Schools, school places and buildings, additional learning needs and Welsh-medium education.
What councils do
Councils run community schools, fund every state school, provide school transport and support pupils with additional learning needs. They plan school places, including Welsh-medium places under a ten-year plan.
Who decides
The Cabinet decides on school changes, such as opening, closing or merging schools, after a formal consultation. Head teachers and governing bodies run each school day to day.
Having a say
Proposals to change a school must be consulted on, and anyone can respond. Parents can also become school governors.
In numbers
Welsh councils plan to spend £1,307 per person on this in 2026-27.
It ranges from £1,099 in Monmouthshire to £1,475 in Merthyr Tydfil.
Year 1 pupils taught in Welsh: 25% across Wales (2025-26).
RESOLVED – T H A T the attendance of the following Councillors at the site visits
indicated, held on 19th July 2024, be noted.
Apologies were received from Councillors C.E.A Champion, C.M. Cowpe, P.
Drake, N.P. Hodges, Dr. I.J. Johnson, C. Stallard and M.R. Wilson (4 Cliff Parade,
Penarth) and C.M. Cowpe, P. Drake and M.R. Wilson (Land at Former Eagleswell
School, Eagleswell Road, Llantwit Major).
4 Cliff Parade, Penarth. Councillor N.C. Thomas (Chair),
Councillors I. Buckley, I.A.N. Perry and
E. Williams.
Land at Former Eagleswell Councillor N.C. Thomas (Chair),
School, Eagleswell Road, Councillors I. Buckley, C.A. Cave,
Llantwit Major C.E.A. Champion, N.P. Hodges,
Dr. I.J. Johnson, I.A.N. Perry,
C. Stallard and E. Williams.
Non-Committee Member also
present: W.A. Hennessy.
Minutes - MS
No.
RESOLVED: Council AGREED:
1.
To approve the new appointments of Local Authority governors to the school governing bodies as set out in Appendix 1, each for a term of 4 years from the date of the appointment, in accordance with the recommendations of the Local Authority Governor Panel.
RESOLVED – That the Council be recommended to approve the recommendations of the Panel to appoint the following persons to current Local Authority Governing Body vacancies as follows:
School
Ward
Start of Vacancy
Applicant
Cardiff West Community High School
Caerau
08/07/2024
Kate Berrisford
Gabalfa Primary School
Llandaff North
05/01/2024
Carolyn Mason
Llanedeyrn Primary School
Pentwyn
31/07/2024
Folabomi Lewis
Marlborough Primary School
Penylan
22/05/2024
Martin Pereira
Mary Immaculate High School
Caerau
04/11/2023
Donna Hoffman
Severn Primary School
Riverside
25/07/2024
Eira Jenkins
Ton-Yr-Ywen Primary School
Heat
09/01/2024
Eleanor Lancaster
Windsor Clive Primary School
Ely
22/03/2024
Sara Nur
Ysgol Gymraeg Coed-Y-Gof
Fairwater
30/06/2024
Meinir Howells
Ysgol Gymraeg Pwll Coch
Canton
17/09/2024
James Eul
Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Hamadryad
Butetowb
06/10/2023
David Hann
The Committee received and considered applications to future vacancies against criteria, matching skills to vacancies.
RESOLVED – That the Council be recommended to approve the recommendations of the Panel to appoint the following:
School
Ward
Start of Vacancy
Re-appointment
New Applicant
Christ the King RC Primary School
Llanishen
Michael Hamblin
Herbert Thompson Primary School
Ely
Louise Lynn
Meadownbank School
Llandaff North
14/09/2024
Gareth Newell
Thornhill Primary School
Lisvane & Thornhill
27/11/2024
Stephen O’Brien
Willowbrook Primary School
Trowbridge
27/11/2024
27/11/2024
Simon Dooley
Julia Watkins
Ysgol Pencae
Llandaff
27/11/2024
Cardiff, Children and Young People Scrutiny Committee,
RESOLVED: That the Chairperson writes to the Cabinet Member on behalf of the Committee expressing their comments and observations captured during the way forward.
Cardiff, Children and Young People Scrutiny Committee,
RESOLVED: that the Committee:
1. Note the contents of Appendix A and agree any amendments required to the draft work programme;
2. Note the update from the SOP T&F Group, set out in paragraphs 18-22 and agree any amendments required;
3. Formally agree to commence the ALN Inquiry and EOTAS T&F Groups, as set out in paragraphs 23 - 27 above, and agree any amendments required.
Cardiff, Children and Young People Scrutiny Committee,
RESOLVED: that the Committee:
1. Note the correspondence update arising from recent scrutiny meetings;
2. Agree whether to implement the correspondence tracker proposal;
3. Note the links to relevant papers from other Council Committees and raise any issues arising from them;
4. Note the links to recent Inspection Reports from Care Inspectorate Wales and Estyn and raise any issues arising from them.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee,
the following application be determined as indicated and any other necessary
action be taken.
Minutes - MT
2024/00306/FUL Received on 3 April 2024
APPLICANT: Welsh Education Partnership (WEPCo) and Cardiff an C/O Agent
AGENT: Mr Tobias Robinson Helmont House, Churchill Way, Cardiff, CF10 2HE
Land to the South of Hood Road, Barry
Proposed redevelopment of vacant brownfield site at Barry Waterfront for a new
educational campus for Cardiff and Vale College including landscaping, related
infrastructure and engineering works
A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations
within the report, with the results as follows:
Member For Against Abstain
J. Aviet √
G. Bruce √
I. Buckley √
C.A. Cave √
C. Champion √
P. Drake √
A. Ernest √
W. Gilligan √
N.P. Hodges √
Dr. I.J. Johnson √
H. Payne √
I. Perry √
C. Stallard √
N. Thomas √
E. Williams √
TOTAL 14 0 1
APPROVED - Subject to the conditions as contained within the report and
amended within the Matters Arising note.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting.
