Loading
The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
RESOLVED That the petition be noted; and the Working Group be asked to ensure the petition is included as evidence in its consideration of the matters referred to it by the Council resolution in July 2025.
RESOLVED (a) That a politically balanced Rural Communities Working Group be established comprised of seven Members. (b) That Officer support, to include senior Officer and Democratic Services, to initiate and coordinate the groups work be agreed. [It was noted that the appointment of Unaffiliated Members to the Working Group would be deferred to later in the meeting when considering the allocation of seats.]
RESOLVED That the annual self-assessment report 2024-25 be approved for publication, subject to including the following statement to page 55 of the Agenda: Analysis of data suggests that an asymmetric week is generally not helpful in securing high levels of attendance.
RESOLVED (a) That the results of the consultation exercise be noted; and the level of future Second Homes Council Tax premium applicable from 1 April 2026 be set at 125% for 2026- 2027. (b) That there be no change to the Use of Second Home Council Tax Premium for 2026-27 (Option 1). [Councillors Bethan Price and Chris Williams then rejoined the meeting.]
RESOLVED (a) That the results of the consultation exercise be noted; and the level of Long-Term Empty Property premium applicable from 1 April 2026 remains at 300% for 2026- 2027 (Option 1). (b) That there be no change to the Use of Council Tax Premiums for 2026-27 (Option 1).
RESOLVED That this Council is opposed to Asymmetric weeks and advises schools that have adopted the practice to reconsider their position. [Councillor Shon Rees left the meeting at this juncture.]
RESOLVED (a) That the Labour Group relinquishes its seat on the Planning Committee be noted. (b) That the Allocation of Committee Seats and Outside Bodies to political groups under the requirements of Section 15 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 as set out in Appendix 1 be approved, with the additional seat on the Planning Committee being allocated to Unaffiliated Members. (c) That the following Unaffiliated Member appointments be approved: (i) Planning Committee– Councillor Jordan Ryan (ii) Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Authority – Councillor Aaron Carey (iii)Dyfed Powys Police and Crime Panel - Councillor David Simpson (iv)Policy and Pre-decision Overview and Scrutiny Committee – Councillor Jordan Ryan (v) Rural Communities Working Group – Councillors Pat Davies Steve Alderman and Phil Kidney. (d) That the following nominations as Reserve Members to the Council bodies to which political balance rules apply be approved: (i) Planning Delegation Panel - Councillors Aaron Carey and David Simpson; and Councillor Michael Stoddart be removed. (e) That the appointment of Members to Committees and other bodies, as set out in Appendix 3, be approved subject to the following amendments made at the meeting: (ii) Planning Committee – Councillor Alec Cormack replaces Councillor Alistair Cameron (iii) Schools and Learning Overview and Scrutiny Committee – Councillor Mel Phillips replaces Councillor Huw Murphy (iv) Planning Delegation Panel - Councillor Huw Murphy replaces Councillor Elwyn Morse. (f) That Councillor Simon Hancock remains in post until formal approval of Councillor David Simpson’s nomination has been granted by the Home Office. There were no nominations for the vacant seats on the Social Care Overview and Scrutiny Committee and the Swansea Bay City Region Joint Scrutiny Committee and these will be carried over to the next meeting.
RESOLVED That the updated Financial Procedure Rules be noted. [Councillors Di Clements, Danny Young and Marc Tierney left the meeting at this juncture.]
RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be approved and the letter be sent to the First Minister with the addition of the following words: ‘That Welsh Government consider the introduction of any emergency legislation required to rectify this situation.’ [Councillors Chris Williams and Viv Stoddart left the meeting at this juncture.]
RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be referred to Cabinet.
RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be referred to Cabinet.
In welcoming everyone to the meeting, the Presiding Member stated that he had agreed to allow consideration of a Notice of Motion submitted by Councillor Jacob Williams as he considered it essential and conducive to the dispatch of business to convey this Authority’s concern over Natural Resources Wales’ recent River Nitrates Guidance in relation to the serious effects it was having on development and advised that this would be debated under Agenda item 14. The Presiding Member then invited the Chair of Council/Deputy Presiding Member to make her announcements. Since the last meeting, the Chair of Council stated that she had represented the Council at numerous events across Pembrokeshire. These included the County Show, civic services for the Mayors of Milford Haven and St Davids, and the Council Bake Off, which she was delighted to judge. She had attended an art exhibition at Haverhub, the Pembrokeshire Scouts AGM, and the unveiling of a Waldo Williams plaque at the Archives building. Recent engagements also included the opening of the Portfield Fair and three events for the Freemans Gild of Haverfordwest: the Freemans Banquet at Wolfscastle, a ceremony at County Hall, and a procession to St Martin’s Church. She also stated that she had been honoured to meet Her Royal Highness, The Princess Royal during her visit to the Pembroke Dock Heritage Centre, which marked the return of a three-metre memorial stained glass window commemorating aircrews who served at RAF Pembroke Dock during the Second World War. Finally, she congratulated the Wales Women’s Street Football Team on their outstanding performance at the Homeless World Cup in Oslo, where they reached the quarter-finals and secured seventh place. The team, based in Pembrokeshire, trained at the Hive in Haverfordwest and included Council representation through Jo Price as Manager, Clare Mantripp as a player, and Councillor Anji Tinley as Well-Being Officer. Their success highlighted the transformative power of sport, and she commended everyone involved in enabling this achievement.
The following declarations of interest were made: (a) Agenda Item No. 8 - Asymmetric Week in Schools Councillor Alistair Cameron declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Greenhill and Tenby VC School; and a non-voting Governor at Stepaside CP School. Councillor Simon Hancock declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Neyland Community School. Councillor Maureen Bowen declared a personal interest by virtue of her partner being a teacher at Henry Tudor School. Councillor Tessa Hodgson declared a personal interest by virtue of two close family Members who work in education in Pembrokeshire. Councillor Michele Wiggins declared a personal interest by virtue of having children and a grandchild, a teacher employed at Ysgol Harri Tudur and a daughter at Pembrokeshire College. Councillor Viv Stoddart declared a personal interest by virtue of having family Members employed in education. Councillor Michael Stoddart declared a personal interest by virtue of having two family Members employed in Pembrokeshire schools. Councillor Michelle Bateman declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Casblaidd and Ysgol Bro Gwaun, appointed by the Authority; and a family member employed at Ysgol Bro Gwaun; and a family member attending Ysgol Bro Gwaun. Councillor Tony Wilcox declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of a school that takes part in the Asymmetric week. Councillor Jonathan Grimes declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Community Governor of Golden Grove School and Monkton Primary School, Pembroke. Councillor Michael John declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Haverfordwest High School and Hook CP School, appointed by the Authority; and an Associate Governor at Cleddau Reach School. Councillor Marc Tierney declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Narberth CP School, appointed by the Authority and a family member being employed at Ysgol Greenhill. Councillor Delme Harries declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of the federation of Ysgol Casmael and Ysgol Llanychllwydog, and Ysgol Ger y Llan. Councillor Alan Dennison declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Milford Haven School. Councillor Jon Harvey declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Pembroke Dock Community School, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Shon Rees declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Bro Preseli appointed by the Authority; and a family member teaches at Ysgol Caer Elen. Councillor Sam Skyrme-Blackhall declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Greenhill, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Phil Kidney declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Manorbier School. Councillor Steve Yelland declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Prendergast School, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Alec Cormack declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Saundersfoot and Greenhill Schools, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Aled Thomas declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Johnston CP School and Ysgol Caer Elen, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Neil Prior declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Croesgoch, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Rhys Jordan declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Hafan y Mor, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Bethan Price declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Penrhyn Dewi, appointed by the Authority; and family members attending the school. Councillor Claire George declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Coastlands School, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Chris Williams declared a personal interest by virtue of a family member being the Headteacher of Golden Grove School. Councillor Nick Neumann declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Broad Haven School, appointed by the Authority; and a Parent Governor of Roch School. Councillor Tim Evans declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Portfield School, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Anji Tinley declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Fenton School, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Vanessa Thomas declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Sageston CP School, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Alun Wills declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Prendergast School, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Iwan Ward declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Clydau School, appointed by the Authority; and a Parent Governor of Ysgol Bro Preseli. Councillor Pat Davies declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Glannau Gwaun, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Rhys Sinnett declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Milford Haven CP School, appointed by the Authority. Councillor John Davies declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor Ysgol Eglwyswrw and Ysgol Cilgerran, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Aaron Carey declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Golden Grove School and Ysgol Bro Penfro, appointed by the Authority. Councillor David Howlett declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of St Aidens School, Wiston, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Huw Murphy declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Bro Ingli, Newport and Ysgol Bro Preseli, Crymych, appointed by the Authority. Councillor David Simpson declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Tavernspite School, appointed by the Authority. Councillor Steve Alderman declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Ysgol Penrhyn, appointed by the Authority; and a family member that teaches. Councillor Paul Miller declared a personal interest by virtue of being a Governor of Neyland Community School, appointed by the Authority. (b) Agenda Item No. 9 – Review of Council Tax Premiums for Second Homes Councillor Alistair Cameron declared a personal and prejudicial interest by virtue of owning a holiday let in Saundersfoot, but stated that he had dispensation to speak but not vote. Councillor Chris Williams declared a personal and prejudicial interest. Councillor Michael Williams declared a personal interest by virtue of being a trustee of an organisation in receipt of funding from the Enhancing Pembrokeshire Fund. Councillor Bethan Price declared a personal and prejudicial interest by virtue of close family member owning a second home. Councillor Aaron Carey declared a personal interest by virtue of having a rental property that would potentially become a second home. (c) Agenda Item No. 10– Review of Council Tax Premiums for Empty Properties Councillor Tessa Hodgson declared a personal interest by virtue of having a family member who currently has an empty property. Councillor Viv Stoddart declared a personal and prejudicial interest by virtue of having an empty property. Councillor Michael Stoddart declared a personal interest by virtue of having a family member who currently has a property that potentially comes under the empty property scheme at some time in the future. Councillor Michelle Bateman declared a personal and prejudicial interest by virtue of having a family member who owns an empty property, but stated that she had dispensation to speak but not vote. (d) Agenda Item No. 14 – Notice of Motion – Letter to be sent to the First Minister Councillor Marc Tierney declared a personal interest by virtue of being employed by Eluned Morgan, First Minister in a regional Senedd Member capacity.
Council considered the Minutes of the Meeting held on 17 July 2025 and the Extraordinary Meeting held on 7 August 2025 for approval as a correct record. Councillor Simon Hancock Moved that the Minutes of the meeting held on 17 July 2025 be approved as a correct record; Seconded by Councillor David Simpson. Councillor Simon Hancock Moved that the Minutes of the Extraordinary Meeting held on 7 August 2025 be approved as a correct record; Seconded by Councillor Maureen Bowen. The votes, undertaken by way of a show of hands, were carried. RESOLVED That the Minutes of the Meeting held on 17 July 2025 and the Extraordinary Meeting held on 7 August 2025 be approved as a correct record.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the petition be noted; and the Working Group be asked to ensure the petition is included as evidence in its consideration of the matters referred to it by the Council resolution in July 2025.
