Loading
The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be taken. 2020/01170/OUT Received on 14 October 2020 (P. 1) APPLICANT: Welsh Government Land Division, Permanent Secretary's Group, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3NQ AGENT: Ms Catherine Blyth Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RS Land at Upper Cosmeston Farm, Lavernock Road, Penarth Outline application for residential development, a primary school, community space and public open space with all matters reserved other than access. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations within the report, with the results as follows: No. Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest √ W. Gilligan √ N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson √ H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ E. Williams √ M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 12 2 RESOLVED – T H A T subject to the applicant entering into a Section 106 agreement to provide for the following (based on 576 dwellings): • Procure that 40% (up to 231) of the dwellings built on the site pursuant to the planning permission are built and thereafter maintained as affordable housing units in perpetuity. • Pay a contribution of £1,324,800 towards sustainable transport improvements. No. • Pay a financial contribution towards education requirements arising from the development of £6,476,088, in addition to the transfer of the 1ha school site to the Council. • Provision of suitable open space within the confines of the site (inclusive of 1 x NEAP, 3 x LEAPs and 4 x LAPs). • Pay 1% of project budget towards public art. • Cliff monitoring contribution of £59,150 • To provide community facilities of circa 0.1-0.2 hectares within the development APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report. Reason for decision Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting. 2023/00032/FUL Received on 27 January 2023 (P. 79) APPLICANT: Biomass UK No.2 Limited -, -, AGENT: Mr Philip Murphy 21 Soho Square, London, W1D 3QP Barry Biomass Renewable Energy Facility, David Davies Road, Barry Retrospective full planning permission for development comprising a wood fired renewable energy plant and associated structures without complying with Condition 5 (Drawings) attached to planning permission 2015/00031/OUT. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based upon whether Members were for or against Rejection of the Application, with the results as follows: Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave √ C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest W. Gilligan √ No. N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson √ H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry √ C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ E. Williams √ M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 13 2 REFUSED – Subject to the following reasons: (1) The unauthorised addition of the ancillary structures, minor alterations, and associated layout changes including:- a Lean-to Fuel Reception Building, lean-to Compressor House, urea Silo, externally mounted discharge Incline conveyor, screening tower and dust extraction plant, emergency diesel generator and fire kiosk, fire water tank and pump house, amendment to stack width and an enlargement to the noise attenuator located at the base of the chimney stack; have detrimentally affected the appearance of the development over and above that approved in 2015 and will harm the amenity of nearby residential properties in both the Waterfront and Dock View Road. The Development is accordingly contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development Within Settlement Boundaries) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. (2) The applicant has failed to demonstrate that there will not be adverse environmental impacts because the EIA fails to adequately and fully assess the impacts regarding waste; particularly as there is no specific chapter dealing with this key issue. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Developments), MD 7 (Environmental Protection) and MD 20 (Assessment of waste Management Proposals) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. Reason for decision Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting. No. 2023/00033/FUL Received on 24 January 2023 (P. 130) APPLICANT: Biomass UK No. 2 Ltd., c/o Agent, -, - AGENT: Mr Philip Murphy, 21, Soho Square, London, W1D 3QP Land to the North of Barry Biomass Renewable Energy Facility, David Davies Road, Barry Retrospective planning permission for external storage, vehicle turning and vehicle layover, and perimeter fencing for use in association with the adjacent renewable energy plant. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based upon whether Members were for or against Rejection of the Application, with the results as follows: Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce √ I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave √ C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest W. Gilligan √ N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson √ H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry √ C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ No. E. Williams M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 15 REFUSED – Subject to the following reasons: 1. The proposal comprises an integral and operational part of the wider development which, by reason of the unauthorised ancillary structures, minor alterations, and associated layout changes that include:- a Lean-to Fuel Reception Building, lean-to Compressor House, urea Silo, externally mounted discharge Incline conveyor, screening tower and dust extraction plant, emergency diesel generator and fire kiosk, fire water tank and pump house, amendment to stack width and an enlargement to the noise attenuator located at the base of the chimney stack; has detrimentally affected the appearance of the development over and above that approved in 2015 and will harm the amenity of nearby residential properties in both the Waterfront and Dock View Road. The Development is accordingly contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development Within Settlement Boundaries) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. 2. The proposal comprises an integral and operational part of the wider development, which is not supported by adequate information to demonstrate that there would not be adverse environmental impacts (due to the EIA failing to assess fully the impacts regarding waste, particularly as there is no specific chapter dealing with this key issue). The proposal is therefore contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Developments), MD 7 (Environmental Protection) and MD 20 (Assessment of waste Management Proposals) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. Reason for decisions Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting. 2023/00895/FUL Received on 17 January 2024 (P. 156) APPLICANT: Mr Huw Llewellyn Great House Farm, Penllyn, Cowbridge, CF71 7RQ AGENT: Ms Bethan Evans Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RS Great House Farm, Penllyn Proposed change of use from agricultural use to glamping visitor accommodation comprising 3 yurts, separate kitchen units and conversion of the existing barn to a shower block and farm storage. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations within the report, with the results as follows: No. Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce √ I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave √ C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest W. Gilligan √ N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry √ C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ E. Williams M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 13 1 APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report. Reason for decision Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
