Wrthi'n llwytho
Y penderfyniadau fel y mae cofnodion y cyngor yn eu cofnodi. Bydd crynodeb mewn iaith glir yn dilyn pan fydd wedi'i ysgrifennu.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services and subject to the receipt of amended plans to correct a minor inconsistency on the proposed plans.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services but with the following changes to conditions one and three; · Condition one to state: A maximum 2 year period commencing from the date any permission is issued with removal of caravans at end of time period · Condition three to state: Foul drainage to be directed to the package treatment plant
In welcoming everyone to the meeting and wishing them a Happy New Year, the Chairman made the following announcements: · During the 8 November 2022 Committee meeting, delegated authority was granted to the Head of Planning to approve Planning Application No. 20/0230/PA, following receipt of a Unilateral Undertaking (UU) in respect of an affordable housing contribution. The completed UU was received in late November and the decision was issued on 12 December 2022. · That oral updates would be provided for Agenda Items No. 6 and 10.
There were no declarations of interest received.
An accuracy correction was requested by Councillor Mark Carter, referring to Minute 60 of the meeting held on 6 December 2022,for the sentence stating ‘Having previously declared a personal and prejudicial interest in this item of business, Councillor Mark Carter withdrew from the meeting’ be changed to ‘Councillor Mark Carter withdrew from the meeting at this juncture’ as the interest declared prior was not stated to be of a personal and prejudicial nature. Moved by Councillor Jacob Williams; Seconded by Councillor Brian Hall The vote, by way of show of hands, was carried. RESOLVED That the Minutes of the meeting held on 6 December 2022 be approved as a correct record subject to the above amendment.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services and subject to the receipt of amended plans to correct a minor inconsistency on the proposed plans.
This application was for Committee consideration as the application was made under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) - a consent under section 73 represents a new planning permission which, in this case, raises issues regarding compliance with the development plan (part (n) of the scheme of delegation). The Development Manager for Major Projects & Planning Obligations provided the Committee with an oral update that an amended recommendation be noted as follows: That the application be approved subject to the conditions stated in paragraph 1.1 of the Committee report and subject to the receipt of amended plans to correct a minor inconsistency on the proposed plans. The Committee proceeded to discuss the application and the key points were noted as follows: · Councillor Brian Hall made reference to Narberth Town Council objecting on the grounds of environmental issues and requested further information. The Development Manager for Major Projects & Planning Obligations advised that no further information had been received from them. Councillor Brian Hall Moved that the application be approved as per the updated recommendation; Seconded by Councillor Mark Carter · Following a request from Councillor Alistair Cameron for more information regarding any concerns raised by the Historic Buildings Conservation Officer, the Development Manager for Major Projects & Planning Obligations stated that no concerns had been raised and as the application was outside of the conservation area, any effect would remain the same as the prior consent due to the boundary line. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, John Cole, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [15] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services and subject to the receipt of amended plans to correct a minor inconsistency on the proposed plans.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
This application was presented for Committee consideration as it involved a hotel and retail development of over 500 sq.m of floorspace (paragraph 1 (f) of the scheme of delegation). The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested party who wished to exercise her right to address the Committee: · Local Member – Councillor Pat Davies Councillor Pat Davies, Local Member, addressed the Committee to express her support of the application stating that the town was in need of additional hotel accommodation and feels the proposal would sympathetically improve the building, offer employment opportunities and have an overall positive impact on the town. The Committee proceeded to discuss the application and the key points were noted as follows: · Following questions raised by Councillor Nicola Gwynn regarding the elevations of the building, the Planning Officer, Mark Hyde, advised that within plans submitted the extension elevation does appear to be higher than the existing building, but due to the way the land lies that it is not visible when you are looking directly at the building. It was noted that the largest impact would be seen from a side view, although the Historic Buildings Conservation Officer had advised the elevations were acceptable. Councillor Nicola Gwynn Moved that the application be approved as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Jordan Ryan. · Councillor Alistair Cameron made reference to a query raised by the Historic Buildings Conservation Officer regarding excessive cladding, and queried if this matter had been resolved. The Planning Officer advised that negotiations had taken place and the matter had been resolved. · Reference was made to the Highways consultation response which stated no objections but recommended a condition to secure the proposed car parking provision and Councillor Tim Evans requested more information as to what was being done regarding parking for the Hotel. The Planning Officer advised that the parking provision proposed had been deemed adequate due to the town centre location and close proximity to a bus station. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, John Cole, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [15] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
