrokeshire County Council offers every retained Fire-Fighter working and living in Pembrokeshire a 10% reduction in the Council Tax they pay after achieving a qualifying period of service annually, to be determined by the Chief Fire Officer. The originator of the Motion, Councillor Huw Murphy, gave some background on the matter and stated that he appreciated that Option 3, as outlined in the report, was the recommended option, in order to continue the conversation as part of a wider review. He then provided some observations which included comments on salaries of firefighters, vacancies in certain stations, as well as other roles that he believed were also deserving of a reduction. In response to the NOM, Councillor Joshua Beynon, the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Corporate Finance and Efficiencies, firstly wished to record his thanks to on-call firefighters and other emergency services, as they provide a valuable service to communities across Pembrokeshire. He stated that he was happy to support Option 3 outlined in the report and believed it would be beneficial to have some conversations on the matter. Councillor Joshua Beynon Moved the Recommendation; Seconded by Councillor Guy Woodham. Councillor Guy Woodham welcomed a review taking place, as referenced in Option 3. He then referred to the current, challenging financial situation of the Authority and stated that he was unsure as to how services provided for the residents of Pembrokeshire would be funded without an increase in Council Tax, which he referred to as a controversial subject and a much bigger issue. He believed that it would be wrong of Cabinet to approve reductions to other groups, without taking the matter as a whole into consideration. The Leader noted Councillor Woodham’s comments and stated that he was sympathetic to Councillor Murphy’s NOM, but suggested that it would be difficult to draw the line in relation to Council Tax reductions, due to the various numbers of key workers. The vote, undertaken by way of a roll call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions. RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be not adopted, but Cabinet consider the matter as part of their review of the Discretionary Discount Policy.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED (a) That it be noted that there has been no use of the available powers under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) since the last inspection by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office (IPCO) in 2022. (b) That it be noted that the Council’s RIPA Policy, as attached at Appendix 1 to the report, does not require any further amendments.
Cabinet considered a report by the Head of Law and Governance which outlined the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) 2000. The Leader, the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Corporate Matters, introduced the report and stated that RIPA and the RIPA Codes regulate the use of covert surveillance. He highlighted that there had been no use made of the available powers under RIPA since the last inspection by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office in 2022, and there had been no legislative changes to RIPA, nor changes to the Codes, requiring the Council to amend its RIPA Policy. The Leader Moved the Recommendation; Seconded by Councillor Jacob Williams. Councillor Jacob Williams sought clarification as to whether there was any national reporting of this power being used at any other Local Authorities. In response, the Head of Law and Governance stated that she was not aware of any national reporting, however she would ask colleagues what the regional picture was in regards to its use. The vote, undertaken by way of a show of hands, was carried. RESOLVED (a) That it be noted that there has been no use of the available powers under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) since the last inspection by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office (IPCO) in 2022. (b) That it be noted that the Council’s RIPA Policy, as attached at Appendix 1 to the report, does not require any further amendments.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the progress made by Pembrokeshire County Council as a delivery partner to Sports Wales, be noted
Cabinet considered a report by the Director of Education which outlined an update on the progress made by Sport Wales and stakeholders, towards establishing a Regional Partnership for Sport and Physical Activity in West Wales. Councillor Rhys Sinnett, the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Residents’ Services, introduced the report and stated that it provided an update on the current position of the creation of the Regional Partnership, and also referred to the background of the Partnership. He outlined the regional organisations involved, and stated that as of 1 April 2025 the Sports Partnership would be fully operational with a new funding model in place. Councillor Sinnett also highlighted that the Authority currently received funding from Sport Wales circa £275,000 per annum, in order to deliver against three specific programmes, as outlined in the report. He also referenced the timescales listed in the report, as well as the need to be involved in the Partnership to potentially gain access to regional funds, and to support the development of the partnership as a whole. Councillor Rhys Sinnett Moved the Recommendation; Seconded by the Leader. The Sports Pembrokeshire Team Leader then explained the detail of the Partnership, which included the significant progress made since September 2023, as well as future funding applications. In response to a question from the Leader in regards to how the Shadow Authority had been working to date, the Sports Pembrokeshire Team Leader explained that things were operating as smoothly as possible, and that the next financial year would be when the regional entities would start to provide finance to the commission partners, as