The decisions as the council's minutes record them. A plain-language summary follows once it has been written.
RESOLVED: To defer in order to conduct a site visit
RESOLVED to defer to conduct a site visit
RESOLVED: To approve the application subject to conditions relating to the following: 1. Duration of working period 31/12/2040 and restoration up to 31/12/2042 to coincide with the terms of overarching planning permission. 2. Permitted operations and compliance with submitted details/plans. 3. Mark the site boundary and mineral extraction zones. 4. Working Hours. 5. Manage HGV vehicle movements from the site to 9 per day on working days (Monday - Friday), No more than 2 on Saturdays, Sundays and Bank/Public Holidays. 6. Dust Suppression Measures. 7. Air quality monitoring 8. Operational Noise – noise level restrictions. 9. Noise monitoring surveys. 10. Restrict the operating hours of the crusher. 11. Reasonable measures to avoid reptiles. 12. Biodiversity Enhancement Plan (to include the creation of an otter holt). 13. Restoration Management Plan (to include surveying and eradication measures for non-native invasive species and stock-proof fencing to stop access of livestock to restored areas).
RESOLVED to approve subject to relevant planning conditions: 1. Compliance with the new submitted plans 2. The window on the eastern elevation of the ground floor to be opaque 3. The development shall be commenced within five years 4. No development to commence until a drainage plan for the site has been submitted to the Local Planning Authority and approved in writing. 5. The exact mitigation measures and the biodiversity enhancement suggestions, as included in sections 5.2 to 5.4 of the Preliminary Ecological Report submitted with application C21/0042/25/LL, must be followed. 6. It shall not be permitted at any time for the highway's current boundary wall/hedge/fence or any new highway-facing boundary erected to be higher than 1 metre above the carriageway level of the adjacent county road from either end of the site's boundary to the highway and it is not permitted to erect anything higher than this within 2m of the wall in question. 7. The access must be planned and constructed in full accordance with the submitted plans. 8. Removal of permitted development rights Notes 1 – Party Wall Act Note 2 – Draw the applicant’s attention to Welsh Water observations 3 – Sustainable Drainage Systems Note
RESOLVED to approve with conditions 1. In accordance with the plans 2. Implement the permission within five years. 3. Materials 4. Landscaping and tree preservation 5. Boundary / curtilage details 6. Archaeological investigation work 7. Removal of permitted rights 8. Complete the work in accordance with the protected species report.
RESOLVED to delegate powers to the Senior Planning Manager to approve the application subject to the applicant signing a Section 106 agreement to secure an open spaces financial contribution and to the following conditions: - 1. Five years. 2. In accordance with the plans/details submitted with the application. 3. Landscaping 4. Secure a plan / arrangement for providing the affordable units e.g. mix, tenure, occupancy criteria, timetable and arrangements to ensure that units are affordable now and in perpetuity. 5. Compliance with the recommendations of the following documents: the Preliminary Ecological Assessment; Reptile Survey and Eradication of Invasive Species Statement. 6. Agree on details regarding Welsh names for the development before the residential units are occupied for any purpose along with signage advertising and promoting the development. 7. Working hours limited to 8:00-18:00 Monday to Friday; 08:00-13:00 Saturday and not at all on Sundays and Bank Holidays. 8. Compliance with the content of the Environmental Construction Management Plan document submitted as part of the application. 9. Relevant conditions from the Transportation Unit regarding improvements to the access and parking spaces. 10. Submit and agree to samples of materials and colours for the residential dwellings. 11. Submit and agree to biodiversity enhancements plan to include reptile re-location. 12. Submit and agree on solar panels details. 13. Restrict the use of the proposed housing to Use Class C3 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) (Amended) (Wales) Order 1987 – residential dwellings used as a sole residence or main residence. 14. Agree on the location and type of noise barrier adjacent to the houses of nearby residents before work is commenced on the site. 15. 106 condition/agreement for the relocation of reptiles. Note – need to submit a sustainable drainage system application to be agreed with the Council. Note – refer the applicant to Welsh Water observations and amended advice. Note – refer the applicant to observations and advice from Natural Resources Wales.
