Loading
The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
RESOLVED (a) 21/1102/PA - That delegated authority be granted to the Director of Community Services to APPROVE the application subject to withdrawal of the Welsh Ministers’ Holding Direction, with the inclusion that the noise mitigation condition be implemented at the start of the construction phase and all conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services. (b) 21/1104/PA - That delegated authority be granted to the Director of Community Services to APPROVE the application subject to withdrawal of the Welsh Ministers’ Holding Direction, with the inclusion that the noise mitigation condition be implemented at the start of the construction phase and all conditions outlined in Section 1.2 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
RESOLVED (a) That the application be APPROVED, subject to the completion of a S106 Planning Obligation and conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services. (b) In the event the planning obligation is not completed within 3 months of the above resolution then discretion be exercised to refuse the application due to failure to comply with the requirements of policy GN.3 of the Local Development Plan.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services
RESOLVED That delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to APPROVE the application subject to receipt of an amended plan in respect of the front elevation and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
RESOLVED (a) That delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to APPROVE the application following resolution of ecology issues and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services including any conditions required in connection with ecology and the completion of a section 106 agreement. (b) If the legal agreement, under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, is not completed within 3 months of the foregoing resolution and if ecology issues cannot be satisfactorily resolved then delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to exercise discretion to refuse the application on the grounds of non-compliance with policies GN.1, GN.2, GN.3, GN.28 and GN.37 of the Local Development Plan (LDP).
RESOLVED That delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to APPROVE the application subject to no objection being received from Natural Resources Wales and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services. [Councillor Nicola Gwynn left the meeting at this juncture]
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
In welcoming the new formation of Members to the meeting the Chairman made the following announcements: · Agenda Item No. 9 Planning Application No.21/0504/PA - Plot 1, Kiln Park, Burton Ferry, Milford Haven, SA73 1NY, had been withdrawn from the agenda as a late representation had been received which included information which was not covered within the Committee report. It was stated that the application would be referred to a subsequent Committee meeting. · That an alteration to the running order was being made, to consider Agenda Item No 14, Planning Application No.21/1198/PA – Withybush General Hospital, Fishguard Road, Haverfordwest, SA61 2PZ following Agenda Item No. 7. · During the Committee meeting of 16 March 2022, delegated authority was granted to the Chief Planning Officer to approve Planning Application No. 21/1003/PA – 15 Victoria Place Haverfordwest, following the end of the publicity period provided no new substantive planning issues were raised. Members were updated that a satisfactory Noise Impact Assessment had been received along with a Flood Consequence Assessment, and with no new substantive issues raised during the publicity period a decision would be issued imminently. · That oral updates would be provided for Agenda Items No. 6 and 14.
Councillor Tony Wilcox declared a personal and prejudicial interest in Agenda Item No. 10 – Planning Application No. 21/0913/PA - Awelfa, Milton Terrace, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6BJ, by virtue of his son being the applicant. He advised that he would leave the meeting during that item of business. Councillor Jamie Adams declared a personal and prejudicial interest in AgendaItem No. 16 – Planning Application No. 21/0722/PA - Pelcomb Cross Campsite, Haverfordwest, SA62 6AB, by virtue of being a neighbouring landowner with part of the site application falling within his ownership. Councillor Brian Hall declared a personal interest in AgendaItem No. 11 – Planning Application No. 20/0785/PA - Plots 51, 52, 53, 54 and 68, Ocean Way, Pennar Park, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6GL by virtue of his son currently renting a property on the site.
