Loading
The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
Resolved that: The application be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the report.
it was resolved not to accept the Officer recommendation to conditionally approve the planning application. The Planning Officer D Cross provided a summary of the application and outlined the current position. The Planning Officer D Cross thenprovided Committee Members with a letter from the applicant. The Chair notified the committee that there would be an adjournment to allow Committee Members to read the letter from the applicant. After the adjournment, the Planning Officer provided information regarding the Committee’s reasons for refusal. The following questions were raised by the committee and were responded to in detail by the Officers in attendance: · Would the applicant be able to claim costs for the application? · What’s the problem with not accepting these? · Is it all down to interpretation? · Regarding the letter, does the applicant have any other properties that she rents out as HMOs within the Local Authority? · CCTV – have they said why it doesn’t seem appropriate? Resolved that: The application be refused. The Committee agreed that Cllr D Sammon wouldprepare the evidence on behalf of the Councillors should an appeal be put forth.
it was resolved not to accept the Officer recommendation to conditionally approve the planning application. The Planning Officer A provided a summary of the application and outlined the current position. The following question was raised: · Did you find out if there was an active business in the neighbouring property? Comments were made regarding the reasons for refusal. Resolved that: The application be refused. The Committee agreed that Cllr D Sammon would prepare the evidence on behalf of the Councillors should an appeal be put forth.
Resolved that: The appeal decision be received.
Resolved that: That the public be excluded from the Meeting on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined under Part 4 of Schedule 12A Section 100 (A) (4) of the Local Government Act 1972
Apologies for absence were received from Cllr B Carter, Cllr L Davies and Cllr E Galsworthy.
Cllr J Thomas Declared an Interest in Item 8- Hackney Carriage Vehicle Licence.
Decision as recorded
Resolved that: The application be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the report.
Construction of mountain bike trails, access trails and uplift track extension and amendments. The Planning Officer A Foote introduced the report and provided the committee with a power point presentation outlining the application. The following comments were raised: · Bike Park Wales is one of the biggest success stories in Merthyr Tydfil. · It’s a fantastic facility and expansion is proving that it is a success. Resolved that: The application be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the report.
Decision as recorded
it was resolved not to accept the Officer recommendation to conditionally approve the planning application. The Planning Officer D Cross provided a summary of the application and outlined the current position. The Planning Officer D Cross thenprovided Committee Members with a letter from the applicant. The Chair notified the committee that there would be an adjournment to allow Committee Members to read the letter from the applicant. After the adjournment, the Planning Officer provided information regarding the Committee’s reasons for refusal. The following questions were raised by the committee and were responded to in detail by the Officers in attendance: · Would the applicant be able to claim costs for the application? · What’s the problem with not accepting these? · Is it all down to interpretation? · Regarding the letter, does the applicant have any other properties that she rents out as HMOs within the Local Authority? · CCTV – have they said why it doesn’t seem appropriate? Resolved that: The application be refused. The Committee agreed that Cllr D Sammon wouldprepare the evidence on behalf of the Councillors should an appeal be put forth.
Change of use from 4 bedroom dwelling (C3 use class) to 6 bedroom HMO (C4 use class) At the Planning, Regulatory and Licensing Committee meeting held on the 10th of April 2024, it was resolved not to accept the Officer recommendation to conditionally approve the planning application. The Planning Officer D Cross provided a summary of the application and outlined the current position. The Planning Officer D Cross thenprovided Committee Members with a letter from the applicant. The Chair notified the committee that there would be an adjournment to allow Committee Members to read the letter from the applicant. After the adjournment, the Planning Officer provided information regarding the Committee’s reasons for refusal. The following questions were raised by the committee and were responded to in detail by the Officers in attendance: · Would the applicant be able to claim costs for the application? · What’s the problem with not accepting these? · Is it all down to interpretation? · Regarding the letter, does the applicant have any other properties that she rents out as HMOs within the Local Authority? · CCTV – have they said why it doesn’t seem appropriate? Resolved that: The application be refused. The Committee agreed that Cllr D Sammon wouldprepare the evidence on behalf of the Councillors should an appeal be put forth.
Decision as recorded
it was resolved not to accept the Officer recommendation to conditionally approve the planning application. The Planning Officer A provided a summary of the application and outlined the current position. The following question was raised: · Did you find out if there was an active business in the neighbouring property? Comments were made regarding the reasons for refusal. Resolved that: The application be refused. The Committee agreed that Cllr D Sammon would prepare the evidence on behalf of the Councillors should an appeal be put forth.
Change of use from a C3 dwelling house to a C4 house in multiple occupancy (HMO) (5 bedrooms) At the Planning, Regulatory and Licensing Committee meeting held on the 10th of April 2024, it was resolved not to accept the Officer recommendation to conditionally approve the planning application. The Planning Officer A provided a summary of the application and outlined the current position. The following question was raised: · Did you find out if there was an active business in the neighbouring property? Comments were made regarding the reasons for refusal. Resolved that: The application be refused. The Committee agreed that Cllr D Sammon would prepare the evidence on behalf of the Councillors should an appeal be put forth.
Decision as recorded
Resolved that: The appeal decision be received.
New digital advertisement hoarding comprising single illuminated LED 48-sheet advertisement display Resolved that: The appeal decision be received.
The Chair advised that there was no other business deemed urgent.
Decision as recorded
Resolved that: That the public be excluded from the Meeting on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined under Part 4 of Schedule 12A Section 100 (A) (4) of the Local Government Act 1972
Resolved that: That the public be excluded from the Meeting on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined under Part 4 of Schedule 12A Section 100 (A) (4) of the Local Government Act 1972
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.