Apologies were received from Councillors Louise Hughes, Delyth Lloyd Griffiths and Huw Wyn Jones
a) The following member declared that he had an interest in relation to the item noted: Councillor Huw Rowlands (a member of this Planning Committee), in item 5.6 (C22/0909/22/LL) on the agenda because of a family connection The Member believed it was a prejudicial interest, and he withdrew from the meeting during the discussion on the application. b) The following members declared that they were local members in relation to the items noted: · Councillor Gruffydd Williams (a member of this Planning Committee) in relation to item 5.2 (C21/1220/42/LL) on the agenda · Councillor Kim Jones (not a member of this Planning Committee), in item 5.3 (C22/1169/15/LL) on the agenda · Councillor Meryl Roberts (not a member of this Planning Committee), in item 5.7 (C23/0201/08/LL) on the agenda
None to note
The Chair accepted the minutes of the previous meeting of this committee, held on 19 June 2023, as a true record
The Committee considered the following applications for development. Details of the applications were expanded upon, and questions were answered in relation to the plans and policy aspects. RESOLVED
Erection of Distribution Depot building and Administration and maintenance building, create vehicle and lorry parking areas, vehicle washing area, installation of security fencing, landscaping and associated works. APPLICATION WITHDRAWN
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED: To defer in order to conduct a site visit
Demolition of existing dwelling and construct a new dwelling in its place, and work to stabilise the cliffs a) The Senior Development Control Officer highlighted that this was a full application for the demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of a replacement dwelling, together with work to stabilise coastal cliffs. Externally, the new house would include a pitched roof finished in dark zinc and the finishes of the exterior walls would be a combination of timber boards on the upper floor and natural stone on the lower floors. He noted that the site and existing building were located at the foot of the cliffs of Nefyn Beach, and the cliffs were designated as the Clogwyni Pen Llŷn Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and was also the Porthdinllaen to Porth Pistyll Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). He added that the site was outside the current development boundary of Nefyn with access gained to the site along the beach as well as a public footpath that led down from the top of the cliff past the site and onwards to the beach below. He explained that the existing site contained a house that dated back to the late 1960s/early 1970s and of a style that included flat roofs. Its appearance conveyed those of that era. The site and the wider area were within the Llŷn and Enlli Landscape of Outstanding Historic Interest designation, and outside a nearby flood zone (which only applied to the beach). He noted that elements of the proposal had been amended since the original submission because of comments received, which included the external finishes of the dwelling following a comment by the AONB Unit (although the site was not within the AONB, these were considered as general comments). He added that originally, a part of the proposal involved diverting the existing public footpath that ran past the site and repositioning it to be further from the building. Following discussions and after receiving comments on the proposal from the Council's Rights of Way Unit, Nefyn Town Council and members of the public, it was decided that the proposal was too contentious and therefore the path would stay as it was. The application was submitted to the Planning Committee by the Local Member for reasons of it being an over-development of the site, that it would destabilise the cliffs and have an adverse impact on the area. In the context of relevant policies, reference was made to the requirements of policy PS 5 which stated that priority should be given to the effective use of land and infrastructure, prioritising the re-use of previously used land and buildings, wherever possible. In this case, a dwelling already existed, and the site was already developed, therefore the proposal satisfied the general requirements of policy PS 5 of the Anglesey and Gwynedd Joint Local Development Plan (JLDP). It was added that Policy TAI 13 of the LDP related specifically to replacement dwellings and set a series of criteria that must be conformed to (where appropriate) in order to approve such schemes. The officer added that the application had obviously involved some considerable scrutiny due to several specialist considerations that would not normally be found to the same degree at least, with most Planning applications to demolish and re-build residential housing. It was reported that qualified companies and/or individuals had assessed the information to hand and had stated their opinion, and that the findings and recommendations of the specialist reports would be included as formal conditions so that the development would have to be carried out in strict conformity to the recommended measures. By ensuring this, the development would be carried out in full compliance with the general consent agreed. Should the situation change in terms of amending the proposal in response to a situation that arises, then we would have to respond at that time to any new situation. In response to some of the objections that had been received expressing concern that granting permission would set a dangerous precedent, it was noted that there was a lawful right to have a dwelling on the site, and that the applicant would be entitled to adapt it without planning permission. It was noted that