Moved by Councillor Jacob Williams; Seconded by Councillor Brian Hall. AGREED That the Minutes of the meeting held on 5 April 2022 be approved as a correct record in both English and Welsh.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED (a) 21/1102/PA - That delegated authority be granted to the Director of Community Services to APPROVE the application subject to withdrawal of the Welsh Ministers’ Holding Direction, with the inclusion that the noise mitigation condition be implemented at the start of the construction phase and all conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services. (b) 21/1104/PA - That delegated authority be granted to the Director of Community Services to APPROVE the application subject to withdrawal of the Welsh Ministers’ Holding Direction, with the inclusion that the noise mitigation condition be implemented at the start of the construction phase and all conditions outlined in Section 1.2 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
This application was presented for Committee consideration as it involved the development of a waste handling facility on a site in excess of 0.5 ha in area (paragraph 1(h) of the scheme of delegation). Planning Officer, Mark Hyde, provided an oral update stating that the report identified the provision of a bus stop adjacent to the site although since publication of the Committee report a technical note had been submitted by the applicant advising that the provision of a bus stop was not feasible. On assessing the evidence, the Head of Infrastructure (Highways) accepted that a bus stop in this location for the proposed type of development would be unlikely to make a meaningful travel choice change and as such, a condition for the provision of a bus stop was not recommended. It was noted that the local highway authority had advised no objection to the proposed development. The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested parties who wished to exercise their right to address the Committee: · Agent – Mr Ben Withers · Objector – Mr Julian George · Local Member – Councillor Reg Owens Following Mr Withers address, Councillor Mark Carter queried if any other sites were being considered. Mr Withers advised that in the early stages of investigations other sites had been considered, but had proceeded to be discounted. It was clarified that the proposed site was the only site currently deemed suitable. Following a question from Councillor Mark Carter, Mr Withers advised that he was not able to provide a figure on the cost that would be required to bring Winsel site up to standard as that site had been discounted at an early stage due to its unsuitability. Following Mr George’s address, Councillor Tim Evans queried if Mr George was the owner of the local turkey farm and if so, was noise from the farm an issue. Mr George clarified that he was not the owner of the turkey farm, and in general, noise from the farm was not an issue but did fluctuate depending on the direction of prevailing wind. Councillor Jacob Williams sought clarification on the alternative access road which would be used during certain times, to which Mr George referred to the site plan and explained that he was referring to the northern boundary access point. Councillor Reg Owens, Local Member, addressed the Committee to express his disapproval of the site. He provided some history of the site, outlined the impact the refinery had had on neighbouring residents and made reference to a legal agreement that had been made many years ago stating that if the use of the refinery ceased, the land would be returned to agricultural land and suggested that the agreement be given further consideration. Concerns were raised regarding the negative noise and air pollution impact the site would have on neighbouring residents and stated that in his opinion there were alternative sites better suited for the development. The Committee proceeded to discuss the application and the key points were noted as follows: · Councillors Brian Hall, Mark Carter and Jamie Adams acknowledged that the County needed a sufficient waste facility and raised no concerns regarding the proposed location. They did however highlight the importance of installation of acoustic fencing around the site, in advance of the construction phase, to assist with sound retention within the site perimeters and to mitigate noise impact on neighbouring residents. · Following a question from Councillor Brain Hall regarding the construction timetable, the Planning Officer advised that a Construction Environment Management Plan had been proposed as a condition, which would seek to control the days and hours of construction to minimise impact on neighbouring properties and the environment. · Councillor Tim Evans queried what impact the current waste facility in Pembroke Dock had on the local area in terms of noise and odour impact. Councillor Tony Wilcox, Pembroke Dock (Pennar) Ward, commented that the impact from the current site was minimal and did not generate significant volumes of complaints although lorry traffic to the site was commented to be heavy. · Following further discussion regarding the acoustic screening, the Chief Planning Officer provided further information on the matter stating that it would be made up of two elements. He advised that to alleviate the Committee’s concerns, as part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan condition, a requirement for one element of the screening to be introduced at construction stage to assist with noise impact on neighbouring residents could be included. Councillor Marc Carter Moved that delegated authority be granted to the Director of Community Services to approve both applications, as recommended, subject to the withdrawal of the Welsh Ministers’ Holding Direction and with the inclusion that the noise mitigation condition be implemented at the start of the construction phase; Seconded by Councillor Brian Hall. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Tony Wilcox, Michelle Wiggins, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams [14] There were no votes against or abstentions. RESOLVED (a) 21/1102/PA - That delegated authority be granted to the Director of Community Services to APPROVE the application subject to withdrawal of the Welsh Ministers’ Holding Direction, with the inclusion that the noise mitigation condition be implemented at the start of the construction phase and all conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services. (b) 21/1104/PA - That delegated authority be granted to the Director of Community Services to APPROVE the application subject to withdrawal of the Welsh Ministers’ Holding Direction, with the inclusion that the noise mitigation condition be implemented at the start of the construction phase and all conditions outlined in Section 1.2 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED (a) That the application be APPROVED, subject to the completion of a S106 Planning Obligation and conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services. (b) In the event the planning obligation is not completed within 3 months of the above resolution then discretion be exercised to refuse the application due to failure to comply with the requirements of policy GN.3 of the Local Development Plan.
