Loading
The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
RESOLVED – That planning permission be refused. Reason for decision (i) The proposal would introduce an additional hot food takeaway/drive-through restaurant within an area already characterised by a concentration of food outlets selling food high in fat, salt and sugar. Having regard to the concerns raised by Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board regarding childhood obesity, health inequalities and the cumulative impact of such uses, the proposal would undermine the objective of creating healthier places and promoting healthy lifestyles. Consequently, the cumulative impact of this overprovision fails to satisfy the holistic wellbeing mandates set out in Paragraphs 3.19 and 3.21 of Planning Policy Wales, alongside the sustainable development duties imposed by the Wellbeing of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. (ii) Insufficient evidence has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed development would not result in unacceptable parking demand and associated highway safety impacts. In particular, concerns remain regarding the methodology used to assess parking demand, the identified shortfall in parking provision, and the reliance upon overspill parking within nearby Tesco car parking facilities. Consequently, the Local Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that adequate parking provision exists to serve the development without adverse impacts on highway safety and the free flow of traffic. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies GDP1 and T8 of the Wrexham Unitary Development Plan.
RESOLVED – That Agenda Item 4c – P/2026/0364 – Colliers Park, Wrexham AFC Training Ground, Chester Road, Gresford, Wrexham, LL12 8PW be brought forward for consideration at this time.
RESOLVED – That consideration of the application be deferred. Reason for decision To request the applicant to provide further consideration to a mains drainage connection or provide further evidence to demonstrate why a mains drainage connection is not feasible.
RESOLVED – That planning permission be refused. Reasons for decision (i) The development will result in an overconcentration of HMOs within the immediate area of the site contrary to Policy H4 (d) of the adopted Wrexham Unitary Development Plan and Local Planning Guidance Note No. 5 'Conversion of Dwellings into Houses in Multiple Occupation' which sets out a maximum of 10% of HMOs within a 50 metres radius. (ii) The development will give rise to demand for on-street parking in the vicinity of the site to the detriment of highway safety. The development therefore conflicts with policies GDP1 and T8 of the Wrexham Unitary Development Plan.
RESOLVED – That the report be noted.
RESOLVED – That the list of delegated decisions be noted.
There were no apologies for absence.
The Minutes of the Meeting held on 27 July 2026 were submitted. RESOLVED – That the Minutes of the Meeting held on 27 July 2026 be signed as a correct record.
Members were reminded of their responsibility, under Paragraph 11 of the Members’ Code of Conduct, to declare any interests in relation to any of the business to be transacted at this meeting. The following declarations were made: Agenda Item – 4c – Application No: P/2026/0364 – Colliers Park, Wrexham AFC Training Ground, Chester Road, Gresford, Wrexham, LL12 8PW Councillor I David Bithell, MBE - Personal – Fire Supervisor at Wrexham FC on match days. The Councillor remained in the meeting taking part in the discussion and voting thereon. Councillor Anthony Wedlake - Personal and Prejudicial – Paid member of the FAW Independent Appeals Panel. The Councillor withdrew from the meeting for this item taking no part in the discussion and voting thereon.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – That planning permission be refused. Reason for decision (i) The proposal would introduce an additional hot food takeaway/drive-through restaurant within an area already characterised by a concentration of food outlets selling food high in fat, salt and sugar. Having regard to the concerns raised by Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board regarding childhood obesity, health inequalities and the cumulative impact of such uses, the proposal would undermine the objective of creating healthier places and promoting healthy lifestyles. Consequently, the cumulative impact of this overprovision fails to satisfy the holistic wellbeing mandates set out in Paragraphs 3.19 and 3.21 of Planning Policy Wales, alongside the sustainable development duties imposed by the Wellbeing of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. (ii) Insufficient evidence has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed development would not result in unacceptable parking demand and associated highway safety impacts. In particular, concerns remain regarding the methodology used to assess parking demand, the identified shortfall in parking provision, and the reliance upon overspill parking within nearby Tesco car parking facilities. Consequently, the Local Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that adequate parking provision exists to serve the development without adverse impacts on highway safety and the free flow of traffic. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies GDP1 and T8 of the Wrexham Unitary Development Plan.