the size and bulk of the house matched the existing dwelling, but a pitched roof was proposed instead of a flat roof. For the purpose of the application, it was noted that the specialist information had been assessed and found to be acceptable. The proposal was considered acceptable and in compliance with the requirements of the relevant policies. b) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the applicant made the following observations: · There had been significant damage recently to the cliffs · Carrying out the adaptations would secure the cliff behind Morlais – which would subsequently ensure the safety of the family and the public · The path in front of the house was the only path that allowed access to the beach at high tide – the work would be a means to preserve the path · The existing building was unpopular – the pre-fab material would be replaced with more sympathetic materials · The size would be similar to the existing house but with less glass, and would use local stone and have a pitched roof which would have a more pleasing appearance · If the application was not approved, permission would be required to secure the cliffs and retain the house as it was · The main driver behind the development was safety · Most of the consultees supported the application · The safety of the family, and users of the footpath and the beach needed to be ensured c) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the Local Member made the following observations: · A large number had objected – how many complaints had been received? · The original application had included moving the footpath – he was very pleased that the route of the path would remain unchanged – need a condition to secure the use of the path for fishermen and the public · A slip and a series of steps connected the site and the beach – the handrail was unstable – there was no reference to this in the report · The existing dwelling was an eye-sore – he welcomed the fact that it would be demolished · It was a matter of opinion as to whether the proposal's design was an improvement · He accepted that the site was not part of the AONB, but it must be taken into account that it bordered the AONB and was located in one of the most beautiful places · Several applications had been refused based on design within the AONB but had then been approved on appeal · Considering the context of the objections, he suggested that the members visit the site ch) It was proposed and seconded to conduct a site visit RESOLVED: To defer in order to conduct a site visit
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED to defer to conduct a site visit
Demolition of former library and construction of three new intermediate affordable dwellings. a) The Senior Development Control Officer highlighted that this was a full application for the demolition of the former Llanberis library and the construction of three new 'intermediate' affordable dwellings in its place (two 2-bedroom semi-detached dwellings and one 3-bedroom detached dwelling). The library was closed in 2017 and the site, which was within the residential area of the Llanberis Local Service Centre as defined in the LDP, had been dormant since. The site was served by Capel Coch Road, which also served Dolbadarn primary school. Reference was made to the footbridge over Afon Coch river towards the rear of the site, which connected with Glanrafon Estate – over the past few years flood alleviation work had been completed on the riverbanks because of significant flooding in 2012. This was a development by Cyngor Gwynedd as part of the 'Tŷ Gwynedd' scheme and the houses will be offered to buy or rent for an affordable price to local people. Attention was drawn to the number of objections to the plan because parking issues already existed on Ffordd Capel Coch which caused ill-feeling amongst residents, and there was concern that the construction of three dwellings at this location would exacerbate the situation. In addition, there was concern regarding the hazard to street users, including children who attended the nearby school, due to the increase in traffic. Despite the concerns, the Transportation Unit had no objection to the proposal in principle although they had noted that they would not support the creation of on-street parking spaces. The officer stated that there was a private parking space for each new property in the plans and that space would remain for three cars to park on the road in front of the development. It was added that until recently, the site had been a public library that attracted traffic itself. Consequently, it was not considered that the development itself would exacerbate the on-street parking situation compared to what could be the case under the site's current lawful planning use. Similarly, it was not considered that the traffic caused by three dwellings would cause a greater risk to street users than the former library. In the context of flooding concerns, a Flood Consequence Assessment (FCA) had been submitted with the application in response to initial observations from Natural Resources Wales (NRW). It was noted that the findings of the Flood Consequence Assessment and the modelling process that was followed confirmed that the development would comply with the requirements of the current TAN 15, specifically the criteria set by Appendix 1 of the TAN. In addition, the FCA proposed a series of alleviation measures to improve the resilience of the development to flooding. As a result, the proposal was considered acceptable based on the ability to manage flood risk to the occupiers of the proposed dwellings, and that it would not cause added risk in other places. It was therefore considered that the application complied with the requirements of Policies PS 5 and PS 6 and