This outline application was presented for Committee consideration as it involved the development of a site in excess of 1.0 ha for residential purposes paragraph 1(a) of the scheme of delegation). The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested parties who wished to exercise their right to address the Committee: · Agent – Mr Andrew Vaughan-Harries · Objector – Mr Paul Rees · Local Member – Councillor Michael John Following Mr Vaughan-Harries’ address, Councillor Mark Carter requested further information on the formation of the 85% of properties which were not the affordable housing contribution. Mr Vaughan-Harries advised that the application was only an outline application and the developer would make the final decision on the formation of the properties as part of a reserved matters application, although commented that it would likely be a mix of 2, 3 and 4 bedroom properties. Following Mr Rees address, Councillor Mark Carter asked him to clarify if his concerns were that occupiers of the new housing development would park outside the school. Mr Rees advised that his concerns were not with the occupiers of the development parking outside the school but were regarding the additional traffic which would need to access the junction, which during peak school times was already dangerous. Councillor Michael John, Local Member, addressed the Committee to express that he did not object to the principle of planning on the site and had been happy to see the total amount of proposed homes reduce from 75 to 54 with 15% of the homes to be an affordable contribution. Concerns were however raised regarding road safety, the importance of the green buffer belt and the air pollution caused by the Welsh Water treatment works. A request was made that due consideration be given to the Construction Environmental Management Plan to ensure minimal disruption. The Committee proceeded to discuss the application and the key points were noted as follows: · Councillor Nicola Gwynn made reference to the affordable housing contribution and reiterated the Community Council’s comments about those homes being offered to people with a local connection. It was queried whether a covenant could be placed upon those homes to ensure only local residents in need of affordable housing could purchase them. The Chief Planning Officer advised that the Section 106 legal agreement would set out the terms, and would limit the purchase to a buyer currently residing in Pembrokeshire but would not limit it to the Llangwm area. It was noted that a cascade effect for local restriction could not be implemented, as the site was not deemed an exception site. Councillor Brian Hall Moved that the application be approved, as recommended, subject to the completion of a S106 Planning Obligation; Seconded by Councillor Mark Carter. · Following a question from Councillor Tim Evans, the Chief Planning Officer clarified that the outline permission would limit the development to 54 dwellings and any increase to that would require a new full planning application to be submitted. · On receiving a number of questions from the Local Member and Councillor Alec Cormack, the Planning Officer, Mark Hyde, provided further explanation on the affordable contribution requirement and confirmed that 15% of the total amount of units would be affordable units. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams [14] There were no votes against or abstentions. RESOLVED (a) That the application be APPROVED, subject to the completion of a S106 Planning Obligation and conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services. (b) In the event the planning obligation is not completed within 3 months of the above resolution then discretion be exercised to refuse the application due to failure to comply with the requirements of policy GN.3 of the Local Development Plan.
