Loading
The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
Resolved that: In respect of Bedlinog 79 (a) On the balance of probabilities, there is sufficient evidence to support that the route marked with a bold black line between Points A – B on the Plan, Bedlinog 79 has been used for such period so as to raise presumption that it has been dedicated as a footpath and that the evidence has not been rebutted by other evidence (b) On confirming (a) above to approve the making of the Definitive Map Modification Order to show Bedlinog 79 as a footpath (c) To approve the confirmation of the Definitive Map Modification Order made as a result of (b) above provided no objections or representations are made within the prescribed period or if any objections or representations so made are withdrawn (d) If any objections or representations are made within the prescribed period and not subsequently withdrawn then to refer the relevant Order to the Planning Inspectorate for determination.
No apologies for absence were received as all Members were present.
No Declarations of Interest were made.
The Rights of Way Guidance was noted by the Committee.
Decision as recorded
Resolved that: In respect of Bedlinog 79 (a) On the balance of probabilities, there is sufficient evidence to support that the route marked with a bold black line between Points A – B on the Plan, Bedlinog 79 has been used for such period so as to raise presumption that it has been dedicated as a footpath and that the evidence has not been rebutted by other evidence (b) On confirming (a) above to approve the making of the Definitive Map Modification Order to show Bedlinog 79 as a footpath (c) To approve the confirmation of the Definitive Map Modification Order made as a result of (b) above provided no objections or representations are made within the prescribed period or if any objections or representations so made are withdrawn (d) If any objections or representations are made within the prescribed period and not subsequently withdrawn then to refer the relevant Order to the Planning Inspectorate for determination.
Bedlinog 79 Cheryl Jones led the Members in detail through the ‘Bedlinog 79’ report. Taking into consideration all of the evidence which has been provided, including historical documents Councillors Resolved that: In respect of Bedlinog 79 (a) On the balance of probabilities, there is sufficient evidence to support that the route marked with a bold black line between Points A – B on the Plan, Bedlinog 79 has been used for such period so as to raise presumption that it has been dedicated as a footpath and that the evidence has not been rebutted by other evidence (b) On confirming (a) above to approve the making of the Definitive Map Modification Order to show Bedlinog 79 as a footpath (c) To approve the confirmation of the Definitive Map Modification Order made as a result of (b) above provided no objections or representations are made within the prescribed period or if any objections or representations so made are withdrawn (d) If any objections or representations are made within the prescribed period and not subsequently withdrawn then to refer the relevant Order to the Planning Inspectorate for determination.
The Chair advised that there was no other business deemed urgent.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.