The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
RESOLVED – T H A T the minutes of the meeting held on 21st December, 2022 be approved as a correct record.
RESOLVED – T H A T the attendance of the following Councillors at the site visits held on 21st December, 2022 be noted: Apologies for both Site Visits (A and B) were received from Councillors G. Bruce, C.M. Cowpe, P. Drake and C. Stallard Apologies for Site Visit A only were received from Councillor N.P Hodges No. Apologies for Site Visit B only were received from Councillor A.M. Ernest (a) 96 Lavernock Councillor N.C. Thomas (Chair); Councillors Road, Penarth A.M. Ernest, and Dr. I.J. Johnson. (b) Albert Road Methodist Councillor N.C. Thomas (Chair); Church, Penarth Councillors C.E.A. Champion, N.P. Hodges and Dr. I.J. Johnson.
RESOLVED – (1) T H A T the passed building regulation applications, as listed in Section A of the report, be noted. (2) T H A T the rejected building applications, as listed in Section B of the report, be noted. (3) T H A T the serving of Notices under Building (Approved Inspectors Etc.) Regulations 2000, as listed in Section C of the report, be noted.
RESOLVED – T H A T the applications as outlined within the report, on pages 7 through 16, under the above delegated powers be noted.
RESOLVED – (1) T H A T it be noted that no Planning Appeals had been received at the time of the meeting taking place. (2) T H A T it be noted that no Enforcement Appeals had been received at the time of the meeting taking place. (3) T H A T the Planning Appeal Decisions, as detailed in Section C of the report, be noted. (4) T H A T it be noted that no Enforcement Appeal Decisions had been received at the time of the meeting taking place. (5) T H A T the statistics relating to appeals for the period April 2022 – March 2023, as detailed in Section E of the report, be noted. No.
RESOLVED – T H A T the applications as outlined within the report on pages 20 to 21, as determined by the Head of Regeneration and Planning under delegated powers, be noted.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be taken. 2022/00918/FUL Received on 11 August 2022 (P22) APPLICANT: Glen Thomas Architechture 112 Kimberley Road, Penylan, Cardiff, CF23 5DN AGENT: Mr Richard Wood 112 Kimberley Road, Penylan, Cardiff, CF23 5DN 96, Lavernock Road, Penarth Loft conversion with rear dormer. Rear single storey, flat roof extension with first floor extension. General internal remodel. Modernisation of front porch. Alteration to front fenestration REFUSED 1. By reason of its scale, form, and proximity to the boundary with the neighbouring property, the proposed extension would result in an imposing and overbearing impact on the neighbour at number 94, Lavernock Road to such an extent that it would unacceptably impact upon the living conditions of the occupiers and the amount of light reaching that property. The proposal is therefore contrary to the advice set out in the Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance on Residential and Householder Development, Policy MD2 (Design of New Development) and Policy MD5 (Development within Settlement Boundaries) of the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026.Council's LDP. Reason for decision The decision to recommend refusal of planning permission has been taken in accordance with Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires that, in determining a planning application the determination must be in accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of No. Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National Plan 2040. It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. The appropriate marine policy documents have been considered in the determination of this application in accordance with Section 59 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – T H A T the minutes of the meeting held on 21st December, 2022 be approved as a correct record.
RESOLVED – T H A T the minutes of the meeting held on 21st December, 2022 be approved as a correct record.
Councillor A.M. Ernest 2022/00918/FUL Prejudicial Interest – - 96 Lavernock Councillor Ernest had Road, Penarth predetermined the application as local ward member and therefore withdrew from the meeting for the item.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – T H A T the attendance of the following Councillors at the site visits held on 21st December, 2022 be noted: Apologies for both Site Visits (A and B) were received from Councillors G. Bruce, C.M. Cowpe, P. Drake and C. Stallard Apologies for Site Visit A only were received from Councillor N.P Hodges No. Apologies for Site Visit B only were received from Councillor A.M. Ernest (a) 96 Lavernock Councillor N.C. Thomas (Chair); Councillors Road, Penarth A.M. Ernest, and Dr. I.J. Johnson. (b) Albert Road Methodist Councillor N.C. Thomas (Chair); Church, Penarth Councillors C.E.A. Champion, N.P. Hodges and Dr. I.J. Johnson.
RESOLVED – T H A T the attendance of the following Councillors at the site visits held on 21st December, 2022 be noted: Apologies for both Site Visits (A and B) were received from Councillors G. Bruce, C.M. Cowpe, P. Drake and C. Stallard Apologies for Site Visit A only were received from Councillor N.P Hodges No. Apologies for Site Visit B only were received from Councillor A.M. Ernest (a) 96 Lavernock Councillor N.C. Thomas (Chair); Councillors Road, Penarth A.M. Ernest, and Dr. I.J. Johnson. (b) Albert Road Methodist Councillor N.C. Thomas (Chair); Church, Penarth Councillors C.E.A. Champion, N.P. Hodges and Dr. I.J. Johnson.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – (1) T H A T the passed building regulation applications, as listed in Section A of the report, be noted. (2) T H A T the rejected building applications, as listed in Section B of the report, be noted. (3) T H A T the serving of Notices under Building (Approved Inspectors Etc.) Regulations 2000, as listed in Section C of the report, be noted.
