Loading
There is no summary of this meeting yet. Summaries are written once the council publishes the minutes, which are its official record of what a meeting decided. They usually appear a few weeks after the meeting.
Apologies for absence were received from County Councillors Liz Rijnenberg, Josie Ewing, Benjamine Breeze, Little Brighouse, Emma Palmer (Chief Executive Officer) and Gavin Williams (Senior Manager – Care and Support).
There were no Declarations of Interest from Members relating to items to be considered on the agenda.
The Committee did not receive any disclosures of prohibited party whips which a Member had been given in relation to the meeting in accordance with Section 78(3) of the Local Government Measure 2011.
The approval of the draft minutes of the meeting held 1st December 2023 were postponed to the next meeting.
Children’s Services Documents Considered: • Draft Medium-Term Financial Strategy 2024-2029 • Draft 2024-25 Budget • Capital Programme for 2024-2029 • Children’s Services Budget/FRM presentation • Impact Assessment: • Reduction in allocated Short Breaks Budget Background: · The Head of Children’s Services provided a presentation explaining cost pressures held at risk, and cost reductions planned for the next financial year. The presentation slides would be made available to view as part of the agenda pack. Actions: · To add the following items to the Forward Work Programme: o Request for Health and Care Scrutiny Committee to review the Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children (UASC) allocation process. o To review the actual cost of the proposed modelled average cost savings relating to UASC placements. o Children’s Services to provide an update relating to the cost pressures around recruiting additional staff for residential homes caring for children with complex needs, once the forward planning work had been completed o Health and Care Scrutiny Committee to be provided with the number of newly-qualified social workers due to join the Service within the year, who studied through the Council’s Grow Our Own social worker programme. Observations: The Committee noted, observed, requested that: · Clarification was received in respect to the cost per child for UASC placements, over and above the funding provided by the Home Office and how the impact on Powys’ budget compared with other councils. · It was agreed that UASC placements would be a future item for scrutiny and would be added to the upcoming agenda. · Greater clarity was received around the Assured Savings figure of £955,850 and how further savings identified in Quarter 3 and Quarter 4 in 2023-2024 affected this and any other associated figures in the budget proposals. · Officers replied to a query around why Early Help was presented as a pressure and whether there was an associated cost reduction. It was explained due to the increased demand post-pandemic, the team would be restructured. · Clarity and further details were requested regarding the £200,000 pressure around the need to increase staffing in Residential settings. · Work was ongoing for projections for 2025-2026 in respect of savings available from budget areas such as; Placements, 16+ Accommodation, and the reduction in Agency staff etc., which would be made available to the Committee. · Officers provided clarification on the utilisation of the COVID workforce grant and explained the significant impacts if the grant were to reduce or cease. · Better quality information was requested around the short breaks impact assessment, and for clarity and evidence to be provided around the “creative approach”. The Committee were concerned that: · The budget did not reflect the additional pressures regarding the UASC placements for the near future (2024-2025 and in the four following years). · Significant impacts for the service had been identified regarding Placement cost reductions which would commence in April 2025, which may present a potential risk to the Council’s financial plan. Adults Services/Commissioning and Partnerships Documents Considered: • Draft Medium-Term Financial Strategy 2024-2029 • Draft 2024-25 Budget • Capital Programme for 2024-2029 • Adult Services Budget/FRM presentation • Impact Assessments: • Transform Direct Payments Model • Older Person Day Opportunity Review and Redesign • Development of Older Persons Locality Model Background: • The Head of Adult Services provided a presentation explaining cost pressures held at risk, and cost reductions planned for the next financial year. The presentation slides would be made available to view as part of the agenda pack. Actions: · The Service agreed that the Older Persons Day Opportunity Review and Redesign, and Locality Model, should be included on the Committee’s forward work programme for consideration. Observations: The Committee noted, observed, requested that: · Officers would provide a single document to demonstrate budget savings and pressures from 16-years and under, through to Post-16 into Adults Services for a 5-year period commencing April 2024. · Reassurance was received that the Council were paying the Real Living Wage to support workers in the care sector. · An answer was provided regarding the calculation of the cost reduction associated with day opportunities/day centres. However additional details of the calculations would be provided to the Committee. · Officers and the Portfolio Holder commented that a robust engagement exercise was underway to explore options for older persons day opportunities including online surveys and face-to- face meetings to determine what was important for now and future needs. · The Service was committed to working with different partners to determine and implement the most suitable model within the residential care sector, with considerations around complex seasonal changes and increased demands. The Committee highlighted the risk associated with the Powys provider market not being able to meet some clients’ needs. · An impact assessment was requested in relation to the cost reduction associated with reducing voids in learning disability respite. It was confirmed that capacity would not be affected. · A key focus was to expand the Shared Lives offer to provide continued support and stability which enabled independence and community inclusivity, with emphasis on less costly packages of care and out-of-county options being needed. Recommendations: · Monitor the risk associated with grant funded fixed-term posts. · Revisit impact assessments, to reflect and include updated previous years and provide an impact assessment for each cost reduction. County Councillor DOCVARIABLE "ChairPresentShortRoleList" \* MERGEFORMAT A Jenner (Chair)
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.