the content of the current TAN 15: Development and Flood Risk (2004). In the context of the specialist information submitted regarding the flood risk, it was accepted that this development would not exacerbate the situation in terms of material planning matters compared with what could occur under the site's present lawful planning use. Indeed, it was considered that the proposal might offer an opportunity to improve the site's resilience to flood risk and introduce improvements in terms of matters such as visual amenities and biodiversity. It was noted that the proposal offered the opportunity to create affordable housing for local people on a brownfield site within the development boundary; it was an acceptable plan in principle, and it complied with relevant local and national planning policies. b) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the Local Member made the following observations: · She was supportive of an application for affordable housing because of the housing crisis for local people, although the site in question was unsuitable · There was a significant lack of parking in the village – there were tensions between local residents / occupiers of second home / Airbnb sites regarding the shortage of parking spaces. · If the houses were built, where would people park? Some occupiers were elderly, lack of mobility – this had not been considered. · Local police officers were called out regularly to deal with matters of illegal parking · The scheme meant the loss of parking spaces that would lead to complete disarray · The road also led to a busy farm · She accepted that there was a shortage of houses, but the location was unsuitable · Was it possible to consider turning the old library into a car park – this would alleviate the problem? c) It was proposed and seconded to conduct a site visit to assess the context of the site ch) During the ensuing discussion, the following observations were made by Members: · Needed to consider the Community Council's concerns regarding parking · It was suggested that three dwellings be erected instead of two, which would release parking space · It would be irresponsible not to respond to the village's parking problems · The proximity of the site to the river needed to be considered RESOLVED to defer to conduct a site visit
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED: To approve the application subject to conditions relating to the following: 1. Duration of working period 31/12/2040 and restoration up to 31/12/2042 to coincide with the terms of overarching planning permission. 2. Permitted operations and compliance with submitted details/plans. 3. Mark the site boundary and mineral extraction zones. 4. Working Hours. 5. Manage HGV vehicle movements from the site to 9 per day on working days (Monday - Friday), No more than 2 on Saturdays, Sundays and Bank/Public Holidays. 6. Dust Suppression Measures. 7. Air quality monitoring 8. Operational Noise – noise level restrictions. 9. Noise monitoring surveys. 10. Restrict the operating hours of the crusher. 11. Reasonable measures to avoid reptiles. 12. Biodiversity Enhancement Plan (to include the creation of an otter holt). 13. Restoration Management Plan (to include surveying and eradication measures for non-native invasive species and stock-proof fencing to stop access of livestock to restored areas).
Application for the working of a slate waste tip to create stockpile for processing at an existing minerals plant. a) The Senior Minerals and Waste Planning Officer explained that this was an application for the working of a slate waste tip to create stockpile for processing at an existing minerals plant. The Bryntirion tip stood within the Ffestiniog Slate Quarry which was to the northwest of the town of Blaenau Ffestiniog; vehicular access to the quarry was gained from the A470 Trunk Road, around 150m north of Oakley Terrace. It was reported that the applicant operated a minerals plant that processed slate waste from both the Ffridd and Bryntirion waste tips to produce granulated slate products. The southern portion of the tip had already been worked as part of planning permission C10M/0103/03/MW (subsequently prolonged under C20/0079/03/AC). Material was moved from the tip using a tracked excavator and fed into a mobile crusher and feed hopper prior to being transported to be dried and milled in the plant on a conveyor belt. This powdered or granulated slate product was primarily used for building materials such as roofing felt, artificial slate bitumen, insecticides, paint, resins, pipeline coatings, roofing and damp-course felts, automotive body under seal, terrazzo tiles and plastics or exported by road as secondary aggregate. The need for the application came because of the limited reserve left in the tips that were already permitted to be worked. There were an estimated 520,000 tonnes of additional reserve within the application area, which would ensure that the minerals plant had a continuous supply of feedstock for five years. The proposal did not propose to increase HGV movements from the site, and it would release the mineral reserve in line with the existing conditions for Ffestiniog Quarry that restricted output to 9 loads per working day and 2 loads on Saturdays, Sundays, and Bank/Public Holidays. Reference was made to observations received from Network Rail (NR) which objected to the proposal because of the lack of information regarding dust control and its effects on the tunnel air shafts. However, it was explained that the applicant had provided thorough information on dust control and the Public Protection Unit had recommended appropriate conditions (mitigation measures) to reduce any impact on air quality. It was added that NR also objected based on ground stability and water