Minutes - MT
RESOLVED – That the following matters be dealt with as indicated:
(1)
Application 1
The Sub Committee was asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire Driver’s Licence given that a complaint had been received which stated that he became threatening and angry when challenged in respect of the metered fare being charged, and failed to provide his driver identification when requested.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver stated that he was at the taxi rank by the castle when a passenger approached him and asked to be taken home. He asked if she had a preferred route and proceeded with the journey, and as they were about to go over the Fairoak roundabout she queried the reading on the meter. She said he was ripping her off but he explained it was the normal meter price and she could take it up with the council if she wanted.
The passenger asked him to stop so she could get out and refused to pay the fare. He saw another cab coming and waved him down to explain the situation. The passenger asked for his ID and he said she could take a picture of his plate number. He recorded a video on his phone but had lost it while backing up his device recently.
Members queried why he had refused to show identification to the passenger when she requested it. The driver suggested that she had been aggressive to him, and he didn’t want to leave his seat. He had reached behind instead to get his papers from the back seat because this included the meter certificate which showed it was functioning correctly.
The Sub Committee explored the discrepancy between the fare requested and what the witness normally expected to pay. The driver didn’t know why exactly it was higher than normal, as every meter was the same. He recalled that when she got out of the cab, he said she could just give him what she had, not necessarily the whole fare.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the witness reiterated the details in her statement, a number of which contradicted the driver’s account. She suggested that the driver had not asked her about her preferred route, but she had asked to avoid Newport Road because it often took longer. As they stopped at the lights on Lake Road East, she noticed that the fare was higher than usual. She got taxis home a lot, frequently after midnight, and the fare was normally around £16. When she challenged this, the driver said that the council set the rates but clearly didn’t want to talk about it any further.
She added that when the driver reached into the back of the car she thought he was grabbing at her, which was distressing. He got out the meter certificate but she realised the meter was still running and by then had reached £21.70. She said she wouldn’t pay anything until he provided his name and badge number so she could make a complaint. She tried to get out of the vehicle to take a picture of the plate number but he locked the doors, and at one point claimed he didn’t know his registration number.
The driver then flagged down another taxi driver who spoke to both of them. The second driver agreed that the fare was higher than expected and suggested that she pay it before taking it up with the council. The driver had been aggressive and rude throughout, and she felt scared and unsafe.
Members discussed the witness’ account and asked whether she accepted the explanation that the doors locking could have been an automatic feature. She explained that she asked the driver to unlock the door but he didn’t. It was only when the second driver came back that the door was unlocked.
In response to questions from the driver’s representative, the witness stated that she couldn’t recall the starting amount on the meter when she got in the taxi. It was only when they got to the lake that she realised the fare was higher than normal. The Licensing Officer added that the council had retrospectively calculated a reasonable fare for the trip at the night-time rate to be about £17, though it might have been higher due to the bank holiday.
The driver’s representative asked whether the witness accepted that meters were checked by authorised council officials and could not be tampered with by the drivers. The witness did not agree, and suspected that it was either set to a higher rate or was already running when she got into the vehicle.
The driver’s representative suggested that the incident could be seen as a misunderstanding. The driver was just doing his job in getting her home, starting and stopping the meter accordingly, and it was not right that he was challenged about what he was required to charge. The driver then flagged down a third party to help defuse the situation.
The witness acknowledged the points made but still felt upset about the experience, and had not used a hackney carriage since. She emphasised that the driver’s conduct was unacceptable, since he had been aggressive and nasty and refused to provide his licence number.
RESOLVED – that the driver receive a written warning.
(2)
Application 2
The Sub Committee was asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire Driver’s Licence given that a complaint had been received which stated that he displayed aggressive and intimidating behaviour by shouting and gesturing towards a cyclist using the regular bus lane.
The driver was not in attendance.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the witness explained that he had been cycling on Newport Road, coming from Roath towards Bute Park. There was a cycleway near the prison but he didn’t join it, choosing instead to use the bus lane which he was entitled to do. He stopped at a red light, and as he pulled away again a taxi started honking at him. The driver overtook him close by and shouted and gestured for him to move over. This was very upsetting and intimidating. It had happened before with other drivers, some of whom had been physically aggressive towards him.
The Sub Committee viewed a video of the incident provided by the witness.
RESOLVED – that the driver receive a written warning.
(3)
Application 3
The Sub Committee was asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Private Hire Driver’s Licence given that he had declared relevant convictions on his DBS certificate as part of the application to renew his licence.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver explained that he had been driving along the bus lane on Westgate Street last November. A bus inspector flagged him down and came over, and they had an altercation which led to the driver being accused of racism. This went to court and he was convicted and fined. He couldn’t afford to appeal and paid the fine in instalments.
He added that he had driven taxis for more than 15 years and never had a complaint. It was an unfortunate incident but he had taken it on the chin and hoped to move on. He relied on his job to pay the rent and support his family, and would be willing to do the relevant BTEC course if it would help.
Members queried what exactly he was alleged to have said. The driver explained that it was allegedly a racial slur, but he disputed saying this. He acknowledged that he shouldn’t have gotten angry, and anything similar were to happen again he would just ignore it and go to the next job.
The driver’s representative reiterated that he had driven taxis for more than 15 years and had a good record with no recent issues. He had disputed the complainant’s version of events but couldn’t afford to challenge the conviction so had to accept the fine and everything that came with it. Outside of work, he was of good character and worked with charities and food banks. Taxi driving was his sole source of income, and it was of vital importance that he be able to keep his licence. He had also indicated his willingness to complete the relevant qualification in order to shore up his knowledge and ability.
RESOLVED – that the Private Hire Driver’s Licence be suspended for two weeks, and that the driver be required to complete the BTEC Certificate In Taxi & Private Hire Driver (Level 2) within three months.