RESOLVED – (1) T H A T the passed building regulation applications, as listed in Section A of the report, be noted. (2) T H A T the rejected building applications, as listed in Section B of the report, be noted. (3) T H A T the serving of Notices under Building (Approved Inspectors Etc.) Regulations 2000, as listed in Section C of the report, be noted.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – T H A T the applications as outlined within the report, on pages 7 through 16, under the above delegated powers be noted.
RESOLVED – T H A T the applications as outlined within the report, on pages 7 through 16, under the above delegated powers be noted.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – (1) T H A T it be noted that no Planning Appeals had been received at the time of the meeting taking place. (2) T H A T it be noted that no Enforcement Appeals had been received at the time of the meeting taking place. (3) T H A T the Planning Appeal Decisions, as detailed in Section C of the report, be noted. (4) T H A T it be noted that no Enforcement Appeal Decisions had been received at the time of the meeting taking place. (5) T H A T the statistics relating to appeals for the period April 2022 – March 2023, as detailed in Section E of the report, be noted. No.
RESOLVED – (1) T H A T it be noted that no Planning Appeals had been received at the time of the meeting taking place. (2) T H A T it be noted that no Enforcement Appeals had been received at the time of the meeting taking place. (3) T H A T the Planning Appeal Decisions, as detailed in Section C of the report, be noted. (4) T H A T it be noted that no Enforcement Appeal Decisions had been received at the time of the meeting taking place. (5) T H A T the statistics relating to appeals for the period April 2022 – March 2023, as detailed in Section E of the report, be noted. No.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – T H A T the applications as outlined within the report on pages 20 to 21, as determined by the Head of Regeneration and Planning under delegated powers, be noted.
(i) Delegated Powers – RESOLVED – T H A T the applications as outlined within the report on pages 20 to 21, as determined by the Head of Regeneration and Planning under delegated powers, be noted.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be taken. 2022/00918/FUL Received on 11 August 2022 (P22) APPLICANT: Glen Thomas Architechture 112 Kimberley Road, Penylan, Cardiff, CF23 5DN AGENT: Mr Richard Wood 112 Kimberley Road, Penylan, Cardiff, CF23 5DN 96, Lavernock Road, Penarth Loft conversion with rear dormer. Rear single storey, flat roof extension with first floor extension. General internal remodel. Modernisation of front porch. Alteration to front fenestration REFUSED 1. By reason of its scale, form, and proximity to the boundary with the neighbouring property, the proposed extension would result in an imposing and overbearing impact on the neighbour at number 94, Lavernock Road to such an extent that it would unacceptably impact upon the living conditions of the occupiers and the amount of light reaching that property. The proposal is therefore contrary to the advice set out in the Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance on Residential and Householder Development, Policy MD2 (Design of New Development) and Policy MD5 (Development within Settlement Boundaries) of the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026.Council's LDP. Reason for decision The decision to recommend refusal of planning permission has been taken in accordance with Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires that, in determining a planning application the determination must be in accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of No. Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National Plan 2040. It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. The appropriate marine policy documents have been considered in the determination of this application in accordance with Section 59 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009.
RESOLVED – T H A T in pursuance of the powers delegated to the Committee, the following applications be determined as indicated and any other necessary action be taken. 2022/00918/FUL Received on 11 August 2022 (P22) APPLICANT: Glen Thomas Architechture 112 Kimberley Road, Penylan, Cardiff, CF23 5DN AGENT: Mr Richard Wood 112 Kimberley Road, Penylan, Cardiff, CF23 5DN 96, Lavernock Road, Penarth Loft conversion with rear dormer. Rear single storey, flat roof extension with first floor extension. General internal remodel. Modernisation of front porch. Alteration to front fenestration REFUSED 1. By reason of its scale, form, and proximity to the boundary with the neighbouring property, the proposed extension would result in an imposing and overbearing impact on the neighbour at number 94, Lavernock Road to such an extent that it would unacceptably impact upon the living conditions of the occupiers and the amount of light reaching that property. The proposal is therefore contrary to the advice set out in the Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance on Residential and Householder Development, Policy MD2 (Design of New Development) and Policy MD5 (Development within Settlement Boundaries) of the Vale of Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026.Council's LDP. Reason for decision The decision to recommend refusal of planning permission has been taken in accordance with Section 38 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires that, in determining a planning application the determination must be in accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The Development Plan for the area comprises the Vale of No. Glamorgan Adopted Local Development Plan 2011-2026 and Future Wales – the National Plan 2040. It is considered that the decision complies with the Council’s well-being objectives and the sustainable development principle in accordance with the requirements of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015. The appropriate marine policy documents have been considered in the determination of this application in accordance with Section 59 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.