Wrthi'n llwytho
Y penderfyniadau fel y mae cofnodion y cyngor yn eu cofnodi. Bydd crynodeb mewn iaith glir yn dilyn pan fydd wedi'i ysgrifennu.
RESOLVED That in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the Meeting for consideration of the current item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information under Schedule 12A to the Act. The Sub-Committee then resumed in open session. DECISION The Sub-Committee has a discretion to exempt specific private hire vehicles from the requirement to display external plates, and instead to allow the vehicle to carry licence plates inside the vehicle. The representations made by the Applicant have clarified that the application is for one specific vehicle, and that the vehicle is to be used predominantly for executive hire-type tours. Conditions imposed by the Council are required to be considered reasonably necessary, including the display of external plates. The Sub-Committee is not persuaded that the reasons for the application as detailed by the Applicant are sufficiently persuasive for the Sub-Committee to exercise its discretion and grant the exemption. It is considered that it is still reasonable and necessary in the circumstances as described for the requirement for the plates to be displayed externally to continue. RESOLVED That the application be refused.
RESOLVED That in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the Meeting for consideration of the current item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information under Schedule 12A to the Act. The Sub-Committee then resumed in open session. DECISION The Sub-Committee has carefully considered the application as revised, following the agreement reached at the multi-agency meeting with the Applicant, and also the representations from the Applicant. From these matters, the Sub-Committee is more than satisfied that the application as varied and agreed promotes the licensing objectives. The Sub-Committee has taken from the agreement reached with the Applicant that those Responsible Authorities involved in the Multi-Agency Meeting, that the Applicant has already satisfied those Responsible Authorities that the Applicant has overcome the rebuttable presumption against the grant of new premises licences within a cumulative impact area. The Sub-Committee is mindful of the only outstanding representation from the Planning Department of the Council. This it considers has been answered to a great extent by the Applicant in her representations, with her indication of the intention to seek to vary the planning conditions. RESOLVED That the application as varied and agreed be granted. The Solicitor further clarified the following: This was subject to the reminder that there was no need for any conditions for hours of live or recorded music, which was a duplication of existing legislation and as such unnecessary. There was also no provision for any non-standard timings in the application so the Sub-Committee was unable to endorse any agreement about provision of door supervision at non-standard times, for example on public holidays. Whilst it may not be applicable in this application, the Sub-Committee would state that the Planning and Licensing regimes run completely separately and distinctly, and are based on different criteria. The grant of a Premises Licence was based entirely upon licensing objectives. It does not mean that there may not be a breach of Planning Conditions which would be subject to separate enforcement by the Planning Department. Grant of a premises licence does not mean that Planning Permission will be granted or varied, and vice versa.
There were no Declarations of Interest made.
Moved by Councillor Tim Evans; Seconded by Councillor John Davies RESOLVED That the Minutes of the meeting held on 2 November 2022 be approved as a correct record.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the Meeting for consideration of the current item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information under Schedule 12A to the Act. The Sub-Committee then resumed in open session. DECISION The Sub-Committee has a discretion to exempt specific private hire vehicles from the requirement to display external plates, and instead to allow the vehicle to carry licence plates inside the vehicle. The representations made by the Applicant have clarified that the application is for one specific vehicle, and that the vehicle is to be used predominantly for executive hire-type tours. Conditions imposed by the Council are required to be considered reasonably necessary, including the display of external plates. The Sub-Committee is not persuaded that the reasons for the application as detailed by the Applicant are sufficiently persuasive for the Sub-Committee to exercise its discretion and grant the exemption. It is considered that it is still reasonable and necessary in the circumstances as described for the requirement for the plates to be displayed externally to continue. RESOLVED That the application be refused.
The Sub-Committee considered a report by the Director of Community Services regarding an application for the use of small private hire plates inside executive vehicles by Mrs Niederlag. The Chair introduced the Solicitor to the meeting who presented the application to the Sub-Committee together with the options that were available. The Lead Officer (Licensing) then presented the report. The Applicant was present remotely for the Hearing and was provided the opportunity to present their case to the Sub-Committee, including answering questions and the key points were highlighted as follows: · The application was for one vehicle, used exclusively for executive hire and that there would be no variation to the Tuk Tuk taxis. · That it was for a black seven seater mini bus with a leather interior. · The vehicle could only be booked in advance and was predominantly for tours from South to North Pembrokeshire or trips to and from the airport. The Solicitor then outlined the options for consideration by the Sub-Committee. The Sub-Committee then retired to undertake its consideration of the matter and the representations submitted. Moved by Councillor Tim Evans; Seconded by Councillor Tony Wilcox RESOLVED That in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the Meeting for consideration of the current item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information under Schedule 12A to the Act. The Sub-Committee then resumed in open session. DECISION The Sub-Committee has a discretion to exempt specific private hire vehicles from the requirement to display external plates, and instead to allow the vehicle to carry licence plates inside the vehicle. The representations made by the Applicant have clarified that the application is for one specific vehicle, and that the vehicle is to be used predominantly for executive hire-type tours. Conditions imposed by the Council are required to be considered reasonably necessary, including the display of external plates. The Sub-Committee is not persuaded that the reasons for the application as detailed by the Applicant are sufficiently persuasive for the Sub-Committee to exercise its discretion and grant the exemption. It is considered that it is still reasonable and necessary in the circumstances as described for the requirement for the plates to be displayed externally to continue. RESOLVED That the application be refused.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the Meeting for consideration of the current item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information under Schedule 12A to the Act. The Sub-Committee then resumed in open session. DECISION The Sub-Committee has carefully considered the application as revised, following the agreement reached at the multi-agency meeting with the Applicant, and also the representations from the Applicant. From these matters, the Sub-Committee is more than satisfied that the application as varied and agreed promotes the licensing objectives. The Sub-Committee has taken from the agreement reached with the Applicant that those Responsible Authorities involved in the Multi-Agency Meeting, that the Applicant has already satisfied those Responsible Authorities that the Applicant has overcome the rebuttable presumption against the grant of new premises licences within a cumulative impact area. The Sub-Committee is mindful of the only outstanding representation from the Planning Department of the Council. This it considers has been answered to a great extent by the Applicant in her representations, with her indication of the intention to seek to vary the planning conditions. RESOLVED That the application as varied and agreed be granted. The Solicitor further clarified the following: This was subject to the reminder that there was no need for any conditions for hours of live or recorded music, which was a duplication of existing legislation and as such unnecessary. There was also no provision for any non-standard timings in the application so the Sub-Committee was unable to endorse any agreement about provision of door supervision at non-standard times, for example on public holidays. Whilst it may not be applicable in this application, the Sub-Committee would state that the Planning and Licensing regimes run completely separately and distinctly, and are based on different criteria. The grant of a Premises Licence was based entirely upon licensing objectives. It does not mean that there may not be a breach of Planning Conditions which would be subject to separate enforcement by the Planning Department. Grant of a premises licence does not mean that Planning Permission will be granted or varied, and vice versa.