(4)
Application 4
The Sub Committee was asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Private Hire Driver’s Licence given that he had been convicted of offences resulting in him being disqualified from driving.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver explained that in 2021 he had taken a job on Cyncoed Road whilst driving for Uber. While driving on Newport Road, he saw a cyclist in the bus lane and passed him when the gap was sufficient. The traffic slowed down and the lane split into two, with his lane diverted slightly towards the middle of the road. The cyclist came up behind him, thinking that the taxi had cut him off, and kicked the car twice, swore at the driver and broke the mirror.
The driver added that he wanted to prosecute the cyclist for this damage so he pulled into the left on Colchester Avenue to stop him leaving the scene. As his vehicle stopped, the cyclist went into the front wing and hit his shoulder on the door. The ambulance and police were called, and the cyclist went to hospital while the driver was arrested. He was released with no charge that day but learned about a year later that criminal proceedings were underway, which led to him being disqualified from driving for two years.
He emphasised that he had not intended to do the cyclist any harm, only move across to stop him running off as he knew he wouldn’t have any registration. It was the worst mistake he had ever made, and he had lost years of earnings and a mortgage as a result.
He added that he had been a taxi driver for 34 years, and had done school runs for 17 of those. He had an excellent record and always went above and beyond for his passengers, and felt he was a good ambassador for the city of Cardiff. He missed doing the job a lot, as it was not only his source of income but also his social life. He didn’t feel he would be able to work anywhere else, and hoped he would be allowed to keep his badges.
Members asked what he would do differently if an incident like this were to happen again. The driver accepted that his reaction had made him the culprit, and in the future he would just ignore it and carry on with the next job. He stressed that what happened that day was out of character for him.
Members queried the details of the incident, noting that a news article about it differed in some respects. The driver maintained that this was an inaccurate report that got key details wrong.
Members asked how he felt about sharing the road with cyclists in general. The driver emphasised that he took his responsibilities both as a taxi driver and under the Highway Code very seriously, and he understood how dangerous a car could be when used improperly. He acknowledged that by not pulling over and calming down he had made a very serious error, but it would never happen again.
RESOLVED – that the Private Hire licence be suspended until such a time that the driver produces a certificate of the SQA ‘Introduction to the Role of the Professional Taxi and Private Hire Driver’ qualification.
(5)
Application 5
The Sub Committee was asked to consider an application in principle for the grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence given that the applicant had a relevant conviction to consider.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver acknowledged he had several convictions from his younger days, but he had come a long way since then and turned his life around, and did not pose any danger to the public.
Members noted that the guidance advised not issuing the licence in a case like this unless there were exceptional circumstances, and asked what these might be. The driver explained that his last conviction was seven years ago, and since then he had a clean record. He had been working consistently since then and had become a real part of the community who was always helping others out.
In response to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver explained that he had recently received an endorsement on his licence due to defective tyres. He had bought a car which passed its MOT, and while driving it back to Cardiff was stopped for a bald tyre. He had received three points and a fine for this.
RESOLVED – that the application for the grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence be refused.
Swansea, Armed Forces Community Covenant Signatories Panel,
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee,
the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary
action be taken.
2023/01102/RG3 Received on 15 November 2023
(p74)
APPLICANT: Vale of Glamorgan Council Civic Offices , Holton Road , Barry,
CF63 4RU
AGENT: Mr Jon Hurley Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park,
Cardiff, CF23 8RS
Land at Former Eagleswell School, Eagleswell Road, Llantwit Major
Minutes - AR
No.
Temporary housing accommodation and associated works
Deemed planning consent be GRANTED subject to the conditions as contained
within the report as well as an amendment to condition 8 and an additional
condition 14:
Amendment to condition 8
Any part of the rear windows in plots 9-27 that are below 1.7m in height about the
level of the floor in the room that is serves shall be obscurely glazed and fixed in
accordance with details that shall first be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall be implemented in accordance
with the approved details prior to the first beneficial occupation of the
development. The windows shall thereafter be retained at all times in accordance
with the approved details.
Addition of new condition
14. Within 12 months of the date of this planning permission, a plan/strategy to
manage the removal of the temporary residential units from the site shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Strategy
will detail the plans to relocate the modular units to alternative sites within the 5-
year period from the grant of planning permission and should include the
commencement of this work at least 18 months prior to the expiry of the planning
permission with the 7 plots 21-27 being identified as those to be removed from the
site first. The plan will detail the proposed method and numbers of units to be
relocated to newly identified sites in batches appropriate to the size of the
receiving site. The temporary residential units shall thereafter be removed from the
site in accordance with the approved details.
Condition 14 Reason:
To ensure that local amenities are safeguarded and to ensure the development
accords with Policies SP1 (Delivering the Strategy), MD1 (Location of New
Development) and MD2 (Design of New Development).
Reason for decision
Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2023/00888/FUL Received on 16 April 2024
(p117)
APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Stuart & Lizzie Reid 4 Cliff Parade, Penarth, CF64 5BP
AGENT: Mr Tim Fry 88 Glebe Street, Penarth, CF64 1EF
4, Cliff Parade, Penarth
Demolition of existing house and construction of replacement dwelling
Minutes - AR
No.
APPROVED - Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting.
2023/00948/FUL Received on 3 June 2024
(p159)
APPLICANT: Marc Lewis 10 Bronheulwen, Porth, Mid Glamorgan , CF39 0BJ
AGENT: Mr Matthew Biggs Suite 212, Morgan Arcade, Cardiff, CF10 1AF
Land off Sandy Lane, Ystradowen
Full planning application for residential development together with engineering,
drainage, landscaping, highways, and other associated works
RESOLVED – T H A T, subject to the below conditions and subject to the
interested person(s) first entering into a Section 106 legal agreement to include
the following necessary planning obligations:
• To secure the provision of the identified 19 affordable housing units on the
site.
• To pay a financial contribution to the sum of £105,800 to contribute towards
the provision of sustainable transport facilities in the vicinity of the site.