run-off in relation to the Ffestiniog tunnel and railway. NR had requested further discussions between all parties in March, but a meeting to discuss further observations on the content of the technical information had not materialised. The Minerals Planning Authority was of the opinion that the applicant had provided adequate information in terms of technical reports relating to the surface load bearing, hydrology/geology and restoration proposals, and that none of the information provided by Network Rail disproved the adequacy or reliability of these reports. The Authority had contacted Network Rail several times regarding these matters, specifically drawing their attention to the detailed reports received, but no additional comments were received. In the context of Biodiversity matters, it was noted that the Gwynedd Biodiversity Unit and NRW had confirmed that they had no objection to the proposals provided relevant conditions were imposed. These conditions would ensure that the proposal complied with policy AMG 5 of the JLDP and TAN 5, namely that there was no adverse effect on local biodiversity. It was considered that the proposed development complied with all relevant planning policies and considerations, and it was recommended that the planning application be approved with conditions. b) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the applicant made the following observations: · The application would facilitate an extension to the works · There would be a continuous five-year supply of material · This would safeguard six jobs for at least another five years · This was the only source of this material in the UK · This step would be significant in securing a continued provision of materials · The company saw value in the history of the quarry It was proposed and seconded to approve the application. RESOLVED: To approve the application subject to conditions relating to the following: 1. Duration of working period 31/12/2040 and restoration up to 31/12/2042 to coincide with the terms of overarching planning permission. 2. Permitted operations and compliance with submitted details/plans. 3. Mark the site boundary and mineral extraction zones. 4. Working Hours. 5. Manage HGV vehicle movements from the site to 9 per day on working days (Monday - Friday), No more than 2 on Saturdays, Sundays and Bank/Public Holidays. 6. Dust Suppression Measures. 7. Air quality monitoring 8. Operational Noise – noise level restrictions. 9. Noise monitoring surveys. 10. Restrict the operating hours of the crusher. 11. Reasonable measures to avoid reptiles. 12. Biodiversity Enhancement Plan (to include the creation of an otter holt). 13. Restoration Management Plan (to include surveying and eradication measures for non-native invasive species and stock-proof fencing to stop access of livestock to restored areas).
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED to approve subject to relevant planning conditions: 1. Compliance with the new submitted plans 2. The window on the eastern elevation of the ground floor to be opaque 3. The development shall be commenced within five years 4. No development to commence until a drainage plan for the site has been submitted to the Local Planning Authority and approved in writing. 5. The exact mitigation measures and the biodiversity enhancement suggestions, as included in sections 5.2 to 5.4 of the Preliminary Ecological Report submitted with application C21/0042/25/LL, must be followed. 6. It shall not be permitted at any time for the highway's current boundary wall/hedge/fence or any new highway-facing boundary erected to be higher than 1 metre above the carriageway level of the adjacent county road from either end of the site's boundary to the highway and it is not permitted to erect anything higher than this within 2m of the wall in question. 7. The access must be planned and constructed in full accordance with the submitted plans. 8. Removal of permitted development rights Notes 1 – Party Wall Act Note 2 – Draw the applicant’s attention to Welsh Water observations 3 – Sustainable Drainage Systems Note
An application to amend conditions attached to planning permission C21/0042/25/LL for the erection of a two-storey dwelling, garage, creation of new vehicular access and associated works: Condition 2 – Variation of the approved plan to enable a change in the position of the proposed building within the site; Condition 9 – amendment in wording to require completion of the access shown on the submitted plan prior to the occupation of the dwelling. Attention was drawn to the additional observations. a) The Planning Manager highlighted that this was an application to vary Condition 2 (planning permission C21/0042/25/LL) for full planning permission to erect a two-storey dwelling and associated works, to allow changing the position of the approved dwelling 3m north-eastwards. He explained that the site was served by an access from Ffordd Penrhos which was a third-class county road, and that a parking area, garage and car port would be provided as part of the development. The rear of the site bordered with a wooded area that was designated as the Ffordd Treborth Woodland Wildlife Site, which separated the site from the Treborth Garden Centre. Revised plans were received when discussing this application, showing a reduction in the building's footprint compared to what had been approved originally. He noted that the proposal to move the location of the dwelling resulted from the need to avoid development within the buffer zone, which extended 4m either side of the centre of the main sewer pipe that crossed the site. He highlighted that the application also included a proposal to vary Condition 9 of the previous permission to facilitate the construction work by ensuring that the