The Presiding Member welcomed Sian Vaughn to the meeting to speak on the petition calling upon Pembrokeshire County Council to a) reaffirm their Declaration of a Climate Emergency, and b) retain their ambition to deliver Net Zero Council operations by 2030 via their "Action Plan towards Becoming a Net Zero-carbon Local Authority." This would align the Council with Welsh Government policy, and the Well-being of Future Generations Act. Ms Sian Vaughn began her presentation by reminding Members of its declaration of a climate emergency in 2019 and its commitment to decarbonising its operations by 2030, in line with Welsh Government expectations. She stressed the urgency of action, citing worsening climate risks such as extreme storms, unpredictable rainfall, threats to food security, and infrastructure damage, and warned of tipping points like a potential Gulf Stream collapse. She emphasised that every authority, regardless of size, has a moral responsibility to act and noted that global players like China are investing heavily in renewable energy. Ms Vaughn acknowledged that decarbonisation involved upfront costs but argued that it delivered long-term savings through energy efficiency, reduced reliance on volatile fossil fuel markets, and protection against future price spikes. She highlighted opportunities for Pembrokeshire, including attracting inward investment, creating green jobs, and developing local supply chains and skills, positioning the county as a leader in renewables. She also called for better public communication to spark ideas and local initiatives. Whilst recognising financial pressures, Ms Vaughn warned that delaying action would lead to higher costs and missed opportunities. She urged the Council to think long-term, as required by the Well-being of Future Generations Act. Finally, she appealed to the Council to reaffirm its climate emergency declaration, maintain its ambition for 2030 net zero, and ensure any review focuses on how to achieve decarbonisation rather than questioning whether to pursue it. Following Ms Vaughn’s address, the Presiding Member invited the Cabinet Member for Place, the Region, Climate Change and Rural Affairs, to provide a response. Councillor Miller expressed his appreciation to the petitioners for their engagement in the democratic process. He noted that the petition appeared to be a response to the Notice of Motion passed by Council on 17 July 2025, which called for the establishment of a working group to enhance transparency and democratic accountability in the Council’s net zero deliberations, with particular emphasis on cost-benefit analysis. He confirmed his personal support for reaffirming both the Council’s declaration of a climate emergency and its ambition to achieve net zero operations by 2030, acknowledging that these remain current Council policy. However, he recognised that the working group may propose revisions to these policies, which aligns with its intended purpose. Councillor Miller emphasised that the petition should be considered as evidence by the working group, reflecting significant public support for retaining the climate emergency declaration and the 2030 net zero target. He commended the petitioners for articulating their case effectively. Councillor Miller also raised concerns regarding the high cost of energy in the UK and the economic impact of well-intentioned regulation, referencing the forthcoming discussion on nitrate vulnerable zones as a relevant example. Nonetheless, he reaffirmed his belief in the necessity of reducing human impact on the planet and advocated for the Council’s continued measured and balanced approach. Councillor Miller then Moved that the petition be noted; and the working group be asked to ensure the petition is included as evidence in its consideration of the matters referred to it by the Council resolution in July 2025; Seconded by Councillor Jon Harvey. The Presiding Member opened the matter for debate, where the following points were raised: Councillor Michael Stoddart raised a constitutional concern, noting that petitions are normally not allowed on matters formally considered within the last six months, and pointed out that the Council had already decided in July to set up a working group to examine the cost-benefit analysis of the climate emergency resolution. Despite this, he said he did not want the petition dismissed on a technicality and was happy to debate the issue after the working group reports back with cost details. Councillor Stoddart stressed that the financial implications were crucial because the Council has other priorities such as education, children’s services, and road maintenance. He clarified that he was not opposed to decarbonisation ideologically but questioned whether it was the best use of scarce public funds. He concluded by stating his support for Councillor Miller’s approach, provided Members keep costs in mind. In response to the Constitutional query, the Head of Law and Governance stated that she and the Head of Democratic Services had considered that point but considered that a decision to establish a Working Group was the substantive decision made in July and that the petition would feed into that decision-making process. Councillor John Cole supported referring the petition to the working group but questioned the accuracy of some claims, noting China’s continued expansion of coal power despite green investments. He argued climate change was a global issue and Pembrokeshire’s impact is small. Councillor Jordan Ryan spoke in support of reaffirming the commitment to tacking climate change. Councillor Alec Cormack stated that he was not a councillor when the climate emergency was first declared but fully supports the commitment. He noted that the situation had worsened since the declaration and stated he would support the current policy position. Councillor Alistair Cameron supported referring the petition to the Working Group for consideration. He acknowledged the need to examine financial implications but stressed that the Council has mechanisms in place to do this. He highlighted the Council’s responsibility to future generations and noted that Pembrokeshire could benefit significantly from green energy opportunities such as floating offshore wind and green hydrogen. Councillor Aled Thomas referred to the real issue being affordability. He warned that achieving net zero and going fully green will not come for free. He argued for a measured, proportionate response focused on financial sustainability and stressed the need for a long-term funding plan. Councillor Michael John stated that aiming for net zero was the right ambition, but the working group must determine whether it was affordable and how funding could be raised. He added that changes to the policy might be necessary depending on the findings and expressed support for the proposed approach. Councillor Jacob Williams stated that he voted against declaring the climate emergency in the previous Council term. He expressed his support for the proposal but stressed that Councillors’ interest in the cost of net zero was not new, recalling a previous resolution for regular cost-benefit analysis that was never fulfilled. He concluded that reaffirming commitments should happen after the review process, not through this petition. Councillor Marc Tierney, as Cabinet Member for Well-being of Future Generations and Chair of the Public Services Board, reminded Members that the Council was bound by the Well-being of Future Generations Act, which marked its 10th anniversary this year. He outlined ongoing work with partners, including developing a climate adaptation toolkit for Pembrokeshire, biodiversity initiatives, and the upcoming launch of the Local Area Energy Plan. Councillor Tierney addressed concerns about job losses in a green transition, stating that roles in fossil fuel industries are transferable to renewable energy sectors. He stressed Pembrokeshire’s strategic position for offshore renewables and warned against falling behind other regions like Ireland, which was investing heavily in green energy. In summing up, Ms Vaughn clarified that scientific consensus on climate change was overwhelming and that the current rate of change was unprecedented and damaging. She acknowledged China’s coal use but noted its emissions appear to have peaked and that the country is investing heavily in solutions. Responding to concerns about green measures, she referred to personal experience of significant savings from solar panels, insulation, and heat pumps, arguing these benefits could extend to social housing. Finally, she stressed the need for a managed transition to protect jobs and supported cost monitoring but warned it should not become a barrier to action. The Motion was then put to the vote, undertaken by way of a show of hands, and was carried. RESOLVED That the petition be noted; and the Working Group be asked to ensure the petition is included as evidence in its consideration of the matters referred to it by the Council resolution in July 2025.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED (a) That a politically balanced Rural Communities Working Group be established comprised of seven Members. (b) That Officer support, to include senior Officer and Democratic Services, to initiate and coordinate the groups work be agreed. [It was noted that the appointment of Unaffiliated Members to the Working Group would be deferred to later in the meeting when considering the allocation of seats.]
Council considered a report by the Assistant Chief Executive regarding the Notice of Motion in relation to the establishment of a Working Group for supporting Rural Areas and the recommendation of the Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee thereon. As originator of the Notice of Motion, Councillor Delme Harries was invited to speak to his Notice of Motion. Councillor Harries stated that there was a need to prioritise rural communities, stressing they are central to Pembrokeshire’s identity, economy, and culture, yet often overlooked. He called for the establishment of a cross-chamber Working Group to focus on regeneration, including connectivity, housing, access to services, mental health, and opportunities for young people. Councillor Harries emphasised fairness and dignity, noting that promises have been made but not delivered, and urged the Council to support his motion to create this Working Group. Seconded by Councillor Phil Kidney. As the relevant Cabinet Member for Rural Affairs, Councillor Paul Miller stated his support for exploring ways to further assist rural areas and pointed out that he has long been interested in helping young people stay or return to Pembrokeshire in secure jobs. He highlighted achievements such as leading on rural fibre broadband rollout and town centre investments that benefit surrounding communities. However, he disagreed with parts of Councillor Harries’ statement, cautioning against claims that rural areas are forgotten and stressing the need for facts. Councillor Miller opposed framing the issue as “community versus community” and emphasised that services must be high-quality and well-placed for all. He concluded that he was happy to discuss rural support but wanted balanced, evidence-based decisions. Council debated the Notice of Motion and the following key points were made: Councillors Jordan Ryan and Phil Kidney expressed their support for the Motion. Councillor Mike Stoddart stated that it should be a given that the Council treats all communities fairly and suggested the Motion was unnecessary. He echoed some of Councillor Miller’s points, noting that development in towns benefits the entire county, including rural areas, and argued that comparing investment in towns like Haverfordwest with smaller villages was not a fair comparison. Councillor Michael John expressed his support for the Motion and recalled previous efforts to improve towns and suggested similar attention for larger villages. He noted cuts to services and highlighted concerns about rural transport and infrastructure, such as cycle paths, which lack investment compared to urban areas. He stressed that regional plans should not overlook rural communities and called for joined-up action across councils and other organisations. Councillor Jamie Adams acknowledged the role of urban-based services but stressed that accessibility was a major issue for rural residents, particularly without effective transport links. He highlighted challenges in rural housing that hinder families and young people from staying in these areas. Councillor Adams supported the proposed Working Group as the right forum to address these issues but cautioned about the growing burden of multiple working groups on Committee Services. He suggested reviewing and consolidating existing groups to ensure efficiency. The Chief Executive clarified that if the Council agrees to establish the Working Group, it would be subordinate to full Council rather than an Overview and Scrutiny Committee. He noted that, subject to the Cabinet Member’s view, the group would likely be led by the Director of Place and the Assistant Chief Executive, as most of the work falls under that directorate. Councillor John Cole supported the motion, noting that rural communities have lost services such as shops, post offices, and banking, which forces more travel and undermines environmental goals. He highlighted the reduction of rural rate relief and said these issues need attention, arguing that backing the motion would help address them. Councillor Iwan Ward agreed with the proposal, stating many services have been lost to rural communities while investment focuses on towns like Haverfordwest. He stressed that rural residents often miss out and face long travel, which also impacts the environment. Councillor Marc Tierney stated he broadly supported the proposal but cautioned against a top-down approach. He stressed the importance of listening directly to communities and noted that the Council was already doing this through the Better Working Together group, which engages with community councils. He asked that this existing work be considered as the proposal moves forward. Councillor Neil Prior spoke in support of those comments and to consider how the Authority can help communities to do more for themselves. Councillor Shon Rees agreed with the need to support rural areas and highlighted tourism as a key reason to invest in them. He criticised poor road conditions in rural areas and stressed that infrastructure improvements were essential. Councillor Alan Dennison sought clarification on the composition of the Working Group. The Presiding Member advised that politically balanced Working Groups tended to be comprised of seven Members. Councillor Dennison Moved a Motion to the effect that the Working Group be comprised of six Members, one from each group and an Unaffiliated Member; Seconded by Councillor Phil Kidney. Council debated the composition of the Working Group and the application of the political balance rules. Councillor Aled Thomas then Moved an Amendment to the effect that the politically balanced Working Group be comprised of seven Members; Seconded by Councillor Jacob Williams. Members proceeded to vote on the Amendment which when put to an electronic vote, the proposal was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Maureen Bowen, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, Di Clements, John Cole, John Davies, Pat Davies, Claire George, Jonathan Grimes, Nicola Gwynn, Simon Hancock, Jon Harvey, Tessa Hodgson, David Howlett, Rhys Jordan, Phil Kidney, Nick Neumann, Neil Prior, Shon Rees, Jordan Ryan, Rhys Sinnett, Sam Skyrme-Blackhall, Mike Stoddart, Viv Stoddart, Aled Thomas, Marc Tierney, Michele Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Michael Williams, Chris Williams, Jacob Williams, Simon Wright, Steve Yelland and Danny Young [38] Against the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Alec Cormack, Terry Davies, Tim Evans, Brian Hall, Delme Harries, Mike John, Elwyn Morse, Huw Murphy, Mel Phillips, Vanessa Thomas, Anji Tinley, Thomas Tudor, Iwan Ward and Alun Wills [15] Abstentions: Councillor Alan Dennison [1] The Substantive Motion was then put to the vote, undertaken by way of an electronic vote, and was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Steve Alderman, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Maureen Bowen, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, Di Clements, John Cole, Alec Cormack, John Davies, Pat Davies, Terry Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Jonathan Grimes, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Simon Hancock, Delme Harries, Jon Harvey, Tessa Hodgson, Mike John, Rhys Jordan, Phil Kidney, Paul Miller, Elwyn Morse, Huw Murphy, Nick Neumann, Mel Phillips, Bethan Price, Neil Prior, Shon Rees, Jordan Ryan, David Simpson, Rhys Sinnett, Sam Skyrme-Blackhall, Viv Stoddart, Aled Thomas, Vanessa Thomas, Marc Tierney, Anji Tinley, Thomas Tudor, Iwan Ward, Michele Wiggins, Michael Williams, Chris Williams, Jacob Williams, Alun Wills, Simon Wright and Danny Young [52] Against the Motion: Councillor Mike Stoddart [1] There were no abstentions RESOLVED (a) That a politically balanced Rural Communities Working Group be established comprised of seven Members. (b) That Officer support, to include senior Officer and Democratic Services, to initiate and coordinate the groups work be agreed. [It was noted that the appointment of Unaffiliated Members to the Working Group would be deferred to later in the meeting when considering the allocation of seats.]