As stated as part of the Chairman’s briefing, an alteration to the running order was being made, to consider Agenda Item No 14, Planning Application No.21/1198/PA – Withybush General Hospital, Fishguard Road, Haverfordwest, SA61 2PZ next on the agenda.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
This application was presented for Committee consideration as it involved a C2 hospital development in excess of 500 sq.m. (paragraph 1(f) of the scheme of delegation). The Planning Officer, Mark Hyde, provided an oral update stating that a consultation response had been received from the Pollution Control Team confirming no objections. The Committee proceeded to discuss the application and the key points were noted as follows: · Following a question from Councillor Jordan Ryan, the Planning Officer confirmed that only 6 parking spaces were being removed. · Clarification was sought by Councillor Tim Evans, as to whether the building was a temporary or permanent structure. The Planning Officer stated that formal clarification had not ben received but it was likely to be a permeant structure. · Councillor John Cole queried if the additional space which would be created by the proposed building could be found within the current building. The Planning Officer advised that they had also asked that question and had been informed that to ensure adequate health and safety provision for staff and patients the additional building was necessary. Councillor Andrew Evans Moved that the application be approved as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Jordan Ryan. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams [14] There were no votes against or abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
The Meeting adjourned at 12:50pm for a short lunch break and reconvened at 1:15pm.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services
This application was for Committee consideration as the Director of Community services had resolved to remove the application from the scheme of delegation due to the decision on the proposed development’s impact within the local community being finely balanced between competing interests and being complex and sensitive and would benefit from a public examination of the merits (criterion 2). The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested party who wished to exercise her right to address the Committee: · Objector – Mrs Gill Wisloki Due to technical difficulties, the Chairman read our part of Mrs Wisloki’s address on her behalf, before she re-joined the meeting and read out the final part of her address to the Committee. The Committee proceeded to discuss the application and the key points were noted as follows: · Following a question from Councillor Alec Cormack as to whether the holiday let element of the development would need to comply with policy SP16, the Chief Planning Officer outlined the requirements that needed to be considered under policy SP16 and clarified that the application would comply with the policy. · Councillor Jamie Adams made reference to a number of environmental concerns which the objector had raised and queried whether any of the points raised were new points that had not already been considered when dealing with the application. The Planning Officer, Sian Husband, advised that the application had been supported by ecological surveys and a number of recommendations has been suggested by the Council’s ecologist and Natural Resources Wales which were covered within the proposed conditions. Councillor Jamie Adams Moved that the application be approved as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Iwan Ward. · On receiving a question from Councillor Tim Evans, the Planning Officer confirmed that there would be no change in the height of the structure. · Councillor Alec Cormack made reference to a previous application on the same building and queried why the current application’s impact was classed to as being ‘finely balanced between competing interests and being complex and sensitive and would benefit from a public examination of the merits’. The Chief Planning Officer outlined the reasons which had led the Director to remove the application from the scheme of delegation which consisted of a range of factors. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Brian Hall, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams [12] Against the Motion: Councillor Jordan Ryan [1] Abstained from voting: Councillor Mark Carter [1] RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services
This item of business was withdrawn from the agenda as a late representation had been received which included information which was not covered within the Committee report. It was stated that the application would be referred to a subsequent Committee meeting.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to APPROVE the application subject to receipt of an amended plan in respect of the front elevation and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
[Having previously declared a personal and prejudicial interest in this item of business, Councillor Tony Wilcox withdrew from the meeting] This application was for Committee consideration as the application was made by a close family member of an Elected Member of the Council (paragraph 1(m) of the scheme of delegation). The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested party who wished to exercise his right to address the Committee: · Applicant – Mr Dean Wilcox Councillor Mark Carter Moved that delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning officer to approve the application as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Tim Evans Following a question from Councillor Brian Hall, the Chief Planning Officer assured Members that the construction method statement as outlined within the proposed conditions would include details of the construction programme, pre-commencement. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams [12] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to APPROVE the application subject to receipt of an amended plan in respect of the front elevation and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED (a) That delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to APPROVE the application following resolution of ecology issues and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services including any conditions required in connection with ecology and the completion of a section 106 agreement. (b) If the legal agreement, under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, is not completed within 3 months of the foregoing resolution and if ecology issues cannot be satisfactorily resolved then delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to exercise discretion to refuse the application on the grounds of non-compliance with policies GN.1, GN.2, GN.3, GN.28 and GN.37 of the Local Development Plan (LDP).
