Wrthi'n llwytho
Does dim crynodeb o'r cyfarfod hwn eto. Caiff crynodebau eu hysgrifennu pan fydd y cyngor yn cyhoeddi'r cofnodion, sef ei gofnod swyddogol o'r hyn a benderfynodd cyfarfod. Maen nhw fel arfer yn ymddangos ychydig wythnosau ar ôl y cyfarfod.
County Councillor Tony Kear declared a personal, non-prejudicial interest in relation to item 6a as he is a trustee of Little Mill Village Hall charity which operates a firework event as its main fundraiser.
The Chair wished to note this meeting as the last day in a very distinguished 6 years of service by Chief Officer of Communities and Place, Frances O’Brien. Members thanked Frances and wished her well in her new appointment.
Council resolved to accept the minutes as an accurate record of the meeting held on 19th September 2024. In doing so County Councillor Catrin Maby highlighted a correction at item 17, para 2 As a supplementary County Councillor Bromfield welcomed further information, particularly around Public Health Wales. The Cabinet Member was asked to update Members regularly, to which she agreed. County Councillor Maby also agreed to email an update on the issue around bacteria and swimming.
https://www.youtube.com/live/Uu0L_icjpik?si=635rwVQqnpzE8mZp&t=836 The Chair welcomed David Cummings, Chair of the Gateway to Wales Action Group to present the following questions to in relation to the Deposit Replacement Local Development Plan: 1. Monmouthshire has set permissible Nitrogen Dioxide levels at four times the levels recommended by the World Health Organisation. Why has MCC chosen a site, close to A40, to build houses where the extra emissions from cars will further break those WHO levels and create more PM 2.5 particulates? 2. The catchment area in which HA4 is located already has phosphate levels exceeding the maxiumum permitted. Why has MCC chosen a site where run off will increase those levels and further pollute the Wye above where the drinking water for our town is extracted? 3. Site HA4 is primarily Grade 2 prime agricultural land. MCC is bound to use the lowest grade agricultural land first. Why has it not chosen a site with poorer quality agricultural land? 4. This site is close to the Wye Valley AONB and is the Gateway to Wales. Why have MCC chosen a site that, if developed, despoils and changes a view that has not changed for visitors since the Wye Tour of 1782? 5. We ask what assessment has been undertaken of the impact of the additional traffic exiting this site either for access to work via the A40 or into the town? 6. In view of the many issues with site HA4 should not an alternative site be chosen for Monmouth, such as CS0274 off Wonastow Road, which has far fewer issues? Can the council agree to consider this option during the Deposit Plan consultation process? The Cabinet Member for Planning and Economic Development, Deputy Leader, thanked Mr. Cummings for the questions and provided a response. 1. Environment officers monitor air quality across the County. The evidence is that this site has permissible air quality levels according to nationally set standards. The evidence has not led to this area being an air quality management area. Nevertheless, because of the strong points made at the Scrutiny Committee, the Deputy Leader has asked that further testing of this site takes place during the public consultation period. 2. In terms of issues relating to water quality, the Monmouth Treatment Works are benefitting from investment in strategic treatment work improvements. This work is being undertaken now and once completed it will remove high levels of phosphates. All the new developments in Monmouthshire will require a sustainable drainage system to ensure there is no increased runoff as a consequence of the development. 3. With regards to agricultural land, in Monmouth the debate has been whether the future development should focus on the proposed Leesbrook site or the Wonastow site. The Leesbrook site has a marginally lower agricultural quality and that will be considered during the public consultation. 4. In terms of the position of the site, the proposed development site at Leesbrook is on a smaller scale than that agreed by the Council in 2020. The proposal has drawn further back from the hillside and provides a green corridor and a landscape buffer. The proposed development was thought to be seen as an extension of the existing settlement. 5. The site promoter has submitted transport strategies and statements to evidence the impact of the development on the local area. A strategic transport assessment has been conducted by Transport for Wales and this does not indicate significant impact consequential on the development itself. 6. Our assessment is that on balance Leesbrook has advantages over Wonastow but if during public consultation evidence emerges that there is a preference and more evidence which would favour Wonastow then that evidence will be given detailed consideration.