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the annual self-assessment report 2024-25 be approved for publication, subject to including the following statement to page 55 of the Agenda: Analysis of data suggests that an asymmetric week is generally not helpful in securing high levels of attendance.
Council considered a report by the Director of Resources seeking approval of the Council’s annual self-assessment report. The Leader introduced the report explaining that the Council has a statutory duty under the Local Government and Elections (Wales) Act to produce an annual self-assessment report for each financial year. He stated that the report was a key corporate document requiring full Council approval, evaluating how well the Council met its performance requirements and outlined actions taken or planned to improve performance. The report was structured around headline corporate and organisational themes with supporting sub-themes, ensuring a comprehensive assessment. The Leader stated that the report had undergone extensive consultation with stakeholders and was endorsed by Cabinet earlier in the week. Overall, he stated that the findings were broadly positive despite financial challenges, highlighting strong performance in areas such as waste and recycling, education planning, and improvements in social care and housing. The Leader then Moved the approval of the report; Seconded by Councillor Alistair Cameron. Council then considered the report and the following key points were noted: Councillor Cormack noted that the 2024–25 self-assessment report did not mention the asymmetric school week, whereas the 2023–24 report stated that analysis suggested it was generally not helpful for improving attendance. He asked the Director for Education whether this view still stood and, if so, whether its omission was accidental, indicating that he might propose an amendment to include the statement if appropriate. In response, the Director confirmed that attendance challenges continued to include the asymmetric week, with detailed information provided in Appendix C of the asymmetric week report, and stated that his commentary remained similar to that of the previous year. Councillor Cormack proposed an amendment to page 55, suggesting that the last bullet point on attendance should re-add the same sentence from last year’s report: “Analysis of data suggests that an asymmetric week is generally not helpful in securing high levels of attendance.” The Leader advised that he was agreeable to the addition. Councillor Mark Carter queried whether the new trade waste service (page 72) was statutory and, if not, whether it would achieve full cost recovery. The Cabinet Member confirmed it was not statutory but had inherited contracts during the transition, noted businesses could choose alternative providers, and stated that while detailed figures were not available, more customers had been secured this year and inquiries would be made to confirm when the service was expected to break even. The Director of Place and Assistant Chief Executive further clarified that while the trade waste service itself was not statutory, there was a statutory requirement to ensure businesses had a trade waste collection. He noted that private providers often do not operate in rural areas like Pembrokeshire due to high costs, which necessitated the Council providing the service and investing in equipment. He confirmed that further information on cost recovery would be obtained. Councillor John Davies, referring to page 34, questioned whether focusing resources on core services such as highways and waste conflicted with the Council’s environmental principles and climate emergency commitments. He highlighted concerns about the rural verge mowing programme starting on 1 July, leaving areas overgrown and unsightly, and raised issues about increased missed residual waste collections, suggesting these undermine efforts to enhance community environments. In response, the Cabinet Member explained that budget cuts agreed in March had reduced highways maintenance and verge cutting capacity, with safety-related work still prioritised but preventative programmes now more challenging. On missed waste collections, he cited staffing and fleet issues, confirmed plans for fleet replacement and recruitment (including a casual staff list), and apologised for service lapses while noting that crews handle over 5 million items annually and missed collections represent only 0.1%. Councillor Jordan Ryan sought clarification on why the burial service makes a loss while the cremation service makes a profit. The Cabinet Member responded that a detailed paper on cremation services, costs, and funding allocation would be presented to the Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee in November. He explained that cremation was a shared service with Carmarthenshire, while cemeteries were maintained by the Council but face issues such as expansion land and maintenance needs. He noted that cremation was increasingly preferred over burial, which contributes to the financial difference. The Director of Place and Assistant Chief Executive added that crematorium income remains steady while cemetery income has declined, with some cemeteries seeing only two or three burials a year. After deducting costs such as grave digging, little revenue remains for maintenance, which was the key reason burial services make a loss compared to cremation services. Councillor Huw Murphy referred to the Cabinet Member’s comments on street maintenance and bridges, challenging the claim about budget constraints. He stated that £120,000 had been saved from the street cleaning budget in the alternative budget, which did not include cuts to street or bridge maintenance as originally proposed, and argued this contradicted the explanation given. In response, the Cabinet Member explained that two budget savings were proposed: 10% and 5% reductions in high-risk maintenance. The 10% cut was rejected under the joint agreement between the Independent Group and the administration, but the 5% reduction was implemented, affecting highways maintenance and drains. The vote for the Recommendation, as amended, undertaken by way of an electronic vote, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Michelle Bateman, Maureen Bowen, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, Di Clements, John Cole, Alec Cormack, John Davies, Pat Davies, Terry Davies, Tim Evans, Claire George, Jonathan Grimes, Nicola Gwynn, Simon Hancock, Delme Harries, Jon Harvey, Tessa Hodgson, David Howlett, Mike John, Rhys Jordan, Phil Kidney, Paul Miller, Elwyn Morse, Nick Neumann, Mel Phillips, Bethan Price, Neil Prior, Shon Rees, Jordan Ryan, David Simpson, Sam Skyrme-Blackhall, Mike Stoddart, Aled Thomas, Vanessa Thomas, Marc Tierney, Anji Tinley, Thomas Tudor, Iwan Ward, Michele Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Michael Williams, Chris Williams, Jacob Williams, Alun Wills, Simon Wright, Steve Yelland and Danny Young [50] Abstentions: Councillors Jamie Adams, Alan Dennison and Huw Murphy [3] There were no votes against. RESOLVED That the annual self-assessment report 2024-25 be approved for publication, subject to including the following statement to page 55 of the Agenda: Analysis of data suggests that an asymmetric week is generally not helpful in securing high levels of attendance.
The meeting was adjourned for a short break between 12:03pm and 12:21pm.
The Presiding Member announced that Mr Roy Folland, an esteemed former Member of the Council, had sadly passed away. The Chamber stood for a moment’s silence in his memory. He then announced a change to the order of business to take Agenda items 9 and 10 next.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED (a) That the results of the consultation exercise be noted; and the level of future Second Homes Council Tax premium applicable from 1 April 2026 be set at 125% for 2026- 2027. (b) That there be no change to the Use of Second Home Council Tax Premium for 2026-27 (Option 1). [Councillors Bethan Price and Chris Williams then rejoined the meeting.]