final vehicular access was in place before the dwelling was occupied rather than before development of the site. The application was submitted to the Committee at the Local Member’s request. A message had been received from the local member noting that, after reading the officer's report and in light of further discussions with the residents of the nearest property, they had confirmed to her that they no longer objected to the application as it stood. However, they emphasised the need to adhere to the plans submitted with the application. The principle of the proposal to erect a house of a similar size and design on this site was considered to have already been accepted via planning permission C21/0042/25/LL – the relevant policies had not changed since then, therefore that permission had been implemented and was extant. It was considered that the principle of building a dwelling on the site remained acceptable and in accordance with the principle of current housing policies. Considering the reduction in the development's footprint, especially in the extension towards the north, together with the discussion regarding the amenity impacts, it was not believed that moving this house to the new position would have a significantly harmful amenity impact on the site's appearance, the local development pattern or on private amenities. b) It was proposed and seconded to approve the application. RESOLVED to approve subject to relevant planning conditions: 1. Compliance with the new submitted plans 2. The window on the eastern elevation of the ground floor to be opaque 3. The development shall be commenced within five years 4. No development to commence until a drainage plan for the site has been submitted to the Local Planning Authority and approved in writing. 5. The exact mitigation measures and the biodiversity enhancement suggestions, as included in sections 5.2 to 5.4 of the Preliminary Ecological Report submitted with application C21/0042/25/LL, must be followed. 6. It shall not be permitted at any time for the highway's current boundary wall/hedge/fence or any new highway-facing boundary erected to be higher than 1 metre above the carriageway level of the adjacent county road from either end of the site's boundary to the highway and it is not permitted to erect anything higher than this within 2m of the wall in question. 7. The access must be planned and constructed in full accordance with the submitted plans. 8. Removal of permitted development rights Notes 1 – Party Wall Act Note 2 – Draw the applicant’s attention to Welsh Water observations 3 – Sustainable Drainage Systems Note
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED to approve with conditions 1. In accordance with the plans 2. Implement the permission within five years. 3. Materials 4. Landscaping and tree preservation 5. Boundary / curtilage details 6. Archaeological investigation work 7. Removal of permitted rights 8. Complete the work in accordance with the protected species report.
Demolish existing dwelling and construct a new house in its place together with a soakaway and private treatment plant. a) The Planning Manager highlighted that this was a full application involving a proposal to demolish an existing dwelling that was in a dilapidated state and to construct a replacement dwelling. The plans showed that the proposed house would keep to the layout form of the existing property and would include a shed, living room / kitchen, hall and office on the ground floor and three bedrooms with a bathroom on the first floor. The proposal would involve constructing a rear extension for a kitchen and bedroom. The property was served by a narrow private track that connected the house and a more recent nearby farmhouse to a third-class county road nearby. It was noted that the property was located within a Landscape of Outstanding Historic Interest and a Special Landscape Area and stood outside any village boundary and was within a rural area. It was highlighted that the Head of Environment considered that the application should be submitted to the Planning Committee due to public interest in the application and the site, and because of the close working relationship between the applicant's brother and the Planning Department. Attention was drawn to the relevant planning history. In terms of the principle of the development, it was noted that the proposal involved demolishing an existing house and erecting a new house in its place by re-using previously developed land, and such a development could therefore be supported. It was reported that the proposal satisfied the basic the requirements of policies PS5, PCYFF1 and PS17 of the LDP as well as Policy TAI 13 that related specifically to replacement dwellings. It was added that Policy TAI 13 set a series of criteria that must be conformed to (where appropriate) to approve such schemes. A lawful development certificate for the proposed use of the property as a residential dwelling was granted on 06-10-2016, therefore it could be stated that the lawful residential use of the house remained valid. Having considered all the relevant planning matters including the local and national policies and guidance, as well as all the observations received, this proposal was considered acceptable and in compliance with the requirements of the relevant policies, and that the conditions addressed the public's concerns. b) It was proposed and seconded to approve the application. RESOLVED to approve with conditions 1. In accordance with the plans 2. Implement the permission within five years. 3. Materials 4. Landscaping and tree preservation 5. Boundary / curtilage details 6. Archaeological investigation work 7. Removal of permitted rights 8. Complete the work in accordance with the protected species report.