• To pay a financial contribution to the sum of £145,992 towards education
requirements arising from the development.
• To pay a financial contribution to the sum of £40,320 to provide / improve
areas of public open space.
• To pay a financial contribution to the sum of £57,960 towards the provision
of new, or enhancement of existing, community facilities in the area, and
• To provide Public Art to the value of 1% of the build costs
In addition to a clause requiring the payment of a fee to monitor and implement
the legal agreement (£7,081.44 in this case).
APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting.
Minutes - AR
No.
2021/01516/FUL Received on 15 September 2022
(p229)
APPLICANT: Mr N Rubenstein c/o DHPC, Lytchett Minster , BH16 6FE
AGENT: Mr Darryl Howells Darryl Howells Planning Consultancy, Unit 6, The
Axium Centre, Dorchester Road , Lytchett Minster, BH16 6FE
Woodside Hamlet, Ham Manor, Llantwit Major
Siting of five proposed tourist pods and wooden platform accesses
REFUSED – Subject to the Reasons for Refusal as contained within the report.
Reason for decision
Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting.
Minutes - AR
RESOLVED: that
1. A consultation on the partnership approach to modernising Cardiff’s football playing pitch provision, as set out in this report and at Appendix 2, be approved, including the future establishment of a smaller number of hub sites to understand the required number and the preferred locations and to return to Cabinet for final approval.
2. A consultation with schools and other relevant stakeholders on the proposed Community Focused Schools 3G Playing Pitch Policy, attached at Appendix 3, be approved.
3. A call for Expressions of Interest from interested local football clubs, for the potential self-management of facilities by way of an Agreement to enable clubs to attract investment to improve facilities, be approved.
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the updates to the Cabinet Quarterly Work Programme for April to
June 2024 attached at Appendix 1 to the report be agreed.
(2) T H A T the Cabinet Quarterly Work Programme July to September 2024
attached at Appendix 2 to the report be endorsed.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To monitor progress.
(2) To approve the Work Programme for July to September 2024.
C61 USE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S EMERGENCY POWERS (EL/PR)
(SCRUTINY – ALL) –
The Leader presented the report, the purpose of which was to notify Cabinet of the
exercising of Emergency Powers by the Chief Executive since the last report on 23rd
May, 2024.
Councillor Williams referred specifically to Paragraph 2.1(a) concerning the Western
Vale Wellbeing Hub for Older Adults and People Living with Dementia and
appreciated the use of emergency powers to enable Officers to act quickly to support
excellent provision.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED – T H A T the use of the Chief Executive's Emergency Powers be
noted.
Reasons for decisions
To inform Cabinet.
C62 RIGHTS OF WAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ROWIP) (DL/SP)
(SCRUTINY – ENVIRONMENT AND REGENERATION) –
The Deputy Leader presented the report, the purpose of which was to enable
Cabinet to consider and approve the Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP).
The ROWIP was a live document and changes could be made as circumstances
demanded, for example, changes in legislation.
Councillor Williams had attended the Local Access Forum meeting where the
principles of the ROWIP, the network and various improvements had been
discussed. The changes to footpath accessibility in the Vale of Glamorgan had been
noted at that meeting, including wheelchair accessibility, which had a positive impact
for local residents and were a part of the ROWIP, though not stated explicitly as a
benefit.
The Leader said that another positive aspect was the availability of routes
electronically to be able to choose which routes were available and with much
improved direct access.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP) attached as Appendix
A to the report be endorsed as the Council’s replacement version and its adoption in
principle agreed subject to consideration by the Environment and Regeneration
Scrutiny Committee.
(2) T H A T the ROWIP be referred to the Environment and Regeneration
Scrutiny Committee for its consideration.
(3) T H A T delegated authority be granted to the Head of Sustainable
Development in consultation with the Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for
Sustainable Places to make typographical or other minor changes as necessary prior
to publication or during the life of the Plan should this become necessary.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To ensure the Council fully discharged its statutory duty under the
Countryside and Rights of Way (CROW) Act 2000 to review and publish every 10
years, its Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP), outlining how it proposed to
meet its Well-being and Improvement Objectives to maintain, improve and publicise
the rights of way network for the public.
(2) To ensure appropriate scrutiny of the report.
(3) To make typographical or other minor changes as necessary without the need
to seek Cabinet approval.
C63 UPDATE ON THE CONSULTATION ON THE PROPOSAL TO
CREATE A WELSH MEDIUM SPECIALIST RESOURCE BASE AT YSGOL
GWAUN Y NANT FROM SEPTEMBER 2024 (EAWL) (SCRUTINY – LEARNING
AND CULTURE) –
The Cabinet Member presented the report, the purpose of which was to advise
Cabinet of the outcome of the consultation exercise undertaken on the proposal to
create a Welsh Medium Specialist Resource Base at Ysgol Gwaun y Nant from
September 2024.
Some of the issues raised as part of the consultation and responses to those issues
were discussed in paragraphs 2.9 to 2.13 of the report.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the consultation document (attached at Appendix A to the report), the
Consultation Response report (attached at Appendix B to the report) and other
appendices included as part of the report, including the Community and Equality
Impact Assessments at Appendices C and D respectively, to create a Welsh Medium
Specialist Resource Base at Ysgol Gwaun y Nant from September 2024 be noted.
(2) T H A T the proposal to create a Welsh Medium Specialist Resource Base at
Ysgol Gwaun y Nant from September 2024 through the publication of the proposals
in the form of a statutory notice be approved.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To ensure that all relevant information was considered by Cabinet in reaching
a decision on whether to publish a statutory notice on the proposals.
(2) To ensure that there was capacity to provide integrated provision for pupils
with a diagnosis of an autism spectrum condition and those experiencing significant
social communication, interaction, or regulation difficulties, reflecting the Council’s
commitments to meeting the requirements of the Additional Learning Needs and
Education Tribunal Act 2018 (ALNET Act 2018) and in its 10 year Welsh in
Education Strategic Plan (WESP) and Welsh Government’s Cymraeg 2050 strategy.