The Sub-Committee considered a report by the Director of Community Services regarding a New Premises Licence for Talouies @ Quay Street, 4 Quay Street, Haverfordwest SA61 1BG. The Lead Officer (Licensing) outlined the application to the Sub-Committee with representations noted. The Solicitor outlined the options available to the Sub-Committee stating that the Sub-Committee is to decide upon the licensing application only and that the application for planning was not for consideration. The Chair welcomed the Applicant Ms Gwenifer S Reeves to the meeting who was present remotely who then outlined the licence application to the Sub-Committee. The Sub-Committee then debated the contents of the report and the key points were highlighted as follows: · Customers would not need to book in advance as there was only static seating available with a maximum of 25 customers. · The maximum capacity included staff in attendance due to only one bathroom. · In response to a question on public safety, the Applicant advised the Sub-Committee that there was a landline and mobile on the premises and only one entrance/exit. · The Applicant advised the Sub-Committee of an error on the planning that there was no external area and did not condone smoking outside of the premises but that a box for the safe disposal of cigarette butts would be in place. · An additional error was highlighted that the application should read drugs possession and NOT drugs profession. · In response to a question from the Vice-Chair, the Applicant advised that vaping would also be banned and that anyone found vaping would be asked to leave. · The Applicant confirmed that they would be the Designated Premises Supervisor (DPS) of the property and that there would always be a licensed holder on site. In summing up, the Applicant advised that this new application would bring in some jobs to the area and offered alternative premises for older clientele who were not looking to attend busy pubs. The Applicant confirmed that they do run one other business in Milford Haven and part of one in Pembroke. The Chair sought clarification on amplified music and the Lead Officer (Licensing) confirmed that live music was allowed up until 2300hrs for a licensed premises however, the Applicant advised the Sub-Committee that there would only be background music for ambiance due to the size of the premises. The Solicitor then outlined the options for consideration by the Sub-Committee. The Sub-Committee then retired to undertake its consideration of the matter and the representations submitted. Moved by Councillor Tim Evans; Seconded by Councillor Tony Wilcox RESOLVED That in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the Meeting for consideration of the current item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information under Schedule 12A to the Act. The Sub-Committee then resumed in open session. DECISION The Sub-Committee has carefully considered the application as revised, following the agreement reached at the multi-agency meeting with the Applicant, and also the representations from the Applicant. From these matters, the Sub-Committee is more than satisfied that the application as varied and agreed promotes the licensing objectives. The Sub-Committee has taken from the agreement reached with the Applicant that those Responsible Authorities involved in the Multi-Agency Meeting, that the Applicant has already satisfied those Responsible Authorities that the Applicant has overcome the rebuttable presumption against the grant of new premises licences within a cumulative impact area. The Sub-Committee is mindful of the only outstanding representation from the Planning Department of the Council. This it considers has been answered to a great extent by the Applicant in her representations, with her indication of the intention to seek to vary the planning conditions. RESOLVED That the application as varied and agreed be granted. The Solicitor further clarified the following: This was subject to the reminder that there was no need for any conditions for hours of live or recorded music, which was a duplication of existing legislation and as such unnecessary. There was also no provision for any non-standard timings in the application so the Sub-Committee was unable to endorse any agreement about provision of door supervision at non-standard times, for example on public holidays. Whilst it may not be applicable in this application, the Sub-Committee would state that the Planning and Licensing regimes run completely separately and distinctly, and are based on different criteria. The grant of a Premises Licence was based entirely upon licensing objectives. It does not mean that there may not be a breach of Planning Conditions which would be subject to separate enforcement by the Planning Department. Grant of a premises licence does not mean that Planning Permission will be granted or varied, and vice versa.
Rhaid i gynghorwyr ddweud pan fydd ganddyn nhw gysylltiad personol â rhywbeth sy'n cael ei drafod, fel swydd, eiddo neu aelod o'r teulu. Mae buddiant sy'n rhagfarnu yn ddigon cryf i'r cynghorydd adael yr ystafell fel arfer a pheidio â chymryd rhan.
Caiff datganiadau eu darllen o'r cofnodion unwaith y byddan nhw wedi'u cyhoeddi.
Yn rhestru cynghorwyr presennol y cyngor yn unig. Nid yw aelodau cyfetholedig, swyddogion a chyn-gynghorwyr yn cael eu dangos.