Decision as recorded
RESOLVED to delegate powers to the Senior Planning Manager to approve the application subject to the applicant signing a Section 106 agreement to secure an open spaces financial contribution and to the following conditions: - 1. Five years. 2. In accordance with the plans/details submitted with the application. 3. Landscaping 4. Secure a plan / arrangement for providing the affordable units e.g. mix, tenure, occupancy criteria, timetable and arrangements to ensure that units are affordable now and in perpetuity. 5. Compliance with the recommendations of the following documents: the Preliminary Ecological Assessment; Reptile Survey and Eradication of Invasive Species Statement. 6. Agree on details regarding Welsh names for the development before the residential units are occupied for any purpose along with signage advertising and promoting the development. 7. Working hours limited to 8:00-18:00 Monday to Friday; 08:00-13:00 Saturday and not at all on Sundays and Bank Holidays. 8. Compliance with the content of the Environmental Construction Management Plan document submitted as part of the application. 9. Relevant conditions from the Transportation Unit regarding improvements to the access and parking spaces. 10. Submit and agree to samples of materials and colours for the residential dwellings. 11. Submit and agree to biodiversity enhancements plan to include reptile re-location. 12. Submit and agree on solar panels details. 13. Restrict the use of the proposed housing to Use Class C3 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) (Amended) (Wales) Order 1987 – residential dwellings used as a sole residence or main residence. 14. Agree on the location and type of noise barrier adjacent to the houses of nearby residents before work is commenced on the site. 15. 106 condition/agreement for the relocation of reptiles. Note – need to submit a sustainable drainage system application to be agreed with the Council. Note – refer the applicant to Welsh Water observations and amended advice. Note – refer the applicant to observations and advice from Natural Resources Wales.
Construction of 41 affordable housing and associated developments a) The Planning Manager highlighted that this was a full application to provide 41 dwellings, a new access, a new estate road and associated works on a plot of land on a site that had been designated under T48 as a housing site in the JLDP. The site was located on a plot of agricultural land used as livestock pasture, in the middle of the settlement of Penrhyndeudraeth and within the development boundary. He noted that the site measured 1.26ha and the application could be split into different elements, which included: - · The provision of 41 residential units to include 30 two-storey houses (20 x 2-bedroom, four person houses; 5 x 3-bedroom, 5 person houses; 1 x 7 person, 4-bedroom house and 4 x 5 person side-access houses); 1 x 2-bedroom, 3 person bungalow; 8 flats (1-bedroom, 2 person); 1 x 6-bedroom, 10 person supported living house, as well as one x 4-bedroom bungalow with wheelchair access. · The provision of parking spaces within the curtilage of each house and off-road. · The creation of a new access off Trem y Moelwyn Estate. · The creation of a new pedestrian access off the nearby A487 highway. · Soft and hard landscaping within and around the edges of the site. · Biodiversity enhancements plan. · The provision of an informal open space for children as well as an amenity space. · Installation of a surface water and foul water drainage system to serve the development. · Culverting part of the watercourse that ran through the site. It was reported that Penrhyndeudraeth would exceed its indicative level through this development, and consequently justification would be required with this application outlining how the proposal would address the needs of the local community by providing an appropriate mix of housing (Policy TAI 8). It was added that the applicant had submitted information to support the application which stated that the Grŵp Cynefin and Clwyd-Alyn registered social landlords would be working together to build the affordable dwellings and become the site's owners once the development had been completed. It was also noted that the plan had been included within a programme to receive a Social Housing Grant from the Welsh Government. Grŵp Cynefin would be responsible for 19 affordable housing units and Clwyd-Alyn would be responsible for 22 affordable housing units, with the tenure being a mix of social and intermediate rent; part-ownership and affordable intermediate housing for sale – this housing mix responded to the local need for affordable housing in Penrhyndeudraeth. In the context of educational matters, it was confirmed that there was enough capacity in the schools in the catchment area, namely Ysgol Gynradd Cefn Coch and Ysgol Ardudwy, to accommodate the proposed number of children that could be expected from approving this proposal. With regard to open spaces, it was noted that a provision of informal open spaces would be located in the centre of the site, which would give prospective occupiers an opportunity to use them, as well as other local residents. This provision of informal open spaces was separate and in addition to the requirement for