C64 WELSH LANGUAGE STANDARDS ANNUAL MONITORING
REPORT 2023-24 (EAWL) (SCRUTINY – LEARNING AND CULTURE AND
CORPORATE PERFORMANCE AND RESOURCES) –
The Cabinet Member presented the report, the purpose of which was to seek
approval for the Council’s Annual Welsh Monitoring Report and update on 5-year
Promotion Strategy.
Councillor Williams said he looked forward to the matter being discussed at the
relevant Scrutiny Committees.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Annual Welsh Monitoring Report for 2023-24 (attached at
Appendix 1 to the report) and Update on the Welsh Language Promotional Strategy
(attached at Appendix 2 to the report) be approved in principle, subject to
consideration by Learning and Culture and Corporate Performance and Resources
Scrutiny Committees.
(2) T H A T the report (and appendices) be referred to Learning and Culture and
Corporate Performance and Resources Scrutiny Committees for consideration and if
endorsed by the Committees, that the report be published.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To allow the Council to meet its reporting duty to the Welsh Commissioner as
part of the Welsh Language Standards.
(2) To enable Learning and Culture and Corporate Performance and Resources
Scrutiny Committees to consider the report (and appendices) prior to publication.
C65 PERMANENT TRAFFIC REGULATION ORDER – SCHOOL STREET
CLOSURE DRYDEN ROAD, PENARTH (NBS) (SCRUTINY – ENVIRONMENT
AND REGENERATION) –
The Cabinet Member presented the report, the purpose of which was to agree to
make the experimental school street closure on Dryden Road for Fairfield Primary
School, Penarth a permanent order.
An Experimental Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) had been in place since April 2023
and gave Officers time to assess the success or otherwise of the pilot school street
closure as the first type of its kind in the Vale of Glamorgan. Feedback from
residents which had been positive was included in Paragraph 2.7 of the report as
well as Appendix D to the report. Appendix C to the report referred to vehicle
speeds and traffic volumes that were assessed prior to implementation and
monitored during the experimental school street closure, with very little traffic
entering at times of closure.
Councillor Birch, as a local ward Member, said that the experimental TRO had been
a popular move with parents. There continued to be issues with inconsiderate
parking which existed prior to the pilot but had been well received locally. Councillor
Wilson said that the other local ward Member, Councillor Buckley, had also been
supportive of the pilot.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T public notice be advertised for the Experimental Traffic Regulation
Order for a school street closure on Dryden Road, Penarth as detailed in Appendices
A and B to the report, to be made permanent.
(2) T H A T delegated authority be granted to the Director of Environment and
Housing, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Neighbourhood and Building
Services to agree the final design and extent of the school street closure and that the
Monitoring Officer / Head of Legal and Democratic Services be authorised to execute
any legal Orders to implement the Scheme.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To provide the necessary authority to the progress with the permanent Traffic
Regulation Order.
(2) To provide the necessary authority to ensure the scheme was implemented in
the most appropriate and efficient manner.
C66 RENEWAL OF PUBLIC SPACE PROTECTION ORDERS FOR THE
PREVENTION OF ALCOHOL RELATED ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR (NBS)
(SCRUTINY – ENVIRONMENT AND REGENERATION) –
The Cabinet Member presented the report, the purpose of which was to ensure there
remained effective controls and management arrangements aimed at preventing
incidences of alcohol related anti-social behaviour in public places.
Councillor Wilson said that such Orders had been in place previously and required
renewal with minor variations to the existing Public Space Protection Orders
(PSPOs), in respect of the prevention of alcohol related Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB).
Such Orders would not prohibit any alcohol consumption in the areas proposed but
provided a means of control should there be instances of anti-social behaviour.
Paragraph 2.12 of the report referred to the inclusion of Orders at twelve new sites
as a result of consultation and representations received from the public and Elected
Members. Survey responses were included within Appendix A which showed support
for such controls in the described areas for a further three years.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the proposal of renewing the existing Public Space Protection Orders
for controlled alcohol zones be agreed and the Orders referred to Full Council, for
consideration.
(2) T H A T the contents of the public consultation results and the inclusion of
new restricted areas be noted.
(3) T H A T the proposed additional areas as part of the renewal process be
agreed and incorporated into the Orders for consideration by Full Council.
(4) T H A T the resolutions of Cabinet as regards the report are referred to Full
Council for consideration.
(5) T H A T use of the urgency procedure set out at Section 15.14 of the
Council’s Constitution be agreed in respect of recommendations 1, 2, 3 and 4 to
allow the matter to be considered at Full Council on 15th July, 2024.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To assist the Council robustly manage alcohol related Anti-Social Behaviour
at its Resorts, Town centres and Public Open Spaces.
(2) To ensure the Council considered the views of the public and other
stakeholders and the Orders reflect current issues.
(3) To ensure the Council and Police had the appropriate powers to protect the
quality of lives of those who lived, worked and visited restricted areas and to permit
the majority of the law-abiding citizens to use and enjoy public spaces, safe from
anti-social behaviour.
(4) The introduction and renewal of Public Space Protection Orders was a matter
for determination by Full Council.
(5) To enable the Orders to be considered at the next available Full Council
meeting to ensure their prompt introduction if agreed.
C67 RENEWAL OF PUBLIC SPACE PROTECTION ORDERS - DOG
CONTROLS (NBS) (SCRUTINY – ENVIRONMENT AND REGENERATION) –
The Cabinet Member presented the report, the purpose of which was to ensure there
remained effective controls and management arrangements in please, aimed at
improving the behaviour of irresponsible dog owners and reducing anti-social
behaviour associated with dogs and dog fouling.
Councillor Wilson said that such Orders had been in place previously and required
renewal with variations to the existing Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs), for
the purpose of dog controls.