highlighted in the report. He believed that the next six months would start to form the agreed priorities for the region, and that Pembrokeshire could be vocal about where the resource would be best aligned, as well as being in a strong position to submit an application in 2026-27. Councillor Paul Miller referred to perceived risks in relation to regional funding, and sought reassurance that Officers were aware of such risks and that partners were being worked with collaboratively, to ensure an equitable spread of investment across the region. The Sports Pembrokeshire Team Leader explained that there were some safeguards in place administered by Sport Wales, and assured Councillor Miller that resources would be aligned across the four relevant Local Authorities, and that no one particular area would have an additional increase, or access to all the funding. He stated that funding would be linked to the quality of the applications submitted by the Authority. The vote, undertaken by way of a show of hands, was carried. RESOLVED That the progress made by Pembrokeshire County Council as a delivery partner to Sports Wales, be noted
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED (a) That Cabinet note the update. (b) That continuing with Option 1 as detailed in the report and which is capable of accommodating an increase to an hourly service, be approved. (c) That the inclusion of the Milford Haven Public Transport Interchange (MHPTI) as part of the Local Transport Fund Bids Grant Application for the financial year 2025-26 for the sum of £6,070,690, be approved to continue development and phased delivery of the MHPTI. (d) That it be noted that any Local Transport Fund Bids Grant Application (or successor grant fund) for the financial year 2026-27, will be subject to a further report to Cabinet for consideration and approval at the relevant time. (e) That the inclusion in the Capital Programme of the MHPTI scheme for financial year 2025-26 and financial year 2026-27, be approved, with the amounts being as set out in Table 2 of the report. (f) That it be noted that should the MHPTI scheme cost in financial year 2025-26 or financial year 2026-27 exceed the amounts included in the Capital Programme, a further report to Cabinet will be required seeking approval for any such additional funding, and this approval must be received before the MHPTI scheme is progressed in the relevant financial year.
Cabinet considered a report by the Head of Infrastructure and Environment which outlined an update in regards to the Milford Haven Public Transport Interchange Scheme. Councillor Paul Miller, the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Place, the Region and Climate Change, introduced the report and stated that the project would improve and enhance the facility, as well as allow for better platform alignment, which would allow trains from London Paddington to call at Milford Haven. He highlighted that conversations were ongoing with Welsh and UK Governments and various transport operators in relation to that aspect. He also stated that there was a construction completion target date of September 2026, and that it was envisaged that just under 90% of the cost would be secured through transport grant funding. Councillor Paul Miller Moved the Recommendation. Councillor Rhys Sinnett stated that the project was good news for Milford Haven and referred to the significant amount of work involved in the scheme so far. He also commented that the project would address concerns regarding reliable trains, as well as increased links and functionality within Milford Haven. He then stated his support for the scheme. The Leader stated that it was an excellent scheme, and that improving the interchange, as well as transport connectivity, was positive for the area. He then expressed his support. The Head of Infrastructure and Environment referred to the preliminary design stage and that the scheme was therefore quite advanced. He explained that if Cabinet was to approve the outlined recommendations and the grant award was received, it would move the project towards the construction stage. He also referred to future proofing, the project programme, financial expenditure and the grant application profile. The Recommendation was Seconded by the Leader. The vote, undertaken by way of a roll call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions. RESOLVED (a) That Cabinet note the update. (b) That continuing with Option 1 as detailed in the report and which is capable of accommodating an increase to an hourly service, be approved. (c) That the inclusion of the Milford Haven Public Transport Interchange (MHPTI) as part of the Local Transport Fund Bids Grant Application for the financial year 2025-26 for the sum of £6,070,690, be approved to continue development and phased delivery of the MHPTI. (d) That it be noted that any Local Transport Fund Bids Grant Application (or successor grant fund) for the financial year 2026-27, will be subject to a further report to Cabinet for consideration and approval at the relevant time. (e) That the inclusion in the Capital Programme of the MHPTI scheme for financial year 2025-26 and financial year 2026-27, be approved, with the amounts being as set out in Table 2 of the report. (f) That it be noted that should the MHPTI scheme cost in financial year 2025-26 or financial year 2026-27 exceed the amounts included in the Capital Programme, a further report to Cabinet will be required seeking approval for any such additional funding, and this approval must be received before the MHPTI scheme is progressed in the relevant financial year.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That entering into the Regional Agreement, substantially in the form shown in Appendix A, be approved; and that authority be delegated to the Head of Law and Governance, in conjunction with the Cabinet Member for Residents’ Services, to agree any revisions to the Regional Agreement, as are considered necessary prior to its completion.
