Climate change, net zero, flooding, energy, biodiversity, parks and green spaces.
What councils do
Every Welsh council has declared or responded to the climate emergency and has plans to cut its own emissions, from buildings, vehicles and the things it buys. Councils also manage flood risk on local rivers and streams.
Who decides
The Cabinet agrees climate plans; scrutiny committees check progress.
Having a say
Ask your councillors how the council is doing against its own targets, and respond to its consultations on plans.
Loading
By council, last 12 months
How many agenda items on this topic each council dealt with, and how many had a decision recorded.
RESOLVED To: approve the Investment decisions below:
(1) A commitment of £50m for the WPP Closed Ended Infrastructure sub-fund Series II
(2) An investment of £20-£30m in the WPP Real Estate UK Impact sub-fund funded from top-slicing the existing Property Investments
(3) The transfer of the existing BlackRock Low Carbon Tracker Fund into the new WPP bespoke BlackRock passive fund.
The decision on the private credit fund was delegated to the Section 151 Officer and Chairperson, with further information to be gathered and shared with committee members.
RESOLVED – That the Council be recommended to approve the recommendations of the Panel to appoint the following persons to current Local Authority Governing Body vacancies as follows:
School
Ward
Start of Vacancy
Applicant
Allensbank Primary School
Gabalfa
21/09/2024
Bryn Deri Primary School
Radyr & Morganstown
01/10/2024
Cardiff West Community High School
Caerau
31/12/2024
30/11/2024
Danescourt Primary School
Llandaff
13/03/2024
Katherine Shearer
Ely and Caerau Childrens Centre
Ely
24/10/2024
Ffederasiwn y Ddraig
(Ysgol Pen y Pil and Bro Eirwg)
Trowbridge/Llanrumney
20/04/2024
Adheesha Liyanagunawardana
Lakeside Primary School
Cyncoed
13/09/2023
Millbank Primary School
Caerau
26/11/2024
Pentyrch Primary School
Pentyrch & St Fagans
12/09/2023
23/10/2024
Pontprennau Primary School
Pontprennau & Old St Mellons
08/11/2024
Cllr Peter Littlechild
Radyr Primary School
Radyr & Morganstown
22/03/2024
Nigel Shears
Severn Primary School
Riverside
22/10/2024
St Mellons CW Primary School
Llanrumney
21/09/2024
St Teilo's C.W High School
Pentwyn
29/02/2023
Whitchurch High School
Whitchurch & Tongwynlais
01/03/2024
Ysgol Glan Ceubal
Llandaff North
23/10/2024
Ysgol Gyfun Gymraeg Glantaf
Llandaff North
18/09/2024
Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Hamadryad
Butetown
06/10/2023
Ysgol Pencae
Llandaff
12/09/2024
The Committee received and considered applications to future vacancies against criteria, matching skills to vacancies. RESOLVED – That the Council be recommended to approve the recommendations of the Panel to appoint the following:
School
Ward
Start of Vacancy
Re-appointment
New Applicant
Albany Primary School
Plasnewydd
01/05/2025
Birchgrove Primary School
Heath
01/02/2025
Bishop Childs C.W Primary School
Trowbridge
01/05/2025
Richard Leyshon
Bryn Celyn Primary School
Pentwyn
01/05/2025
Cardiff High School
Cyncoed
24/03/2025
01/05/2025
01/05/2025
Julia Phillips Lewis
Nonny Matthewson
Cardiff West Community High School
Caerau
19/03/2025
Joanne Larner
Cathays High School
Gabalfa
01/05/2025
Cllr Peter Wong
Coed Glas Primary School
Llanishen
01/05/2025
Cllr Garry Hunt
Corpus Christi R.C High School
Lisvane & Thornhill
01/05/2025
Fitzalan High School
Fairwater
24/04/2025
01/05/2025
Cerys Furlong
Ramesh Patel
Grangetown Primary School
Grangetown
01/05/2025
Hawthorn Primary School
Llandaff North
01/05/2025
01/05/2025
01/05/2025
Steven Chadwell
Paul Rock
Llanedeyrn Primary School
Pentwyn
01/05/2025
Alex Ingram
Llysfaen Primary School
Lisvane & Thornhill
01/05/2025
Susan Powell
Marlborough Primary School
Penylan
01/05/2025
Cllr Rodney Berman
Meadowbank School
Llandaff North
01/05/2025
Mike Borley
Meadowlane Primary School
Trowbridge
01/05/2025
Mount Stuart Primary School
Butetown
01/05/2025
Ivor Gittens
Ninian Park Primary School
Grangetown
01/05/2025
Radyr Comprehensive School
Radyr & Morganstown
01/05/2025
David Silver
Rhiwbeina Primary School
Rhiwbina
29/03/2025
Siva Sivapalan
Rhydypenau Primary School
Cyncoed
01/05/2025
Nonny Matthewson
Rumney Primary School
Rumney
01/05/2025
01/05/2025
Cllr Bob Derbyshire
Caroline Derbyshire
Springwood Primary School
Pentwyn
19/03/2025
Jessica Gow
St Teilo's C.W High School
Pentwyn
01/05/2025
Trelai Primary School
Caerau
24/03/2025
Whitchurch High School
Whitchurch & Tongwynlais
01/05/2025
Whitchurch Primary School
Whitchurch & Tongwynlais
01/05/2025
Ysgol Glan Morfa
Splott
01/05/2025
Cllr Huw Thomas
Ysgol Gyfun Gymraeg Bro Edern
Penylan
01/05/2025
01/05/2025
01/05/2025
Ysgol Gyfun Gymraeg Glantaf
Llandaff North
27/01/2025
01/05/2025
Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Hamadryad
Butetown
01/05/2025
Ysgol Gynradd Gymraeg Pen-y-Groes
Pentwyn
01/05/2025
Michael Landers
Ysgol Mynydd Bychan
Gabalfa
01/05/2025
Cllr Rhys Taylor
Ysgol Y Berllan Deg
Pentwyn
01/05/2025
Cllr Rodney Berman
RESOLVED: Pursuant to this Committee’s delegated powers the following development management applications be determined in accordance with the recommendation set out in the reports of the Director of Planning, Transport and Environment, subject to any further amendments as detailed below and notification be given of the decisions in accordance with Section 70 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 or Section 74 of the Planning (Listed Building & Conservation) Act 1990.