Consultation had taken place on the matter and many of the responses received
were positive about the proposed Orders. Appendix A referred to 64% of the public
agreed with the proposal to retain all the existing dog controls in the Vale of
Glamorgan, strong agreement regarding the removal of faeces from all adopted
highways and footpaths and seasonal dog controls at Ogmore-by-Sea.
Councillor Wilson proposed an additional Recommendation to Cabinet to agree that
Llantwit Major Recreation Ground be added to the proposals to be considered at Full
Council, with enforcement subject to the agreement of Llantwit Major Town Council
who owned the land. Llantwit Major Councillors were in support of that area being
included in the proposals and agreement with Llantwit Major Town Council would
have to be sought prior to the matter being considered at Full Council on 15th July,
2024.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the proposal of renewing the existing Public Space Protection Orders
for dog controls be endorsed.
(2) T H A T the contents of the public consultation results be noted.
(3) T H A T the proposed new additional areas as part of the renewal process be
agreed and incorporated into the Orders for Full Council consideration.
(4) T H A T the resolutions of Cabinet in respect to the report be referred to Full
Council for consideration.
(5) T H A T use of the urgency procedure set out at Section 15.14 of the
Council’s Constitution be agreed in respect of resolutions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 to allow the
matter to be considered at Full Council on 15th July, 2024.
(6) T H A T subject to formal agreement with Llantwit Major Town Council,
Llantwit Major Recreation Ground be added to the proposals for consideration at Full
Council, with enforcement subject to the agreement of Llantwit Major Town Council
who own the land.
Reasons for decisions
(1) So that the Council had robust Orders in place for dog controls on adopted
highways, footpaths, resorts/beaches, town centres, sports pitches and public open
spaces.
(2) To ensure the Council considered the views of the public and other
stakeholders and the Orders reflected current issues.
(3) To ensure the Council had appropriate powers to protect the quality of lives of
those who lived, worked and visited the Vale.
(4) The renewal and introduction of Public Space Protection Orders were a
matter for determination by Full Council.
(5) To ensure the Orders could be considered at the next Full Council meeting
and if agreed, promptly introduced following the meeting.
(6) To include Llantwit Major Recreation Ground to the proposals, with the
support of the local ward Members and agreement with Llantwit Majot Town Council.
C68 RE-COMMISSIONING OF THE PROVISION OF CHILDCARE FOR
FLYING START IN COLCOT, BARRY, VALE OF GLAMORGAN (SCH)
(SCRUTINY – HEALTHY LIVING AND SOCIAL CARE) –
The Cabinet Member presented the report, the purpose of which was to seek
authority to re-commission an existing contract relating to the provision of childcare
for the Vale of Glamorgan Flying Start Programme within Colcot, Barry and delegate
authority to award the contract to the successful provider.
Councillor Williams said that although the report fell within the Social Care and
Health Portfolio that it was important to recognise the work undertaken with the
Cabinet Member for Education, Arts and the Welsh Language as much of the work
was cross-Directorate. Although the programme provided services to children aged
0-3 and 2-3 years, it was important to recognise that there was also provision for
parents who were a part of the tendering process.
Councillor Birch welcomed the report and was pleased to see parental involvement
in the programme and actively involved in ongoing provision. The cluster of schools
in Barry were some of the most disadvantaged in the Vale of Glamorgan and the
programme would work towards improving the life chances of children.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Director of Social Services, in consultation with the Cabinet
Member for Social Care and Health, be authorised to undertake a competitive tender
process for the provision of Flying Start services in Colcot, Barry.
(2) T H A T the Director of Social Services, in consultation with the Cabinet
Member for Social Care and Health, be authorised to award the contract(s) for the
service for an initial period of two years with an option to extend for up to a further
two years, following the completion of the tender process.
(3) T H A T delegated authority be granted to the Monitoring Officer/Head of
Legal and Democratic Services to prepare, complete and execute a contract with the
successful bidder.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To enable the Directorate to undertake a tender process that would provide
Flying Start childcare within Colcot, Barry in a cost-effective way that met the
requirements of Welsh Government Flying Start Guidance and the required
standards of the Care Inspectorate Wales (CIW).
(2) To ensure that the service was in place for the next two years with the
potential to extend it for a further two years if required.
(3). To ensure that the appropriate authority and documentation were in place to
complete the contract.
C69 CONTRACT FOR THE PROVISION OF CHILDCARE FOR FLYING
START IN CADOXTON, BARRY, VALE OF GLAMORGAN (SCH) (SCRUTINY –
HEALTHY LIVING AND SOCIAL CARE) –
The Cabinet Member presented the report which was similar to the previous agenda
item but focused on a different area, the purpose of which was to seek authority to
undertake a tender process relating to the provision of childcare for the Vale of
Glamorgan Flying Start Programme within the setting in the grounds of Cadoxton
Primary School in Barry and delegate authority to award the contract to the
successful provider.
Councillor Birch was pleased to endorse the report and said that Cadoxton Primary
School already had initiatives such as Bocs Bwyd and coffee mornings that had a
positive impact on families and actively involved parents and carers on aspects of
school life.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the Director of Social Services, in consultation with the Cabinet
Member for Social Care and Health, be authorised to undertake a competitive tender
process for the provision of Flying Start services in Cadoxton, Barry.
(2) T H A T the Director of Social Services, in consultation with the Cabinet
Member for Social Care and Health, be authorised to award the contract(s) for the
service for an initial period of two years with an option to extend for up to a further
two years, following the completion of the tender process.
(3) T H A T delegated authority be granted to the Monitoring Officer/Head of
Legal and Democratic Services to prepare, complete and execute a contract with the
successful bidder.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To enable the Directorate to undertake a tender process that would provide
Flying Start childcare within Cadoxton, Barry in a cost-effective way that met the
requirements of Welsh Government Flying Start Guidance and the required
standards of the Care Inspectorate Wales (CIW).