Cabinet considered a report by the Head of Infrastructure and Environment which outlined the Regional Bus Funding Joint Working Agreement. Councillor Rhys Sinnett, the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Residents’ Services, introduced the report and explained that Swansea was the lead Authority for the region and had received just over £10 million from Welsh Government for the year, with a portion of that funding devolved to Pembrokeshire to deliver transport services. He highlighted that the amount allocated to Pembrokeshire was £1,685,940, plus an additional amount of £186,480, which could be used to fund any route enhancements or if any services which currently ran on a commercial basis were no longer sustainable. He added that not being part of the regional agreement was not feasible and would result in a loss of that funding and a likely failure to meet statutory obligations. Councillor Rhys Sinnett Moved the Recommendation; Seconded by Councillor Guy Woodham. Councillor Jacob Williams asked whether a report would be brought back to Cabinet to agree any changes made by the Head of Law and Governance, as outlined in the Recommendation. The Head of Law and Governance explained that the changes implied by the Recommendation were minor amendments and would simply strengthen the contract. She then went on to list the proposed changes and stated that the contract could be brought back to Cabinet, however no substantial changes would be made. The Leader suggested to include the following in the Recommendation in order to provide oversight of the changes: ‘…in conjunction with the Cabinet Member for Residents’ Services…’ The Mover and Seconder confirmed that they were happy to support that inclusion. Councillor Sinnett added that there was a regional group that met on a regular basis and suggested that any issues could be raised there. The vote, undertaken by way of a roll call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions. RESOLVED That entering into the Regional Agreement, substantially in the form shown in Appendix A, be approved; and that authority be delegated to the Head of Law and Governance, in conjunction with the Cabinet Member for Residents’ Services, to agree any revisions to the Regional Agreement, as are considered necessary prior to its completion.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the public be excluded from the meeting in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 as Appendix E involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 16 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the Act; and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. The webcast was paused at this juncture. Having convened in private session in accordance with Paragraph 16 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, Cabinet considered Appendix E, The webcast was then resumed. The Leader stated his support for the outlined Recommendations and agreed that six months was too short a time to amend the premium again, as there was no significant data available to review at this time. He also understood the concern around the 182 day rule, and highlighted that the Recommendations on the matter would be for Council to determine in due course. The votes, undertaken by way of separate roll calls, were carried. The votes were recorded as follows: RESOLVED That the following be approved: (a) Level of Council Tax Premiums (i) Second Homes: Option 2 - to remain as current For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [7] Against the Motion: Councillor Neil Prior [1] There were no abstentions. (ii) Long Term Empty Properties: Option 2 - to remain as current For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [7] There were no votes against or abstentions. (b) Discretionary Discount Policy (i) Retained Firefighter Discount: Option 1 - no discount For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions. (ii) Self-catering Units: Option 1 – To follow the 182/252 days as stipulated by Welsh Government legislation, but, as suggested by the Council Tax Working Group, to recommend to Full Council that they write to Welsh Government asking them to reduce the 182 days let threshold. For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions.