APPLICATIONS GRANTED
24/01641/DOC – WHITCHURCH AND TONGWYNLAIS
Land to the North West of Whitchurch Hospital Playing Fields, Whitchurch.
Re-discharge of Condition 20 (Drainage) of 17/01735/MJR subsequently varied under 20/02632/MJR.
The application was granted subject to the conditions outlined in the report.
23/02481/FUL – BUTETOWN
Parcel of Land located to the South of Hemingway Road, West of Future Inns Hotel and South of Miller & Carter Steak House.
Demolition of an existing building and construction of a car park with associated lighting, EV provision and landscaping.
(Cllr Gunter left the meeting during discussion of this item in accordance with her prejudicial interest).
The application was granted subject to the conditions outlined in the report.
24/02088/FUL – BUTETOWN
Land South of Future Inns Access Road, Butetown.
Multi-Storey Car Park including an ancillary office, and associated infrastructure including vehicular and pedestrian access, landscaping, drainage and a temporary construction compound.
(Cllr Gunter left her seat as a member of the Committee during this item in order to speak as a Ward Councillor, and did not vote in accordance with her prejudicial interest.)
The application was granted subject to the conditions outlined in the report.
23/01914/FUL – CATHAYS
Medallion House Crwys Road, Cathays.
Partial change of use of the ground floor from A1 retail to D1 community centre and A1 retail, demolition of the existing first and second floor and the construction of 64no. affordable flats on 4 new upper floors and 3no. 2-bed flats in existing car park and associated works.
(Cllr Humphreys left the meeting during discussion of this item in accordance with her personal and prejudicial interest).
The application was granted subject to the conditions outlined in the report.
APPLICATION DEFERRED
24/01620/OUT – OLD ST MELLONS
Land adjacent to Cefn Eurg, Druidstone Road.
Proposed construction of a detached dwelling with integral garage.
The application was deferred for a site visit to take place.
APPLICATION REFUSED
23/02600/FUL – LLANDAFF
Land at Radyr Court Close.
Erection of affordable houses together with access, landscaping, drainage, engineering and other associated works.
(Cllr Driscoll left his seat as a member of the Committee during this item in order to speak as a Ward Councillor, and did not vote in accordance with his prejudicial interest.)
The application was refused.
RESOLVED – That the following matters be dealt with as indicated:
(1)
Application 1
The Sub Committee was asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Hackney Carriage / Private Hire Driver’s License given that a complaint had been received stating that he attempted to charge a customer an extra amount for paying by debit card and was attempting to charge a fixed fee and not utilise the calibrated meter in the vehicle.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver explained that he had taken card payments long before it was mandatory to offer them, and often picked up passengers near the train station who did not have cash on them. On the night in question, at about 1am he saw the witness waiting for a taxi and asked him if he needed to pay by card, which he did. The passenger asked how much it would be to go to Penylan, which he said would cost about £10.
The driver added that he had accidentally pressed the £1 extra button on SumUp while waiting to leave the rank but did not intend to charge this. He was aware of the rules against charging more than was on the meter, even though he had to pay fees on card payments. The driver suggested that during the journey, the passenger was upset and rude. After arriving at the destination, they paid the £9.30 fare listed on the meter by card and then took pictures of the inside and outside of the car. The passenger was not charged anything extra, which the receipt showed.
The driver’s representative added that there had been no previous complaints against the driver, and he had been taking card payments for six years now without ever being accused of trying to charge more than what was on the meter.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver emphasised that he knew it was not legal to charge a transaction fee for card payments, and stressed that he had added the £1 fee by mistake at the start of the journey and then not tried to charge it at the end. He also emphasised that he had not asked for a fixed fee, but had just said that a trip to Penylan would likely be around that amount, and then put the meter on as requested.