This application was for Committee consideration as the application was made under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) - a consent under section 73 represents a new planning permission which, in this case, raises issues regarding compliance with the Development Plan (part (n) of the scheme of delegation). In response to a question raised by Councillor Alistair Cameron, the Development Manager for Major Projects & Planning Obligations advised that the area which had been allocated for recreational use would be an open area, therefore the soil would not be disturbed to any depth which may cause contamination concerns. Councillor Alistair Cameron expressed the importance of careful consideration in relation to flood resilience measures following ongoing concerns within the area. Councillor Mark Carter Moved that the application be approved as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Andrew Edwards The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, John Cole, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [15] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
The Meeting adjourned at 11:04am for a short comfort break and reconvened at 11:12am.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
This application was for Committee consideration as it involved a development that was contrary to a policy of the Development Plan but which was being recommended for approval (paragraph 1(n) of the scheme of delegation). In response to a policy based question from the Chairman who highlighted the increase in applications of this nature coming before Committee and the regular support of them despite them being contrary to the current local policy, the Head of Planning advised that as part of the revised Local Development Plan, such matters had been addressed and would be brought in line with national policy. Councillor Brian Hall requested examples of measures which could be put in place to meet the required biodiversity enhancement to which the Planning Officer, Kane Thomas, advised that bat/bird box could be used to satisfy such requirements. Councillor Brian Hall Moved that the application be approved as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Andrew Edwards The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, John Cole, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [15] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
Y penderfyniad fel y'i cofnodwyd
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services but with the following changes to conditions one and three; · Condition one to state: A maximum 2 year period commencing from the date any permission is issued with removal of caravans at end of time period · Condition three to state: Foul drainage to be directed to the package treatment plant
This application was for Committee consideration as the application was for development contrary to the Development Plan but which was being recommended for approval (paragraph 1(n) of the scheme of delegation). The Planning Officer, Kane Thomas, provided two oral updates as follows: • At the time of submission, the application form stated that the proposed development had not commenced and it was drawn to the Planning department’s attention that caravans had been placed on the site since submission. Such information does not change the proposed conditions in the recommendation, as condition 1 refers to the permission being for a 2 year period. However for clarification, this condition will be worded as being for a maximum 2 year period commencing from the date any permission is issued. In addition, an informative would be added to the decision notice asking the developer to notify the Department of the date the caravans have been removed from the site. • Condition 3 in the recommendation stated that details of the package treatment plant would need to be submitted for approval. The agent has supplied details of the package treatment plant installed and therefore the condition will refer to foul drainage being directed to this installation. The Committee proceeded to discuss the application and the key points were noted as follows: · Councillor Mark Carter, Local Member, expressed that although it had been disappointing to have to consider the application in a retrospective manner, he did support the development and hoped that the applicants would adhere to the requirement of the caravan removal within the stated timeframe. Councillor Mark Carter Moved that the application be approved as updated in the oral update; Seconded by Councillor Andrew Edwards · In response to a question from Councillor Tim Evans, the Planning Officer confirmed that the caravans would be within the boundary of the property being constructed, although in response to a further question on the matter from the Chairman, stated that he had not revisited the site since the caravans had been positioned. The Chief Planning Officer added that the position of the caravans can be checked to ensure they are in accordance with the consent. Councillor Mark Carter stated that in his opinion as Local Member, the caravans were in the correct position. · Following a request for further information by Councillor Tim Evans, the Planning Officer and Chief Planning Officer provided further details of the reasoning which had been given by the applicants as to why the caravans were placed on site prematurely, which had been deemed genuine reasoning. · In response to a question raised by Councillor Michael Williams, the Chief Planning Officer provided details as to reasons which would demonstrate the need for the applicants to live on site during the construction of the property. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, John Cole, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [15] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services but with the following changes to conditions one and three; · Condition one to state: A maximum 2 year period commencing from the date any permission is issued with removal of caravans at end of time period · Condition three to state: Foul drainage to be directed to the package treatment plant
Rhaid i gynghorwyr ddweud pan fydd ganddyn nhw gysylltiad personol â rhywbeth sy'n cael ei drafod, fel swydd, eiddo neu aelod o'r teulu. Mae buddiant sy'n rhagfarnu yn ddigon cryf i'r cynghorydd adael yr ystafell fel arfer a pheidio â chymryd rhan.
Caiff datganiadau eu darllen o'r cofnodion unwaith y byddan nhw wedi'u cyhoeddi.
Yn rhestru cynghorwyr presennol y cyngor yn unig. Nid yw aelodau cyfetholedig, swyddogion a chyn-gynghorwyr yn cael eu dangos.