Cabinet considered a report by the Head of Financial Services which outlined the findings of the Public Consultation held on Council Tax premiums for second homes and long-term empty properties, as well as the Council’s Discretionary Discount Policy in relation to properties returning into the Council Tax list, from a non-domestic rating. Councillor Joshua Beynon, the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Corporate Finance and Efficiencies, introduced the report and recognised that it was an emotive subject. He referred to the significant consultation exercise undertaken over the summer, as well as the various correspondence he had received from the public on the matter. He explained the background of the Council Tax premium as outlined in the report, and referred to the consultation responses, which resulted in a wide range of views. Councillor Beynon then highlighted the Non-Domestic Rates properties and the new 182 day letting legislation, and believed it to be risky to amend this figure. He referred to the Recommendation and stated that it would be beneficial to write to Welsh Government on the matter. He also outlined the figures relating to second homes and self-catering properties, as listed in the report, as well as the long term empty properties premium. He believed that it was not right for the Authority’s Council Tax legislation or the 200% premium to be amended at this current time, due to the importance of protecting the sustainability of local communities. Councillor Beynon added that 40% of owners of self-catering units who responded to the consultation expected them to be rented for at least 182 days, which was positive. Councillor Joshua Beynon Moved the Recommendations and suggested they be voted on separately. Councillor Neil Prior highlighted the reasons as to why this matter had occurred, and referred to his ward in the north of the County, where the amount of second homes was high. He stated that he did not support the rise to 200% and explained that since that rise had been implemented, he had not seen any significant movement in regards to people selling their second homes. He also referred to conversations with self-catering businesses concerned about the 182 day rule. He then highlighted the significant benefit second home owners had brought into his community, and stated that he would not support the 200% and would prefer to see a reduction. Councillor Beynon appreciated the honest views of Councillor Prior and agreed that some of the issues being faced currently, could relate to historical housing problems. He agreed that second home owners added value to the County, but referred to the need to find a balance, and believed that not enough time had passed to see the impacts of this change. Councillor Michelle Bateman agreed that second home owners added value, but highlighted the impact of the lack of affordable housing within Pembrokeshire, on families, communities and on the ability to recruit and attract people into the County. She also referred to bringing properties back into permanent use. Councillor Bateman wished for the 182 day rule to be separated from this issue, as it was not a decision of the Authority, and agreed that it was too high and that Welsh Government should be written to on the matter. She also agreed with Councillor Beynon that it was too early to see the impacts of the change, and suggested that this be reviewed in six months’ time. Councillor Rhys Sinnett believed that the list of Recommendations were well balanced, and agreed that it was too early to come to a definite conclusion on the matter. He also suggested that it be kept under consistent review, and stated his support for the outlined Recommendations. The Recommendation was Seconded by Councillor Rhys Sinnett. The Head of Law and Governance wished to clarify that that public interest was not a factor in regards to considering the private appendices. Cabinet then considered excluding the public from the meeting to consider the exempt Appendix E. The Leader Moved the exclusion of the public; Seconded by Councillor Michelle Bateman. The vote was taken by a roll call and was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions. RESOLVED That the public be excluded from the meeting in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 as Appendix E involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 16 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the Act; and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. The webcast was paused at this juncture. Having convened in private session in accordance with Paragraph 16 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, Cabinet considered Appendix E, The webcast was then resumed. The Leader stated his support for the outlined Recommendations and agreed that six months was too short a time to amend the premium again, as there was no significant data available to review at this time. He also understood the concern around the 182 day rule, and highlighted that the Recommendations on the matter would be for Council to determine in due course. The votes, undertaken by way of separate roll calls, were carried. The votes were recorded as follows: RESOLVED That the following be approved: (a) Level of Council Tax Premiums (i) Second Homes: Option 2 - to remain as current For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [7] Against the Motion: Councillor Neil Prior [1] There were no abstentions. (ii) Long Term Empty Properties: Option 2 - to remain as current For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [7] There were no votes against or abstentions. (b) Discretionary Discount Policy (i) Retained Firefighter Discount: Option 1 - no discount For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions. (ii) Self-catering Units: Option 1 – To follow the 182/252 days as stipulated by Welsh Government legislation, but, as suggested by the Council Tax Working Group, to recommend to Full Council that they write to Welsh Government asking them to reduce the 182 days let threshold. For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the progress made and challenges faced in the implementation of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund be noted.
Cabinet considered a report by the Head of Financial Services which outlined the third six-monthly update on progress in implementing the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) in Pembrokeshire. Councillor Joshua Beynon, the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Corporate Finance and Efficiencies, introduced the report and stated that the team was continuing to receive requests for additional funding, partly in response to the offer of project extensions. In terms of the project and programme closure, he added that the updated position was that 27 had sought extensions, He explained that it had been decided that the Authority could offer an extension up to 28 February 2025 to all but two, therefore those extensions should allow for some more spends, as well as for more of the projects to be delivered. Councillor Joshua Beynon Moved the Recommendation; Seconded by the Leader. The vote, undertaken by way of a show of hands, was carried. RESOLVED That the progress made and challenges faced in the implementation of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund be noted.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the report be received and the progress, which continues to be made, on the improvement of the delivery of Social Services during 2023-24, be noted.