[Having previously declared a personal and prejudicial interest in this item, Councillors Chris Williams and Bethan Price withdrew from the meeting. Councillor Alistair Cameron reiterated his personal and prejudicial interest in this item by virtue of owning a holiday let in Saundersfoot and advised that he had a dispensation to speak but not to vote on the matter.] Council considered a report of Cabinet in relation to the findings of the public consultation on Council Tax premiums and calling for Council to make a decision on the level of the second homes Council Tax premium and the use of the income from the premium. Councillor Alistair Cameron, the relevant Cabinet Member presented the report and highlighted the consultation results on second home and long-term empty property premiums, noting of the 2,375 responses: 44% opposed any premium, 25% supported 50%, 18% supported 100%, 3% supported 150% (current level), and 11% wanted more than 150%. He outlined Welsh Government’s proposed changes to self-catering property classification, the statutory purpose of premiums, and their impact on housing availability, with non-occupied homes falling from 14.6% to 13.8% since 2023. He highlighted £11 million raised for housing schemes, 232 new affordable homes delivered in 2024–25, and funding allocations for homelessness, schools, youth services and the public realm. He also addressed community and Welsh language impacts and explained why a proposed discretionary relief for properties let 140–182 days was considered unworkable due to administrative complexity, potential legal issues and significant income loss. The Leader then Moved the recommendation of Cabinet to the effect that the second homes premium remains at 150%, with no changes to the use of second home tax premiums for 2026–27; Seconded by Councillor Paul Miller. Council then considered the report and recommendations of Cabinet and the following key points were noted: Councillor Mark Carter argued that the second homes premium, introduced in 2016 to support community projects and housing, now allocates only 8% of funds to its original purpose and has not funded a single house build. He expressed concern for small letting businesses struggling to meet the 182-day threshold and criticized the Authority’s reliance on premium income, warning of Council Tax rises if reduced. He noted tourism’s importance to Pembrokeshire and proposed reducing the second homes premium to 100% for 2026–27 to support fairness and small-scale accommodation providers. Councillor Carter then Moved an Amendment to the effect that the Second Home Council Tax premium be set at 100%; Seconded by Councillor Di Clements. At this juncture, Councillor Phil Kidney gave notice of a further Amendment to the effect that the Second Home Council Tax premium be set at 125% if Councillor Carter’s Amendment failed. Councillor Aled Thomas asked the Cabinet Member for Finance to clarify the definition of “affordable homes,” querying whether it referred specifically to Council houses. The Cabinet Member explained that affordable homes include a mix of council houses and housing association properties. The Cabinet Member for Housing added that separate figures exist for housing delivered directly by the local authority, but properties delivered by Registered Social Landlord partners cannot be excluded as they are funded through social housing grants administered by the Council. She stressed these schemes are part of the overall housing strategy and allocation process. Responding to Councillor Carter’s earlier point, she clarified that while no council houses were built directly from second home premium funds due to HRA ring-fencing, the money remains in the Affordable Housing account and was being used for schemes now nearing completion, such as phase two in St David’s. Councillor Miller stated that he disagreed with Councillor Carter’s view of the policy and explained that the policy had aimed primarily to discourage second home ownership and encourage year-round occupation by applying a premium to properties that did not qualify as businesses. He noted that if homes had been let for less than half the year, they had not been considered viable businesses and had reverted to council tax. While acknowledging that reducing the premium would have shifted the tax burden to permanent residents, he stressed that the main objective had been to address the shortage of homes for permanent occupation, which had been a major barrier to economic growth. He concluded that second homeowners had faced a choice: pay the premium or sell the property so it could become a permanent dwelling. Councillor Huw Murphy asked if a cottage in the Haverfordwest Castle renovation would be let as a holiday property and noted that project documents suggested it could meet the 180-day letting target. In response, Councillor Paul Miller said he was unaware of this and confirmed he would check and report back. Councillor Alec Cormack noted that throughout the current Council term, the Chief Financial Officer had repeatedly highlighted the importance of distinguishing between one-off savings and recurring base budget savings when assessing sustainability. He warned that changing council tax premiums annually risked the revenue being treated as one-off rather than supporting medium-term sustainability. He cautioned that reducing the premium from 150% to 100% would result in a loss of approximately £2.8 million (around 3% of the total budget), which would need to be found elsewhere during an already challenging financial period. The Director of Resources clarified that a reduction to 100% premium would increase the projected funding gap by approximately £2.5–£2.6 million, plus a further £0.2–£0.3 million loss from second home premium income linked to annual Council Tax rises, making a total of around £2.8 million. He stressed that this shortfall would need to be met through other sources such as Council Tax increases or additional savings, noting the already challenging position with recurring budget savings year after year. Councillor Phil Kidney supported reducing the premium, stating that the 182-day rule had caused financial hardship for local people. He said the policy had not worked as intended and emphasised that members should vote based on what they believe was right. Councillor Rhys Jordan opposed the premium, stating it had not achieved its intended purpose and had failed to bring properties back into use. He argued that combined measures had been overly punitive, damaging the tourism industry and causing severe financial hardship for local residents. He confirmed support for reducing the premium to 100%, describing it as the best option in a difficult situation. Councillor Neil Prior highlighted concerns about the 182-day rule, noting its significant impact on genuine businesses and residents. He supported the principle of a premium for second homes but stressed the need to balance this with tourism growth. He questioned why discretionary policies could not be applied locally and suggested exploring automation to reduce administrative burden. He called for a review of reducing the threshold to 140 days and emphasised the importance of acting impartially and fairly. The Cabinet Member responded that the 182-day threshold was set by Welsh Government and would be extremely difficult for the Council to change. The Leader stated there was insufficient data to assess the impact of second-home ownership but warned that reducing the premium to 100% would create a £2.3 million shortfall, requiring either additional cuts or a Council Tax increase. He stressed that the revenue was already part of the general fund and used to support services. He expressed concern about the effect of second-home ownership on rural areas and argued that changing the premium annually was poor financial planning. He confirmed he would not support the amendment and favoured retaining the 150% premium. Councillor Mike Stoddart argued that the impact on tourism and the housing market should not be ignored. He opposed using the premium to avoid raising Council Tax for residents, calling it politically motivated and unfair to second homeowners who pay more but use fewer services. He suggested improving Council efficiency instead of imposing premiums and confirmed he would support reducing the premium to 100%, or the next amendment if that failed. Councillor Michelle Bateman acknowledged the complexity of the issue and said she did not wish to demonise second homeowners but stressed the need to consider high housing demand across the county. She argued that frequent changes to the premium created uncertainty and that stability was needed for long-term impact. She highlighted that revenue from the premium had funded initiatives such as Home by Pembrokeshire, which had already helped several residents become homeowners. While agreeing to lobby Welsh Government on reducing the 182-day threshold, she emphasised that this was not a Council decision. She concluded that, from a housing perspective, the premium should remain unchanged. Councillor Mark Carter highlighted concerns that the second-home premium was not targeted and disproportionately affected locals who relied on modest holiday-let income, particularly due to the 182-day rule. He questioned what additional income could be expected from properties moving from business rates to Council Tax. The Director of Resources responded that a definitive figure could not be given, as many properties were delaying payment while awaiting valuation decisions, which could take 6–12 months. Some payments had been reflected in the previous year’s outturn report, and monitoring was ongoing. Councillor Sam Skyrme-Blackhall stated that housing demand in Tenby was severe and local families were struggling to find accommodation. She stated she could not justify asking these residents to tolerate the current situation while second homeowners purchased properties in streets locals wished to live in. She supported keeping the premium at its current level until the next election to assess its long-term impact. Councillor Thomas Tudor spoke in support of keeping the current policy, strongly urging other Members to do the same. Councillor Aled Thomas reflected that the premium had originally been introduced to fund affordable housing but noted that no homes had been built as a result. He argued the policy had damaged tourism and said the Council should reduce reliance on this revenue, pointing out last year’s underspend could offset the impact. He confirmed support for reducing the premium to 100%. A point of order was raised by Councillor Michael Stoddart regarding the voting procedure, with clarification sought on the right of reply to the Amendment from Councillor Carter to reduce the premium to 100%. The Presiding Member confirmed that under Rule 4.21.9(b), if an Amendment was moved, the mover of the original motion had the right of reply at the close of the debate on the Amendment. The Amendment to reduce the premium to 100% was put to the vote, undertaken by way of an electronic vote, and was lost. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, Di Clements, John Davies, Tim Evans, Claire George, Jonathan Grimes, Brian Hall, Simon Hancock, Delme Harries, David Howlett, Rhys Jordan, Phil Kidney, Elwyn Morse, Nick Neumann, Neil Prior, Mike Stoddart, Viv Stoddart, Aled Thomas, Anji Tinley and Danny Young [21] Against the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Pat Davies, Terry Davies, Alan Dennison, Nicola Gwynn, Jon Harvey, Tessa Hodgson, Mike John, Paul Miller, Mel Phillips, Shon Rees, Jordan Ryan, David Simpson, Rhys Sinnett, Sam Skyrme-Blackhall, Vanessa Thomas, Marc Tierney, Thomas Tudor, Iwan Ward, Michele Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Michael Williams, Jacob Williams, Alun Wills and Simon Wright [29] Abstentions: Councillors Maureen Bowen and Huw Murphy [2] A further Amendment was Moved by Councillor Phil Kidney to the effect that the level be 125%; Seconded by Councillor Huw Murphy. On a point of clarification, the Director of Resources advised that if approved, the consequence would be an additional pressure of £1.4m on the Budget. The further Amendment was then put to the vote, undertaken by way of an electronic vote, and was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Mark Carter, Di Clements, John Cole, John Davies, Terry Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Claire George, Jonathan Grimes, Brian Hall, Delme Harries, David Howlett, Rhys Jordan, Phil Kidney, Elwyn Morse, Huw Murphy, Nick Neumann, Neil Prior, Shon Rees, Mike Stoddart, Aled Thomas, Anji Tinley, Iwan Ward, Alun Wills, Simon Wright and Danny Young [26] * Against the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Maureen Bowen, Aaron Carey, Alec Cormack, Pat Davies, Nicola Gwynn, Simon Hancock, Jon Harvey, Tessa Hodgson, Mike John, Paul Miller, Mel Phillips, Jordan Ryan, David Simpson, Rhys Sinnett, Sam Skyrme-Blackhall, Vanessa Thomas, Marc Tierney, Thomas Tudor, Michele Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Michael Williams and Jacob Williams [25] There were no abstentions [*Councillor Viv Stoddart also voted in favour of this Amendment bringing the vote to 27 but due to a technical error the vote was not displayed.] The Substantive Motion was then put to the vote, undertaken by way of an electronic vote, and was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Mark Carter, Di Clements, John Cole, John Davies, Terry Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Claire George, Jonathan Grimes, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Delme Harries, Tessa Hodgson, David Howlett, Rhys Jordan, Phil Kidney, Paul Miller, Elwyn Morse, Huw Murphy, Nick Neumann, Neil Prior, Mike Stoddart, Viv Stoddart, Aled Thomas, Vanessa Thomas, Anji Tinley, Iwan Ward, Michele Wiggins, Jacob Williams, Alun Wills, Simon Wright and Danny Young [32] Against the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Joshua Beynon, Maureen Bowen, Aaron Carey, Alec Cormack, Pat Davies, Simon Hancock, Jon Harvey, Mike John, Mel Phillips, Jordan Ryan, David Simpson, Rhys Sinnett, Sam Skyrme-Blackhall, Marc Tierney, Thomas Tudor, Tony Wilcox and Michael Williams [18] Abstentions: Councillor Michelle Bateman [1] RESOLVED (a) That the results of the consultation exercise be noted; and the level of future Second Homes Council Tax premium applicable from 1 April 2026 be set at 125% for 2026- 2027. (b) That there be no change to the Use of Second Home Council Tax Premium for 2026-27 (Option 1). [Councillors Bethan Price and Chris Williams then rejoined the meeting.]
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED (a) That the results of the consultation exercise be noted; and the level of Long-Term Empty Property premium applicable from 1 April 2026 remains at 300% for 2026- 2027 (Option 1). (b) That there be no change to the Use of Council Tax Premiums for 2026-27 (Option 1).
[Having previously declared a personal and prejudicial interest in this item of business, Councillor Viv Stoddart withdrew from the meeting.] Council considered a report of Cabinet in relation to the findings of the public consultation on Council Tax premiums and calling for Council to make a decision on the level of the long term empty Council Tax premium and the use of the income from the premium. Councillor Alistair Cameron, the relevant Cabinet Member presented the report and referred to the 300% premium for properties empty for two years or more and noted that 67 of the 2,375 consultation responses were from empty homeowners. He highlighted that 63% of respondents believed the premium should be 100% or less and pointed to detailed findings in the report. He further stated that in June there were 1,442 properties exempt from Council Tax and 505 long-term empty properties paying the premium. He then Moved the recommendation of Cabinet; Seconded by Councillor Huw Murphy. Councillor Alan Dennison asked how many of the empty properties referred to were owned by the Council. The Cabinet Member confirmed that the information was not immediately available but would be provided to Council at a later date. Councillor Aled Thomas highlighted that the empty properties premium was one tool to reduce empty homes and noted that the enforced sales procedure, previously scheduled for discussion, had been withdrawn twice. He asked why this had happened and when the matter would be brought forward, stressing the need for full information before decisions on Council Tax and premiums were made. In response, the Cabinet Member for Housing explained that the paper was withdrawn to incorporate it into a wider empty homes strategy rather than considering it as a stand-alone element, and confirmed it would be subject to scrutiny shortly. The vote, undertaken by way of an electronic vote, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Steve Alderman, Joshua Beynon, Maureen Bowen, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, Di Clements, John Cole, Alec Cormack, John Davies, Pat Davies, Terry Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Claire George, Jonathan Grimes, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Simon Hancock, Delme Harries, Jon Harvey, Tessa Hodgson, David Howlett, Mike John, Rhys Jordan, Phil Kidney, Paul Miller, Huw Murphy, Nick Neumann, Mel Phillips, Bethan Price, Neil Prior, Jordan Ryan, David Simpson, Rhys Sinnett, Sam Skyrme-Blackhall, Mike Stoddart, Aled Thomas, Vanessa Thomas, Marc Tierney, Anji Tinley, Iwan Ward, Michele Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Michael Williams, Chris Williams, Jacob Williams, Alun Wills, Steve Yelland and Danny Young [50] There were no votes against or abstentions RESOLVED (a) That the results of the consultation exercise be noted; and the level of Long-Term Empty Property premium applicable from 1 April 2026 remains at 300% for 2026- 2027 (Option 1). (b) That there be no change to the Use of Council Tax Premiums for 2026-27 (Option 1).