(2) To ensure that the service was in place for the next two years with the
potential to extend it for a further two years if required.
(3) To ensure that the appropriate authority and documentation were in place to
complete the contract.
C70 VALE OF GLAMORGAN REPLACEMENT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN (RLDP) 2021-2036 PREFERRED STRATEGY INITIAL CONSULTATION
REPORT (CEERS) (SCRUTINY – ENVIRONMENT AND REGENERATION) –
The Leader presented the report on behalf of the Cabinet Member, the purpose of
which was to advise Cabinet of the issues raised through representations received
during the public consultation exercise undertaken between December 2023 and
February 2024 in respect of the Preferred Strategy for the Vale of Glamorgan
Replacement Local Development Plan (RLDP) 2021-2036.
The Preferred Strategy for the RLDP had been subject to a ten-week public
consultation between December 2023 and February 2024 and the report set out the
issues raised as part of that consultation and how the responses had been
considered within the report.
The Preferred Strategy set out how much growth would be accommodated in the
Vale of Glamorgan from 2021 to 2036 in terms of population, homes and jobs, with
growth met in the most sustainable locations which reduced the need to travel,
sought to co-locate housing with employment and locations well-served by public
transport.
Engagement on the Preferred Strategy took place a number of ways, including
online and in-person engagement sessions across the Vale of Glamorgan, as well as
sessions with Elected Members, Town and Community Councils and specific
stakeholder groups such as the 50+ Forum and Equalities Consultative Forum. In
total, over 3,000 representations were made from 857 individuals and organisations.
Notably there was a representation from Welsh Government stating that they
considered the Preferred Strategy to conform with the National Development
Framework: Future Wales, with the scale of growth being at an appropriate level for
the Vale of Glamorgan’s position within a national growth area. The spatial
distribution of that growth to sustainable locations was considered appropriate and in
line with national policy. Comments were made from other stakeholders that the
scale of development was too high, and others considered it to be too low.
The RLDP made provision for 8,679 new houses, compared to 10,400 in the current
adopted Local Development Plan (LDP). The RLDP level of growth was a median
level, with higher and lower gross scenarios being tested. The housing supply was
made up of new housing allocations, committed sites and allowance for unallocated
windfall sites.
The adopted LDP included housing allocations totalling over 8,000 new dwellings.
The RLDP Preferred Strategy showed a more modest allocation of up to 2,750 new
homes on new sites, or 32% of the provision, plus a further 2,600 homes on sites in
the adopted LDP that had been rolled forward.
Key sites in the RLDP were in parts of the Vale of Glamorgan with the highest levels
of affordable housing need and provided real opportunity to deliver homes for those
in housing need through Section 106 funding.
Most of the representations made during the consultation period were objections to
the key sites identified within the Preferred Strategy, with similar issues raised
across the five key sites including the impact of new development on the natural
environment and the ability of existing infrastructure to cope with increased demand.
The initial consultation report addressed those key points and set out the prepared
evidence in support of the Development Plan and addressed the concerns raised.
The consultation allowed for new sites to be submitted as part of a second call for
candidate sites, with 14 new sites submitted as part of the process, and 24 new sites
with amendments of boundary or use which would now be assessed to determine
their suitability for inclusion in the Deposit Plan.
This was a matter for Executive decision.
Cabinet, having considered the report and all the issues and implications contained
therein
RESOLVED –
(1) T H A T the contents of the report be noted.
(2) T H A T the report be referred to Environment and Regeneration Scrutiny
Committee for their consideration. Should the Committee raise no further matters for
Cabinet consideration, the report be referred to a meeting of Full Council on 30th
September, 2024 for:
a) endorsement of the actions set out in the Initial Consultation Report;
b) approval of the Replacement Local Development Plan (RLDP)
Preferred Strategy as a basis for the ongoing preparation of the
Deposit RLDP.
Reasons for decisions
(1) To outline to Members the issues raised during the 10-week public
consultation exercise on the RLDP Preferred Strategy.
(2) To seek approval for the proposed changes to the Preferred Strategy as set
out in the Initial Consultation Report and to allow officers to progress with
preparation of the Deposit RLDP in accordance with the Council’s approved Delivery
Agreement.
RESOLVED – That the following matters be dealt with as indicated:
(1)
Application 1
The Sub Committee were asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Hackney Carriage/Private Hire Driver’s Licence given that a complaint has been received stating that he refused to take a journey from Cardiff train station to Penarth after allegedly saying he was available for hire
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver’s representative asserted that the driver had not broken any rules and suggested he had had been singled out by this complaint. He was not registered with the ICO and was not legally allowed to store information about customers and their trips as he was self-employed.
The Chair noted that the allegation from the witness was that the driver was asked to take someone in his cab and said yes, but then changed his mind and refused the fare. He acknowledged that Penarth was out of the Cardiff area, but the witness’ contention was that this was not why it was refused
The driver’s representative suggested that the driver was not obligated to explain to a member of the public why he wasn’t able to take a fare. The driver added that the witness did not ask him whether he was booked, and just said ‘Penarth’ as his window was rolling down. He also suggested that it wasn’t a formal rank as it was only his taxi there.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the witness stated that he was out with his family on a day out, and as they worked their way down the rank they were turned down by quite a few cabs when he said they needed to go to Penarth. A few of the drivers told them to ask the first cab on the rank, which he did. After he turned down the fare, another driver advised him that this was not allowed, and so he made a complaint. His daughter told him that it was like that every weekend when she tried to get to Penarth.
The driver reiterated that he had not heard anything from the witness other than ‘Penarth’, and would not have been able to get back in time for his next booked trip if he had accepted it. He did not have a record of it but regularly took passengers to Penarth and other destinations outside of town. Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, he emphasised that he had no objection at all to taking passengers anywhere they asked.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the witness explained that he had complained about another driver too, and this driver had not been singled out.