[Councillor Miller declared a personal and prejudicial interestby virtue of being a Director of Community Interest Care (CIC) who are a provider of Social Care Services to the Council. He stated that he had a dispensation to speak but not vote.] Cabinet considered a report by the Director of Social Services which outlined the Annual Report of the Statutory Director of Social Services for 2023-24. The Director introduced the report and stated that it had been produced to meet the legislative requirements under the Social Services and Wellbeing Act, and was based on a body of evidence that covered performance, risks, priorities and plans for improvement on the whole range of social care functions.The report also set out how people were helping to shape services and how the Service works in partnership with other departments such as housing and education, as well as the third sector, the Health Board and Police. The Director stated that the report also identified priorities for 2024-25. Councillor Neil Prior commented that this was a huge area of pressure for the Council and he was aware of the significant amount of work going on within the Service. He stated that he was particularly keen to see the focus on preventions, and suggested the need for the term to become more widely known, to allow people to understand what was trying to be achieved in regards to prevention work. He thanked the Director and Officers for their work. The Director referred to the Prevention Agenda and stated that he was open to a discussion around how the Agenda could be reframed, perhaps with a greater focus on well-being. He stated that it was really important work and that everything possible needed to be done to support individuals. The Chief Executive welcomed Councillor Prior’s comments and agreed that the Authority needed to be clear as to what the Prevention Agenda was. He stated that the challenge was how much resource could be allocated to the Agenda, and referred to the current challenges within the Service as a whole, and stated that he had asked the Director of Resources how the agenda could be operationalised. He believed that it was a strong agenda, but that it could be improved in order to create long term solutions. The Leader stated that the pressures on Children's Services were exceptional and hoped that the Prevention Agenda could reduce that pressure, but appreciated the fact that it could take some time. Councillor Rhys Sinnett sought clarification in regards to direct payments and whether anything was being done by way of promoting this element. [Councillor Guy Woodham declared personal interest at this point in the meeting by virtue of a family member receiving direct payments.] In response to Councillor Sinnett’s question, the Director explained that there had been an increase in the number of individuals accessing direct payments, with an average of 8,000 hours of planned care per week being delivered through direct payments. He stated that it was an area that he wished to expand on, as it offered more choice and control for individuals who had eligible care and support needs. He highlighted, however, that one of the issues was ensuring that the Authority had provision that individuals could purchase. Therefore, the Service’s forward plan was said to include the promotion of direct payments, as well as working with the wider market to ensure adequate provision. He stated that the report outlined the work being undertaken in regards to this matter, which referenced micro enterprises and a dedicated payroll service for direct payments. Councillor Michelle Bateman referred to micro enterprises and stated her support for them, but questioned whether there was a risk to the Authority in regards to losing experienced staff to micro enterprises, where they could be more selective of the cases they take on. In response, the Director stated that it was not something that the Authority had experienced, and that a micro enterprises meant that individuals were self-employed, which was a business model that did not work for everyone. He stated that this aspect, however, would be monitored closely going forward, but highlighted the need for a mixed economy of provisions that delivered quality and effective care. Councillor Bateman suggested the need to monitor the number of micro enterprises in relation to personal care. The Leader Moved the Recommendation; Seconded by Councillor Rhys Sinnett. The vote, undertaken by way of a show of hands, was carried. Councillor Paul Miller did not vote due to his declaration of interest. RESOLVED That the report be received and the progress, which continues to be made, on the improvement of the delivery of Social Services during 2023-24, be noted.