formal/informal play areas for children and outdoor sports areas. Nonetheless, it was noted that there was a shortage of both play areas with equipment for children and outdoor sports areas in the catchment area of the application site, and a viability statement was submitted with the application which stated that should they be required to provide open play areas for the anticipated number of children, this would necessitate the loss of many housing units, rendering the development non-viable. It was added that the applicants had already held initial discussions with the Community Council about making a financial contribution towards improving the facilities of Parc Mileniwm located in the town centre, by signing a legal agreement to realise the contribution. It was considered that the proposal as revised would be acceptable in principle and that the affordable units would contribute significantly towards the affordable housing needs of Penrhyndeudraeth. Full consideration was given to the observations received from local residents and the statutory consultees, however, no significantly harmful impact that contravened relevant local and national planning policies was identified. b) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the applicant made the following observations: · The Planning officers supported the application · The application site had been allocated for housing development · The application offered more than the 10% affordable housing provision - 41 rather than 4.1% · The scheme addressed the local need · Drainage concerns were now being managed on the site and the arrangement had been approved by NRW · Light pollution and neighbours' privacy had been taken into consideration · A detailed review of the site's ecology had been carried out, and a comprehensive landscape plan had been produced in response · They had been careful when considering the access · The aims of preserving and protecting the language were welcomed · Discussions regarding a play area had commenced with the Town Council c) Taking advantage of the right to speak, the Local Member made the following observations: · She was supportive of the application · She welcomed the fact that the access was larger · She was pleased that the water problems had been sorted out · Local people should be given priority ch) It was proposed and seconded to approve the application. d) In response to an observation regarding having assurance that it would be Penrhyndeudraeth residents being housed in the units, the Assistant Head stated that the units would be let in accordance with the Council's Allocations Policy, and the Planning Manager added that an affordable housing condition would ensure that the local need was addressed, but this did not mean restricting the need to a particular area. RESOLVED to delegate powers to the Senior Planning Manager to approve the application subject to the applicant signing a Section 106 agreement to secure an open spaces financial contribution and to the following conditions: - 1. Five years. 2. In accordance with the plans/details submitted with the application. 3. Landscaping 4. Secure a plan / arrangement for providing the affordable units e.g. mix, tenure, occupancy criteria, timetable and arrangements to ensure that units are affordable now and in perpetuity. 5. Compliance with the recommendations of the following documents: the Preliminary Ecological Assessment; Reptile Survey and Eradication of Invasive Species Statement. 6. Agree on details regarding Welsh names for the development before the residential units are occupied for any purpose along with signage advertising and promoting the development. 7. Working hours limited to 8:00-18:00 Monday to Friday; 08:00-13:00 Saturday and not at all on Sundays and Bank Holidays. 8. Compliance with the content of the Environmental Construction Management Plan document submitted as part of the application. 9. Relevant conditions from the Transportation Unit regarding improvements to the access and parking spaces. 10. Submit and agree to samples of materials and colours for the residential dwellings. 11. Submit and agree to biodiversity enhancements plan to include reptile re-location. 12. Submit and agree on solar panels details. 13. Restrict the use of the proposed housing to Use Class C3 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) (Amended) (Wales) Order 1987 – residential dwellings used as a sole residence or main residence. 14. Agree on the location and type of noise barrier adjacent to the houses of nearby residents before work is commenced on the site. 15. 106 condition/agreement for the relocation of reptiles. Note – need to submit a sustainable drainage system application to be agreed with the Council. Note – refer the applicant to Welsh Water observations and amended advice. Note – refer the applicant to observations and advice from Natural Resources Wales.
Councillors must say when they have a personal link to something being discussed, such as a job, a property or a family member. A prejudicial interest is one strong enough that the councillor usually leaves the room and takes no part.
Declarations are read from the minutes once they are published.
Lists the council's current councillors only. Co-opted members, officers and former councillors aren't shown.