The driver’s representative summarised that while there was an issue with some drivers cherry-picking jobs, this driver had made clear that he did not do that. He only turned this one down because he had a job booked already and wouldn’t have been able to get back in time. He had done nothing wrong legally and did not deserve to be punished.
RESOLVED – that the driver receive a written warning.
(2)
Application 2
The Sub Committee were asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Private Hire Driver’s Licence given that he declared he was disqualified from driving and had received a driving ban from the DVLA.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver explained that his offence had occurred when he was having a very bad day. He was going through a lot of stress and his wife had just filed divorce papers. He was working as a chef and finished late, and had drunk two pints. He undertook another vehicle while it was raining heavily and was pulled over. After that, he lost everything and didn’t have any other opportunities for work. He hoped that Members would give him another chance to get back on the road and earn a proper living.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver explained that he was still working as a chef but was only able to do occasional part-time work as he did not have a car and it was hard to travel long distances. He relied on his wife and friends to give lifts but this was not always possible.
RESOLVED – that the Private Hire Driver’s Licence be revoked.
(3)
Application 3
The Sub Committee were asked to consider an application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence given that the applicant had a conviction contrary to the guidance.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver explained that he had made some silly mistakes but he wanted to feed his family and children. He stated he was a businessman and not aggressive
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver explained that he had re-applied for a Private Hire Driver’s Licence as he had previously owned a takeaway shop which he had sold and wanted to do something comfortable and easy. He had previously been in possession of a Private Hire Driver’s Licence in Newport (6 months) and Cardiff (just under a year). He had stopped after 6 months in Newport as he did not like travelling. He had not renewed either licence.
RESOLVED – that the application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence be refused.
(4)
Application 4
The Sub Committee were asked to consider an application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence given that the applicant previously held a licence with the Authority but was convicted for taking his daughter out of the county without the mother’s consent in 2019. He was also referred to committee in 2019 and subsequently had his licence revoked.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver explained that he first moved to Cardiff in 1994 and his daughter was born in 2012. He was then banned from the UK for 10 years and moved back to Romania. In 2014, he was accused of kidnapping his daughter. His wife moved to London and he was unable to go to his daughter’s school or doctors. His wife and daughter then moved back to Romania, and he had attended court on six occasions to try to gain custody of his daughter as she had returned from Romania with injuries.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee the driver explained that he had not seen his daughter for 4 or 5 years and she was now 12 years of age. He had received a prison sentence for taking his daughter out of the UK without her mother’s consent. Whilst in prison he was attacked. When he came out of prison he was not feeling well so he had handed in his badge. He informed the Sub Committee that he was now fit and well and wanted to come back to work as quickly as possible. He explained that it was just a family quarrel and there was no violence involved.
RESOLVED – that the application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence be refused.
(5)
Application 5
The Sub Committee were asked to consider an application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence given that the applicant previously held a licence with the authority but was convicted for totting up points on his DVLA licence. He was also referred to committee and subsequently had his licence revoked.
The driver explained that he had not committed any speeding offences whilst working as a taxi driver. He had been a delivery driver with his own shop and the police had caught him on camera speeding. He now had a clean driving licence. He stressed that he had never committed any crimes and had now learnt his lesson. For one and half years had had no employment, lost his licence and lost his shop. He informed the Sub Committee that he had a security job but that only provided him with 10 days’ work per month which was not enough and asked for another chance.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee the driver explained that the court had given him the chance to drive despite his points and said that if he made another mistake he would receive a 6 month ban. The police then stopped him for a worn tyre and he lost his licence for 6 months and his shop. He said that he had tried to use the train but the last one was at 10.00 pm and there were no busses. Sometimes he slept on the sofa which was hard. He explained that he had lost his licence before his taxi licence and had disclosed this information in his last application. The car with the worn tyre was his only car and the one he used as a taxi.
RESOLVED – that the application for the Grant of a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver's Licence be refused.
RESOLVED: Council AGREED to:
1.
Approve the new appointments of Local Authority governors to the school governing bodies as set out in Appendix 1, each for a term of 4 years from the date of the appointment, in accordance with the recommendations of the Local Authority Governor Panel.
RESOLVED: that
1. The proposals in respect of changes to Additional Leaning Needs provision as set out in paragraph 1 of this report without modification be approved.
2. Officers be authorised to take the appropriate actions to implement the proposals as set out in paragraph 1.
3. Officers be authorised to publish the decision within 7 days of determination of the proposals.
4. Authority be delegated to the Director of Education & Lifelong Learning (in consultation with the Cabinet Members for Education and Finance, Modernisation & Performance, the Director of Governance and Legal Services, the Director of Economic Development and the Corporate Director Resources) to determine all aspects of the procurement process (including for the avoidance of doubt development of all procurement documentation and selection and award criteria, commencement of procurement through to award of contracts).
Cardiff, Children and Young People Scrutiny Committee,
RESOLVED: That the Chairperson writes to the Cabinet Member on behalf of the Committee expressing their comments and observations captured during the way forward.
Cardiff, Children and Young People Scrutiny Committee,
RESOLVED:
To note that Council agreed the following Terms of Reference for the Committee at its annual meeting on 23rd May 2024:
“To scrutinise, measure and actively promote improvement in the Council’s performance in the provision of services and compliance with Council policies, aims and objectives in the area of children and young people, including:
· School Improvement
· Schools Organisation
· School Support Services
· Education Welfare & Inclusion
· Early Years Development
· Special Educational needs
· Governor Services
· Children’s Social Services
· Youth Services and Justice
· Children’s Play Services
To assess the impact of partnerships with and resources and services provided by external organisations including the Welsh Government, Welsh Government Sponsored Public Bodies, joint local government services and quasi-departmental non-governmental bodies on the effectiveness of Council service delivery.
To report to an appropriate Cabinet or Council meeting on its findings and to make recommendations on measures which may enhance Council performance and service delivery in this area.”