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED (a) That the proposed fee structure set out in the table below be approved, and that the Head of Housing and Public Protection be authorised to carry out the scheme of delegated powers in accordance with the list of powers in paragraph 11 in the report. (b) That Cabinet ensure that the delegations are reflected by amendment in the Constitution and the amendments reported to Council for noting the changes in the Constitution. Licence Type New Renewal Special Procedures Licence (3yr licence) £203 (£159 Application £44 Compliance) £189 (£148 Application £41 Compliance) Approved Premises Certificate (3yr licence) £385 (£244 Application £141 Compliance) £345 (£204 Application £141 Compliance) Special Procedure Licence Variation (Add Procedure) £131 Special Procedure Licence Variation (Change of Detail) £26 Replacement Licence £13 Temporary Special Procedure licence £92 Special Procedure approved premises variation (Add Procedure) £189 Approved Premises Variation (Structural Change) £189 Approved Premises - Change of Detail £26 Replacement Licence £13 Approved Premises Temporary Approval (Ancillary Event) £385 Approved Premises Temporary Approval (Convention / Main Purpose) £680
Cabinet considered a report by the Head of Housing and Public Protection which outlined the fee structure and scheme of delegated authority for the Public Health (Wales) Act 2017, in respect of special procedure licensing. Councillor Jacob Williams, the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Planning and Regulatory Services, introduced the report and stated that the current legislative framework for Special Procedures was inadequate, and highlighted that the Local Government Act 1982 currently in place did not require a competency test for practitioners to demonstrate an appropriate knowledge of hygiene and infection control. He explained that the intention of the licensing scheme was to improve and sustain standards within the industry, as well as ensure the health and safety of both clients and practitioners. Councillor Williams then referred to the fees, as outlined in the report, and stated that they had been calculated by the Special Procedures Implementation Group and subsequently approved by Public Protection Wales, in order to be applied by Local Authorities across Wales. He also referred to cost recovery exercises, delegation of powers and an amendment to the Authority’s Constitution, and he pointed out that current license holders had been made aware of the new regulations. Councillor Jacob Williams Moved the Recommendation. Councillor Neil Prior sought clarification in regards to cost recovery in relation to the set fees. In response, Councillor Williams explained that Welsh Government had directed that the same fees be set and stated that the review would be undertaken across Wales in a year’s time. The Licensing Lead Officer referred to the potential for the Authority to receive full cost recovery, however, it was important for the Authority to feedback to the Implementation Group in order to review the fees going forward to hopefully achieve full cost recovery. She also referred to the fact that Pembrokeshire had a lower amount of practitioners compared to other areas which reduced the economy of scale. Councillor Michelle Bateman commented on economies of scale, and stated that she could see why this may not result in a full cost recovery for the Authority. She also suggested factoring in the advising of license holders, follow-up’s, complaints, advice and support. The Recommendation was Seconded by the Leader. The vote, undertaken by way of an roll call, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jon Harvey, Paul Miller, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Neil Prior, Rhys Sinnett, Jacob Williams and Guy Woodham [8] There were no votes against or abstentions. RESOLVED (a) That the proposed fee structure set out in the table below be approved, and that the Head of Housing and Public Protection be authorised to carry out the scheme of delegated powers in accordance with the list of powers in paragraph 11 in the report. (b) That Cabinet ensure that the delegations are reflected by amendment in the Constitution and the amendments reported to Council for noting the changes in the Constitution. Licence Type New Renewal Special Procedures Licence (3yr licence) £203 (£159 Application £44 Compliance) £189 (£148 Application £41 Compliance) Approved Premises Certificate (3yr licence) £385 (£244 Application £141 Compliance) £345 (£204 Application £141 Compliance) Special Procedure Licence Variation (Add Procedure) £131 Special Procedure Licence Variation (Change of Detail) £26 Replacement Licence £13 Temporary Special Procedure licence £92 Special Procedure approved premises variation (Add Procedure) £189 Approved Premises Variation (Structural Change) £189 Approved Premises - Change of Detail £26 Replacement Licence £13 Approved Premises Temporary Approval (Ancillary Event) £385 Approved Premises Temporary Approval (Convention / Main Purpose) £680
Rhaid i gynghorwyr ddweud pan fydd ganddyn nhw gysylltiad personol â rhywbeth sy'n cael ei drafod, fel swydd, eiddo neu aelod o'r teulu. Mae buddiant sy'n rhagfarnu yn ddigon cryf i'r cynghorydd adael yr ystafell fel arfer a pheidio â chymryd rhan.
Caiff datganiadau eu darllen o'r cofnodion unwaith y byddan nhw wedi'u cyhoeddi.
Yn rhestru cynghorwyr presennol y cyngor yn unig. Nid yw aelodau cyfetholedig, swyddogion a chyn-gynghorwyr yn cael eu dangos.