Councillor Agenda Item No. Nature of Interest I.R. Buckley 2020/01170/OUT – Land at The Councillor had previously Upper Cosmeston Farm, considered the application in Lavernock Road, Penarth previous meetings of Penarth Town Council. The Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. C.A. Cave 2020/01170/OUT – Land at The Councillor felt that her Upper Cosmeston Farm, previous minuted comments Lavernock Road, Penarth at the original adjourned meeting meant she could not participate in discussions and voting on this item. Also, public speakers, representatives and Committee Members who were present at February’s meeting were not necessarily present now. It was very No. unclear as to whether what occurred in March was a resumption from an adjournment in February, or a restart. As a result of these and other concerns, she informed the committee that she would remain silent on this discussion and application. N.B. These concerns were responded to and addressed by the Chair and the Legal Officer, both in the meeting and in the Chair’s statement (see below). I.A.N. Perry 2020/01170/OUT – Land at The Councillor did not vote Upper Cosmeston Farm, because he felt that matters Lavernock Road, Penarth related to the planning decision raised at the meeting in February were not repeated at the meeting in March and as a result there were some members who voted in March who did not have all the information as they were not present in February. It was very unclear as to whether what occurred in March was a resumption from an adjournment in February, or a restart. As a result of issues raised in February not being repeated in March, he informed the committee that he would not be voting due to new participants not having heard all the debate. N.B. These concerns were responded to and addressed by the Chair, both in the meeting and in his statement (see below). N.C. Thomas 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry Councillor declared that they No. would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. S.D. Perkes 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. I. Buckley 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. C.A. Cave 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. P. Drake 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. A.M. Ernest 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. N.P. Hodges 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the No. matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. Dr. I.J. Johnson 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings or made Barry and 2023/00033/FUL comments. The Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. H.M. Payne 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry and 2023/00033/FUL Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. E. Williams 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. M.R. Wilson 2023/00032/FUL – Barry The Councillor had previously Biomass Renewable Energy considered the application in Facility, David Davies Road, previous meetings. The Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. N.C. Thomas 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. S.D. Perkes 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so No. remained in the meeting for the item. I. Buckley 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. C.A. Cave 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. P. Drake 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. A.M. Ernest 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. N.P. Hodges 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. Dr. I.J. Johnson 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings or made David Davies Road, Barry comments. The Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from No. afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. H.M. Payne 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. E. Williams 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item. M.R. Wilson 2023/00033/FUL – Land to The Councillor had previously the north of Barry Biomass considered the application in Renewable Energy Facility, previous meetings. The David Davies Road, Barry Councillor declared that they would be considering the matter from afresh and so remained in the meeting for the item.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be taken. 2020/01170/OUT Received on 14 October 2020 (P. 1) APPLICANT: Welsh Government Land Division, Permanent Secretary's Group, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3NQ AGENT: Ms Catherine Blyth Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RS Land at Upper Cosmeston Farm, Lavernock Road, Penarth Outline application for residential development, a primary school, community space and public open space with all matters reserved other than access. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations within the report, with the results as follows: No. Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest √ W. Gilligan √ N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson √ H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ E. Williams √ M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 12 2 RESOLVED – T H A T subject to the applicant entering into a Section 106 agreement to provide for the following (based on 576 dwellings): • Procure that 40% (up to 231) of the dwellings built on the site pursuant to the planning permission are built and thereafter maintained as affordable housing units in perpetuity. • Pay a contribution of £1,324,800 towards sustainable transport improvements. No. • Pay a financial contribution towards education requirements arising from the development of £6,476,088, in addition to the transfer of the 1ha school site to the Council. • Provision of suitable open space within the confines of the site (inclusive of 1 x NEAP, 3 x LEAPs and 4 x LAPs). • Pay 1% of project budget towards public art. • Cliff monitoring contribution of £59,150 • To provide community facilities of circa 0.1-0.2 hectares within the development APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report. Reason for decision Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting. 2023/00032/FUL Received on 27 January 2023 (P. 79) APPLICANT: Biomass UK No.2 Limited -, -, AGENT: Mr Philip Murphy 21 Soho Square, London, W1D 3QP Barry Biomass Renewable Energy Facility, David Davies Road, Barry Retrospective full planning permission for development comprising a wood fired renewable energy plant and associated structures without complying with Condition 5 (Drawings) attached to planning permission 2015/00031/OUT. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based upon whether Members were for or against Rejection of the Application, with the results as follows: Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave √ C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest W. Gilligan √ No. N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson √ H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry √ C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ E. Williams √ M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 13 2 REFUSED – Subject to the following reasons: (1) The unauthorised addition of the ancillary structures, minor alterations, and associated layout changes including:- a Lean-to Fuel Reception Building, lean-to Compressor House, urea Silo, externally mounted discharge Incline conveyor, screening tower and dust extraction plant, emergency diesel generator and fire kiosk, fire water tank and pump house, amendment to stack width and an enlargement to the noise attenuator located at the base of the chimney stack; have detrimentally affected the appearance of the development over and above that approved in 2015 and will harm the amenity of nearby residential properties in both the Waterfront and Dock View Road. The Development is accordingly contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development Within Settlement Boundaries) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. (2) The applicant has failed to demonstrate that there will not be adverse environmental impacts because the EIA fails to adequately and fully assess the impacts regarding waste; particularly as there is no specific chapter dealing with this key issue. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Developments), MD 7 (Environmental Protection) and MD 20 (Assessment of waste Management Proposals) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. Reason for decision Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting. No. 2023/00033/FUL Received on 24 January 2023 (P. 130) APPLICANT: Biomass UK No. 2 Ltd., c/o Agent, -, - AGENT: Mr Philip Murphy, 21, Soho Square, London, W1D 3QP Land to the North of Barry Biomass Renewable Energy Facility, David Davies Road, Barry Retrospective planning permission for external storage, vehicle turning and vehicle layover, and perimeter fencing for use in association with the adjacent renewable energy plant. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based upon whether Members were for or against Rejection of the Application, with the results as follows: Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce √ I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave √ C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest W. Gilligan √ N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson √ H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry √ C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ No. E. Williams M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 15 REFUSED – Subject to the following reasons: 1. The proposal comprises an integral and operational part of the wider development which, by reason of the unauthorised ancillary structures, minor alterations, and associated layout changes that include:- a Lean-to Fuel Reception Building, lean-to Compressor House, urea Silo, externally mounted discharge Incline conveyor, screening tower and dust extraction plant, emergency diesel generator and fire kiosk, fire water tank and pump house, amendment to stack width and an enlargement to the noise attenuator located at the base of the chimney stack; has detrimentally affected the appearance of the development over and above that approved in 2015 and will harm the amenity of nearby residential properties in both the Waterfront and Dock View Road. The Development is accordingly contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development Within Settlement Boundaries) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. 2. The proposal comprises an integral and operational part of the wider development, which is not supported by adequate information to demonstrate that there would not be adverse environmental impacts (due to the EIA failing to assess fully the impacts regarding waste, particularly as there is no specific chapter dealing with this key issue). The proposal is therefore contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Developments), MD 7 (Environmental Protection) and MD 20 (Assessment of waste Management Proposals) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. Reason for decisions Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting. 2023/00895/FUL Received on 17 January 2024 (P. 156) APPLICANT: Mr Huw Llewellyn Great House Farm, Penllyn, Cowbridge, CF71 7RQ AGENT: Ms Bethan Evans Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RS Great House Farm, Penllyn Proposed change of use from agricultural use to glamping visitor accommodation comprising 3 yurts, separate kitchen units and conversion of the existing barn to a shower block and farm storage. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations within the report, with the results as follows: No. Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce √ I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave √ C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest W. Gilligan √ N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry √ C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ E. Williams M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 13 1 APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report. Reason for decision Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be taken. 2020/01170/OUT Received on 14 October 2020 (P. 1) APPLICANT: Welsh Government Land Division, Permanent Secretary's Group, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3NQ AGENT: Ms Catherine Blyth Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RS Land at Upper Cosmeston Farm, Lavernock Road, Penarth Outline application for residential development, a primary school, community space and public open space with all matters reserved other than access. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations within the report, with the results as follows: No. Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest √ W. Gilligan √ N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson √ H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ E. Williams √ M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 12 2 RESOLVED – T H A T subject to the applicant entering into a Section 106 agreement to provide for the following (based on 576 dwellings): • Procure that 40% (up to 231) of the dwellings built on the site pursuant to the planning permission are built and thereafter maintained as affordable housing units in perpetuity. • Pay a contribution of £1,324,800 towards sustainable transport improvements. No. • Pay a financial contribution towards education requirements arising from the development of £6,476,088, in addition to the transfer of the 1ha school site to the Council. • Provision of suitable open space within the confines of the site (inclusive of 1 x NEAP, 3 x LEAPs and 4 x LAPs). • Pay 1% of project budget towards public art. • Cliff monitoring contribution of £59,150 • To provide community facilities of circa 0.1-0.2 hectares within the development APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report. Reason for decision Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting. 2023/00032/FUL Received on 27 January 2023 (P. 79) APPLICANT: Biomass UK No.2 Limited -, -, AGENT: Mr Philip Murphy 21 Soho Square, London, W1D 3QP Barry Biomass Renewable Energy Facility, David Davies Road, Barry Retrospective full planning permission for development comprising a wood fired renewable energy plant and associated structures without complying with Condition 5 (Drawings) attached to planning permission 2015/00031/OUT. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based upon whether Members were for or against Rejection of the Application, with the results as follows: Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave √ C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest W. Gilligan √ No. N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson √ H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry √ C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ E. Williams √ M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 13 2 REFUSED – Subject to the following reasons: (1) The unauthorised addition of the ancillary structures, minor alterations, and associated layout changes including:- a Lean-to Fuel Reception Building, lean-to Compressor House, urea Silo, externally mounted discharge Incline conveyor, screening tower and dust extraction plant, emergency diesel generator and fire kiosk, fire water tank and pump house, amendment to stack width and an enlargement to the noise attenuator located at the base of the chimney stack; have detrimentally affected the appearance of the development over and above that approved in 2015 and will harm the amenity of nearby residential properties in both the Waterfront and Dock View Road. The Development is accordingly contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development Within Settlement Boundaries) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. (2) The applicant has failed to demonstrate that there will not be adverse environmental impacts because the EIA fails to adequately and fully assess the impacts regarding waste; particularly as there is no specific chapter dealing with this key issue. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Developments), MD 7 (Environmental Protection) and MD 20 (Assessment of waste Management Proposals) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. Reason for decision Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting. No. 2023/00033/FUL Received on 24 January 2023 (P. 130) APPLICANT: Biomass UK No. 2 Ltd., c/o Agent, -, - AGENT: Mr Philip Murphy, 21, Soho Square, London, W1D 3QP Land to the North of Barry Biomass Renewable Energy Facility, David Davies Road, Barry Retrospective planning permission for external storage, vehicle turning and vehicle layover, and perimeter fencing for use in association with the adjacent renewable energy plant. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based upon whether Members were for or against Rejection of the Application, with the results as follows: Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce √ I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave √ C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest W. Gilligan √ N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson √ H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry √ C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ No. E. Williams M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 15 REFUSED – Subject to the following reasons: 1. The proposal comprises an integral and operational part of the wider development which, by reason of the unauthorised ancillary structures, minor alterations, and associated layout changes that include:- a Lean-to Fuel Reception Building, lean-to Compressor House, urea Silo, externally mounted discharge Incline conveyor, screening tower and dust extraction plant, emergency diesel generator and fire kiosk, fire water tank and pump house, amendment to stack width and an enlargement to the noise attenuator located at the base of the chimney stack; has detrimentally affected the appearance of the development over and above that approved in 2015 and will harm the amenity of nearby residential properties in both the Waterfront and Dock View Road. The Development is accordingly contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Development) and MD5 (Development Within Settlement Boundaries) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. 2. The proposal comprises an integral and operational part of the wider development, which is not supported by adequate information to demonstrate that there would not be adverse environmental impacts (due to the EIA failing to assess fully the impacts regarding waste, particularly as there is no specific chapter dealing with this key issue). The proposal is therefore contrary to policies MD 2 (Design of New Developments), MD 7 (Environmental Protection) and MD 20 (Assessment of waste Management Proposals) of the adopted Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan. Reason for decisions Having regard to the contents of the report and discussions at the meeting. 2023/00895/FUL Received on 17 January 2024 (P. 156) APPLICANT: Mr Huw Llewellyn Great House Farm, Penllyn, Cowbridge, CF71 7RQ AGENT: Ms Bethan Evans Unit 9, Oak Tree Court, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, CF23 8RS Great House Farm, Penllyn Proposed change of use from agricultural use to glamping visitor accommodation comprising 3 yurts, separate kitchen units and conversion of the existing barn to a shower block and farm storage. A recorded vote was called for the Application, based on the recommendations within the report, with the results as follows: No. Members For Against Abstain G. Bruce √ I.R. Buckley √ C.A. Cave √ C.E.A. Champion √ C.M. Cowpe √ P. Drake √ A.M. Ernest W. Gilligan √ N.P. Hodges √ Dr. I.J. Johnson H.M. Payne √ S.D. Perkes √ I.A.N. Perry √ C. Stallard √ N.C. Thomas √ E. Williams M.R. Wilson √ TOTAL 13 1 APPROVED – Subject to the conditions as contained within the report. Reason for decision Having regard to the content of the report and discussions at the meeting.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.