Loading
The Scrutiny Performance Panel for Climate Change and Nature, a group of councillors who review Council work, met on 16 September 2025 to hear an update on weed spraying and wildflower planting from Cabinet Member Andrew Stevens and officers. The minute records discussion only, with no decision. The Panel later wrote to Cabinet Members with its views in a letter dated 3 October 2025.
No disclosures of interest were received.
No declarations were made.
Panel agreed the Minutes of the meeting on 29 July 2025 as an accurate record of the meeting.
Letter to Cabinet Member following the meeting on 29 July 2025 was noted.
No questions were received.
Cabinet Members and relevant officers updated the Panel on the Council’s approach to weed spraying and wildflower planting. It focused on the use of glyphosate-based herbicides, their effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and environmental impact, confirming that current practices follow HSE guidance. The discussion also highlighted the Council’s commitment to enhancing biodiversity through wildflower planting, including both native and non-native species, and the role of the “cut and collect” programme in supporting nature recovery. Key concerns raised by Panel Members included: • The potential health risks of glyphosate to humans and animals, referencing recent international studies. • The environmental impact on pollinators, soil health, and biodiversity, particularly in areas treated prior to wildflower planting. • The desire to reduce glyphosate use and explore non-chemical alternatives, including manual methods and steam treatments. • The feasibility of excluding sensitive areas such as schools and parks from spraying. • The long-term sustainability of glyphosate use, including the risk of resistance in invasive species like Japanese knotweed. • The balance between native and non-native wildflower planting and its impact on biodiversity and public expectations. • The need for improved public communication about nature recovery initiatives and available community grants.
Panel considered the work plan and noted items for the next meeting.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.