The meeting adjourned at 1:32pm and reconvened at 2:14pm. Councillor Michael Williams submitted his apologies; and Councillor Simon Wright joined the meeting in person. Councillors Claire George and Elwyn Morse were not present for the afternoon session.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That this Council is opposed to Asymmetric weeks and advises schools that have adopted the practice to reconsider their position. [Councillor Shon Rees left the meeting at this juncture.]
[During consideration of this item, Councillor Jordan Ryan declared a personal interest by virtue of being an Authority appointed Governor on Ysgol Bro Gwaun. Councillor Jacob Williams declared a personal interest by virtue of being an Authority appointed Governor on St Oswalds School. Councillor Simon Wright declared a personal interest by virtue of a family member being in Ysgol Caer Elen.] Council considered a report by the Director for Education calling for Council to determine its position, if any, in relation to asymmetric weeks in schools In introducing the report, the Leader explained that Council was being asked to decide its stance on the asymmetric school week, where lessons run longer Monday–Thursday and finish early on Friday. This model, he stated was used mainly in Pembrokeshire and aimed to give teachers time for professional development and wellbeing. He stated that the benefits include staff collaboration and extracurricular opportunities, but drawbacks include lower Friday attendance, childcare issues and no proven improvement in pupil outcomes. Council was advised its role was advisory only, as governing bodies set school hours. The options were to oppose, support, or remain neutral. As Chair of the Schools and Learning Overview and Scrutiny Committee, Councillor Rhys Jordan stated that the Committee had reviewed reports on the asymmetric school week and listened to schools that use it and those that do not. While some benefits for staff planning and training were noted, there was no clear evidence of improved pupil attainment, and attendance was generally lower on Fridays in schools using this model. Given the Council’s priorities of improving attendance and raising standards, he stated that the Committee believed neutrality was not appropriate and recommended option 1: that the Council oppose the asymmetric week and advise schools that have adopted it to reconsider, while respecting governing bodies’ autonomy. The aim being to maintain equity, consistency, and high standards across education. Councillor Jordan then Moved that this Council is opposed to asymmetric weeks and advises schools that have adopted the practice to reconsider their position (Option1); Seconded by Councillor Mark Carter. In response to a question from Councillor Alec Cormack, the Director of Education confirmed that while the number of schools adopting the asymmetric week had generally increased since 2019, two schools have recently reverted to a traditional timetable after reviewing the model with their governing bodies and communities. In response to a further question, the Director for Education stated that the approach originally came through the Pioneer Network, which supported early curriculum development and gave schools flexibility under Welsh Government’s “New Deal for schools” initiative. Although Welsh Government never formally endorsed the asymmetric week, it was seen at the time as aligned with their direction. Councillor Wilcox shared feedback from a school where he is a governor, stating that the school reported that using Friday afternoons for staff training had significantly improved professional learning, reduced costs for mandatory training, and strengthened cluster collaboration, which supports continuity and transition for pupils. He acknowledged attendance concerns but felt the impact was minimal locally and expressed support for leaving the decision to individual schools, aligning with the current neutral position. Councillor Rhys Sinnett shared positive feedback from his school’s headteacher, saying the asymmetric week improved professional learning. He noted three schools using the model had strong inspection reports citing excellent professional development. He argued there was no clear evidence the model affected pupil outcomes and felt the paper lacked rigour for a political steer. He supported option 3, maintaining neutrality and leaving decisions to governing bodies in consultation with parents. Councillor Anji Tinley questioned whether proper consultation had taken place and noted that while staff benefited from the asymmetric week, some schools still kept set days, which seemed inconsistent. She stated that consultations she had undertaken with pupils showed little support for the model and raised concerns about reduced social interaction due to compressed timetables. She stressed that schools look to the Council for guidance and urged better consultation with pupils and parents, expressing opposition to the asymmetric week. Councillor Aled Thomas said he supported the Committee’s recommendation to oppose the asymmetric week, believing it was not positive for learning outcomes. He noted Welsh Government’s recent legal change requiring a “meaningful session” on Friday afternoons, which now results in very short lessons, questioning their value. He expressed concern that some schools may feel pressured to remain in clusters using the model and stressed that pupils should receive full learning time. He argued the Council should show leadership to raise educational standards and attainment in Pembrokeshire. The Director for Education clarified that legislation required ten “meaningful” sessions per week, but their length was not defined, leaving schools to decide. All asymmetric schools were fully compliant with required teaching hours, and some provided more teaching time than non-asymmetric schools. Consultations on changes to the school day always included parents, pupils, and the Authority. He explained that attendance was slightly lower in asymmetric schools but stressed there was no causal link, as many factors influenced attendance. Some asymmetric schools even had among the highest attendance rates, making it difficult to conclude the model was either good or bad. Councillor Viv Stoddart stated that the Committee had examined the issue thoroughly and supported option 1 to oppose asymmetric weeks, while respecting school autonomy. She stressed attendance concerns and cited Estyn feedback showing the model often benefited teachers more than pupils. She warned compressed timetables could harm extracurricular activities and noted two schools had reverted to full weeks after consultation. Councillor Kidney supported the recommendation, saying schools looked to the Council for leadership. He acknowledged the Council could not compel schools but felt a clear stance was needed. His main concerns were attendance and public perception that Friday afternoons were time off for teachers, even though that was not the case. Councillor Adams supported the recommendation to oppose asymmetric weeks, stressing that reducing contact time was not in pupils’ best interests. He highlighted the importance of social interaction and warned that limiting it could push behavioural issues outside school. He argued schools should prepare pupils for real-world expectations, where a four-and-a-half-day week would not suffice. Councillor Tessa Hodgson supported the Committee’s recommendation, citing Estyn’s finding that Friday attendance declined more than twice as much in asymmetric schools compared to others. She also raised concerns about the loss of social interaction and extracurricular activities due to compressed timetables, stressing that schools are communities, not just exam factories. She praised the Committee’s work and said Councillors should provide clear leadership. Councillor Maureen Bowen stated that children learn best in school but Fridays had always been seen as an easy day to miss. She acknowledged the benefits of the asymmetric week for teacher development and extracurricular activities but argued attendance issues were complex and not solved by longer days. She urged leaving decisions to headteachers and governors and supported option 3, maintaining neutrality. Councillor Sam Skyrme-Blackhall stated that the issue was about balance, noting that consultations had shown parents’ concerns over childcare costs and Friday arrangements. Drawing on 18 years in education, she highlighted pressures on staff from teaching, planning, and extracurricular duties. She supported option 1, citing her experience as a governor at Greenhill, where the school rejected the model due to attendance challenges after coming out of special measures. She believed schools should stick to five full days and felt there was insufficient evidence that the asymmetric week worked across the board. Councillor Alistair Cameron noted the lack of clear research on the benefits of the asymmetric week and asked for the Director’s professional view. The Director said the issue was finely balanced, with some schools making good use of the model for professional learning. He stressed decisions should remain with schools and their communities but highlighted that wraparound care was available through grants, meaning no child should have to leave early or change schools because of the model. Councillors Jacob Williams and Pat Davies expressed their support for Option 1. Councillor Davies citing attendance concerns and the issue of pupils being unsupervised on Friday afternoons. She agreed with points about compressed hours reducing social interaction and felt the evidence in the papers justified opposing the asymmetric week. In response to a question from Councillor Paul Miller, The Director confirmed that schools in more deprived areas were more likely to adopt the asymmetric week, while those in less deprived areas generally did not. He said there was no specific data explaining this trend but noted that in some cases governing bodies had decided against the model before consultation. Councillor Alec Cormack emphasised that attendance was a key driver of pupil performance and noted Pembrokeshire’s literacy standards were below national and international levels. He highlighted Estyn’s finding that attendance issues in asymmetric schools had not been addressed and cited data showing Friday absence rates were higher in these schools (3.24% compared to 1.97%). While acknowledging benefits for staff wellbeing, he argued these should not outweigh pupil outcomes and supported option 1, opposing the asymmetric week. The vote, undertaken by way of an electronic vote, was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Steve Alderman, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Mark Carter, Di Clements, John Cole, Alec Cormack, John Davies, Pat Davies, Terry Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Jonathan Grimes, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Simon Hancock, Delme Harries, Jon Harvey, Tessa Hodgson, David Howlett, Rhys Jordan, Phil Kidney, Paul Miller, Huw Murphy, Nick Neumann, Mel Phillips, Bethan Price, Neil Prior, Shon Rees, Jordan Ryan, Sam Skyrme-Blackhall, Mike Stoddart, Viv Stoddart, Aled Thomas, Vanessa Thomas, Marc Tierney, Anji Tinley, Thomas Tudor, Chris Williams, Jacob Williams, Alun Wills, Simon Wright and Danny Young [44] Against the Motion: Councillors Maureen Bowen, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mike John, Rhys Sinnett and Tony Wilcox [6] Abstentions: Councillor Michele Wiggins [1] RESOLVED That this Council is opposed to Asymmetric weeks and advises schools that have adopted the practice to reconsider their position. [Councillor Shon Rees left the meeting at this juncture.]
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED (a) That the Labour Group relinquishes its seat on the Planning Committee be noted. (b) That the Allocation of Committee Seats and Outside Bodies to political groups under the requirements of Section 15 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 as set out in Appendix 1 be approved, with the additional seat on the Planning Committee being allocated to Unaffiliated Members. (c) That the following Unaffiliated Member appointments be approved: (i) Planning Committee– Councillor Jordan Ryan (ii) Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Authority – Councillor Aaron Carey (iii)Dyfed Powys Police and Crime Panel - Councillor David Simpson (iv)Policy and Pre-decision Overview and Scrutiny Committee – Councillor Jordan Ryan (v) Rural Communities Working Group – Councillors Pat Davies Steve Alderman and Phil Kidney. (d) That the following nominations as Reserve Members to the Council bodies to which political balance rules apply be approved: (i) Planning Delegation Panel - Councillors Aaron Carey and David Simpson; and Councillor Michael Stoddart be removed. (e) That the appointment of Members to Committees and other bodies, as set out in Appendix 3, be approved subject to the following amendments made at the meeting: (ii) Planning Committee – Councillor Alec Cormack replaces Councillor Alistair Cameron (iii) Schools and Learning Overview and Scrutiny Committee – Councillor Mel Phillips replaces Councillor Huw Murphy (iv) Planning Delegation Panel - Councillor Huw Murphy replaces Councillor Elwyn Morse. (f) That Councillor Simon Hancock remains in post until formal approval of Councillor David Simpson’s nomination has been granted by the Home Office. There were no nominations for the vacant seats on the Social Care Overview and Scrutiny Committee and the Swansea Bay City Region Joint Scrutiny Committee and these will be carried over to the next meeting.