The witness recalled that he had hailed a taxi at the bottom of St Mary’s Street on a Friday night, which was always busy. He found a taxi which was willing to take card, as he didn’t have cash and this was before a card reader became a requirement. He asked the driver if he could go to Penylan and the driver said ‘£10’. The witness said ‘we’ll see what the meter says’, because he was aware of the requirements for journeys within the city boundaries. The driver then said there would be a £1 fee, which he disputed.
The witness insisted that he had not been rude or angry. At the end of the journey, as he exited the vehicle he took a photo of the numberplate, because he didn’t think it was right that the driver had tried to charge him a fixed fare within the city boundaries.
Members asked what the fee was at the end of the journey. The witness responded that he paid £9.30 and suggested that the photo he took of the meter showed a £9.30 total with a £1 fee having been added to it. The driver clarified that the £1 fee had not been added to the fare, as he had to press an extra button to add this on before taking payment, but did not do this because he had pressed the £1 button accidentally.
The driver added that he had never been accused of overcharging before, and he always used the meter even when he went outside of the boundaries to places like Penarth.
The driver’s representative suggested that the situation may have stemmed from a misunderstanding when the driver advised that the likely cost to go to Penylan would be around £10, which the passenger interpreted as a fixed fare.
RESOLVED – that no further action be taken.
(2)
Application 2
The Sub Committee was asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Hackney Carriage / Private Hire Driver’s License given that he had 9 penalty points on his driving licence.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver explained the offences and acknowledged complacency on his part, particularly regarding two of his speeding offences which had occurred in the same week. At the time he was going through a personal crisis with his partner being ill in hospital, and he failed to notice a recent change in speed limit in an area from 40mph to 30mph.
Members asked why the driver had only declared 6 penalty points when renewing his licence when he actually had 9. The driver explained that the second offence in that week, in June 2023, was not actually penalised until the following February, which he still did not understand. He had paid the fine initially but then had it reimbursed in December 2023, so he assumed it had been a mistake and they had charged him twice for the same offence. In January 2024 he was summoned to court and told that he hadn’t paid the fine. He co-operated in every way he could and accepted his punishment for speeding, which ended up being a larger fine than the original one. At the time he renewed his application, he believed there were only 6 points on his licence.
Responding to questions from the Sub Committee, the driver explained that the two offences in the same week were committed on Manor Way. The driver added that he drove past there almost every day because he lived nearby. He was not making excuses but felt there were some mitigating circumstances on his mind when he failed to notice the change to a 30mph road, and he did not deny that he was speeding.
Members noted that with 9 points now on his licence, he would need to be very careful in order to keep driving at all. The driver agreed and stressed that he was very aware of this. Taxi driving was very important to him because it allowed him to work flexibly and care for his wife. He reiterated that the offences had been a temporary lapse of judgement which he had owned up to.
RESOLVED – that no further action be taken.
(3)
Application 3
The Sub Committee was asked to consider an application for a Hackney Carriage / Private Hire Driver’s License given that he had a conviction contrary to the guidance.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver stated that he had made a big mistake six years ago, while he was new in the country and had been drinking. He had sexually assaulted a woman who reported him to the police, and he had accepted a caution for this and apologised.
Members asked why he had not declared this on his application form. The driver explained that he didn’t know that he needed to at the time, having only been in the UK for a year and only having had limited English skills then. At the police station he had come under the impression that accepting the caution and apologising would be the end of the matter. He didn’t know it would show up on his application but he needed a job and didn’t want to be turned down. He felt very ashamed, both for what he did and for not declaring it.
RESOLVED – that the application for a Hackney Carriage / Private Hire Driver’s Licence be refused.
(4)
Application 4
The Sub Committee was asked to determine if a driver remained a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Hackney Carriage / Private Hire Driver’s License given that he had been issued with a caution by South Wales Police which he did not declare on his renewal application.
Addressing the Sub Committee, the driver explained that he had received a caution for battery in 2022 after an incident between him and his wife. He pushed her and she called the police, and he was arrested and released with a caution. When it came to renew his licence, he misunderstood the question and thought it only referred to convictions, not cautions.
Members asked why he had not declared the caution immediately in 2022, let alone failing to do so in 2024 upon renewal. The driver responded that he didn’t realise it was something he had to declare as he had been released straight away. He had understood it as a warning rather than something on his permanent record, and apologised for this.
Members suggested that having been a taxi driver since 2008, he would have renewed his licence several times before, and should have been aware of the need to inform the licensing authority as soon as possible if he committed any sort of offence. The driver apologised and reiterated that he was under the impression that a caution was more like a warning.
The driver added that in 16 years in the trade he had never had any incidents of this or any other nature. The offence was something in his private life which he and his wife had now resolved.
RESOLVED – that the Hackney Carriage / Private Hire Driver’s Licence be suspended for 28 days, and the driver receive a written warning.
(5)
This case was deferred to the next meeting.
Vale of Glamorgan, Governance and Audit Committee,