The report was presented to seek Council’s endorsement of the Deposit Plan to commence statutory consultation/engagement with communities and key stakeholders, and to seek Council’s agreement of the RLDP Revised Delivery Agreement to submit to Welsh Government for approval. Upon being put to a recorded vote Council resolved to accept the recommendations: To endorse the Deposit RLDP to commence statutory consultation/engagement with communities and key stakeholders. To agree the revised Delivery Agreement for the RLDP for submission to Welsh Government for approval For: 21 Against: 20 Abstain: 1
The report was presented for Members to consider the Council’s existing resolution to not permit casinos within the County of Monmouthshire. Upon being put to a vote Council resolved to accept the recommendations: To refuse any casino applications made under the Gambling Act 2005 and stated within the Authority’s Gambling Policy. To adopt the ‘Statement of Gambling Policy 2025’ for Monmouthshire County Council, provided in Appendix A (changes highlighted in red) https://www.youtube.com/live/Uu0L_icjpik?si=J_sFxks8WPzqibTX&t=14577
The Cabinet Member presented the 2023/24 annual report of the Council’s Standards Committee. Upon being put to a vote Council resolved to accept the recommendation: That Council notes the Annual Report of the Standards Committee https://www.youtube.com/live/Uu0L_icjpik?si=VNFmFJC1gNlUR2w8&t=14817 County Councillors Jayne McKenna(18:03), Tony Kear(18:11) and Phil Murphy(18:10) left the meeting.
The Cabinet Member presented the report, the purpose being for Member to: · Evaluate the progress of Monmouthshire County Council’s key safeguarding priorities during 2023 / 2024 highlighting progress, identifying risks and setting out actions and priorities for 2024 - 2025. · Inform Members about the effectiveness of safeguarding in Monmouthshire and the work that is in progress to support the Council’s aims in protecting children and adults at risk from harm and abuse. · To inform Members about the progress made towards meeting the standards in the Council’s Corporate Safeguarding Policy approved by Council in July 2017, amended July 2022 and November 2023. Upon being put to a vote Council resolved to accept the recommendations: To receive and endorse the Annual Safeguarding Report 2023/24. That Council tasks the Chief Officer of Social Care, Safeguarding and Health to maintain focus on the priority actions as set out in the Whole Authority Action Plan (appendix 4). https://www.youtube.com/live/Uu0L_icjpik?si=d_bt0q5vCK7p6Z0E&t=15045 County Councillor Frances Taylor left the meeting at 18:20
The Chief Officer for Social Care, Safeguarding and Health presented the Annual Report 2023/24. Upon being put to vote Council resolved to accept the recommendation: To receive and endorse the Annual Director’s Report 2023/24. That Council tasks the Chief Officer of Social Care, Safeguarding and Health to maintain focus on the priority actions as set out in Section 9 of the report. https://www.youtube.com/live/Uu0L_icjpik?si=z6LY0XwRJDXJt8gW&t=15735 County Councillor Rachel Buckler left the meeting at 18:32
Upon recommencement the following County Councillors were recorded as leaving the meeting: Fay Bromfield; Louise Brown; Jan Butler; Tomos Davies; Christopher Edwards; Steven Garratt; Richard John; Penny Jones; Malcolm Lane; Jane Lucas; Paul Pavia; Maureen Powell; Ann Webb. County Councillor Meirion Howells presented the motion: Council notes the RSPCA’s Bang Out of Order campaign which highlights how pets, horses and livestock are affected by fireworks, many of them hurting themselves in reaction to the noise and flashes. Therefore, Council resolves: · To actively promote a public awareness campaign via the Council’s social media channels about the impact of fireworks on animal welfare and vulnerable people – including the precautions that can be taken to mitigate risks. · To write to the Welsh Government urging them to utilise any levers at their disposal to mitigate any negative impacts on animals and vulnerable people of the hosting of fireworks displays. · To write to the UK Government urging them to introduce legislation to limit the maximum noise level of fireworks to 90dB for those sold to the public for private displays. Seconded by County Councillor Emma Bryn. Upon being put to a recorded vote the motion was carried. For: 24 Against: 0 Abstain: 0 https://www.youtube.com/live/Uu0L_icjpik?si=GLZdhx7mG97fY71W&t=18453
County Councillor Lisa Dymock left the meeting at 19:46pm County Councillor Meirion Howells presented the motion: This Council supports the campaign to devolve management of the Crown Estate and its assets in Wales to the Welsh Government and that the funds raised be used to support the social needs of the Welsh people. Council calls upon the Leader to write to the Welsh Government outlining our support to help persuade the UK Government to devolve the Crown Estate as a matter of urgency. Upon being put to a recorded vote the motion was carried. For: 22 Against: 1 Abstain: 0 https://www.youtube.com/live/Uu0L_icjpik?si=3mPZ0DLoaQVedM8R&t=19968
Noted.
Rhaid i gynghorwyr ddweud pan fydd ganddyn nhw gysylltiad personol â rhywbeth sy'n cael ei drafod, fel swydd, eiddo neu aelod o'r teulu. Mae buddiant sy'n rhagfarnu yn ddigon cryf i'r cynghorydd adael yr ystafell fel arfer a pheidio â chymryd rhan.
Caiff datganiadau eu darllen o'r cofnodion unwaith y byddan nhw wedi'u cyhoeddi.
Yn rhestru cynghorwyr presennol y cyngor yn unig. Nid yw aelodau cyfetholedig, swyddogion a chyn-gynghorwyr yn cael eu dangos.