Council considered a report by the Head of Democratic Services on changes to Committee seats and outside bodies following the change of political balance of the Authority arising from Councillor Jordan Ryan’s resignation from the Labour Group and becoming an Unaffiliated Member. As a consequence, it was noted that the Labour Group would lose a seat on an ordinary Committee, either the Planning Committee or the Investigation and Disciplinary Committee. Moved by the Presiding Member that the Labour Group relinquishes its seat on the Planning Committee; Seconded by Councillor Joshua Beynon. The vote undertaken by a show of hands was carried. Council was then asked to approve the revised Allocation of Committee Seats and Outside Bodies to political groups under the requirements of Section 15 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 as set out in Appendix 1 with the additional seat on the Planning Committee being allocated to Unaffiliated Members. This was Moved by the Presiding Member; Seconded by Councillor Joshua Beynon. The votes, undertaken by way of a show of hands, were carried. The following nominations were then proposed for the changes to Committee and outside body seats: (i) Planning Committee – Councillor Jordan Ryan (ii) Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Authority – Councillor Aaron Carey (iii)Dyfed Powys Police and Crime Panel - Councillor David Simpson (iv)Policy and Pre-decision Overview and Scrutiny Committee – Councillor Jordan Ryan (v) Rural Communities Working Group – Councillors Pat Davies Steve Alderman and Phil Kidney. Moved by Councillor Jacob Williams; seconded by Councillor Steve Alderman The votes, undertaken by way of a show of hands, were carried. Council considered the allocation of Members to Committees and other bodies, as set out in Appendix 3 and noted the changes that had occurred since the July meeting. Moved by Councillor Simon Hancock; Seconded by Councillor Steve Alderman. The votes, undertaken by way of a show of hands, were carried. In respect of Reserve Members, the following changes were proposed: Planning Delegation Panel - Councillors Aaron Carey and David Simpson be added; and Councillor Michael Stoddart be removed. Moved by Councillor Jacob Williams; Seconded by Councillor Simon Hancock. The votes, undertaken by way of a show of hands, were carried. With regard to the Police and Crime Panel vacancy, Members were advised that the Council nominates Members to the Home Office and it makes the formal appointment. As this process may take a while, Council was advised that the Panel Support Officer has confirmed that it would be in order for Councillor Hancock to remain in post until that the formal approval of Council’s nomination has been granted to avoid having a vacant seat. Council was asked to endorse that. It was moved by Councillor Jonathan Grimes that Councillor Simon Hancock remains in post until formal approval of Councillor David Simpson’s nomination has been granted by the Home Office as an interim arrangement; Seconded by Councillor Simon Wright. Concerns were raised by Councillor Michael Stoddart about legality and compliance with political balance rules, but officers advised that the arrangement was pragmatic and had been agreed as acceptable by the panel, pending Council’s decision. The votes, undertaken by way of a show of hands, were carried. RESOLVED (a) That the Labour Group relinquishes its seat on the Planning Committee be noted. (b) That the Allocation of Committee Seats and Outside Bodies to political groups under the requirements of Section 15 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 as set out in Appendix 1 be approved, with the additional seat on the Planning Committee being allocated to Unaffiliated Members. (c) That the following Unaffiliated Member appointments be approved: (i) Planning Committee– Councillor Jordan Ryan (ii) Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Authority – Councillor Aaron Carey (iii)Dyfed Powys Police and Crime Panel - Councillor David Simpson (iv)Policy and Pre-decision Overview and Scrutiny Committee – Councillor Jordan Ryan (v) Rural Communities Working Group – Councillors Pat Davies Steve Alderman and Phil Kidney. (d) That the following nominations as Reserve Members to the Council bodies to which political balance rules apply be approved: (i) Planning Delegation Panel - Councillors Aaron Carey and David Simpson; and Councillor Michael Stoddart be removed. (e) That the appointment of Members to Committees and other bodies, as set out in Appendix 3, be approved subject to the following amendments made at the meeting: (ii) Planning Committee – Councillor Alec Cormack replaces Councillor Alistair Cameron (iii) Schools and Learning Overview and Scrutiny Committee – Councillor Mel Phillips replaces Councillor Huw Murphy (iv) Planning Delegation Panel - Councillor Huw Murphy replaces Councillor Elwyn Morse. (f) That Councillor Simon Hancock remains in post until formal approval of Councillor David Simpson’s nomination has been granted by the Home Office. There were no nominations for the vacant seats on the Social Care Overview and Scrutiny Committee and the Swansea Bay City Region Joint Scrutiny Committee and these will be carried over to the next meeting.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the updated Financial Procedure Rules be noted. [Councillors Di Clements, Danny Young and Marc Tierney left the meeting at this juncture.]
Council considered a report by the Director of Resources outlining changes to the Financial Procedure Rules. The Cabinet Member for Corporate Finance and Efficiencies presented the report and stated that the Governance and Audit Committee had approved updates to the financial procedure rules in July 2025, and the Constitution had been updated accordingly. The revised rules were shown in the report with amendments highlighted and deletions struck through. He recommended that Council note the updated financial procedure rules. Councillor Alistair Cameron Moved that Council note the updated financial procedure rules; Seconded by Councillor Jon Harvey. The vote, undertaken by way of a show of hands, was carried. RESOLVED That the updated Financial Procedure Rules be noted. [Councillors Di Clements, Danny Young and Marc Tierney left the meeting at this juncture.]
With the agreement of Council, the Presiding Member announced that the order of business would be changed in the following order:
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be approved and the letter be sent to the First Minister with the addition of the following words: ‘That Welsh Government consider the introduction of any emergency legislation required to rectify this situation.’ [Councillors Chris Williams and Viv Stoddart left the meeting at this juncture.]
Having previously agreed to allow the Notice of Motion to be taken at the meeting, the Presiding Member invited Councillor Jacob Williams to speak on his Notice of Motion. Councillor Williams explained that updated Natural Resources Wales (NRW) assessments showed Milford Haven’s inner water body was failing ecological standards due to high nitrogen levels, triggering a requirement for nitrogen neutrality in new developments. He warned this had created an effective moratorium on certain planning applications, affecting 200 live applications, 600 homes (including 220 affordable), and £25 million in social housing investment. He noted the lack of Welsh Government guidance and stated mitigation measures would be costly and slow, with nitrogen stripping at treatment plants estimated at £60 million. He stressed the economic impact, with thousands of homes and jobs at risk, and called the situation “scandalous.” He proposed a letter calling for urgent action and outlined an approved Cabinet plan for a £394,000 mitigation strategy, partially funded by a Welsh Government change programme bid and contributions from the National Park Authority. Councillor Williams then Moved the Notice of Motion in the following terms: That Pembrokeshire County Council resolves to send the letter, below, to the First Minister of Wales, the Rt. Hon. Eluned Morgan, Baroness Morgan of Ely MS. That the letter is sent by Councillor Simon Hancock in his capacity as the Authority’s Presiding Member. That Councillor Hancock is given delegation to add clarifications, amend the introductory paragraph, and to write the letter’s sign-off. LETTER: Dear First Minister, I write to you in my capacity as Pembrokeshire County Council’s Presiding Member. At our October 9 full council meeting, councillors voted unanimously [delete if not applicable] in support of writing to you. This is to convey our authority’s great concern over Natural Resources Wales’ recent river nitrates guidance in relation to development, and the serious effects this is having. As you are aware, it has essentially placed a moratorium on certain types of development in Pembrokeshire, a situation with no quick or obvious way out. The authority is grateful that you have recently created a taskforce into this matter, but is concerned that any outcomes may be slow to emerge. Marine and river quality is an important issue and we understand why improvements are a priority for the Welsh Government. Two other relevant priorities of your government - surely shared by every council and politician in Wales - are housebuilding and economic promotion, both of which are clearly linked. Wales’ 22 unitary councils and its three national park authorities try their best to pursue these aims, but the effective block which has been placed on our ability to consider a wide range of planning applications in Pembrokeshire creates wide knock-on effects. In accordance with the published data, the extent of the area within which development is required to demonstrate nitrogen neutrality is approximately 75% of our county. This includes the towns of Haverfordwest, Narberth, Pembroke and Pembroke Dock, and amounts to approximately 35% of the council’s future housing land supply. In his September 19 letter sent to your minister, Jane Bryant MS, this authority’s Leader, Councillor Jon Harvey, outlines the situation in which Pembrokeshire County Council (PCC), planning applicants, and the potential beneficiaries of the associated developments, now find themselves: • 200 live planning applications affected, including 50 housing applications. • 600 new homes at risk, of which 220 are affordable homes. • 200 affordable homes funded by Social Housing Grant (SHG) jeopardised, representing £25 million of social housing investment. • 2,236 units in our replacement Development Plan (LDP2) fall within the affected catchment. • Thousands of direct and indirect jobs at risk. Whilst there is tangible evidence that river quality is poor, there is also evidence that PCC is being unfairly hampered in its ability to make progress on development - including significant housebuilding which attracted Welsh Government funding! The positive impact of measures tackling water quality must be balanced against the harm created by this moratorium on development, and the associated loss of economic activity. On behalf of Pembrokeshire County Council, I wish to emphasise our strength of feeling, and to request some feedback on the following points: 1) It would be helpful if you could please explain how the Welsh Government intends to address the issue and find a way forward to allow development to take place. Also, is the Welsh Government leading on this, or is it going to be down to local planning authorities (LPAs)? 2) If the Welsh Government is exploring ways that these issues can be addressed, please could you state the timescales you will be working to? 3) Is a national nutrient credit-trading system under consideration, and if so, do you agree that the Welsh Government would be best placed to administer this? 4) It is the view of PCC’s planning professionals that the money which has so far been provided or committed to NRW is unlikely to have much direct benefit for individual LPAs. Funding for a marine nutrient officer and £100k for consultancy work at the Nutrient Management Boards has recently been announced, but this is also anticipated to fall well short of the resource implications now faced by affected LPAs. This might be taken to suggest that the scale of the problem has been underestimated. What level of funding do you think is going to assist LPAs in their efforts to tackle this issue? In advance of the meeting, Councillor Williams provided the following statement in support of his Notice of Motion which was circulated to all Members: First of all I believe it is important that all councillors are given an opportunity to raise their concerns in relation to this important matter individually, and secondly for council as a whole to show its strength of feeling. I think both of these aims will be fulfilled through a full council discussion and by council resolving to send the letter. The Presiding Member then invited Council to discuss the terms of the Notice of Motion and the following points were raised: Councillor Michael Stoddart stated that he was agreeable to seconding the Motion but asked for the following words to be added, ‘that Welsh Government consider the introduction of any emergency legislation required to rectify this situation.’ Councillor Williams accepted the additional wording. Council noted that the issue had been widely discussed in many forums, including Cabinet and workshops, and was considered critically important. Councillor Rhys Jordan stated that he had spoken to several developers who were at serious risk of going out of business if the matter was not resolved urgently. He stressed that this would be highly undesirable, especially given the importance of employment to the county and beyond. He emphasized that the sooner the issue was addressed, the better. Councillor Jamie Adams agreed with the letter and supported the additional wording proposed. He stated that Welsh Government had acted at its worst with this legislation, as it had undermined its own ambition to build affordable homes. As a result, no homes—whether market or affordable—were being built, despite people being in desperate need and the economy requiring a strong construction industry. He stressed that an immediate solution or reversal was essential. Councillor Adams noted that publicity around the issue was currently limited but would increase if that was what it took to secure the necessary resolution for the construction sector in Wales, particularly in Pembrokeshire and within the County Plan area. He also mentioned that farmers were already complying with Nitrate Vulnerable Zone regulations, showing that agriculture was playing its part. Councillor Mike John expressed full support for the letter and sentiments, noting that the problem had existed for many years. He referred to inactivity NRW for years and highlighted that NRW had only pursued a limited number of prosecutions. He also mentioned a private prosecution underway in the Wye Valley by local residents and businesses. He concluded by stressing the importance of sending the letter and making representations wherever possible. The matter was put to the vote, by way of a roll call and carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Steve Alderman, Michelle Bateman, Joshua Beynon, Maureen Bowen, Alistair Cameron, Aaron Carey, Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, John Davies, Terry Davies, Alan Dennison, Tim Evans, Jonathan Grimes, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Simon Hancock, Delme Harries, Jon Harvey, Tessa Hodgson, David Howlett, Mike John, Rhys Jordan, Phil Kidney, Huw Murphy, Nick Neumann, Mel Phillips, Bethan Price, David Simpson, Rhys Sinnett, Sam Skyrme-Blackhall, Mike Stoddart, Viv Stoddart, Aled Thomas, Vanessa Thomas, Anji Tinley, Thomas Tudor, Michele Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Chris Williams, Jacob Williams, Simon Wright and Steve Yelland [44] There were no votes against or abstentions RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be approved and the letter be sent to the First Minister with the addition of the following words: ‘That Welsh Government consider the introduction of any emergency legislation required to rectify this situation.’ [Councillors Chris Williams and Viv Stoddart left the meeting at this juncture.]
