The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
RESOLVED - That permission be GRANTED in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief Officer Economy and Planning as set out in report COEP/06/23.
RESOLVED - That permission be GRANTED in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief Officer Economy and Planning as set out in report COEP/06/23)
RESOLVED – That the list of Delegated Decisions be noted.
Apologies for absence were received from Councillor I David Bithell, MBE.
The Chair referred, with deep regret, to the recent death of former Councillor Malcolm Williams, who represented Llay for many years and also chaired the Planning Committee for a considerable period. He extended the Committee’s deepest sympathy to his family. Members and Officers stood in silence as a mark of respect.
RESOLVED – That the Minutes of the Meeting held on Tuesday 9 May, 2023 be signed as a correct record.
There were no declarations of interest made at the meeting
The Chief Officer Economy and Planning submitted a report (COEP/06/23) asking Members to determine the list of planning applications.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED - That permission be GRANTED in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief Officer Economy and Planning as set out in report COEP/06/23.
The Head of Planning Development Management introduced the report and informed Committee that retrospective planning permission was being sought for a storage building, goat hut/shelter and a wooden structure composting toilet that were already on site. Councillor Trevor Bates (Local Member) spoke in relation to the application and informed Members that he had received some concerns in relation to the following: · Run off water · Visual impact of the track · Increased traffic in the area A discussion ensued and the following points were raised: · Assurances were sought that the shelter was for people working on the land · The building should not be used at any time other than for agriculture use · Confirmation that a detailed landscaping scheme would be required. Upon conclusion of the debate, it was agreed that planning permission should be granted subject to the following additional conditions: Condition 3: Notwithstanding the provisions of Part 6 of Schedule to of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any order revoking, re-enacting that Order with or without modification), no extensions shall take place to the buildings hereby granted planning permission and no additional free-standing buildings shall be erected on the land edged red on drawing no. EX01 Revision X. Reason: In the interests of protecting the countryside, Special Landscape Area, the amenities of nearby occupiers and highway safety in accordance with policies GDP1 and EC5 of the Wrexham Unitary Development Plan. Condition 4: The building identified as Storage Building on drawings nos. SK01 Revision A and SK02 Revision X shall not be used at any time other than for agriculture as defined in section 336 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and for purposes ancillary to the use of the land edged red on drawing no. EX01 Revision X for agriculture. Reason: In the interests of protecting the amenities of nearby occupiers and highway safety in accordance with policy GDP1 of the Wrexham Unitary Development Plan. RESOLVED - That permission be GRANTED in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief Officer Economy and Planning as set out in report COEP/06/23.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED - That permission be GRANTED in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief Officer Economy and Planning as set out in report COEP/06/23)
The Head of Service, Planning Development Management introduced the report and informed Committee that the application proposed the parking and operation of two private hire vehicles. Both drivers were residents of the property. A discussion ensued and the following points were raised: · Confirmation that that there would be no waiting area at the application address and the private hire vehicles would be available via pre-bookings only. · There was sufficient space provided within the curtilage of the property for the two vehicles to be parked off the road without affecting the visual and general amenity of the area. · If permission was granted, it would only apply to the applicants whilst they resided at the property. · The Community Council had not raised any objections to the application, providing the premises were not visited by members of the public (which should not be the case for private hire vehicles). · Pleasing news that a new small business was being set up. · Assurances sought that there wouldn’t be any noise disturbance. RESOLVED - That permission be GRANTED in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief Officer Economy and Planning as set out in report COEP/06/23)
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – That the list of Delegated Decisions be noted.
RESOLVED – That the list of Delegated Decisions be noted.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
The council hasn't recorded attendance for this meeting.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.