[Having previously declared a personal interest in this item of business, Councillor Brian Hall received advice from the Solicitor, proceeded to make his interest a personal and prejudicial interest and withdrew from the meeting] This application was for Committee consideration as it was for development contrary to the development plan but which was being recommended for approval (paragraph 1(n) of the scheme of delegation). The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested party who wished to exercise his right to address the Committee: · Objector – Mr Garry Hart The Committee proceeded to discuss the application and the key points were noted as follows: · Following questions from Councillor Alec Cormack regarding a previous outline planning permission as outlined with the Committee report, the Chief Planning Officer confirmed that if the current application was approved, only 41 units could be developed on the rest of the site. Councillor Tony Wilcox Moved that delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning officer to approve the application as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Michael Williams. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Nicola Gwynn, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [12] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED (a) That delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to APPROVE the application following resolution of ecology issues and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services including any conditions required in connection with ecology and the completion of a section 106 agreement. (b) If the legal agreement, under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, is not completed within 3 months of the foregoing resolution and if ecology issues cannot be satisfactorily resolved then delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to exercise discretion to refuse the application on the grounds of non-compliance with policies GN.1, GN.2, GN.3, GN.28 and GN.37 of the Local Development Plan (LDP).
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to APPROVE the application subject to no objection being received from Natural Resources Wales and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
This application was for Committee consideration as it involved a tourist, leisure or recreation development over 0.5 ha in area (paragraph 1 (g) of the scheme of delegation. The Committee was advised that due notification had been received from the following interested party who wished to exercise his right to address the Committee: · Agent – Mr Wayne Reynolds Councillor Mark Carter Moved that delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to approve the application as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Andrew Edwards. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Brian Hall, Nicola Gwynn, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [14] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That delegated power be granted to the Chief Planning Officer to APPROVE the application subject to no objection being received from Natural Resources Wales and subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services. [Councillor Nicola Gwynn left the meeting at this juncture]
This outline application was presented for Committee consideration as it involved a development that incorporated an element of C2 housing in excess of 500 sq.m. (paragraph 1(f ) of the scheme of delegation). Following a number of question from Councillor Mark Carter, the Planning Officer, Mark Hyde, clarified the purpose of a reablement centre and the Chief Planning Officer confirmed that although not included within the Committee report, Haverfordwest Town Council were in support of the proposal. Councillor Tim Evans Moved that the application be approved as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Mark Carter. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Brian Hall, Nicola Gwynn, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [14] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services. [Councillor Nicola Gwynn left the meeting at this juncture]
The Meeting adjourned at 15:05pm for a comfort break and reconvened at 15:10pm.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
This application was for Committee consideration as it was contrary to the Local Development Plan but which was being recommended for approval, (paragraph 1(n) of the scheme of delegation). Following a question from Councillor Alec Cormack, the Chief Planning Officer provided an explanation as to the informal advice which had been given to the applicant as outlined within the Committee report. Councillor Mark Carter Moved that the application be approved as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Alec Cormack. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Jamie Adams, Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [12] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
[Having previously declared a personal and prejudicial interest in this item of business, Councillor Jamie Adams withdrew from the meeting and stated that he would not be returning] This application was for Committee consideration as it was for tourist, leisure or recreational development over 0.5 hectares in area (paragraph 1(g) of the scheme of delegation). Following a question from Councillor Tim Evans, it was confirmed that the speed limit of the application site location was 40mph. Councillor Mark Carter Moved that the application be approved as recommended; Seconded by Councillor John Cole. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams. [11] There were no votes against the motion or abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
This application was for Committee consideration as it involved a development that was contrary to the development plan but which was being recommended for approval (paragraph 1(n) of the scheme of delegation). Following a question from Councillor Mark Carter, the Planning Officer, Ceri Jones, provided further details on the proposed roof, stating that the plans show a mono pitch, zinc construction. Councillor Iwan Ward expressed that he felt the proposal was out of character for the village. Councillor Jordan Ryan Moved that the application be approved as recommended; Seconded by Councillor Mark Carter. The Committee then proceeded to the vote, undertaken by way of a roll-call, which was carried. The votes were recorded as follows: For the Motion: Councillors Mark Carter, John Cole, Alec Cormack, Andrew Edwards, Tim Evans, Jordan Ryan, Iwan Ward, Michelle Wiggins, Tony Wilcox, Jacob Williams and Michael Williams [10] Against the Motion: Councillor Iwan Ward [1] There were no abstentions. RESOLVED That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions outlined in Section 1.1 of the report of the Director of Community Services.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.