Councillor Rhys Sinnett, the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to a question submitted by Councillor Rhys Jordan prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: On the weekend of 13 September, heavy rainfall once again caused flooding on the B4318 at Gumfreston, beginning what has sadly become a predictable cycle of disruption each autumn and winter. Despite assurances previously given, residents have yet to see the promised flood alert service implemented. Could the Cabinet Member explain why this commitment has not yet been delivered, and provide a clear timetable for when residents can expect this service to be operational? The Cabinet Member responded to the effect that over the past few months new bespoke depth sensors have been fabricated and installed at this site and the existing flood warning messaging signs have been checked and upgraded, with further upgrades planned for the next few weeks. Flooding occurred at this location on both 13th and 20th September and on both occasions the signs were activated and all worked correctly. A minor error has been detected in the software that will be used to activate the planned alert messaging system, and understandably this needs to be rectified before it is rolled out to road users. The software has now been corrected and will be subjected to final testing before being made publicly available. The Cabinet Member further stated that it was not possible to assimilate flooding to test the system, so it will be necessary to wait until after the next flooding event before the system can finally be made “live.” Unfortunately flooding at this site is impacted by several factors which means flood incidents are sporadic and it is therefore not possible to give an accurate estimate of timescale. [Councillor Anji Tinley left the meeting at this juncture.]
Councillor Rhys Sinnett, the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to a question submitted by Councillor Jonathan Grimes prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: What progress has been made by the Authority on the issue of fly-grazing? The Cabinet Member stated that work had continued surrounding fly-grazing and the control of horses in Pembrokeshire and that the Authority had experienced a significant reduction in reports of horses on the highway and in public areas since the peak experienced in the latter half of 2024-25. During this time, he stated that a trial of the new procedure surrounding the control of horses had taken place with the removal of two animals illegally fly-grazing in line with the Control of Horses Act and incorporating collaborative working with Dyfed Powys Police surrounding public safety and horse on the highway. Further options available surrounding the control of horses including benchmarking with other Welsh Local Authorities surrounding best practice, policies and procedures, especially surrounding instances on private land, has continued and will be presented to the Working Group at the next meeting for discussion, prior to returning to the Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee in the New Year. In response to a supplementary question on whether there was a definitive timescale for implementing a clear action plan, the Cabinet Member explained that the Council had taken several actions to address fly grazing. These included establishing a multi-agency officer group to review and strengthen the county’s response protocol, clarify roles and responsibilities, and coordinate enforcement. An overview and scrutiny task-and-finish group was also set up to oversee progress and recommend strategic interventions, and this group was actively reviewing the current approach. Enforcement powers under the Control of Horses (Wales) Act 2024 had been used in several cases, and the Council’s 2018 protocol was reviewed, including discretionary powers that currently limit enforcement on private land due to resource constraints, although advice and guidance continued to be provided to landowners. He highlighted ongoing challenges such as unchipped horses making ownership difficult to establish, limited cooperation from some community members, intimidation and threats directed at staff, landowners, and residents during enforcement, and horses being moved to new locations after enforcement notices, perpetuating the issue. He acknowledged the complexity of the problem and stated that it would be premature to give a definitive timeline until Scrutiny had completed its review. In his view, Scrutiny should advise Cabinet on an action plan. [Councillor Sam Skyrme-Blackhall left the meeting at this juncture.]
Councillor Rhys Sinnett, the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to a question submitted by Councillor David Bryan prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: Haverfordwest being a hilly town, when surface water drains are blocked with mud and refuse all the way down the water tends to flow to the bottom of the hill and cause flooding. I assume there is a proactive programme to ensure that in Autumn each year drains are cleared to prevent this probability. Would the Cabinet Member for the Environment please give details of that programme, not only for Haverfordwest but for the whole of the county? The Cabinet Member responded that the Authority was responsible for maintaining approximately 41,000 road gullies and these were scheduled for checking once per annum and cleaning where necessary. The level of resources available, however, mean that in practice every year approximately 10% of the road gullies are not checked. However, he stated that the Authority aimed to respond urgently to reports of blocked highway drainage systems and that any concerns would be best directed via the Contact Centre. [Councillor Jonathan Grimes left the meeting at this juncture.] On behalf of Councillor David Bryan, Councillor Mark Carter asked a supplementary question on how far the Council had progressed with this year’s drain-clearing programme. The Cabinet Member stated that he did not have the figure to hand but would provide it later. He added that, as far as he was aware, the programme was on target. He explained that the Council had two gully suckers available, which had historically operated on double shifts, but their hours of operation had been reduced by 25% due to budget savings. These reductions were a result of decisions made during the last budget round in March, where a 5% cut in routine highway maintenance expenditure was approved. He noted that this cut was expected to lead to major reductions in drain cleaning, longer times to repair potholes and reduced capacity to respond to severe weather events.
Councillor Rhys Sinnett, the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to a question submitted by Councillor Di Clements prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: On the 29th July the Planning Committee approved the change of use of Goodwick Moor Car park to allow for overnight motor home and camper van stays. No facilities will be provided and no licences will be required. Does the appropriate Cabinet Member believe it is fair that private site owners require a site licence stating maximum numbers allowed, a fire safety space requirement between units, the provision of water, litter and foul water/chemical toilet disposal? All costs the private site owner has to bear. However, PCC will not have the burden of providing those facilities and none of the associated costs. The Cabinet Member responded that the trial scheme at Goodwick Parrog was not set up as a camp site – the trial allows for one night self-contained stop over – not camping. He pointed out that there was a difference between a camp site and stop over site in relation to infrastructure requirements and general set up. He stated that Goodwick Moor car park was a car park as designated by the off street parking order – parking will continue on this site – the off street variation order will allow for one night park and sleep – not camping. Temporary planning permission has been granted for a change of use from a car park to a car park which allows overnight stays of campervans/motorhomes. The site fundamentally remains a car park, but which allows overnight stays by motorhomes/campervans for a single night. This is materially different to the use of land as a caravan site. As this land is owned by the local authority, he stated that a site licence was not required for the use of the car park as a stop-over site. Officers continue to closely monitor the stop–over area for any signs of waste or other nuisance concerns, and in reviewing the success of the trial period, these matters will be taken into consideration. On behalf of Councillor Di Clements, Councillor Mark Carter asked a supplementary question on whether the Cabinet Member was confident the initiative would succeed in ensuring payments were made and that the process could be managed safely and sensibly. The Cabinet Member confirmed that, based on the advice he had received, this would be the case. He added that civil enforcement officers would check every morning to ensure payments were made and conditions were adhered to by those using the facility for overnight stays. He noted that while the scheme would not eliminate the Council’s budget shortfall, it should generate some income because the site was already being used for this purpose due to its proximity to the Goodwick ferry port. He emphasized that the aim was to regularize its use and secure funding from those choosing to use it.
Councillor Rhys Sinnett, the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to a question submitted by Councillor Di Clements prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: For over four months myself and Councillor Bryan have been trying to contact SWTRA regarding their proposals for Salutation Square in light of the severe congestion issues. Despite numerous emails to SWTRA and subsequently to Eluned Morgan MS to organise a meeting, disappointingly we have had absolutely no response. Would the appropriate Cabinet Member agree to assist us in making contact and organise a meeting with SWTRA please so that we can put our residents' views across? The Cabinet Member responded that he fully appreciated the frustration local Members were experiencing with regards to obtaining a response from external bodies surrounding this issue. Councillor Clements has also been in touch for updates on this matter with Council Officers, throughout the summer, and is aware of Officer efforts to progress this request. Officers have also been in communication with Welsh Government Officers in the hope of progressing this matter. The Cabinet Member agreed to contact South Wales Trunk Road Agency to arrange a meeting as per Councillor Clements’ request. On behalf of Councillor Di Clements, Councillor Mark Carter stated that contact had now been made with Councillor Clements and he had asked if the Cabinet Member could commit to assisting and attending an on-site meeting. The Cabinet Member confirmed he was happy to do so and added that, within the regional transport plan, £30,000 had been requested to develop design solutions for Salutation Square that would meet both SWTRA’s light-touch requirements and Transport for Wales’ aim for a more pedestrian-focused approach. He explained that this work was scheduled to begin in April 2026, subject to funding approval through the RTP Development Plan and the Corporate Joint Committees as outlined in a recent Cabinet report. He stressed the importance of incorporating residents’ concerns into the process rather than designing solutions without consultation. He concluded by reaffirming his willingness to attend the meeting. [The Presiding Member left the meeting at this juncture and the Chair of Council presided over the remaining items of business.]