The Chair welcomed Hayley Koumas to the Meeting who spoke against the application. He also welcomed Mat Carpenter who spoke in favour of the application. The Officer presented the report and in doing so, displayed plans and photographs of the site to assist with his presentation. A discussion ensued and the following points were raised during the debate: · Members shared the concerns submitted by Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board on the potential impact of the proposal on public health. · Members highlighted the need to have regard to the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 and the importance of considering the potential long-term impact of the proposal on the health and well-being of future generations. · Concerns were raised regarding the cumulative impact of additional hot food outlets within the area and their proximity to schools and educational establishments. · Concerns were also expressed regarding existing traffic congestion in the area and the potential for the development to exacerbate highway and parking issues. · Officers advised that there were no adopted planning policies that restricted the number of hot food outlets in a particular area and highlighted that no objections had been received from the Highway Authority in respect of the proposal. RESOLVED – That planning permission be refused. Reason for decision (i) The proposal would introduce an additional hot food takeaway/drive-through restaurant within an area already characterised by a concentration of food outlets selling food high in fat, salt and sugar. Having regard to the concerns raised by Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board regarding childhood obesity, health inequalities and the cumulative impact of such uses, the proposal would undermine the objective of creating healthier places and promoting healthy lifestyles. Consequently, the cumulative impact of this overprovision fails to satisfy the holistic wellbeing mandates set out in Paragraphs 3.19 and 3.21 of Planning Policy Wales, alongside the sustainable development duties imposed by the Wellbeing of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. (ii) Insufficient evidence has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed development would not result in unacceptable parking demand and associated highway safety impacts. In particular, concerns remain regarding the methodology used to assess parking demand, the identified shortfall in parking provision, and the reliance upon overspill parking within nearby Tesco car parking facilities. Consequently, the Local Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that adequate parking provision exists to serve the development without adverse impacts on highway safety and the free flow of traffic. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies GDP1 and T8 of the Wrexham Unitary Development Plan.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – That Agenda Item 4c – P/2026/0364 – Colliers Park, Wrexham AFC Training Ground, Chester Road, Gresford, Wrexham, LL12 8PW be brought forward for consideration at this time.
RESOLVED – That Agenda Item 4c – P/2026/0364 – Colliers Park, Wrexham AFC Training Ground, Chester Road, Gresford, Wrexham, LL12 8PW be brought forward for consideration at this time.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – That consideration of the application be deferred. Reason for decision To request the applicant to provide further consideration to a mains drainage connection or provide further evidence to demonstrate why a mains drainage connection is not feasible.
(Members declarations of interest in relation to this item are set out in Minute 28 above) The Chair welcomed Andrew Lewis to the Meeting who spoke against the application. He also welcomed Aiden Miller who spoke in favour of the application. The Officer presented the report and in doing so, displayed plans and photographs of the site to assist with his presentation. A discussion ensued and the following points were raised during the debate: · Members of the Committee and the Local Member expressed concern regarding the retrospective nature of the application. · Concerns were raised regarding the proposed foul drainage arrangements and the feasibility of connecting the development to the mains sewerage network. · Officers advised that further information remained outstanding in respect of drainage and highway matters and explained the recommendation to delegate authority to the Chief Officer was subject to the additional information being satisfactory. RESOLVED – That consideration of the application be deferred. Reason for decision To request the applicant to provide further consideration to a mains drainage connection or provide further evidence to demonstrate why a mains drainage connection is not feasible.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – That planning permission be refused. Reasons for decision (i) The development will result in an overconcentration of HMOs within the immediate area of the site contrary to Policy H4 (d) of the adopted Wrexham Unitary Development Plan and Local Planning Guidance Note No. 5 'Conversion of Dwellings into Houses in Multiple Occupation' which sets out a maximum of 10% of HMOs within a 50 metres radius. (ii) The development will give rise to demand for on-street parking in the vicinity of the site to the detriment of highway safety. The development therefore conflicts with policies GDP1 and T8 of the Wrexham Unitary Development Plan.
The local Member, Councillor Phil Wynn, addressed the Committee. The Officer presented the report and highlighted the mains points contained within it. A discussion ensued and the following points were raised during the debate: · Importance of ensuring that refuse and recycling bins were stored off the highway was highlighted. · Members discussed the concentration of Houses in Multiple Occupation within the locality. · Concerns were raised regarding parking provision and the impact of the proposal on the surrounding area. · Officers advised that the site was located within a predominantly commercial area and that the proposal would not materially alter the existing residential use of the property. RESOLVED – That planning permission be refused. Reasons for decision (i) The development will result in an overconcentration of HMOs within the immediate area of the site contrary to Policy H4 (d) of the adopted Wrexham Unitary Development Plan and Local Planning Guidance Note No. 5 'Conversion of Dwellings into Houses in Multiple Occupation' which sets out a maximum of 10% of HMOs within a 50 metres radius. (ii) The development will give rise to demand for on-street parking in the vicinity of the site to the detriment of highway safety. The development therefore conflicts with policies GDP1 and T8 of the Wrexham Unitary Development Plan.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – That the report be noted.
The Chief Officer Economy and Planning submitted a report (COEP/57/26) providing an update on the performance of the Planning Service for reporting period Quarter 1 of the financial year 2026/27 and staff resourcing. A discussion ensued and the following points were raised during the debate: · Members noted the introduction of additional Welsh Government performance indicators, including measures relating to listed building consent applications, enforcement activity and committee overturns. · Application determination times had been adversely affected by phosphorus related issues, staffing vacancies and delays in receiving consultation responses. · Members discussed enforcement activity and acknowledged the pressures being experienced, particularly in relation to unauthorised Gypsy and Traveller sites and the impact this had on wider enforcement performance. · Members were advised that recruitment to vacant posts was ongoing. · Discussion took place regarding the absence of a Local Development Plan and the challenges this presented when considering certain types of planning applications and policy matters. · Members thanked officers for their work and recognised the challenges currently facing the Planning Service. RESOLVED – That the report be noted.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – That the list of delegated decisions be noted.
The Chief Officer Economy and Planning submitted a list of delegated decisions for the period 1 July 2026 to 31 July 2026. RESOLVED – That the list of delegated decisions be noted.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
The council hasn't recorded attendance for this meeting.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.