Prior to receiving an answer to this question, Councillor Joshua Beynon called for the question to be rejected as it contained potentially defamatory or vexations content and breaches confidentiality and safeguarding concerns and, in his opinion, was contrary to Section 4.18.7 of the Constitution. In response, the Head of Law and Governance advised that the form was deemed acceptable as it stood. Any expressions were considered to be opinions, and it was believed that they could be properly addressed. The Leader, on behalf of the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to a question submitted by Councillor John Cole prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: With the opening of a new educational school at Haverfordwest Mosque, can the Cabinet Member for Education and Welsh Language reply to the following? 1) How many children who attended mainstream schools, children due to have returned or started at a mainstream school in September now attend the Peace school as it is known? 2) How has the funding of these children, if they have transferred to the Peace school, impacted mainstream schools due to any former pupils not now attending, or were due to attend, and has those pupils funding attending the Peace school, transferred to their place of education with them? 3) From a question put by myself to the headteacher of the Peace school I was told that the school would not be following the national curriculum. As the school is not following the national curriculum, is the Peace school out of the jurisdiction of Ofsted and the educational department of the Council? The Leader clarified that the centre was called the Cherry Grove Learning Centre, not the Peace School. Peace was described as a sacrament for enriching education, and community empowerment, operating as a community interest company. It was understood that the Cherry Grove Learning Centre was as an alternative provision and, as far as was known, had not been registered as an independent school, which would have been required for it to be known as a school. He then responded to the three questions are as follows: (1) No children who have attended a mainstream school are placed by the local authority at the Cherry Grove Learning Centre. (2) No funding from the local authority has been transferred to Cherry Grove Learning Centre. (3) Independent (private) schools in Wales are not required to follow the Curriculum for Wales; instead, they must provide a curriculum that meets the Independent School Standards, ensuring a broad and balanced education with experience in linguistic, mathematical, scientific, technological, human/social, physical, and aesthetic/creative areas, and actively promoting spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development. Registered independent schools are subject to the Independent School Standards (Wales) Regulations 2024, which set the minimum requirements for the education provided. However, it remains our understanding that Cherry Grove Learning Centre is not currently registered as an independent school. Furthermore, in response to question 3, the Leader pointed out that Ofsted does not operate in Wales, the equivalent body being Estyn. [Councillor Rhys Sinnett left the meeting at this juncture.] In response to a supplementary question on how many children who previously attended mainstream schools no longer did so, the Director of Education stated that there were no children who had moved from mainstream schools. The Leader then suggested that Councillor Cole visited the learning centre to meet staff and gain a better understanding of its work.
Councillor Michelle Bateman, the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to a question submitted by Councillor Aled Thomas prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: In this council term (since May 2022), how much rental revenue has the HRA lost and how much council tax revenue has the revenue budget lost due to empty PCC properties? Please give the answers to the above as a total figure, as well as a year by year breakdown by type. The Cabinet Member responded that the Revenue budget had not lost any Council Tax income due to empty council properties. The loss of “rental revenue” where the property remains unoccupied related to voids over the period since April 2022 includes the total figure of £3,514 ,440 broken down as: 2022-23 £980,320 2023-24 £1,264,710 2024-25 £1,269,410 This includes a significant amount for Windsor gardens and Maes Ingli which are due for demolition and redevelopment. She stated that the HRA Business Plan had factored in a 3% loss of income to account for void turnover. Property turnover was essential for managing housing stock, enabling people to move into accommodation that matched their current needs. Some of these figures included properties used as decants for tenants while major repairs were carried out, including work on blocks of flats and fire-damaged flats in Milford Haven. She also highlighted the significant and increasing amount of work required to bring properties up to WHQS 2 standard. In response to a supplementary question on how many Council properties remain empty, the Cabinet Member stated that she would send the information to Councillor Thomas. [Councillors Mark Carter and Nick Neumann left the meeting at this juncture.]
Councillor Michelle Bateman, the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to a question submitted by Councillor Aled Thomas prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: In this Council term (since May 2022), how much empty property premium, second homes premium and basic rate council tax has Pembrokeshire County Council’s Housing Team had to pay the Pembrokeshire County Council’s revenue department? Please give the answers to the above as a total figure, as well as a year by year breakdown by type of tax paid. The Cabinet Member responded that the premium raised during the specified financial year as at 29/9/25 for Empty Premium raised a total of £362,615.75 broken down as follows: 2022 - £5,091.94 2023 - £18,204.74 2024 – £203,764.93 2025 – £135,554.14 For the Second Home Premium raised this was broken down as follows: 2022 - £5,263.31 2023 – £6,604.68 2024 - £14,862.14 2025 – £15,347.10 She stated that the Council Tax standard charge was difficult to calculate as there were many variable factors including exemption periods; tenants moving in and out, properties becoming empty for two years or more and becoming liable for the long term empty premium etc. It will take a period of time she stated to make this calculation for previous years but the current calculation for 2025 was £204,507.33 plus £4362.44 adjustments made for previous years. In response to a supplementary question on whether the Cabinet Member agreed that the Cabinet and Authority should practice what they preach regarding empty properties and second homes, noting that a significant amount had been paid from the HRA account for these properties. In response, the Cabinet Member explained that the Council’s position was different because it managed a portfolio of over 5,800 properties. She stated that some properties were undergoing major refurbishments, others were large blocks scheduled for demolition, and many were empty to allow comprehensive work on tenants’ homes. She emphasized that the Council was doing all it could to bring properties back into use and highlighted the impact of WHQS2 standards, which required significant work while properties were vacant to minimize disruption. She also noted that the Housing Team had worked hard to secure external funding, bringing in £15 million in grants last year and projecting over £49 million this year to increase housing stock.
Councillor Alistair Cameron, the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to a question submitted by Councillor Aled Thomas prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: Since the implementation of the Second Homes Premium in 2017, how much money has been claimed by the authority to date? Please give the breakdown of money claimed per year in a year by year breakdown. The Cabinet Member responded that as reported in the Budget Monitoring Report to Cabinet for Quarter 1 2025-26, £29.715m has been collected in Second Homes Council Tax Premium between 2017-18 and 2024-25, with a further £8.373m budgeted to be received in 2025-26. Break down as follows: 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 1.743m 1.860m 2.031m 2.078 2.275 4.363 These figures do not include any town and community council or Dyfed Powys Police precepts. In response to a supplementary question on the Pembrokeshire Home Buy scheme in helping young people get on the property ladder, the Cabinet Member for Finance responded that the Council used funds in a legally correct manner, including addressing homelessness. The Cabinet Member for Housing then confirmed that the Home Buy scheme launched earlier in the year had been a resounding success, enabling people to become homeowners. She added that some development sites were mixed tenure, including shared ownership, intermediate rent, and social housing.
Councillor Tessa Hodgson, the relevant Cabinet Member, responded to questions submitted by Councillor Joshua Beynon prior to the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 4.18 as follows: In light of the very recent announcement that Shalom House Hospice in St Davids will close at the end of October 2025, I wish to raise an urgent question. Shalom House has provided vital palliative and end-of-life care for many years, serving residents across Pembrokeshire with compassion and dedication. Its closure will have an immediate impact on some of the most vulnerable people in our county, as well as on their families, staff, and volunteers. Given the seriousness and imminence of this situation, can the Leader (or relevant Cabinet Member) set out: (1) What urgent discussions the Council has had, or intends to have, with Hywel Dda University Health Board and Welsh Government to ensure continuity of palliative and end-of-life care for Pembrokeshire residents? (2) What role the Council’s own social services will play in supporting patients and families during this transition, alongside what wider support can be offered to affected staff and volunteers? (3) Whether the Council will make formal representations to Welsh Government about the urgent need for sustainable funding for hospice and community-based palliative care across Pembrokeshire and Wales? The Cabinet Member responded as follows: (1) We were sorry to hear that the Shalom House charity will be closing, which was announced last week. No discussions have yet taken place as yet with Hywel Dda University Health Board, although we understand the Health Board are working to ensure continuity of care for those patients registered with the two rooms that have been operating as a branch surgery. (2) The role of Social Services would be to work alongside anyone with eligible care and support needs during any transition planning. although as always, if it is identified that any of our residents may have eligible social care needs, we would encourage them to contact to adult services. Staff and volunteers would be directly employed with Shalom House. We would welcome discussions with any affected staff who may wish to explore an alternative role within the Local Authority. We currently have vacancies in residential care and reablement services as well as our community wellbeing independence teams. Should families wish to find out more about end-of-life care, we would encourage them to contact their GP in the first instance, who can provide details of options. In addition, the Hospice UK Hospice Care Finder includes an online search facility for local hospice or palliative care. End-of-life care is provided to some palliative patients on an in-patient basis through the Health Board’s community hospitals, located at South Pembrokeshire Hospital and Tenby Cottage Hospital and also Park House Court Care Home. People requiring end of life care are also cared for within Nursing Home bed-based provision throughout the county. Other local services include the Paul Sartori Foundation Hospice at Home; a registered charity offering free specialised, supportive care and advice for those in the later stages of any life-limiting illness throughout Pembrokeshire. This service offers home nursing care in people’s own homes which can include (depending on assessed need) Night Care 10.00pm – 7.00am; Day Respite and Limited Personal Care on a temporary basis. This service is commissioned directly by the Health Board. • There is currently no intention to make formal representations to Welsh Government at this time. In response to a supplementary question on whether the matter could be added to the Forward Work Programme of the Social Care Overview and Scrutiny Committee for consideration, the Cabinet Member welcomed working with the Chair of the Committee on that point.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be referred to Cabinet.
A Notice of Motion was submitted by Councillor Rhys Jordan in the following terms: Pembrokeshire County Council resolves that any proposed changes to the opening hours of Leisure Centres and Libraries must be subject to a minimum six-week consultation period with staff and service users before implementation. Upon the terms of Council Procedure Rule 4.19, the Motion having been Moved by Councillor David Simpson; Seconded by Councillor Alec Cormack then stood referred to Cabinet. The vote, undertaken by way of a show of hands, was carried. RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be referred to Cabinet.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be referred to Cabinet.
Prior to consideration of this item, Councillor Joshua Beynon stated that he considered the Notice of Motion was vexatious and discriminatory and was outside the control of the Council; and as such did not meet the requirements of procedure rule 4.19.2.(b). In response, the Chair of Council advised that the Notice of Motion was deemed suitable. A Notice of Motion was submitted by Councillor John Cole in the following terms: I call on the Council to review the use of halal products in all Council-controlled organisations and in facilities supported financially by the Council, such as educational establishments, canteens, restaurants, and healthcare facilities. Research and reports have highlighted concerns regarding animal welfare in some methods of ritual slaughter, including non-stun slaughter, where animals may experience distress before loss of consciousness. Even with reversible stunning, questions remain about the welfare implications during slaughter. Upon the terms of Council Procedure Rule 4.19, the Motion having been Moved by Councillor Alan Dennison; Seconded by Councillor Huw Murphy then stood referred to Cabinet. The vote, undertaken by way of a show of hands, was carried. RESOLVED That the Notice of Motion be referred to Cabinet.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.